Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Should moralfagging be banned on here?

Should moralfagging be banned on here?


  • Total voters
    80
Dude, I utterly refuted your argument and you ran from the discussion. I demonstrated that you either apply your "just looking at media containing crimes should be a crime" logic consistently and get a totalitarian government where most people would be criminals just because they looked at media, or you selectively apply that to CP only and be a hypocrite. I also demonstrated that your "you're giving attention to it!" argument doesn't hold itself for various reasons.

Men who simply watched media shouldn't be jailed. That's all I'm saying, I'm not for child abuse, yes, jail everyone who actually harmed an innocent child. But people who just watched a vid or saw a pic, not paying for it in any way, didn't do it. Regardless of the feelings of the producers, regardless of what the people who downloaded it do while they look at it. Accept it.
I have already addressed all those points in my replies to Edmund. Maybe you failed to read them, or whatever. You were just repeating his points. Which is kind of annoying. I am not going to tell the same thing to 10 people. Heck even he could not respond to my arguments so started going in circles. So I have decided to not go back there for a while. And I am surely not going to repeat them here. You can hang on and wait for my response back there.

Also stop with this "hurr durr I won lol hurr durr" nonsense. It is embarrassing. You are presumably an adult, not one of those primary school kids that you'd like to see raped.
 
I have already addressed all those points in my replies to Edmund. Maybe you failed to read them, or whatever. You were just repeating his points. Which is kind of annoying. I am not going to tell the same thing to 10 people. Heck even he could not respond to my arguments so started going in circles. So I have decided to not go back there for a while. And I am surely not going to repeat them here. You can hang on and wait for my response back there.
Why didn't you reply to me instead? Let's see it...

EDIT: I can't find such posts, link them ITT if you want me to address them.

Also stop with this "hurr durr I won lol hurr durr" nonsense. It is embarrassing. You are presumably an adult, not one of those primary school kids that you'd like to see raped.
But I did win. Your logic doesn't follow. You're are either for a totalitarian government or a double standards hypocrite, that's the logical conclusion of what you think should be illegal (just watching media downloaded for free). But I'll read what you wrote to Edmund soon.

Also, you're using ad hominem attacks against me nonstop. You say I'm a pedophile who faps to CP because I'm against men being being unjustly jailed for simple possession of media. That's both an ad hominem and a non sequitur, two fallacies for the price of one.
 
Last edited:
I’ve noticed some moralfags joining this forum lately and this sucks and we will end up like IT if this continues. Should we ban moralfagging such as “a 17 year old is a toddler”?

@Mainländer @epillepsy @Robtical @RREEEEEEEEE @turbocuckcel_7000 @existentialhack @Total Imbecile @Personalityinkwell @Diocel @ordinaryotaku @ThoughtfulCel @Sparrow's Song @Grothendieck @Transcended Trucel @nazianime @AlexanderTheGreat11 @manicel @Colvin76 @iKillCucks @zangano1 @FUCKITALLREEE @ionlycopenow @ihaveno1 @FACEandLMS @nxdismycope @werty1457
Moralfags as in christcels or edgy soycucks ?
 
@SlayerSlayer
 
Why didn't you reply to me instead? Let's see it...

EDIT: I can't find such posts, link them ITT if you want me to address them.


But I did win. Your logic doesn't follow. You're are either for a totalitarian government or a double standards hypocrite, that's the logical conclusion of what you think should be illegal (just watching media downloaded for free). But I'll read what you wrote to Edmund soon.

Also, you're using ad hominem attacks against me nonstop. You say I'm a pedophile who faps to CP because I'm against men being being unjustly jailed for simple possession of media. That's both an ad hominem and a non sequitur, two fallacies for the price of one.
Of course its an ad hominem. I did not say it to discredit your points. You are just acting like an ITcuck with this "But I did win" bs. I am not supposed to take seriously every brainlet move that you throw at me.

If you want the thread you can find it in your notifications. And if you want my specific posts. I will link them to you later since I am using mobile now. You gotta wait a little. Do something else till then instead of wasting your time with me. Your point will be addressed if you were not satisfied.
I think you should be banned...
Spoooooooooky
 
I didn't report you, but you're unhealthy for the community.
For voicing my opinion? Can you point out other instances where I have been "unhealthy" according to you. You cannot really expect me to address literal pedophilic arguments without being a bit snarky can you?
 
