Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Stepping on a puppy for 18 billion dollars

Here comes the money


  • Total voters
    49
Capable_Onion

Capable_Onion

Member of The Akatsuki
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 15, 2019
Posts
9,816
Id do It for a puppy
 
I'd do it for free :feelsjuice:
 
90% of inkwells would do it just to get sex one time, let alone billions. :feelsjuice:
 
No I love dogs and would adopt it.
 
Those who said yes, this y u inkler:feelsUgh:
 
I don't like animal cruelty but 18B...
ye i would make sure it dies instantly if you would ask any it memmber would u kill a incel for that amout they wouldnt think twice
 
Last edited:
not sure if I'd be able to, it's like killing a baby
 
No, won’t take advantage of an innocent life i.e a puppy, just to get money. Would rather step on an IT member
 
thread title doesnt say how hard i had to step on it
 
@Broly @Idotms vote. btw congrats @Diocel
 
Id say I wouldn't, but even donating half of it for animal shelters, etc would aleviate so much suffering. Its a necessary evil at this point.
 
I contemplated on this and my answer is yes. I would do it with maximum force to the puppies head tho to make sure it doesn't suffer.
 
Would do it just for fun tbh. Cats and snakes are the only animals I have sympathy for
 
who wouldn't?
 
Buddy I would happily do it to a human baby for much less. This is a rhetorical question
 
I would do it for 1000$
 
who wouldn't?
yeah, wtf?
six people value the life of a puppy over their own?
they're clearly lying. no one worships animals this much.
 
yeah, wtf?
six people value the life of a puppy over their own?
they're clearly lying. no one worships animals this much.
idk many men are actually that low IQ and retarded
 
yeah, wtf?
six people value the life of a puppy over their own?
they're clearly lying. no one worships animals this much.
If it was a real situation, of course they would accept.

Also, people pay to eat animals, so why not be payed to kill one?
 
idk many men are actually that low IQ and retarded
If it was a real situation, of course they would accept.

Also, people pay to eat animals, so why not be payed to kill one?
if they thought about it for a few seconds, the answer is obvious.
$18,000,000,000. <---

some ricecels actually voted no, keeping in mind that we eat dogs for stamina and sexual prowess in the summertime.
 
TO ANYONE WHO VOTED IN FAVOR OF STEPPING ON A PUPPY: IT GIVES ME EXTREME LEVELS OF JOY TO SEE YOU ARE SUFFERING FROM INCELDOM. :feelsokman:
 
not sure if I'd be able to, it's like killing a baby
but the actual act of stomping on a puppy, you can disentangle your consciousness long enough to do this, easy.
it will take less than 1 second.
[UWSL]it's not like abortion where you have to have malicious intent and sign a bunch of papers and have a lot of time to think about it.[/UWSL]
[UWSL]most people wouldn't even have to do this because we know a human baby is not comparable to a dog baby.[/UWSL]

i'm assuming you would stomp on a dog's head but not a puppy's?
why? this is kind of agecucked in a different way, since age shouldn't matter for "innocence," as dogs don't reach full consciousness ever, they are driven by instinct.
 
Easiest moral choice.
How could you justify *not* temporary unpleasantness and a degree of cruelty in return for the potential for massive sweeping change????
Of course, we have moral choices analogous to this all the time: what is uncomfortable and superficially wrong set against the damage done by choosing *not* to follow through.
 
1622749825670

soy niggers:reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee::reeeeee:
 
@Weeb25 would you accept the challenge
 
but the actual act of stomping on a puppy, you can disentangle your consciousness long enough to do this, easy.
it will take less than 1 second.
[UWSL]it's not like abortion where you have to have malicious intent and sign a bunch of papers and have a lot of time to think about it.[/UWSL]
[UWSL]most people wouldn't even have to do this because we know a human baby is not comparable to a dog baby.[/UWSL]

i'm assuming you would stomp on a dog's head but not a puppy's?
why? this is kind of agecucked in a different way, since age shouldn't matter for "innocence," as dogs don't reach full consciousness ever, they are driven by instinct.
Yeah I get this, is just a personal thing, not sure if I'd be able to do that to a grown dog either, maby, just for 1 second is fine I guess, the thing with a puppy is that he's way more fragile though, not really a matter of innocence
 
I guess, the thing with a puppy is that he's way more fragile though, not really a matter of innocence
but fragility/sturdiness doesn't have anything to do with it.
you would step on an egg for $18 billion, right?
 
