Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Story Some sex havers came at me and warned me about a baby locked in a van

blackpillmage

blackpillmage

Goodbye - fuck you life
-
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Posts
684
so i got back from the store and some couple came at me and warned me about some baby locked in a car and i asked if it was a boy or foid (not literally) and they told me it was a female

i didnt fucki bother helping anyways even if what they said is tru because that fcuking FOID IS NOT ENTITLED TO MY HELP especially bc that same female will become a misandrist wishing death upon men and making fun of male suicides and loneliness so what should i help for???

Btw : sorry i havent posted in a minute, have been mentally fucked up lately
 
Based, don't help those who wish you didnt exist
 
They could've done something about it themselves.
 
so i got back from the store and some couple came at me and warned me about some baby locked in a car and i asked if it was a boy or foid (not literally) and they told me it was a female

i didnt fucki bother helping anyways even if what they said is tru because that fcuking FOID IS NOT ENTITLED TO MY HELP especially bc that same female will become a misandrist wishing death upon men and making fun of male suicides and loneliness so what should i help for???

Btw : sorry i havent posted in a minute, have been mentally fucked up lately
Not your job to help them
 
Idk man I hate women but the baby thing is too far imo
:soy:

That baby is going to be wishing death upon you and making fun of male suicides and male loneliness epidemic, you arent thinking long term enough
 
:soy:

That baby is going to be wishing death upon you and making fun of male suicides and male loneliness epidemic, you arent thinking long term enough
 
:soy:

That baby is going to be wishing death upon you and making fun of male suicides and male loneliness epidemic, you arent thinking long term enough
That's an issue I see here often. So many incels moral fagging over future incel tormentors dying. It's pathetic.
 
Did you tell them about your cerebral palsy?
 
:soy:

That baby is going to be wishing death upon you and making fun of male suicides and male loneliness epidemic, you arent thinking long term enough
Idk man
 
That's an issue I see here often. So many incels moral fagging over future incel tormentors dying. It's pathetic.
I just don’t think wishing death upon babies is a good thing
 
I just don’t think wishing death upon babies is a good thing
Nor is it a good thing to wish life upon the people who will find the male suicides funny
 
There is such a law - abandonment in danger. If you know that someone knows that you abandoned someone in danger, then it is better to call the police and let them deal with it. Otherwise, you can be put in jail because of someone else's larva.
 
I just don’t think wishing death upon babies is a good thing

Sex does not stop mattering just because of age, and if women as a class are the problem, then producing more of them only continues it. People like to get sentimental about children, but they grow into the same adults who treat us like garbage.
 
Nor is it a good thing to wish life upon the people who will find the male suicides funny
I understand your pov I just disagree I mean I am more in line with if they are 9 or older I don’t care about their lives
 
Sex does not stop mattering just because of age, and if women as a class are the problem, then producing more of them only continues it. People like to get sentimental about children, but they grow into the same adults who treat us like garbage.
I don’t care if they are 9 or older I’m just saying I don’t like the take on babies
 
I don’t care if they are 9 or older I’m just saying I don’t like the take on babies

If a child dies or an adult dies, I do not see why one should be viewed as a greater tragedy than the other. People act as if a child's life is more "innocent" or "pure," but in reality it is simply shorter and undeveloped. A child has not yet built anything, proven anything, or contributed anything, so to mourn them more than an adult who has lived, worked, and created is backwards. Death is death, and people should stop pretending that the age of the victim makes it more or less meaningful.
 
If a child dies or an adult dies, I do not see why one should be viewed as a greater tragedy than the other. People act as if a child's life is more "innocent" or "pure," but in reality it is simply shorter and undeveloped. A child has not yet built anything, proven anything, or contributed anything, so to mourn them more than an adult who has lived, worked, and created is backwards. Death is death, and people should stop pretending that the age of the victim makes it more or less meaningful.
I’m not saying I would mourn them
 
If a child dies or an adult dies, I do not see why one should be viewed as a greater tragedy than the other. People act as if a child's life is more "innocent" or "pure," but in reality it is simply shorter and undeveloped. A child has not yet built anything, proven anything, or contributed anything, so to mourn them more than an adult who has lived, worked, and created is backwards. Death is death, and people should stop pretending that the age of the victim makes it more or less meaningful.
I actually thought this aswell but the way society conditions you to be a moralfag, I thought I was being cruel.

It's true they aren't pure or innocent, most of them will grow up to be people who despise us and commit the same degeneracies. Hell look at all those child stars, they all become whores sexualising themsevles for fame and were supposed to think they're victims
 
If a child dies or an adult dies, I do not see why one should be viewed as a greater tragedy than the other. People act as if a child's life is more "innocent" or "pure," but in reality it is simply shorter and undeveloped. A child has not yet built anything, proven anything, or contributed anything, so to mourn them more than an adult who has lived, worked, and created is backwards. Death is death, and people should stop pretending that the age of the victim makes it more or less meaningful.
People are more emotionally attached to children because this is their main firmware, tuned to reproduction and raising children.

For society, people are a resource. An old man will soon kick the bucket, but an adult has already lived (and if he lives longer, he will become a pensioner, the state's dream is for no one to live to retirement), and a child can become a soldier, a policeman or a worker - which is useful.
 
Last edited:
I’m not saying I would mourn them

I am talking about people in general. In your case, I do not think you should care about what he hopes for the baby. It should mean no less to you than if he had said the same thing about an adult woman.
 
Idk man I hate women but the baby thing is too far imo
I agree. Being an incel is tough, but we shouldn't let our emotions cloud our judgement. I would help a baby in need even if I despise its parents.
 
