Experiment Should moralfagging be banned on here?

[Edmund_Kemper]

I’ve noticed some moralfags joining this forum lately and this sucks and we will end up like IT if this continues. Should we ban moralfagging such as “a 17 year old is a toddler”?

@Mainländer @epillepsy @Robtical @RREEEEEEEEE @turbocuckcel_7000 @existentialhack @Total Imbecile @Personalityinkwell @Diocel @ordinaryotaku @ThoughtfulCel @Sparrow's Song @Grothendieck @Transcended Trucel @nazianime @AlexanderTheGreat11 @manicel @Colvin76 @iKillCucks @zangano1 @FUCKITALLREEE @ionlycopenow @ihaveno1 @FACEandLMS @nxdismycope @werty1457

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Yes ban Cucks like @werty1457 @Caesercel @PPEcel
@FrothySolutions
all they do is post cuck shit all the time. all 4 of those users think 18 yearold girls are kids jfl at these cucks

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

@JosefMengelecel @ReturnOfSaddam @Stalin

 

[Caesercel]

Yes ban Cucks like @werty1457 @Caesercel @PPEcel
@FrothySolutions
all they do is post cuck shit all the time. all 4 of those users think 18 yearold girls are kids jfl at these cucks

Hey don't put me on the same league as that islamcoper and that literal liberal. Also I never said 18 year old girls are kids, stop lying plz. Its not like your saint @Edmund_Kemper who cannot differentiate between a 18 year old and 8 year old.

 

[epillepsy]

We should. It is the tactics of feminist propaganda, and it's a barrier to intelligent discussion. We ban foids here for a reason, and that same reason should extend to virtue signaling moralfags.

 

[Deleted member 5653]

Depends on how you define "moralfaging", calling out retarded teen edgelords who have nothing to do with inceldom shouldn't be bannable.

 

[HyperVersager_4EVER]

Who the fuck decides what is moralfagging and what isn't? Not agreeing with you is moralfagging? As long as they are not taking your right to speak your mind defend yourself properly when someone disagrees with you instead of bitching about it.

“a 17 year old is a toddler”?

Congrats on beating a straw-man

 

[Robtical]

Yes. Moralfagging for jb's is the same as whiteknighting and pussy worship. I can't be comfortable around an irrational idiot who wants me killed or locked up just for having a normal high t sex drive.

 

[Caesercel]

Who the fuck decides what is moralfagging and what isn't? Not agreeing with you is moralfagging? As long as they are not taking your right to speak your mind defend yourself properly when someone disagrees with you instead of bitching about it.

Congrats on beating a straw-man

Lol his strawman are great. He will accuse us of thinking that a 16 year old girl is a child. Then go on to fap to 8 year old child rape. Or maybe he is so retarted he cannot see the difference.

 

[epillepsy]

He will accuse us of thinking that a 16 year old girl is a child. Then go on to fap to 8 year old child rape.

Evidence?

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

Lol his strawman are great. He will accuse us of thinking that a 16 year old girl is a child. Then go on to fap to 8 year old child rape. Or maybe he is so retarted he cannot see the difference.

Jesus I never said it’s ok to look at cp stop strawmannijg me. I don’t even have attraction to 8 year olds you retard. Also, I never accused you specifically of calling teens children

Yes. Moralfagging for jb's is the same as whiteknighting and pussy worship. I can't be comfortable around an irrational idiot who wants me killed or locked up just for having a normal high t sex drive.

Exactly. If banning non blackpillers is ok then so is banning moralfags

people have the right to have different opinions, and it's kind of a breath of fresh air in this circle jerk place, also you can have different opinion from another user and still be friendly with him.

but @Colvin76 should be banned because he's a 6ft4 light skin tyrone.

Having different opinions is fine but moralfags are white knights and aren’t truly blackpilled

Who the fuck decides what is moralfagging and what isn't? Not agreeing with you is moralfagging? As long as they are not taking your right to speak your mind defend yourself properly when someone disagrees with you instead of bitching about it.

