Blackpill Simping, Male on Male Aggression & Mating Cues

[Lookslikeit]

Men who saw pictures of attractive foids were much more likely to support going to war and were much faster at recognizing war-related words and images.

Already said this. This poster:

with a more real looking woman, more at the center of the whole thing, would get 1 million+ drafted in a single week than all other propaganda combined...

 

[deleted dude]

Already said this. This poster:

View attachment 1730063

with a more real looking woman, more at the center of the whole thing, would get 1 million+ drafted in a single week than all other propaganda combined...

men are mega cucked

 

[luciferiancel]

There is an utterly delusional conclusion people can get to if this matter is approached superficially: it paints men as a whole as fickle, immoral and animalistic while portraying women as a whole as stoic paragons of integrity and moral highstanding, when in reality it's the absolute opposite, NOT to pretend most men aren't cattle-like (much like 99% of women) but we are the ones capable and conscious of morality, integrity, mind over matter. Capable, not inherently possessing or being. While the vast majority of women seem to be irrevocably purely carnal, low and mundane

 

[jo_yugislayer08]

"I'm a kind, caring betabuxx cuck with resources to spare."

the thing with these faggot cunts is that they don't fucking get it, i checked out ,i just observe now, u see normalfags who're already 6'0 shit on incels and ppl they naturally mog,like u cunt you either got picked or not ,toilets social circle can literally reach any guy they want,normie hivemind always find the easiest way to do sth and there's nth easier than social media to do it ,u walk/walked past how many fertile toilets at school? if only one found u attractive they'd have found ur social media an u wouldn't have been here ,not being picked/found in this day and age is really gg more than not getting an arranged marriage in 1900s, and the urge to simp is tied to this ,they think if they mog the incel they win jfl,toilets don't even consider incels and any guy lacking in anything human ,it's all unironically a game of looks, many here haven't deeped that for whatever reason,bud looks isn't only a major factor it's the only factor it's not 80% 90% it's literally 100% ,stop projecting your nature on them,not becasue u find the LTB breedable that'd mean she reciprocates the feeling, btw the sub-3 bottom of the bottom barrel toilets ALSO don't view you as a suitable genetic vessel,3/10 incels would breed anything the opposite isn't true toilets only want Chad ofc but they just can't all get him either on the part of him not willing to tap their sorry holes or just lack of chad supply in certain areas or just them being really shit ugly so they settle and focus on the term "settle" they won't "love" they settle for someone (min 15 cm taller than them,2-3 looks level above them,better status money than them,more dominant than them) and that's the lowest of the lowest toilets standards like it can't get any worse these are toilets even the most starved ppl on this forum would hesitate to tap ,if u knew how grudgingly toilets navigate everyday lives having to move through ppl that look like us and low status normies you'd nevER have to hold that last glimmer of hope ya'll seem so persistent to hold onto,they bitterly want the unskippable cutscenes they have to endure to go about their day pass as fast as possible,want to minimize their interacions with normies and with us ofc, they'd rather we die or rope all at once so they can relieve themselves of the burden of looking at our faces and uncanny body and face shapes,our receeding hairlines ,having to adjust their biology and behaviour to 1-follow societal unwritten rules (bonus:some virtue signal if she's in a good mood) 2- to avoid some incel who's at the edge(like me) going ER and risk losing this tutorial mode life ,the bottom line is simping is retarded , if u had to do anything to get the most abundant and cheapest of goods itw it's incredibly over for u no true normal looking normie (for toilets standards) evER had to do any of this shit,he just exists ,moves with the flow and they find him, also something more brutal that toilets can and will reach any guy they want as long as u went to school and uni and just move with the flow and still is empty-handed it means that ur truly omitted from this market as a whole and no toilet will ever find you attractive (jfl) or even settle for u,no HTN had to evER mog other guys in a conscious way he just naturally mogged almost everyone and that was enough, another aspect that i find incredibly brutal is that this cringe practice is among sub-5s who've nevER sniffed a positive intERaction with anything social or sexual in their lives so they're on factory settings and think that mogging another manlet 3/10 in a social situation would make any difference except drawing negative attention to them and also revealing how much of a virgin the "mogger" is ,toilets minds would find it hilariously ironic how naive and deprived these guys are, if ur a sub-5 don't bother mogging just keep ur head down ,you're getting mogged by the average "mid" guy AND you're not getting picked even if all the present toilets r 50 yr old single mums who're drug addicts and that's unironically btw ,even if they found amuse in u mogging him it'd have to be like watching a comedy show and then going about ur day and forgetting what the joke was 10 mins later,sub-5s have an insane feeling of self-importance it's ironic, literally anyone u encounter even subpar males would forget who you're in a couple of hours even if ya'll were close friends or even remebER u as that ugly/unremarkable dude from (.....) ,so no she didn't remebER what u did to the othER guy the other day she just saw 2 naive sub-5s she considers human cattle that she wouldn't allow within 100m radius of her if it wasn't for a school/work thing fighting for her LTB looks so she laughed out of irony and the false-hope u held

 

[yeetbender_]

Non-chads are desperate for foids, chads don't have to deal with the burden, foids ruin everything and need to be replaced. Countless lives wasted over some worthless pile of meat that simply needed to be hit and told to shut up.

