Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Significant Differences Were Found For STD Status in Regard to Gender

DarkStar

DarkStar

I failed at life
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
11,242

This study was conducted on a group of almost around 1'000 Juvenile offenders, who ofc we know are much more likely to both engage in underage sex & also less likely to use protection. So let's examine the results, shall we?:feelswhere:
Correspondingly, nearly 3 out of 4 females, compared to just over half of the males, were released to the community, while more males than females were placed on house arrest or sent to secure detention.
Justice system showing its "fairness" yet again. :feelsjuice:
In regard to drug use, the males had a significantly higher marijuana positive rate, than the females. No significant gender differences were found for the cocaine test result.
Kinda an interesting "drugpill" since it seems that usage for a "hard" drug is relatively even but a more softer one is more abused by males: Personally, I speculate more males feel the need to cope with harder drugs.
However, here are the main findings:
Significant differences were found for STD status in regard to gender, with nearly 20% of the girls, but only 11% of the boys, being STD positive.

There you go. :feelsjuice:

Even amongst juvenile delinquents, foids are still 2x more likely to have STDs compared to their equally degenerate counterparts. Also another big L for "muh innocent angels" copERs. :society:
 

This study was conducted on a group of almost around 1'000 Juvenile offenders, who ofc we know are much more likely to both engage in underage sex & also less likely to use protection. So let's examine the results, shall we?:feelswhere:

Justice system showing its "fairness" yet again. :feelsjuice:

Kinda an interesting "drugpill" since it seems that usage for a "hard" drug is relatively even but a more softer one is more abused by males: Personally, I speculate more males feel the need to cope with harder drugs.
However, here are the main findings:


There you go. :feelsjuice:

Even amongst juvenile delinquents, foids are still 2x more likely to have STDs compared to their equally degenerate counterparts. Also another big L for "muh innocent angels" copERs. :society:
they will disagree with you and say its cuz the peenus gets infected less easy cuz its like a tube with piss going through it. And that the vageena is like a petri dish, warm and moist. And that this is the reason for higher infection rate in women. I srs doubt that claim tbh, seems highly speculative and simple another ad hoc explanation to excuse female behavior.
 
@AnApparentMyth @WorthlessSlavicShit
 
This is cool, thanks @DarkStar !

No significant gender differences were found for the cocaine test result.
This is actually pretty normal, at least from where I am from. Tons of druggies (both men and women here.) are on cocaine usually laced with fent or some other shit. I can tell, since they do the horse walk. Look it up, if you don't know xd.

The Table 4 Chart is also interesting, I won't post it here cause I think it takes up too much space, but I think it's somewhat unexpected that older women took the cake for higher federal arrests. Of course, outliers and younger women still occurred, but I still saw that,

STD-positive females averaged over twice as many prior arrests as STD-negative females. STD-positive females were significantly more likely to be older, charged with a more serious offense, test positive for marijuana and cocaine, and have more prior arrests, than STD-negative females.

Which is too be expected. More likely that it's some sort of frenzy for them. I wonder if pregnancy, age, or ovulation can play a part.


This bottom part is also interesting to me. The Jews seemed to have a higher overall writing up for STD compared to other races. Not sure if the Full sample includes both women and men, but let's say it does. This obviously aligns with the baby boom happening in places like Mumbai and Africa along with hoodlum streets and hoods in general. Looking at the results even more when not talking about STD'S. The Jewish Women also had higher drug ratings. Along with the men. I'm noticing a trend.... :feelshehe:
STD positive
 Full sample​
19.7%​
10.8%​
χ2 (1) = 14.57, P < 0.001​
 African-American youth (n = 478)​
28.5%​
15.9%​
χ2 (1) = 11.09, P < 0.001​
 Non-African-American youth (n = 446)​
11.1%​
4.8%​
χ2 (1) = 6.03, P < 0.014​
 
On the other hand, a significantly larger percentage of females were arrested on less serious (misdemeanor, diversion eligible) charges than the males. Correspondingly, nearly 3 out of 4 females, compared to just over half of the males, were released to the community, while more males than females were placed on house arrest or sent to secure detention.
>"significantly larger:soy::soy:"
>72.2% vs 55.3%% difference

Maybe statistically significant for nerdy mathematicians, but barely relevant IRL. If I had to choose between two things with those probabilities of killing me, sure, I'd choose the latter, but I'd expect to be killed either way.

Justice system showing its "fairness" yet again. :feelsjuice:
Indeed:feelsUgh:.


There you go. :feelsjuice:

Even amongst juvenile delinquents, foids are still 2x more likely to have STDs compared to their equally degenerate counterparts. Also another big L for "muh innocent angels" copERs. :society:
The disadvantages of sharing the same gang leader Chad/Tyrone:feelsjuice:.
 
they will disagree with you and say its cuz the peenus gets infected less easy cuz its like a tube with piss going through it. And that the vageena is like a petri dish, warm and moist. And that this is the reason for higher infection rate in women. I srs doubt that claim tbh, seems highly speculative and simple another ad hoc explanation to excuse female behavior.
A blackpill which people should be more receptive should be that of noticing how they constantly cover up the actions of foids, yet allow this to continue
>"significantly larger:soy::soy:"
>72.2% vs 55.3%% difference

Maybe statistically significant for nerdy mathematicians, but barely relevant IRL. If I had to choose between two things with those probabilities of killing me, sure, I'd choose the latter, but I'd expect to be killed either way.
As proven here
 

Similar threads

Lazyandtalentless
Blackpill Brutal gaitpill
Replies
10
Views
370
GrandWizard_137
GrandWizard_137
DarkStar
Replies
10
Views
647
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
6
Views
482
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
DarkStar
Replies
13
Views
1K
erenyeager
erenyeager
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
1
Views
305
pizzamaxxer
pizzamaxxer

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top