Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Should sex be free?

Should sex be free


  • Total voters
    64
Logic55

Logic55

Blackpill Philosopher
★★★★★
Joined
May 10, 2023
Posts
9,686
Here is my take, sex should be free to all men because sex is unfairly given to attractive men while unattractive men receive no sex. Making sex free to all men regardless of looks would make our society fair and free from discrimination.
 
Last edited:
No. I don't want to live in a generation of free-use prostitutes.
 
No. I don't want to live in a generation of free-use prostitutes.
It doesn't have to be random women. Being given a wife by the government will ensure that you will have easy access to sex
 
It doesn't have to be random women. Being given a wife by the government will ensure that you will have easy access to sex
That would be my fantasy actually. Being given a loving wife that won't cheat on me. If that happened then sure, make it free.
 
who voted no??? lmmmaaoo....too psyched out in the beta bux realm....somebody reel him back in!!!! fuck for fee only cause we can;t get it for free...not the other way around
 
suicide male will be almost non existent
 
who voted no??? lmmmaaoo....too psyched out in the beta bux realm....somebody reel him back in!!!! fuck for fee only cause we can;t get it for free...not the other way around
I voted no because I thought it meant every woman becomes free-use. That isn't appealing to me.
 
I voted no because I thought it meant every woman becomes free-use. That isn't appealing to me.
i would vote no if we had to share women. Every person should only have one partner
 
I voted no because I thought it meant every woman becomes free-use. That isn't appealing to me.
Outside the box thinking...okay...okay...prolly another topic or sub topic all in its own....

Sex free for yes or no simplicity tho...what would it be?
 
i would vote no if we had to share women. Every person should only have one partner
Okay...I see the poster prolly needed to be more straight and narrow with it for the free thinkers in here..lmmaooo

Nobody wants sloppy seconds if they could have it fresh...we get it..
 
Outside the box thinking...okay...okay...prolly another topic or sub topic all in its own....

Sex free for yes or no simplicity tho...what would it be?
Yeah, sex would be nice.
 
Escorts should be free yes paid by tax money as emotional stress relief for truecels.

Some form of therapy/treatment it should be seen as. Better than nothing
 
Escorts should be free yes paid by tax money as emotional stress relief for truecels.

Some form of therapy/treatment it should be seen as. Better than nothing
Both trucels and the girls will get tested, and be on birth control, so you can fuck without a condom, this is a must, also should be aloud to creampie
 
Sex should be a human right
 
Both trucels and the girls will get tested, and be on birth control, so you can fuck without a condom, this is a must, also should be aloud to creampie
Maybe yes but you cant just go there everyday maybe you can be allowed once a month since there will be extremely high demand for this service
 
Sex is a god given right
 
Sex is a god given right
Liberals say...sex should no be a mandated entitlement...llmmaaooo
That's their arguments why they wanna bann prostituiton/sex workers....
My account got banned because I asked a FOID if she p2p...llmmaaooo
 
What form
State mandated genetically modified (your own choice how she will look and act) FREE STACY . YES
Free used up whores. NO
 
Maybe yes but you cant just go there everyday maybe you can be allowed once a month since there will be extremely high demand for this service
I think once a week is more appropriate, the government needs to step in and fund enough to service us all.
 
I think once a week is more appropriate, the government needs to step in and fund enough to service us all.
no once a week is too much it would go out of control. once a month is valid under specific circumstances
 
I think once a week is more appropriate, the government needs to step in and fund enough to service us all.
Word...take a portion out of our check like medicaid part b or taxes...lmmaooo
 
no once a week is too much it would go out of control. once a month is valid under specific circumstances
Yea...once a month like disability...lmmaooo...we are disabled in other ways...
 
You either pay with your looks or your money
 
Bro that shit doesn't work even with money, let alone sex.
 
Should be compulsory for all males
 
Sex will become illegal after all males receive their state-assigned Robot-girlfriend.

All reproduction happen through IVF "designer babies" incubated by young stacies kept in a coma in deep underground breeding barns and tended by robot nurses.

In one generation, ugliness, deformity, and most disease will be eradicated, together with the financial and psychological exploitation of men by the foids. Thus is the progress that can be achieved in a foidless society brought about by Marxism-Rodgerism.
 
If food stamps and welfare redistribution exist, then, why, of course it should be.
 
Here is my take, sex should be free to all men because sex is unfairly given to attractive men while unattractive men receive no sex. Making sex free to all men regardless of looks would make our society fair and free from discrimination.
Sex should be FORBIDDEN, except prostitution.

Pregnancies should be only through artificial insemination and the kids should be raised as orphans in military-style schools.
 
Sex should be FORBIDDEN, except prostitution.

Pregnancies should be only through artificial insemination and the kids should be raised as orphans in military-style schools.
In a Marxist-Rodgerist society all sex is illegal.

Men have their robot-girlfriends for sexual relief.

And, yes, foids are kept in underground breeding barns. It's a foidless society.
 
Retarded question of course sex should be free.
 
