Rassisten
I am everywhere.
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2019
- Posts
- 11,319
He tells me all the good users left after he was banned for spamming up the site and that all of you that remain are animal abusing psychos.
Animals are foodHe tells me all the good users left after he was banned for spamming up the site and that all of you that remain are animal abusing psychos.
False, no good user liked him.He tells me all the good users left after he was banned for spamming up the site
False.and that all of you that remain are animal abusing psychos.
Gas everyone who voted no
Fuck him, it's not Burger King
Bro these vote options got me dead.He tells me all the good users left after he was banned for spamming up the site and that all of you that remain are animal abusing psychos.
Ban everyone who voted yes
i changed my mind, i am gonna vote yes tbhsuicidefuel for @Med Amine
Are you vegan?Anyone who supports/watches/commits animal cruelty should be gassed
What does that have yo do with anything? Abusing animals isnt using them for food.
Based.Yes
animals are innocent unlike humans who are evil, putrid creatures.
I’d save a random dog’s life over 1 billion humans, heck I’d save a dog’s life even if it came at the cost of the life of every human in the world. I’d let the human species go extinct to save an innocent animal, fuck humans, they all desERve to die
Then don't click threads tagged NSFW? I guess it's like being lewd in public but don't complain about it when you walk into a stripclub and see naked women.most people don't want to see it.
You can kill an animal for food without torturing or abusing it. There are ways of killing it to minimize the suffering experienced. The commission of suffering, allowing of it, and the apathy towards it are much more abhorrent and morally evil than the killing. And if you ask a deontologist, the reason why you're doing the killing greatly matters. Killing because you don't like it vs killing because you need to eat are very different.
Anyone who supports/watches/commits animal cruelty should be gassed
Anyone who supports/watches/commits animal cruelty should be gassed
There is no excuse in the west not to go vegan. Proposing you HAVE to eat meat when you are in the west is preposterous.you need to eat
You can kill an animal without torturing and abusing it but that's not what happens anywhere in the world right now. Many farms get busted because they totally neglect regulation and many are still operational. Even the farms that follow regulations inflict a great deal of physical and psychological suffering upon these animals. You cannot create a non torturous environment when you cultivate meat on such a massive scale as we do now.You can kill an animal for food without torturing or abusing it. There are ways of killing it to minimize the suffering experienced. The commission of suffering,
If you live in the west and eat meat and still oppose farming conditions while you're eating a big mac you're a hypocrite plain and simple.you can be a meat eater and be opposed to the cruel farming conditions and practices. Those two things are not mutually exclusive.
That would be much better lmao even fucking reddit allows this kind of stuff why should we ban it.Put it in spoilers mayb?
That's a fair point, and it's one reason why we have the NSFW tag.Then don't click threads tagged NSFW? I guess it's like being lewd in public but don't complain about it when you walk into a stripclub and see naked women.
Fuck him, it's not Burger King
absofuckinglutely; only foid gore should be allowed
Animals are food
Anyone who supports/watches/commits animal cruelty should be gassed
as subversive elements begin to use this site for their sick purposes, they should be banned.
Yes
animals are innocent unlike humans who are evil, putrid creatures.
I’d save a random dog’s life over 1 billion humans, heck I’d save a dog’s life even if it came at the cost of the life of every human in the world. I’d let the human species go extinct to save an innocent animal, fuck humans, they all desERve to die
I only have been here for close to a year but still i never found a lot of people posting animal gore in my time here + my time lurking. I remember a case of a user called lycan that killed a lizard and posted it but I don't really see a good case for banning it on the grounds of it being subversive. Does it make people want to kill animals? Is there an epidemic of users spamming it? I don't see the use of banning it. Even reddit allows people to post gore like that why should we ban it? I don't see any reason that goes further than the emotional.We've had many cases of it in the past with other things.
Let me stop you right there.There is no excuse in the west not to go vegan. Proposing you HAVE to eat meat when you are in the west is preposterous.
My argument doesn't depend on asshole corporate farmers and their quest for profits to not be assholes.You can kill an animal without torturing and abusing it but that's not what happens anywhere in the world right now. Many farms get busted because they totally neglect regulation and many are still operational. Even the farms that follow regulations inflict a great deal of physical and psychological suffering upon these animals. You cannot create a non torturous environment when you cultivate meat on such a massive scale as we do now.
