Eunuch
Lookism is worse than slavery & genocide combined
★★
- Joined
- May 29, 2022
- Posts
- 1,116
- Online time
- 5h 56m
TLDR: Being an ugly loser doesn't mean you're secretly a genius who was wronged out of a high competence profession by the neo Jim Crow lookist order, but simultaneously this rhetoric is very similar to various historical narratives designed to keep black people subservient.
This is basically the etiology of why some incels retreat into IQcoping. normies (and especially ugly women) act like muh bezos, muh gates deductively proves that being incel is due to an intellectual failing rather than mainly looks.
it doesn't disprove @Ryo_Hazuki 's point about IQcoping, but that point is inductive in its own right and really more designed to say that ugly losers use muh IQ as a way to soften the blow of lookism. often times you also see incels embracing the whole "I'm an ugly stupid genetic dead end" script, and I would say this cope ironically serves the same function as inflating IQ. By writing yourself off as a genetic dead end, you automatically ignore instances where you were objectively wronged via lookism in a way that has nothing to do with IQ.
The biggest elephant in the room with this cope is that to be a successful ugly guy, you almost have to go into STEM. Of course even STEM is being taken over by women nowadays, but I don't see it becoming a female field like nursing. Meanwhile normies can go into business, law, medicine, and ofc a whole host of middle class professions that are also implicitly exclusionary towards ugly men. Business and law have always been lookist but it's gotten worse over time. Medicine didn't really used to be a lookist field but has gotten way worse with the switch to female nursing that occurred around World War Two, and will likely get even worse as we see more women than men becoming doctors.
This is basically the etiology of why some incels retreat into IQcoping. normies (and especially ugly women) act like muh bezos, muh gates deductively proves that being incel is due to an intellectual failing rather than mainly looks.
it doesn't disprove @Ryo_Hazuki 's point about IQcoping, but that point is inductive in its own right and really more designed to say that ugly losers use muh IQ as a way to soften the blow of lookism. often times you also see incels embracing the whole "I'm an ugly stupid genetic dead end" script, and I would say this cope ironically serves the same function as inflating IQ. By writing yourself off as a genetic dead end, you automatically ignore instances where you were objectively wronged via lookism in a way that has nothing to do with IQ.
The biggest elephant in the room with this cope is that to be a successful ugly guy, you almost have to go into STEM. Of course even STEM is being taken over by women nowadays, but I don't see it becoming a female field like nursing. Meanwhile normies can go into business, law, medicine, and ofc a whole host of middle class professions that are also implicitly exclusionary towards ugly men. Business and law have always been lookist but it's gotten worse over time. Medicine didn't really used to be a lookist field but has gotten way worse with the switch to female nursing that occurred around World War Two, and will likely get even worse as we see more women than men becoming doctors.