I voted no, everyone has to deserve it by paying, men and toilets alike and there should be no selection.
Sex is what is driving society, men are working to have sex. No sex = what's the meaning of working eh?
 
I voted no, everyone has to deserve it by paying, men and toilets alike and there should be no selection.
Sex is what is driving society, men are working to have sex. No sex = what's the meaning of working eh?
Boomer bs. Men are rotting instead of earning money to pay for sex.
 
I think what the OP is saying isnt sex should be handed on a plate to unattractive men, but unattractive mens value in society should be raised so that more women feel attracted and therefore date/marry/have sex.

Crime is definitely increasing since 2012, along with the introduction of the smartphone. The Incentives of being a law abiding unattractive male are not there anymore.

I am isolated in this society with no chance of ever dating a female. I am forced to talk to an a.i because no female wants to be friends or engage with me outside of work.

Imagine that reality.
 
Last edited:
I think what the OP is saying isnt sex should be handed on a plate to unattractive men, but unattractive mens value in society should be raised so that more women feel attracted and therefore date/marry/have sex.

Crime is definitely increasing since 2012, along with the introduction of the smartphone. The Incentives of being a law abiding unattractive male are not there anymore.

I am isolated in this society with no chance of ever dating a female. I am forced to talk to an a.i because no female wants to be friends or engage with me outside of work.

Imagine that reality.
I'm not surprised by a number of fags on this forum completely discarding the sentiment of the post and implicitly saying ,'you go girl.'
For example This postmaxxed gray faggot's post
 
In a Marxist-Rodgerist society all sex is illegal.

Men have their robot-girlfriends for sexual relief.

And, yes, foids are kept in underground breeding barns. It's a foidless society.
Why not prostitution?
 
Why not prostitution?
Prostitutes are starting to turn down incels...in favor of "ONLY FANS"....

Their is a call in MAINE however to legalize prostitution aka sex workers...as legitimate workers ..

Maine is a white liberal area...besides that nutcase shooting...overall low in crime..so hoes trust their johns....

In more liberated crowded city areas...they dnt feel safe..and really would rather rely on govt. Assistance and jobs than sleep with a sub 5.
 
Here is my take, sex should be free to all men because sex is unfairly given to attractive men while unattractive men receive no sex. Making sex free to all men regardless of looks would make our society fair and free from discrimination.
My answer would be "Yes" but, that because you gave only binary choices. The bottom line is that collage age girls should be prostitutes for relatively affordable prices. For GigaStacy/Stacy it should be mandatory for them to get room and board. To pay for their tuition or expenses they must prostitute themselves out men between the ages of 18-70 or so. Contraception (in the form of birth control only) should be used. Later on for having kids they can do insemination.
 
Yes and Chads should be banned and send to the Madagascar like jews were supposed to. Any foid trying to go there will get shot on sight and livestreamed (i would pay for that)
 
It's FREE for Chad and foids. Ofc course it should be free
 
Why not prostitution?
Foids should never ever be allowed to have any agency whatsoever.

Prostitution is an excercise of power and agency. Many spies and blackmail rings recruit prostitutes, for instance, because these professionals are capable of exert ing influence, extracting information, etc.

If you give an inch of agency to a foid, she will use it to charm, bewitch, enslave and control the nearest male to do her bidding. Either that, or a pimp will use the prostitute to extract resources from males.
 
I don't understand how this is supposed to work in practice or in theory. In reality nothing is truly free, because there's always a cost associated with the provision of something. Somebody, somewhere is always paying something to get you the "free shit."
 
Here is my take, sex should be free to all men because sex is unfairly given to attractive men while unattractive men receive no sex. Making sex free to all men regardless of looks would make our society fair and free from discrimination.
It is free but not for us
 
I don't understand how this is supposed to work in practice or in theory. In reality nothing is truly free, because there's always a cost associated with the provision of something. Somebody, somewhere is always paying something to get you the "free shit."
Correct. Hence Prostitution should be something that college age foids must do in order to pay for/complete their education and move into a career field. Agreed?
 
Correct. Hence Prostitution should be something that college age foids must do in order to pay for/complete their education and move into a career field. Agreed?
Prostitution can also be a profession...for those who are of a lower class of society contribution. It was like so for many centuries...and the problem occur when married men was going to brothels...they need to be banned somhow...

GOVT. Needs to control prostitution..security guards are hired to protect them..it will create jobs...law enforcement will be in cohoots to make them safer....

All cities that vote in will have a couple of centers...like shelters...where the sex takes place ...upon personal request...a prostitute can sign out to see a customer upon her free will...she just needs to check in and be somewhat monitored....
 

Similar threads

Tunadiver
Replies
54
Views
949
BurntIvoryKingcel
BurntIvoryKingcel
Destroyed lonely
Replies
9
Views
311
edgelordcel
edgelordcel
Logic55
Replies
5
Views
522
Slut_Annihilator298
Slut_Annihilator298
screwthefbi
Replies
14
Views
294
fukurou
fukurou

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top