 

[yeetbender_]

There is an utterly delusional conclusion people can get to if this matter is approached superficially: it paints men as a whole as fickle, immoral and animalistic while portraying women as a whole as stoic paragons of integrity and moral highstanding, when in reality it's the absolute opposite, NOT to pretend most men aren't cattle-like (much like 99% of women) but we are the ones capable and conscious of morality, integrity, mind over matter. Capable, not inherently possessing or being. While the vast majority of women seem to be irrevocably purely carnal, low and mundane

Most men ARE evil: it's just that women are more evil, though most men aren't far off.

 

[SilverBullet]

Male competition is BRUTAL. It really makes me grateful to have discovered the BP, and not be grasping for straws in this overcompetitive dating market

 

[DjentlemanDuke]

Male competition is BRUTAL. It really makes me grateful to have discovered the BP, and not be grasping for straws in this overcompetitive dating market

Same

 

[LOLI BREEDING]

let me just put this here. very relevant


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1i_bPmQf74

 

[IWWorkER]

chimpology

 

[IWWorkER]

feminists were right, m*n are literally animals

Boyim are literally cattle

 

[Rick prime]

We really would have flying cars. Foids are such a bottleneck, current soyciety is like pairing a 20-year-old Graphics Card with a Ryzen CPU.

I'll never stop advocating for gender segregation.

foids and Jews and blacks and gays are the true bottlenecks that need out

 

[BasedGoyslopReviews]

shit like this makes me glad I have a higher self conscience than these normalfag apeniggers

 

[Spooky_Heejin]

Study 1: "Blatant Benevolence and Conspicuous Consumption" (Griskevicius et al., 2007)​

For "steeper temporal discounting in economic decisions, and spend more on luxury items (but not on mundane expenses)"

What they did: They asked college students to look at pictures of attractive people (to get them thinking about romance) or pictures of buildings (for the control group). Then they asked: "How much money would you spend on fancy, show-off stuff (like a new car or a fancy watch)?" and "How many hours would you volunteer to help at a homeless shelter?"

What they found:
1- Men who were thinking about romance wanted to spend way more money on fancy, show-off stuff. (Not on mundane stuff like toilet paper)
2- Foids who were thinking about romance wanted to volunteer more hours helping others, but only in public, visible ways. They didn't want to do more private, anonymous helping. The romance thoughts made them want to show off their "kindness".

The Bottom Line: When looking for a mate, men try to show off their money, and foids try to virtue signal.
What's going on here is that males want to attract foids via money but we all know how that goes and foids try to virtue signal their kindness to say "hey! I'm not a complete psychopath trying to exploit you!". For the foid part I think the romance things makes them think of LTR aka Betabuxxers so that's why that happens.

So basically foids only do nice stuff to attract mates. Brutal BP.

What they found:
1- Men who were thinking about romance blasted other men with louder, more painful noise. They did NOT blast women louder. It was specifically male-on-male aggression.
2- This effect was strongest in men who were the "hookup" type AKA Chads
3- When men were told they had already "won" a competition against the other guy, the mating prime no longer made them aggressive.
4- Women did not show this effect toward other women.

The Bottom Line: When men are thinking about mating, they become more aggressive toward other men BUT ONLY IF THEY HAVEN'T FUCKED THE OTHER GUY UP!
The aggression is a tool for climbing the social ladder to impress foids, not just random anger.
Another thing on 4, Foids are the ONLY gender to have an ingroup bias for eachother, Again I quote

This is exactly why friend groups between males and females never work out.

1- Single men arrived at the bus stop much closer to the departure time than single women, cutting it fine and risking missing the bus. Single women arrived closer to the "optimal" time that balanced waiting and risk.
2- Men were much more likely to cross a busy road when it was dangerous to do so.
3- Men were especially likely to take risks when there were women watching. The more women were present at the crosswalk, the more likely men were to cross when it was risky.
4- Women's risk-taking didn't change based on the male audience.

The Bottom Line: Even in mundane, everyday situations, Men take more risks than women AND they amp it up when women are watching. And foids don't care about men.
This is the best one yet because the researchers actually look at human behavior without any lab or researchers being involved.

As a kid I used to do stupid shit to impress females. It was subconscious like I didn't even realize it. I guess it's in our biology.