Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Should sexhaver escortcels be allowed on this forum?

Should escortcels be allowed?

  • Yes

    Votes: 36 65.5%
  • No

    Votes: 19 34.5%

  • Total voters
    55
PersonaPimp

PersonaPimp

WOMEN OWE ME SEX - Discord: personapimp
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Posts
18,521
What is the general consensus about escortcels here?

On one hand, they only got sex by paying money. However, we can't ignore the fact that they are indeed sexhavers, and not to mention the fact that they were low inhib enough and rich enough to actually afford an escort. Plus I believe it is extremely cucked to pay money to a foid just for her to spread her legs to you. Personally, I will not pay for something that I am owed.

For the KHHV trucels, are you able to relate to them?
 
Last edited:
I voted no but I doubt mods would ever gas all the escortcels out of this forum. I think realistically anything escortmaxxing related shouldn't be brought up anywhere but the sewers.
 
I voted no but I doubt mods would ever gas all the escortcels out of this forum. I think realistically anything escortmaxxing related shouldn't be brought up anywhere but the sewers.
Well, let's see what the results say after a day or two.

@LeFrenchCel seems to suggest that they were allowed because of a poll.
 
Well, let's see what the results say after a day or two.

@LeFrenchCel seems to suggest that they were allowed because of a poll.
At least one of the mods is an open escortcel and this has never been an impartial forum so keep ur expectations in the gutter.
 
Escortcels should be allowed because they are truecels.

Having to pay escort not to DIE VIRGIN is truecel trait.
 
ESCORTS ARE THE ONLY WAY FOR UGLY SUBHUMAN MEN NOT TO DIE VIRGIN
 
What is the general consensus about escortcels here?

On one hand, they only got sex by paying money. However, we can't ignore the fact that they are indeed sexhavers, and not to mention the fact that they were low inhib enough and rich enough to actually afford an escort. Plus I believe it is extremely cucked to pay money to a foid just for her to spread her legs to you. Personally, I will not pay for something that I am owed.

For the KHHV trucels, are you able to relate to them?
I don't see how being "rich" is a bad thing now.
To get some prostitute you don't have to be rich.

I had to save up money for that shit, man.

Was it wrong to do because it's cucked? Yes.

I have done it because I just didn't want to die as a virgin. Nowadays though, I have to say that I should not have done this.
For one, it just further inflates foids' egos.
Then there is the fact that it wasn't even raw sex, which still bothers me to this day.

Ultimately it wasn't honorable, but what's done is done.
Besides I haven't been to one in ages and I don't plan on going either.

I too don't want to pay for something which I am owed.
 
Its truly the only way to get near pussy if you're really incel. Kind of just your fate sadly. If they are bragging about it here then different story and should receive warnings/band
 
Well, let's see what the results say after a day or two.

@LeFrenchCel seems to suggest that they were allowed because of a poll.
It's been a while though iirc so the community's opinion might have changed about that subject

But it's the kind of rule that sounds good on paper but in reality is unapplicable.
Even if, let's say, one day we agree that escortcels should be banned. How do you even implement such rule?

Should we look at the post history of every user and ban all escortcels?
Should we keep the existing escortcels in and only ban newcomers?
 
What is the general consensus about escortcels here?

On one hand, they only got sex by paying money. However, we can't ignore the fact that they are indeed sexhavers, and not to mention the fact that they were low inhib enough and rich enough to actually afford an escort. Plus I believe it is extremely cucked to pay money to a foid just for her to spread her legs to you. Personally, I will not pay for something that I am owed.

For the KHHV trucels, are you able to relate to them?
Yes, if sex is paid you are still an incel.
 
It's been a while though iirc so the community's opinion might have changed about that subject

But it's the kind of rule that sounds good on paper but in reality is unapplicable.
Even if, let's say, one day we agree that escortcels should be banned. How do you even implement such rule?

Should we look at the post history of every user and ban all escortcels?
Should we keep the existing escortcels in and only ban newcomers?
I don't believe escortcels should get banned, they are still incels. I strongly oppose to banning them.
 
Ban any escortcel that shares his experience
Why is a PiV experience allowed in a forum for non-sexhavers
 
This poll is like asking a jew if he should leave Israel
of course he going to vote NO
 
Fakecel if you fuck escorts. I remember seeing some people here say that they got rejected by escorts.
 
I'm not an escortcel. I don't have that kind of money and even if I did, I'd rather die a virgin than pay for something chad gets for free.

That said, everyone has their own opinions about escortmaxxing in general, and I don't believe that escortcels should be banned. Sure, they may have stuck their willy into a pink taco, but it's not like the woman actually liked it or wanted it.
 