I agree. Being an incel is tough, but we shouldn't let our emotions cloud our judgement. I would help a baby in need even if I despise its parents.
Yeah
 
I agree. Being an incel is tough, but we shouldn't let our emotions cloud our judgement. I would help a baby in need even if I despise its parents.

In saving that baby, are you not letting emotion cloud your judgment by projecting worth onto the life of a stranger? A child does not carry any inherent value just by existing. Once grown, that baby will almost certainly join the ranks of those who despise people like us, mocking or ignoring our struggles without a second thought.
 
In saving that baby, are you not letting emotion cloud your judgment by projecting worth onto the life of a stranger? A child does not carry any inherent value just by existing. Once grown, that baby will almost certainly join the ranks of those who despise people like us, mocking or ignoring our struggles without a second thought.
Why are you bringing "value" and "worth" into this? That's an innocent, helpless baby. Sure, it might grow up to be one of the people who hate us, but nobody knows that for sure. As long as you're not endangering yourself by helping the baby, I see no reason not to help it.
 
Why are you bringing "value" and "worth" into this? That's an innocent, helpless baby. Sure, it might grow up to be one of the people who hate us, but nobody knows that for sure. As long as you're not endangering yourself by helping the baby, I see no reason not to help it.

Because "innocence" and "helplessness" are emotional triggers. Every baby is helpless, but that does not make them inherently worth saving. You admit yourself that it could just as easily grow up to hate us, which means you are acting on sentiment, not reason. To say "nobody knows for sure" is a way of excusing the fact that the odds are overwhelmingly against that child ever being anything but another cog in the same hostile society.
 
you are acting on sentiment, not reason
I think it's neither reasonable nor unreasonable to save the baby in the grand scheme of things. It's not going to affect your life positively or negatively. It doesn't make a difference to put another tiny cog into the huge machine. You're just cruel and cold-blooded to let a baby die if saving it didn't put you at risk of harm.
 
I think it's neither reasonable nor unreasonable to save the baby in the grand scheme of things. It's not going to affect your life positively or negatively. It doesn't make a difference to put another tiny cog into the huge machine. You're just cruel and cold-blooded to let a baby die if saving it didn't put you at risk of harm.

Is it really "cruel" to refuse to involve yourself in something that does not require your involvement? Cruelty implies an intent to harm, but in this case you are not harming, you are simply refraining from acting. There was already a couple there, and usually there is a broader society ready to intervene in such situations. Why must the moral burden fall on me for their child? If every bystander is equally capable of action, then to single one out as "cruel" for doing nothing is arbitrary.
 
tenor.gif
 
You have no moral obligation to care for the offspring of those who deem you subhuman.
 
They could've done something about it themselves.
I do not know why but people love to do that, ask you to do something they could have done themself and shame you for doing nothing.
 
This is such a stupid discusion. Have they called the police? No? Then why were they bothering You instead of calling police? Whats so fucking hard about it? You just say: "Good day offiSAARS, theres a kid boiling in a car with license plate 4M0GU5. Please come help the kid, offiSAARS."
You do this and are done. Theres nothing more to do. What they have wanted You to do? Break in that van only for You becoming the bad one? Damned if You do, damned if You dont. Just call the police and gtfo.
 
imagine meeting that baby 20 years later, seeing her with Chad,
all privileged with money, while you never got any pussy.
 
Was it their kid or someone else's?
 
so i got back from the store and some couple came at me and warned me about some baby locked in a car and i asked if it was a boy or foid (not literally) and they told me it was a female

i didnt fucki bother helping anyways even if what they said is tru because that fcuking FOID IS NOT ENTITLED TO MY HELP especially bc that same female will become a misandrist wishing death upon men and making fun of male suicides and loneliness so what should i help for???

Btw : sorry i havent posted in a minute, have been mentally fucked up lately
They should have called the cops and told them that. They want men to risk their lives and be selfless. That's messed up to tell this to a stranger ngl
 
imagine meeting that baby 20 years later, seeing her with Chad,
all privileged with money, while you never got any pussy.
She is going to be hating men and making fun of lonely men 20 years later
 
I agree. Being an incel is tough, but we shouldn't let our emotions cloud our judgement. I would help a baby in need even if I despise its parents.
Absolute cuck, that baby is going to be wishing death upon men, whoring out in her prime and being a future incel tormenter in 20 years, you have to think in the long term.
 
I think it's neither reasonable nor unreasonable to save the baby in the grand scheme of things. It's not going to affect your life positively or negatively. It doesn't make a difference to put another tiny cog into the huge machine. You're just cruel and cold-blooded to let a baby die if saving it didn't put you at risk of harm.
As if society isn't already cruel and cold-blooded towards us? Do you think that foid is not going to grow up to torment us
 
Why are you bringing "value" and "worth" into this? That's an innocent, helpless baby. Sure, it might grow up to be one of the people who hate us, but nobody knows that for sure. As long as you're not endangering yourself by helping the baby, I see no reason not to help it.
:bluepill::soy:

And what do I get out of saving a female baby that is going to hate us years down the road? Nothing

You act as if this baby is going to be an incel sympathizer when its mentioned ITS A FEMALE and foids are misandrists bc of their biology telling them to
 
The death of their newborn is punishment for their negligence. If you helped them out then it would've just been killed some other stupid way.
 
The death of their newborn is punishment for their negligence. If you helped them out then it would've just been killed some other stupid way.
If it died, future incel tormenter killed? BASED
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top