Congrats on beating a straw-man

I’ve seen many go on about calling us pedohpiles and it should end. Also, disagreeing is fine but moralfags are white knights and aren’t blackpilled, that’s why we ban non blackpillers

 

[Caesercel]

Evidence?

what evidence does he have that we think jb should be illegal. He is making stuff up out of his ass. Plus he never really makes an age distinction. In front of other incels he will pretend that he thinks 16 yo or 17 yo should not be illegal to which everyone agrees. But when he comes down to his defence of child porn he never makes that distinction. Heck even when I make that assumption by saying "child rape" he doesn't correct me. Of course I don't think 16 year olds are children and when I say "child rape" I am not talking about post-puberty teens, which concludes that he actually is for ALL child porn

 

[Cruel]

Nowadays 18 years old foids are already roasties.

 

[Deleted member 20811]

people have the right to have different opinions, and it's kind of a breath of fresh air in this circle jerk place, also you can have different opinion from another user and still be friendly with him.

but @Colvin76 should be banned because he's a 6ft4 light skin tyrone.

 

[epillepsy]

what evidence does he have that we think jb should be illegal. He is making stuff up out of his ass. Plus he never really makes an age distinction. In front of other incels he will pretend that he thinks 16 yo or 17 yo should not be illegal to everyone agrees. But when he comes down to his defence of child porn he never makes that distinction. Heck even when I make that assumption by saying "child rape" he doesn't correct me. Of course I don't think 16 year olds are children which concludes that he actually is for ALL child porn

That's not very convincing evidence.

Also, the argument in that thread was about the legality of viewing child porn. You think it should be illegal; others disagreed. You proceeded to call people who disagreed with you, including me, pedophiles. The topic did not need to stray there but you brought up the issue. Now you're acting as if the whole argument was about whether or not 8-year-old children should be raped or not.

Have you ever argued with a foid and, when she was losing the argument, she began screeching and calling you all sorts of names? That's what you're doing. If you can make the assumption that someone is a pedo with no evidence, then I can make the assumption that you have a vagina.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

what evidence does he have that we think jb should be illegal. He is making stuff up out of his ass. Plus he never really makes an age distinction. In front of other incels he will pretend that he thinks 16 yo or 17 yo should not be illegal to which everyone agrees. But when he comes down to his defence of child porn he never makes that distinction. Heck even when I make that assumption by saying "child rape" he doesn't correct me. Of course I don't think 16 year olds are children which concludes that he actually is for ALL child porn

I never said cp should be legal how many times do I have to tell that? I said if it should be a criminal offense to simply view it so should viewing videos of people irl being murdered. That’s all. I think both should be banned.

Nowadays 18 years old foids are already roasties.

false. Foids are hottest at 18

 

[Deleted member 27159]

I personally believe that people can have different opinions but for the most part moralfagging is gay.

 

[Caesercel]

That's not very convincing evidence.

Also, the argument in that thread was about the legality of viewing child porn. You think it should be illegal; others disagreed. You proceeded to call people who disagreed with you, including me, pedophiles. The topic did not need to stray there but you brought up the issue. Now you're acting as if the whole argument was about whether or not 8-year-old children should be raped or not.

Have you ever argued with a foid and, when she was losing the argument, she began screeching and calling you all sorts of names? That's what you're doing. If you can make the assumption that someone is a pedo with no evidence, then I can make the assumption that you have a vagina.

But of course you guys will never make that distinction. If you were talking about post puberty teens you could have said that and saved us a lot of trouble. But you didn't. Now you come here and pretend that you were not defending ALL child porn in the first place. Because that's exactly what you were doing.

As far as screeching is concerned, I am not the one making threads about banning "moralfags"

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

That's not very convincing evidence.

Also, the argument in that thread was about the legality of viewing child porn. You think it should be illegal; others disagreed. You proceeded to call people who disagreed with you, including me, pedophiles. The topic did not need to stray there but you brought up the issue. Now you're acting as if the whole argument was about whether or not 8-year-old children should be raped or not.

Have you ever argued with a foid and, when she was losing the argument, she began screeching and calling you all sorts of names? That's what you're doing. If you can make the assumption that someone is a pedo with no evidence, then I can make the assumption that you have a vagina.

Infinite IQ

 

[epillepsy]

But of course you guys will never make that distinction. If you were talking about post puberty teens you could have said that and saved us a lot of trouble. But you didn't. Now you come here and pretend that you were not defending ALL child porn in the first place. Because that's exactly what you were doing.

As far as screeching is concerned, I am not the one making threads about banning "moralfags"

I was saying that it did not make sense, based on legal precedents, to make the viewing of cp illegal. A legal system needs consistency to work well. Please read my comments again. Nowhere did I defend the creation of child porn.

