Punjabis and Pashtuns, I believe
Yeah most of the images I've seen of them show a lot of them wearing Turbans, which is basically exclusive towards Sikhs if I am correct.
Ethnics here either can’t wrap their heads around or are purposefully dense regarding race realism
Seems like it.
The only non-Slavic white user I recall making anti-Slav threads was ADHD_cel, and he would do so as a joke. The only users here that make serious anti-Slav threads are either crab bucket-ing ethnics or Slavs themselves
I don't recall seeing those, mainly because most of what he ever posted was about seeing escorts every weekend: I'm not against escortcelling, but still.
Most I saw was from my good friend
@Puppeter but I assume/know most of it is banter: He also is a Balkanite, so I can understand the chauvinism he may hold in regards to that aspect.
Dutch, French, Portugueses all tried to colonize us, but in the end pommies won.
That may be true, but it doesn't change the fact Anglos eventually won in the end.
Also, I would wager that rule under the Portuguese or French may not have been as bad.
They were sepoys. Indian of origin, not of interest
They weren't sepoys, sepoy refereed to those who fought for anglos.
These were international volunteers who fought for the Axis: Axis also sent tons of aid to Azad Hind.
Agreed. I don't care about DNA. I am only bothered about values and culture.
Fair enough: However, I will point out that Slavs have a much more warrior-based culture as opposed to other Euros(ofc I like this), and have seemingly held much more ethnocentric views throughout their history, as opposed to Anglos whom seemingly took a more "White mans burden" kind of approach, which allowed for them to co-operate with local leaders.
As I stated, I think Portuguese or even French rule would have been much less harsh for the Curries as opposed to Angloid rule, but imagine if Imperial Russia had ruled that continent?
Whites oppressed tons of other Whites: Anglos opressed the Irish, as well as the Scottish through the highland clearances, they even regarded the French as being quite barbaric & backwards, despite the fact many Anglos(including the part of my family with Anglo blood) has origins in Normandy.
North Italians(central regions included) still hold somewhat of a disdain towards South Italians, despite the fact many of the genetic, cultural, and other differences are overstated.
Sweden & Denmark hated each other for most of history, and Norway was caught constantly in the cross-fire.
Ever heard of the highland clearances? Anglos forced tons of Scotsmen out of their land.
USSR was founded & ran by International Bolsheviks: They killed millions of Native Russians & other groups.
But if they helped your country, then fair enough, I get that(though I despise mine).
@TBIcel
No, most of it is from self hating Slavs for some reason.
Hmmm, I can somewhat see your point here: We do have a lot of proud Slavs, but a few seem somewhat self-hating which I don't get, considering that they are some of the last holdouts against globohomo, multiculturalism, etc.
Yes, Slav foids are golddiggers, but all foids are like that: I feel especially bad, since many Slavbros get cucked by Africans & Asians.
I appreciate you staying civil, and you also gave me some good information in some other threads, so I will return the favor ofc.
However, the whole premise you stated here implied that the other Whitecels are all constantly insulting & shitting on the Slavs, when in reality most of us like them & consider them the most based Whites, due to reasons I stated above. In reality, it is mainly ethnics trying to project their insecurities on them, and in this case it seems to me that you were trying to assert your proximity to Slavs & create this dilemma of it being "Slavs v White" when as stated, it is mainly ethnics I have seen insulting them, as well as self-hating ones(which we agree upon).
@Chudpreet