However, we can't ignore the fact that they are indeed sexhavers
Paying for it is a symptom of inceldom
and not to mention the fact that they were low inhib enough
Not this again. :feelsseriously: you'd have to be a severally autistic abused dog to be scared of this, otherwise you lack the testosterone of meeting a whore? :forcedsmile:
and rich enough to actually afford an escort
not when I used to do it. I paid in the range of £60 - £80 for half hour sessions with white htbs and Staceys
Plus I believe it is extremely cucked to pay money to a foid just for her to spread her legs to you
it is a shame/pathetic to do this because that's what inceldom does to you
 
If escortcels are considered fakecels because they have had sex---does that mean that someone who doesn't pay for sex is a volcel because they could have paid for sex but chose not to?
 
What is the general consensus about escortcels here?

On one hand, they only got sex by paying money. However, we can't ignore the fact that they are indeed sexhavers, and not to mention the fact that they were low inhib enough and rich enough to actually afford an escort. Plus I believe it is extremely cucked to pay money to a foid just for her to spread her legs to you. Personally, I will not pay for something that I am owed.

For the KHHV trucels, are you able to relate to them?

There's been multiple polls in the past where the majority (over 50% of users...as is the case with this poll already) have voted to allow them, provided they exclusively have had sex relatively recently (one can be an incel without being a virgin if due to this or having ordinary sex but falling into inceldom) with a prostitute/"escort," and not anything else. Therefore, they are allowed.

As a 29 year old KHHV, my stance on the matter is that they should be allowed. Because the entire point of being incel is that you can't get a woman to voluntarily enter a committed long-term relationship with you. If you are just having sex just because you have to pay one money, that does not count as not being an incel anymore. As the Introduction page says.

Truecel trait: even prostitutes won't go near you.

In all seriousness, any guy, no matter how dejected and ugly, can technically "have sex" if they pay a prostitute to do it. It's precisely for this reason it should be allowed. Saying it shouldn't would just be overly technical, like on the basis: "well you did have sex though." Completely dumb.

Also, I absolutely do think they should be able to talk about their experiences with escorts/prostitutes here. The logic that disagrees says incels don't want to read about people having experiences they haven't had because that's depressing. However, as long as the post was clear they could just avoid such posts and it may be edifying for those who are not bothered by it.

Also, the rules of the site thankfully say the same:

1746561676768
 
Last edited:
Yes. The sex they got was literally just paid service that means nothing. The only way escortcelling can actually lead someone to ascend is if the prostitute becomes his actual girlfriend, which I'm not sure many guys here would even want:feelshaha:.
 
Today sexhavers allowed, tomorrow femcels. Take a note.

This just prove the word incel doesn't mean nothing, is a meme word, involuntary celibate who has sex every week with a different woman, what a joke.
 
its not really ascension just paying a foid to fuck
 
What does the word incel actually mean if we’re allowing people who aren’t celibate to join the involuntarily celibate forum?

Is incel just a term now for men who can’t get into a committed relationship?
 
it's allowed and it should be. just don't really mention it out of respect for moneycels

it's not like fucking a spent, stinky, ugly, flabby, old cunt that hates you with a rubber on is anywhere near true ascension (not that I've tried)
 
What does the word incel actually mean if we’re allowing people who aren’t celibate to join the involuntarily celibate forum?

Is incel just a term now for men who can’t get into a committed relationship?
you can't be involuntarily unfuckable by prostitutes. they're literally prostitutes

just don't brag about it
 
you can't be involuntarily unfuckable by prostitutes. they're literally prostitutes

just don't brag about it
You do know that escorts can reject customers, right? So the fact that the escort is not rejecting a customer means that they’re ok with having sex with them
 
Today sexhavers allowed, tomorrow femcels. Take a note.

This just prove the word incel doesn't mean nothing, is a meme word, involuntary celibate who has sex every week with a different woman, what a joke.
I will rape you greycel. who do you think you are commenting on fucking site policy with a 1 month old account? slap your bitch ass sissy balls immediately
You do know that escorts can reject customers, right? So the fact that the escort is not rejecting a customer means that they’re ok with having sex with them
that barely ever happens
 
I think they should be allowed, but ofc if it gets to a point where they're bragging, trolling, or excessively posting yes they should be warned for it.

Ideally, I think we should make an optional sub-forum for escortcels or those interested in it to talk about it.
It's been a while though iirc so the community's opinion might have changed about that subject

But it's the kind of rule that sounds good on paper but in reality is unapplicable.
Even if, let's say, one day we agree that escortcels should be banned. How do you even implement such rule?