For voicing my opinion? Can you point out other instances where I have been "unhealthy" according to you. You cannot really expect me to address literal pedophilic arguments without being a bit snarky can you?
You are an alien here. You're intractable and heedless. No matter what reasoned arguments are offered to you in the most civil way, it washes over you like the ocean tide, and you return again and again to the same personal attacks. You are persecuting where you are not persecuted. Is it a lack of intelligence or a lack of moral flexibility? It doesn't matter. You are a tumor on the body politik. What do we do with such malignant growths? We excise them and remove them from the body, as cleanly as possible.
 
Opinion discarded
 
I’m only a moralfag when it comes to rape
 
  • Erenor
  • Total Imbecile
  • EyesAreSoCold
  • gymletethnicel
  • yeshuallah
  • M12Comic
  • HyperVersager_4EVER
  • Reega8765665
  • FallenPrime

These faggots are all moralfags.
 
You are an alien here. You're intractable and heedless. No matter what reasoned arguments are offered to you in the most civil way, it washes over you like the ocean tide, and you return again and again to the same personal attacks. You are persecuting where you are not persecuted. Is it a lack of intelligence or a lack of moral flexibility? It doesn't matter. You are a tumor on the body politik. What do we do with such malignant growths? We excise them and remove them from the body, as cleanly as possible.
Umm. I am sorry, but that's not correct. I keep my personal attacks very separated from the well reasoned arguments that I put forward respectfully. Just because you would like to ignore those arguments like Edmund , doesn't change those facts that I present. Of course the people who argue against my positions go on and misrepresent them. But they have to do it because the whitewashed positions they are trying to present and what they truly believe and argue are different.

Take Edmund for example. He would say that people who watch child porn shouldn't be jailed. So when I counter argue that people who possess cp should have action taken for them including external intervention, rehabilitation and counselling, and maybe jail time if they are showing signs of anti social behaviour and give my reasons for it, he wouldn't try to agree or form a common ground, that yeah instant jailing is bad and other more humane or sympathetic action should be taken

That's because what Edmund truly believes is that cp watchers should be completely left alone to watch as much child rape as they want And that's his position.

Its crazy you would think that what you call "logical arguments" flow over my head when I have addressed each and every one of them. Whether its the coping "gore porn equivalence" argument or the ridiculous "it doesn't incentivize" argument. The only one I haven't touched is the "children enjoy it" argument, because that's where Edmund's nature truly shines. I keep it for the viewers to judge themselves. Its not like I hate the guy or anything, he's a coping cel as well. But the things some of you say.

Further you can accuse me of making personal attacks all you want but anyone with half a brain could see through the gaslighting facade that is being presented here.

Lastly, with some self introspection I do agree that my behaviour here is unconventional. I know there are many many cels who would atleast somewhat or even fully agree with what I say, but they wisely decide to stay away from pedofag threads and let the pedocels do their thing. Just like many would stay away from islamcoper threads or racecoper threads. I just decided to engage the pedocels beyond any cel should. I am pretty much shooting myself in the foot here.
 
Last edited:
Are you sure about this one? His post in this thread makes him seem not to be a moralfag.
He says, and I quote "That said they shouldnt be banned, but each moralfag act should be like a 24h ban with no warning % to deter it." He does want them banned but only temporarily. Why would you want to put up with such people?
Yes ban Cucks like @werty1457 @Caesercel @PPEcel
@FrothySolutions
all they do is post cuck shit all the time. all 4 of those users think 18 yearold girls are kids jfl at these cucks
They do? JFL at those cucks.
 
Umm. I am sorry, but that's not correct. I keep my personal attacks very separated from the well reasoned arguments that I put forward respectfully. Just because you would like to ignore those arguments like Edmund , doesn't change those facts that I present. Of course the people who argue against my positions go on and misrepresent them. But they have to do it because the whitewashed positions they are trying to present and what they truly believe and argue are different.