If you voted for the puppy then you should click on that spoiler. If you didn't then this spoiler is not for you.


.
Meanwhile eating their steak, hamburgers, pulled pork and chicken wings.

What makes you think a dog is different than a sheep or a pig? Why kill one but save another? ""B..but muh dogs are friends"

View: https://youtu.be/s50vvwTystA


Is that not friendly enough?

"B.but muh dogs are smarter"


"B..but they are animals bro, who cares we are at the top of the food chain bro"

Okay so what makes us superior to these animals?

"Our IQ bro, we are smarter and more capable than animals bro"

So going by that logic would it be acceptable to kill, torture and eat a mentally ill wheelchair bound person?

"B..but meat tastes good tho"

So Jeffrey Dahmer was right then? Killing and eating of sentinent being regardless of species should be given the same treatment. If you don't believe in this then name the trait lacking in animals if it lacks in a human being justifies the killing and torture of a human being.

"B..but what about the mosquitoes and ants you crazy vegans kill everyday"

The fallacy you call "appeal to futility" is, "X is the ideal perfect goal; there is no possible perfect solution Y that completely achieves X; therefore X is not worth attempting." e.g. "World peace would be ideal; there is no conceivable peace treaty or other action that would completely achieve world peace; therefore, there's no point in working towards world peace."

"B..but my ancestors used to eat meat. That's how it works bro"

Your ancestors owned slaves, genocided and cannibalized people. I guess that's fine now huh?

If you save the puppy and you aren't a vegan then I exposed your moral inconsistencies and now that you've read all of this


View: https://youtu.be/UcN7SGGoCNI


And watched this video, if you are still eating meat then you are a Hypocrite.
 
but fragility/sturdiness doesn't have anything to do with it.
you would step on an egg for $18 billion, right?
but are these even comparable given the nature of the egg? I know where you coming from though, I'd step on a cockroach or any other insect without any remorse
 
You could save millions of puppies with 18 billion dollars
 
If you voted for the puppy then you should click on that spoiler. If you didn't then this spoiler is not for you.


.
Meanwhile eating their steak, hamburgers, pulled pork and chicken wings.

What makes you think a dog is different than a sheep or a pig? Why kill one but save another? ""B..but muh dogs are friends"

View: https://youtu.be/s50vvwTystA


Is that not friendly enough?

"B.but muh dogs are smarter"


"B..but they are animals bro, who cares we are at the top of the food chain bro"

Okay so what makes us superior to these animals?

"Our IQ bro, we are smarter and more capable than animals bro"

So going by that logic would it be acceptable to kill, torture and eat a mentally ill wheelchair bound person?

"B..but meat tastes good tho"

So Jeffrey Dahmer was right then? Killing and eating of sentinent being regardless of species should be given the same treatment. If you don't believe in this then name the trait lacking in animals if it lacks in a human being justifies the killing and torture of a human being.

"B..but what about the mosquitoes and ants you crazy vegans kill everyday"

The fallacy you call "appeal to futility" is, "X is the ideal perfect goal; there is no possible perfect solution Y that completely achieves X; therefore X is not worth attempting." e.g. "World peace would be ideal; there is no conceivable peace treaty or other action that would completely achieve world peace; therefore, there's no point in working towards world peace."

"B..but my ancestors used to eat meat. That's how it works bro"

Your ancestors owned slaves, genocided and cannibalized people. I guess that's fine now huh?

If you save the puppy and you aren't a vegan then I exposed your moral inconsistencies and now that you've read all of this


View: https://youtu.be/UcN7SGGoCNI


And watched this video, if you are still eating meat then you are a Hypocrite.

Its simple, its not human species, it shouldn't be humanized or given rights.

Animals can't follow laws and don't even have any duty, therefor they aren't going to have rights. A dog has much rights as a bacteria, none
 
Its simple, its not human species, it shouldn't be humanized or given rights.