Should we look at the post history of every user and ban all escortcels?
Should we keep the existing escortcels in and only ban newcomers?
I imagine they'd grandfather in those who did it and just tell them not to talk on it and ban all newfags who joined and mentioned it

But I think my above suggestion is the most ideal
Not this again. :feelsseriously: you'd have to be a severally autistic abused dog to be scared of this, otherwise you lack the testosterone of meeting a whore? :forcedsmile:
Some might be worried about getting scammed or even attacked which ofc ties into the legality

In the US if you try to hire a hooker, you could get beaten by the pimp, but you can't report it since you would face charges as well
not when I used to do it. I paid in the range of £60 - £80 for half hour sessions with white htbs and Staceys
It varies by country, some prices i've seen in the US are like 200$ for some low-end fat slutina
it is a shame/pathetic to do this because that's what inceldom does to you
:yes: :blackpill:
There's been multiple polls in the past where the majority (over 50% of users...as is the case with this poll already) have voted to allow them, provided they exclusively have had sex relatively recently (one can be an incel without being a virgin if due to this or having ordinary sex but falling into inceldom) with a prostitute/"escort," and not anything else. Therefore, they are allowed.

As a 29 year old KHHV, my stance on the matter is that they should be allowed. Because the entire point of being incel is that you can't get a woman to voluntarily enter a committed long-term relationship with you. If you are just having sex just because you have to pay one money, that does not count as not being an incel anymore. As the Introduction page says.

Truecel trait: even prostitutes won't go near you.

In all seriousness, any guy, no matter how dejected and ugly, can technically "have sex" if they pay a prostitute to do it. It's precisely for this reason it should be allowed. Saying it shouldn't would just be overly technical, like on the basis: "well you did have sex though." Completely dumb.

Also, I absolutely do think they should be able to talk about their experiences with escorts/prostitutes here. The logic that disagrees says incels don't want to read about people having experiences they haven't had because that's depressing. However, as long as the post was clear they could just avoid such posts and it may be edifying for those who are not bothered by it.

Also, the rules of the site thankfully say the same:

View attachment 1440721
This is why I think an optional subforum for discussing it would be best

Escortcels are incels ofc, but some for various reasons can't access it so to avoid issues i think this is the best course
 
that barely ever happens
My point is that is can happen, and has. At the end of the day being an escort is considered a “service”, and like any other service provider they are allowed to reject you based off of whatever criteria they deem fit.

That’s besides the real point, however, my main point is — how is incel defined on this forum?

Is it really just about relationships and not sex?
 
Escortcels are incels ofc, but some for various reasons can't access it

Here are the reasons incels who do not see prostitutes do not do so:

  1. They simply don't want to.
  2. They don't have the money.
  3. They live somewhere where it's hard or not possible to find escorts/prostitutes, or can't access them due to not having a car. (this ties back to number 2.)

I am the first two. I don't have the money, and even if I did, I wouldn't want to.

I have absolutely zero interest in this, and no interests in hook-ups/one night stands, for the same reasons, of course. I am only interested in a serious, committed, long-term, monogamous relationship.

Not to mention, sex with a prostitute is much worse than sex with a significant other. To begin with, you have to use a condom. (unless you're insane and want to see how many STDs you can get.) Secondly, one of the best parts about sex is the intimacy and the emotional component. Needless to say, that's not the case with a prostitute like it is with a partner. Also, it's for a set limited time. This ties into the first reason, of course.

A fourth reason would be the incel is disabled, but at that point said disability is part of the reason they are incel in the first place.
 
Last edited:
anti-escortcels are giga cucks

stop being a coward and go fuck a whore

my last cope is to make money and pay prostitutes for sex
 
Here are the reasons incels who do not see prostitutes do not do so:

  1. They simply don't want to.
It's fair enough to be against it & not want to partake
  1. They don't have the money.
This is correct, it makes sense since a lot here are NEETs due to various factors & incels in general don't do well
  1. They live somewhere where it's hard or not possible to find escorts/prostitutes.
Due to a mix of legality or just living in maybe some small town in a flyover state. for the legality part again, ties into being non-NT
I am the first two. I neither have the money, and even if I did, I wouldn't want to. I have absolutely zero interest in this, and no interests in hook-ups/one night stands, for the same reasons, of course. I am only interested in a serious, committed, long-term, monogamous relationship.
That's fair i'd say
 

Similar threads

Stupid Clown
Replies
84
Views
4K
Oneitiscel
Oneitiscel
four1298
Replies
24
Views
690
FemcelHater
FemcelHater
DarkStar
Replies
19
Views
1K
Koomersarj
Koomersarj
Retardfuel
Replies
17
Views
744
Fluoxymesterone
Fluoxymesterone
Sex-Starved Beast
Replies
39
Views
4K
incredible
I

Users who are viewing this thread

  • shape1
    shape2
    shape3
    shape4
    shape5
    shape6
    Back
    Top