Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News South Korean City Doing “Matchmaking” Events to Try to Boost World’s Worst Birth Rates

Shaktiman

Shaktiman

Captain
★★★
Joined
May 24, 2022
Posts
1,714



South Korean City Doing “Matchmaking” Events to Try to Boost World’s Worst Birth Rates​

Elvis Dunderhoff November 28, 2023


I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that the birthrate problem is not a result of people not being able to meet each other.
Seoul is extremely urbanized. People meet people from the opposite sex every day. They could be having sex with those people and producing children.
The reason that is not happening is feminism. Women do not want to have kids. They want to have adventures.
If you want to increase the birthrate, the only option is to reduce women’s rights.
Maybe tax incentives can help. But the big thing is making it unaffordable for women to remain single.
Reuters:
Against the backdrop of Christmas songs, 100 South Korean men and women gathered at a hotel near Seoul dressed in their best with name tags hanging on their clothes, hoping to find love.
The government hopes they make babies.
They were participants at a mass blind-dating event hosted by Seongnam city, an attempt by the local government to reverse a falling birth rate in a country where the popularity of marriage and enthusiasm towards parenthood have nosedived.
Yeah.
The participants, in their 20s and 30s, sat quietly next to one another until a relationship coach kick started the event with a rock-paper-scissor game, quickly filling the room with chatter and laughter.
The city appeared determined to arrange a match, preparing red wine, chocolates, games, free make-up services, and even background checks for the participating singles.

Lee Yu-mi, 36, who works for the city government, said she had to apply three times to finally get a spot at the event.

Lee Yu-mi, 36
“I had no idea it would be this competitive,” she said.
After five rounds of events this year, 198 people among 460 left the event as “couples,” agreeing to exchange contacts with their pairs, the city said.
The South Korean capital Seoul had considered a similar event but put the plan on hold after facing criticism that it would be a waste of taxpayers’ money that failed to tackle the reasons behind people opting not to marry and have babies – most notably the sky-high costs of housing and education.

South Korea’s fertility rate dropped to a record low of 0.78 last year in yet another grim milestone for the country with the world’s lowest number of expected children for each woman.
The number is far below 1.66 in the United States and 1.3 in Japan in 2021. The average rate among countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development stood at 1.58 the same year.
It’s sad.
But the cost of living stuff is really a red herring.
The government should do something about cost of living. That wouldn’t hurt.
But who is thinking about that? It’s not men. Men want to get married and have kids, and their thinking is “we’ll figure out the details later.”
Women demand huge amounts of money before they commit.
The problem is women.


 
The same way you can brainwash women to be 70% of the climate change retards or 70% of a refugees welcome protest you could brainwash them to make babies too.
 
This would only work if they went full NK with state enforced matchmaking. Otherwise it's just cope, no one wants to bring kids into the hellish dystopia they've set up:

 
The same way you can brainwash women to be 70% of the climate change retards or 70% of a refugees welcome protest you could brainwash them to make babies too.
This.W*men are conformist programmable NPCs
 
Anglin is gigabased
East Asia also has a problem with working ppl to death too
 
This.W*men are conformist programmable NPCs
Exactly, they don't know shit about climate change they just watch some commercial of floods, woods on fire, some animals dying with some sad song in the background and that's it, now they care about climate change.
 
just force them to pair up
 
I’m gonna go out on a limb here and say that the birthrate problem is not a result of people not being able to meet each other.
Seoul is extremely urbanized. People meet people from the opposite sex every day. They could be having sex with those people and producing children.
The reason that is not happening is feminism. Women do not want to have kids. They want to have adventures.
If you want to increase the birthrate, the only option is to reduce women’s rights.
Maybe tax incentives can help. But the big thing is making it unaffordable for women to remain single.
Based Elvis. He's 100% correct.

Feminism is the problem.
 
Here is what South Korea should do, force their women to be in marriages with their male looksmatch. That will solve their low birthrate problem
 
The solution is the same solution their ancestors came to. This coping needs to stop.
 
Here is what South Korea should do, force their women to be in marriages with their male looksmatch. That will solve their low birthrate problem
 
They have a birth rate of 0.7. South korea is beyond pathetic
 
The cost of living is not an issue.
Do you think a crackhead thinks about the cost of crack when his brain screams in addiction ? He'll sell a kidney and his mother to obtain it.