Animals can't follow laws and don't even have any duty, therefor they aren't going to have rights. A dog has much rights as a bacteria, none
I see you voted against the puppy so that spoiler was not for you. I explicitly mentioned in the first sentence.
That spoiler was for guys like @RREEEEEEEEE
 
I see you voted against the puppy so that spoiler was not for you. I explicitly mentioned in the first sentence.
That spoiler was for guys like @RREEEEEEEEE
I know, I'm just [UWSL]complementing [/UWSL]your ideas
 
I see you voted against the puppy so that spoiler was not for you. I explicitly mentioned in the first sentence.
That spoiler was for guys like @RREEEEEEEEE
I didn't vote but you do have a point and I agree with you, I personally don't see dogs as any different than goats or cows, I just don't like unnecessary suffering and violence. For instance I don't see any moral problem with chinese people eating dogs except for the necessity of this act when we already have a huge market revolved around feeding humans with cattle.

Another thing I don't get is why they have to kill animals in such a gruesome way just for the sake of having soft and smooth meat
 
If you voted for the puppy then you should click on that spoiler. If you didn't then this spoiler is not for you.


.
Meanwhile eating their steak, hamburgers, pulled pork and chicken wings.

What makes you think a dog is different than a sheep or a pig? Why kill one but save another? ""B..but muh dogs are friends"

View: https://youtu.be/s50vvwTystA


Is that not friendly enough?

"B.but muh dogs are smarter"


"B..but they are animals bro, who cares we are at the top of the food chain bro"

Okay so what makes us superior to these animals?

"Our IQ bro, we are smarter and more capable than animals bro"

So going by that logic would it be acceptable to kill, torture and eat a mentally ill wheelchair bound person?

"B..but meat tastes good tho"

So Jeffrey Dahmer was right then? Killing and eating of sentinent being regardless of species should be given the same treatment. If you don't believe in this then name the trait lacking in animals if it lacks in a human being justifies the killing and torture of a human being.

"B..but what about the mosquitoes and ants you crazy vegans kill everyday"

The fallacy you call "appeal to futility" is, "X is the ideal perfect goal; there is no possible perfect solution Y that completely achieves X; therefore X is not worth attempting." e.g. "World peace would be ideal; there is no conceivable peace treaty or other action that would completely achieve world peace; therefore, there's no point in working towards world peace."

"B..but my ancestors used to eat meat. That's how it works bro"

Your ancestors owned slaves, genocided and cannibalized people. I guess that's fine now huh?

If you save the puppy and you aren't a vegan then I exposed your moral inconsistencies and now that you've read all of this


View: https://youtu.be/UcN7SGGoCNI


And watched this video, if you are still eating meat then you are a Hypocrite.

high IQ a pig is smarter than any dog. a cow, a sheep are smarter than some dogs yet the people voting against killing the puppy will eat those animals perfectly fine. brain damaged cels
 
I’d pay 18 billion to do it
 
You are a cuck if you voted yes to this but would vote "no" if the question asked "would you step on a whore with a metal boot for 18 billion?"
 
You are a cuck if you voted yes to this but would vote "no" if the question asked "would you step on a whore with a metal boot for 18 billion?"
your no vote more respectable than the others cause you actually did cut meat out and don't have the cognitive dissonance other voters do. praiseworthy.
 
Well in that case

If we can't give them human rights then we should kill them??? I guess going by that logic Aliens would love to massacre us humans.
Aliens probably don't even exist, if they did, they would visited us a long time ago. But assuming they exist, they couldn't kill us legally, because we can simply follow laws and we can have duties, animals can't. Also, we are a rational species.

We shouldn't kill them, no one should be forced nothing, we just shouldn't put anyone in jail for killing an animal, the only case someone can be sued/arrested for killing an animal, its when the animal has an owner, because other one is harming the owners property. Also, if the animal of someone kill or attack other person, the owner is the one to be arrested/sued, not the animal (for obvious reasons)
 

Similar threads

Clavicus Vile
Replies
3
Views
243
Pancakecel
Pancakecel
justuseless
Replies
25
Views
930
fatecel
fatecel
leasurehobo
Replies
8
Views
709
leasurehobo
leasurehobo

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top