Take Edmund for example. He would say that people who watch child porn shouldn't be jailed. So when I counter argue that people who possess cp should have action taken for them including external intervention, rehabilitation and counselling, and maybe jail time if they are showing signs of anti social behaviour and give my reasons for it, he wouldn't try to agree or form a common ground, that yeah instant jailing is bad and other more humane or sympathetic action should be taken

That's because what Edmund truly believes is that cp watchers should be completely left alone to watch as much child rape as they want And that's his position.

Its crazy you would think that what you call "logical arguments" flow over my head when I have addressed each and every one of them. Whether its the coping "gore porn equivalence" argument or the ridiculous "it doesn't incentivize" argument. The only one I haven't touched is the "children enjoy it" argument, because that's where Edmund's nature truly shines. I keep it for the viewers to judge themselves. Its not like I hate the guy or anything, he's a coping cel as well. But the things some of you say.

Further you can accuse me of making personal attacks all you want but anyone with half a brain could see through the gaslighting facade that is being presented here.

Lastly, with some self introspection I do agree that my behaviour here is unconventional. I know there are many many cels who would atleast somewhat or even fully agree with what I say, but they wisely decide to stay away from pedofag threads and let the pedocels do their thing. Just like many would stay away from islamcoper threads or racecoper threads. I just decided to engage the pedocels beyond any cel should.
:soy:
 
You are an alien here. You're intractable and heedless. No matter what reasoned arguments are offered to you in the most civil way, it washes over you like the ocean tide, and you return again and again to the same personal attacks. You are persecuting where you are not persecuted. Is it a lack of intelligence or a lack of moral flexibility? It doesn't matter. You are a tumor on the body politik. What do we do with such malignant growths? We excise them and remove them from the body, as cleanly as possible.
Want to know the problem? He's a curry.
:feelskek: Two non-cucked curries VS a cucked curry praising some dead cumskin guy from ancient times.
 
Yes they can go the fuck back to being good cucks on reddit.
 
You've got to be fucking kidding me.

Just because I think paedophilia is fucked up doesn't mean I think 17-year-olds are toddlers.

You can always make your own forum; pedocels.co or whatever.
 
You've got to be fucking kidding me.

Just because I think paedophilia is fucked up doesn't mean I think 17-year-olds are toddlers.

You can always make your own forum; pedocels.co or whatever.
:soy:
 
No. Some people have different opinions. Explain why your opinion is the right one and you might win over more support whereas banning them just silences dissident beliefs.
 
Never understood why moralfags defends teenagers as pure beings while they fuck older chad left and right.
 
We don't really have lines drawn in the sand on what is moralfagging versus what is having a different view. I say no banning moralfagging because any moralfagging that is bad enough will get a user roastes by the niggas on the forum bad enough as it is and it it's IT level shit they will be suspected of being an infiltrator and banned for that if proven.
 
I’ve noticed some moralfags joining this forum lately and this sucks and we will end up like IT if this continues. Should we ban moralfagging such as “a 17 year old is a toddler”?

@Mainländer @epillepsy @Robtical @RREEEEEEEEE @turbocuckcel_7000 @existentialhack @Total Imbecile @Personalityinkwell @Diocel @ordinaryotaku @ThoughtfulCel @Sparrow's Song @Grothendieck @Transcended Trucel @nazianime @AlexanderTheGreat11 @manicel @Colvin76 @iKillCucks @zangano1 @FUCKITALLREEE @ionlycopenow @ihaveno1 @FACEandLMS @nxdismycope @werty1457
Absolutely. Also tag me in such highiq propositions.
 
Everyone is a moralfag. The whole point of this forum is to argue what is and isn't moralfaggotry. Usually if you are too moralqueer you get BTFOed and leave by your own volition anyway. Real incels never escape the crab bucket that is inceldom
 
Umm. I am sorry, but that's not correct. I keep my personal attacks very separated from the well reasoned arguments that I put forward respectfully. Just because you would like to ignore those arguments like Edmund , doesn't change those facts that I present. Of course the people who argue against my positions go on and misrepresent them. But they have to do it because the whitewashed positions they are trying to present and what they truly believe and argue are different.

Take Edmund for example. He would say that people who watch child porn shouldn't be jailed. So when I counter argue that people who possess cp should have action taken for them including external intervention, rehabilitation and counselling, and maybe jail time if they are showing signs of anti social behaviour and give my reasons for it, he wouldn't try to agree or form a common ground, that yeah instant jailing is bad and other more humane or sympathetic action should be taken

That's because what Edmund truly believes is that cp watchers should be completely left alone to watch as much child rape as they want And that's his position.

