Everytime i explain the obvious : that CHADS have it better than an average femoid in the romantic and sexual life (equal in sex, but better in romantic prospects) i'm surprised by responders who seem to lack the most basic logic and reading skills.
Let's start with the logic skills, if you believe the pareto rule : 80% of women seek 20% of guys, then BY DEFINITION chads have it better than average femoid. That's just how the math works, basic fucking logics. More than 20% of women are average, if 80% of women seek 20% top guys, then by definition there is more demand than offer for chads, chads have it better.
No, let's go to the basic reading skills : Any femoid can have as much sex as she wants, as much if not more than chads, there is no debating that. But chad doesn't have the problem of "being used just for sex", "used and dumped" or "wanted just for sex", it's a consensus here that chads can seek girls under their league just for sex, for women it's not the case, the men they want to fuck are the men they want to date. Therefore chads have an advantage over an average femoid, girls not only want to sleep with him, but they love him and want him and want a relationship with him. Chad have no anxiety of being used, chad is wanted for sex and is wanted, loved, as a priority, not just as a one night stand. Remember, femoids don't want to just be fucked, they want a relationship to feel they are valued and have value, and an average femoid can't have that as easily with chad (since chads can date a staceys).
No, stating this basic clear argument, the answer i often get is "You're wrong, tinder proves the contrary", HOW THE FUCK DOES TINDER PROVE SOMETHING ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS ? how the fuck can Tinder stats prove that the chads want to date the girl exclusively instead of using her as a cum dumbster ? One really has to lack basic understanding skills to reply "Tinder" to an argument about chads having an advantage in relationships/being wanted/loved over average femoids.
Let's start with the logic skills, if you believe the pareto rule : 80% of women seek 20% of guys, then BY DEFINITION chads have it better than average femoid. That's just how the math works, basic fucking logics. More than 20% of women are average, if 80% of women seek 20% top guys, then by definition there is more demand than offer for chads, chads have it better.
No, let's go to the basic reading skills : Any femoid can have as much sex as she wants, as much if not more than chads, there is no debating that. But chad doesn't have the problem of "being used just for sex", "used and dumped" or "wanted just for sex", it's a consensus here that chads can seek girls under their league just for sex, for women it's not the case, the men they want to fuck are the men they want to date. Therefore chads have an advantage over an average femoid, girls not only want to sleep with him, but they love him and want him and want a relationship with him. Chad have no anxiety of being used, chad is wanted for sex and is wanted, loved, as a priority, not just as a one night stand. Remember, femoids don't want to just be fucked, they want a relationship to feel they are valued and have value, and an average femoid can't have that as easily with chad (since chads can date a staceys).
No, stating this basic clear argument, the answer i often get is "You're wrong, tinder proves the contrary", HOW THE FUCK DOES TINDER PROVE SOMETHING ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS ? how the fuck can Tinder stats prove that the chads want to date the girl exclusively instead of using her as a cum dumbster ? One really has to lack basic understanding skills to reply "Tinder" to an argument about chads having an advantage in relationships/being wanted/loved over average femoids.