There is, you fucking dumbass. You've never heard of the expression "mercy killing"? It's entirely based on the experience of suffering and minimizing it. It's why capital punishment tends to use something like the lethal injection after sedating you unconscious, instead of flaying you alive and dismembering you piece by piece and using heavy doses of amphetamines to keep you conscious and fully experiencing every painful moment when the natural tendency is for your brain to shut down and black out.And all this is assuming that there is such a thing as "being humanely killed"
See above.I guess it's better that the rabbit wasn't tortured to death but is it really that much of a difference of shooting it in the back of the head? It's still dead. You killed it.
Not even close. Like I said, it's a privilege and not a natural diet. Even in the West vegan options tend to be more expensive. You see this with the "organic" branding. Everything gets corporatized, even veganism. The market treats it like a diet fad and charges premiums for catering to the niche consumer demographic.If you live in the west and eat meat and still oppose farming conditions while you're eating a big mac you're a hypocrite plain and simple.
The subversion comes from bad actors trying to paint a particular image of us. Before anyone copes by saying we're already at the bottom and shouldn't care what normie say about us, there's more to it than that and it happens regardless of whether you care or not.I only have been here for close to a year but still i never found a lot of people posting animal gore in my time here + my time lurking. I remember a case of a user called lycan that killed a lizard and posted it but I don't really see a good case for banning it on the grounds of it being subversive. Does it make people want to kill animals? Is there an epidemic of users spamming it? I don't see the use of banning it. Even reddit allows people to post gore like that why should we ban it? I don't see any reason that goes further than the emotional.
But if I see a valid point that posting such content is detrimental for the platform I'd definitely change my vote. I just don't really see any rational reasoning behind the proposition.
The first post gives a good reason. We've had many cases of it in the past with other things. The second post makes a claim about the possibility of moral culpability of animals, specifically that animals can't be evil - great start, but it doesn't really go anywhere with it and explore further.
Being vegan is not a natural diet for humans.
I can provide studies that say otherwise it's generally well established that you can live a perfectly normal life on a vegan diet I used to argue against it too because it sounds right from intuition but it's just not true to say it has detrimental health effects many of studies that say this are faulty.not a natural diet.
That's true I was conflating it with something else that I was thinking about I am sorry.My argument doesn't depend on asshole corporate farmers and their quest for profits to not be assholes.
Some civility pleaseyou fucking dumbass
Yes it minimizes suffering indeed and I never denied that. I was asking you if the act of killing itself can ever be humane.experience of suffering and miminimizing
I think a study was done on this and it actually was disproven that vegan diets are generally more expensive than omnivorous diets. I am not sure tho might have to check that one againvegan options tend to be more expensive.
Because most people here argue from a place of emotion.Banning human stuff makes more sense. Why should animals take priority over humans?
Oof, I have a feeling the slippery slope this kind of thinking would create would be extremely destructive.fight back against people who actively try to worsen your image,
Baseeeed!Animals are food
does using an avi like mine count as pedophilia?We should ban all pro-pedophilia discussion next.
Didn’t you say it’s because you want a daughter?does using an avi like mine count as pedophilia?
i am not really sexualizing the girl, there's a difference between seeing something as cute and and wanting to fuck it
just like considering male babies to be cute.
yes i didDidn’t you say it’s because you want a daughter?
I'm sure you can, but my point of contention was against the claim that "there's no excuse not to go vegan in the West."I can provide studies that say otherwise it's generally well established that you can live a perfectly normal life on a vegan diet
I'm not talking about full grown adults who are already developed. I'm talking about foods you're evolved to eat and grow on. With enough money you can do a lot and can even pull a Bryan Johnson to slow down your aging.I used to argue against it too because it sounds right from intuition but it's just not true to say it has detrimental health effects many of studies that say this are faulty.
The real fallacy here is pretending that we're outside of nature and having the hubris to think we that we change nature (influence, yes, but not change). And yes, a lot of crap we eat daily isn't natural, which is why we've developed so many health and weight problems over the decades in the "civilized world." We're not meant to eat processed garbage loaded with chemicals that make us sick.Also I don't think appealing to nature (fallacy) is the best thing to do here. We are humans. We change nature. The food you eat on a daily basis isn't natural. The way we are communicating right now isn't natural.
I'm sorry for the outburst, but when you hear/read someone say something so patently absurd when you shouldn't expect to them to it can easily make you (me) agitated.Some civility please
The answer is yes, because "humane" refers to having the properties of mercy and compassion, which directly corresponds to the minimization of suffering. Your question isn't asking if killing itself can ever be "moral." That's a completely different question, since (abstractly) properties are not actions and vice versa, though actions always have properties.Yes it minimizes suffering indeed and I never denied that. I was asking you if the act of killing itself can ever be humane.
Yikes! Big oof!Oof, I have a feeling the slippery slope this kind of thinking would create would be extremely destructive.