Its crazy you would think that what you call "logical arguments" flow over my head when I have addressed each and every one of them. Whether its the coping "gore porn equivalence" argument or the ridiculous "it doesn't incentivize" argument. The only one I haven't touched is the "children enjoy it" argument, because that's where Edmund's nature truly shines. I keep it for the viewers to judge themselves. Its not like I hate the guy or anything, he's a coping cel as well. But the things some of you say.

Further you can accuse me of making personal attacks all you want but anyone with half a brain could see through the gaslighting facade that is being presented here.

Lastly, with some self introspection I do agree that my behaviour here is unconventional. I know there are many many cels who would atleast somewhat or even fully agree with what I say, but they wisely decide to stay away from pedofag threads and let the pedocels do their thing. Just like many would stay away from islamcoper threads or racecoper threads. I just decided to engage the pedocels beyond any cel should. I am pretty much shooting myself in the foot here.
How many god damn times do I need to clarify I never said cp viewers shouldn’t be jailed I said if they are jailed so should those who watch vids of people getting killed. I don’t think it should be legal to watch cp

also, when I clarified that some children enjoy it, it was because you were assuming all cp viewers enjoy watching children in pain or something
 
depends on what type
 
What exactly do you mean by moralfagging? I have principles and morals that i follow in life which is what differentiates me from a cuck. Society has given up in morals and dignity. Infact, we live in an immoral and degenerate society/world. If any positive beliefs are shown, they are solely for virtue signalling and not real at all.

Am i moral fag too then? Please Elab. :feelswhere:
 
depends on what type
Like moralfagging over jb
What exactly do you mean by moralfagging? I have principles and morals that i follow in life which is what differentiates me from a cuck. Society has given up in morals and dignity. Infact, we live in an immoral and degenerate society/world. If any positive beliefs are shown, they are solely for virtue signalling and not real at all.

Am i moral fag too then? Please Elab. :feelswhere:
Like saying that attraction to teens is pedophilia
 
We should. It is the tactics of feminist propaganda, and it's a barrier to intelligent discussion. We ban foids here for a reason, and that same reason should extend to virtue signaling moralfags.
 
Yes ban Cucks like @werty1457 @Caesercel @PPEcel
@FrothySolutions
all they do is post cuck shit all the time. all 4 of those users think 18 yearold girls are kids jfl at these cucks
@FrothySolutions should definitely be on the chopping block.
 
Yes, but certain aspects of moralfagging like anti-violence are okay. Any bluepilled shit should be banned on sight.
 
I’ve noticed some moralfags joining this forum lately and this sucks and we will end up like IT if this continues.
Should we ban moralfagging such as “a 17 year old is a toddler”?
much as I like the idea, SOME level of moralfagging should be allowed, we want to allow free speech and not be an echo chamber
we after all can reasonably discuss moral issues like it being unethical for women to cuck men, or it not being awwright to put it a baby in a blender
 
much as I like the idea, SOME level of moralfagging should be allowed, we want to allow free speech and not be an echo chamber
we after all can reasonably discuss moral issues like it being unethical for women to cuck men, or it not being awwright to put it a baby in a blender
Anyone who says “finding jb foids attractive is pedophilia” isn’t blackpilled
 
Hard 1 tbh, morals are cope for ugy hoomans after all , its 50/50 imho but i voted yes anyway to keep it 100 , too much of anything is overdose ngh
 
Hard 1 tbh, morals are cope for ugy hoomans after all , its 50/50 imho but i voted yes anyway to keep it 100 , too much of anything is overdose ngh
Moralfags make this forum look like IT
 
Yes ban Cucks like @werty1457 @Caesercel @PPEcel
@FrothySolutions
all they do is post cuck shit all the time. all 4 of those users think 18 yearold girls are kids jfl at these cucks
LOL keep putting words in my mouth buddy
 

Similar threads

BummerDrummerOG
Replies
50
Views
1K
singleplayercel
singleplayercel
nihility
Replies
34
Views
950
Yerberito
Yerberito

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top