Humans do not think solely in term of cost, humans think in term of pleasure/cost ratio.
Women are not having babies because they do not find the prospect worth it in term of pleasure/cost ratio.

In the developed world where a subset of them have achieved high social status, can travel through the whole world, eat the fanciest meals, sleep with good looking guys. Why would they want to give birth ?

It's as if their dopamine receptors are fried.
 
The cost of living is not an issue.
Do you think a crackhead thinks about the cost of crack when his brain screams in addiction ? He'll sell a kidney and his mother to obtain it.

Humans do not think solely in term of cost, humans think in term of pleasure/cost ratio.
Women are not having babies because they do not find the prospect worth it in term of pleasure/cost ratio.

In the developed world where a subset of them have achieved high social status, can travel through the whole world, eat the fanciest meals, sleep with good looking guys. Why would they want to give birth ?

It's as if their dopamine receptors are fried.
This.You hit the nail on the head
 
Last edited:
The cost of living is not an issue.
Do you think a crackhead thinks about the cost of crack when his brain screams in addiction ? He'll sell a kidney and his mother to obtain it.

Humans do not think solely in term of cost, humans think in term of pleasure/cost ratio.
Women are not having babies because they do not find the prospect worth it in term of pleasure/cost ratio.

In the developed world where a subset of them have achieved high social status, can travel through the whole world, eat the fanciest meals, sleep with good looking guys. Why would they want to give birth ?

It's as if their dopamine receptors are fried.
:feelsthink: :bigbrain: :blackpill:
 
It's as if their dopamine receptors are fried.
Oxytocin receptors are long gone.

Reward system is completely hijacked by immediate pleasure-seeking : big-dicked dogs, Chad, food, travel, office intrigue, consoomerism, drama etc.
 
Oxytocin receptors are long gone.

Reward system is completely hijacked by immediate pleasure-seeking : big-dicked dogs, Chad, food, travel, office intrigue, consoomerism, drama etc.
Unrelated but why no sushicel or gookcel in this forum?
 
Oxytocin receptors are long gone.

Reward system is completely hijacked by immediate pleasure-seeking : big-dicked dogs, Chad, food, travel, office intrigue, consoomerism, drama etc.
Hmm ... Oxytocin receptors.
I didn't think about this one, i was more referring to dopamine.

I'll do some research on it.
 
Taking away women's rights is the only way to increase birthrates. When will governments around the world realize this?
 
Taking away women's rights is the only way to increase birthrates. When will governments around the world realize this?
(((They))) have no intention of increasing birthrates they just want more bodies for feeding their capitalist machine and africans alone will do that by migrating to low birth rate countries
 
Here is what South Korea should do, force their women to be in marriages with their male looksmatch. That will solve their low birthrate problem
Gov-mandated looksmatched couples should be a thing everywhere
 
The same way you can brainwash women to be 70% of the climate change retards or 70% of a refugees welcome protest you could brainwash them to make babies too.
This

W0men doing what they do because society tells them to do it.

If society became traditional w0men also become traditional.
 
>Put toilets in the work force
>give them birth control
>allow them to withhold sex from men

*proceed to wonder why birth rates are in the trash can*
 
Go there as a whitecel and slay muhahahaha
 
The cost of living is not an issue.
Do you think a crackhead thinks about the cost of crack when his brain screams in addiction ? He'll sell a kidney and his mother to obtain it.

Humans do not think solely in term of cost, humans think in term of pleasure/cost ratio.
Women are not having babies because they do not find the prospect worth it in term of pleasure/cost ratio.

In the developed world where a subset of them have achieved high social status, can travel through the whole world, eat the fanciest meals, sleep with good looking guys. Why would they want to give birth ?

It's as if their dopamine receptors are fried.
 
>Put toilets in the work force
>give them birth control
>allow them to withhold sex from men

*proceed to wonder why birth rates are in the trash can*
 

Similar threads

coping_manlet
Replies
16
Views
386
Darth Aries
Darth Aries
B
Replies
43
Views
848
Fancy Alcoholic
Fancy Alcoholic
M
Replies
5
Views
185
mcmoohyun
M
AngryUbermensch
Replies
4
Views
183
Max Doltman
M

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top