Theory SMV formula exist?

[Arbitrary]

I‘ve seen some attempts at SMV formulas like weighted geometric mean of relevant factors but those formulas only seem to be reliable for extreme cases. Is it even viable to make an accurate formula?

 

[Allah (Real)]

no. from what I've seen, in studies with facial attractiveness as a factor they either use like the average of subjective human ratings or machine learning that replicates human ratings (or god-forbid self reporting). SMV is not a quantifiable thing as of yet, no formula exists for now.

in truth, the best measure of SMV is just your experience dabbling in romance.

 

[Mr. Agent Clark]

I‘ve seen some attempts at SMV formulas like weighted geometric mean of relevant factors but those formulas only seem to be reliable for extreme cases. Is it even viable to make an accurate formula?

no. from what I've seen, in studies with facial attractiveness as a factor they either use like the average of subjective human ratings or machine learning that replicates human ratings (or god-forbid self reporting). SMV is not a quantifiable thing as of yet, no formula exists for now.

in truth, the best measure of SMV is just your experience dabbling in romance.

Generally, easiest way to calculate someone's SMV is by knowing height is about half as important as face and autism can remove between .5 to 3 or more SMV points depending on the severity of it.

So for example, a 5'10 ltn (4/10 face) neurotipical dude would be a little bit more than 4/10 SMV as his height is 1-2 inches above average.

 

[DreamCoper]

Nigga why the shit do you need a formula, the only indicator you need is how foids treat you, nothing else.

 

[Arbitrary]

no. from what I've seen, in studies with facial attractiveness as a factor they either use like the average of subjective human ratings or machine learning that replicates human ratings (or god-forbid self reporting). SMV is not a quantifiable thing as of yet, no formula exists for now.

in truth, the best measure of SMV is just your experience dabbling in romance.

Incel, ltn and mtn all get mostly nothing in terms of romance. It‘s not trivial to tell the difference sometimes

 

[PersonalityChad]

Nigga why the shit do you need a formula, the only indicator you need is how foids treat you, nothing else.

This. Foids are living SMV-meters. If they treat you like shit or ignore you then you have low SMV, if they beg to suck your dick then you have high SMV. It's that easy

 

[Arbitrary]

This. Foids are living SMV-meters. If they treat you like shit or ignore you then you have low SMV, if they beg to suck your dick then you have high SMV. It's that easy

The extreme behaviours only occur for the +-1 or +-2 SD of SMV (I’d argue SMV is roughly uniform because the most important constituent factors are uniform). It‘s harder to tell if one is in the 40th percentile or 60th percentile based on foid feedback. Both get ignored most of the time but 60th percentile usually finds a foid somehow while that‘s not as guaranteed for the 40th percentile

 

[CosmicInjustice]

Male SMV = Skeleton

 

[Diddy]

We would need to first conduct a study on which traits have higher precedence.

 

[Arbitrary]

We would need to first conduct a study on which traits have higher precedence.

I‘d say face>height>frame pretty much universally. One would also have to find out how much SMV differers from multiple foid perspectives