Also consider reading some books and learn to argue better. It's impossible to respond to bold accusations and statements with no reasoning or evidence to back them up. I think you are falling into the Dunning-Kruger Effect. You believe that you're being coherent, but really you're not.

 

[FlamingCel]

No man

 

[Total Imbecile]

Yes ban Cucks like @werty1457 @Caesercel @PPEcel
@FrothySolutions
all they do is post cuck shit all the time. all 4 of those users think 18 yearold girls are kids jfl at these cucks

FrothySolutions is the biggest moralfag on this forum hands down

This could be me being autistic or just low empathy from years of inceldom but I was shocked at the number of white knights in that CP thread yesterday

I dont care that it might cause pedos to act out or that it indirectly supports the industry or whatever, LOL @ making things illegal because they make you uncomfortable, LOL @ giving up your rights because some rando kiddo might get hurt

Hang pedos publicly by the neck until dead or flay them alive to deter it

Sequences of ones and zeros should not be illegal unless you sign some sort of contract or agreement not to disclose them or copy them like when you purchase a DVD or sign an NDA

And mind you this isnt even about CP because I dont care about prepub kids, hatespeech too or any kind of speech shouldnt be illegal because its obscene or it might cause this or that

Normies dont understand that the internet is just electrical signals traveling across wires, anyone advocating for making anything illegal probably has 0 understanding of how computers work and thinks images and videos are magic

Consider drawing two stick figures fucking

And then making progressively more realistic drawings

At what point does your drawing become "obscene" and become pornography?

I personally wouldnt even consider hardcore porn obscene because Ive seen so much of it its just meh to me

And even if hardcore porn is obscene and has no value so what? Should we make it illegal for kids to draw because their art has no serious political or philosophical value either?

Drugs should be legal too, if you wanna shoot up heroin until your heart stops beating you should be more than welcome to do it

Smh @ these white knights

That said they shouldnt be banned, but each moralfag act should be like a 24h ban with no warning % to deter it

 

[Transcended Trucel]

what evidence does he have that we think jb should be illegal. He is making stuff up out of his ass. Plus he never really makes an age distinction. In front of other incels he will pretend that he thinks 16 yo or 17 yo should not be illegal to which everyone agrees. But when he comes down to his defence of child porn he never makes that distinction. Heck even when I make that assumption by saying "child rape" he doesn't correct me. Of course I don't think 16 year olds are children and when I say "child rape" I am not talking about post-puberty teens, which concludes that he actually is for ALL child porn

But of course you guys will never make that distinction. If you were talking about post puberty teens you could have said that and saved us a lot of trouble. But you didn't. Now you come here and pretend that you were not defending ALL child porn in the first place. Because that's exactly what you were doing.

As far as screeching is concerned, I am not the one making threads about banning "moralfags"

FrothySolutions is the biggest moralfag on this forum hands down

This could be me being autistic or just low empathy from years of inceldom but I was shocked at the number of white knights in that CP thread yesterday

I dont care that it might cause pedos to act out or that it indirectly supports the industry or whatever, LOL @ making things illegal because they make you uncomfortable, LOL @ giving up your rights because some rando kiddo might get hurt

Hang pedos publicly by the neck until dead or flay them alive to deter it

Sequences of ones and zeros should not be illegal unless you sign some sort of contract or agreement not to disclose them or copy them like when you purchase a DVD or sign an NDA

And mind you this isnt even about CP because I dont care about prepub kids, hatespeech too or any kind of speech shouldnt be illegal because its obscene or it might cause this or that

Normies dont understand that the internet is just electrical signals traveling across wires, anyone advocating for making anything illegal probably has 0 understanding of how computers work and thinks images and videos are magic

Consider drawing two stick figures fucking

And then making progressively more realistic drawings

At what point does your drawing become "obscene" and become pornography?

I personally wouldnt even consider hardcore porn obscene because Ive seen so much of it its just meh to me

And even if hardcore porn is obscene and has no value so what? Should we make it illegal for kids to draw because their art has no serious political or philosophical value either?

Drugs should be legal too, if you wanna shoot up heroin until your heart stops beating you should be more than welcome to do it

Smh @ these white knights

That said they shouldnt be banned, but each moralfag act should be like a 24h ban with no warning % to deter it

it's sad many incels moral fag cope and religious cope. fucking over their fellow ugly men over useless bullshit and simping for foids. too unfortunate, it's why a men's right revolution will likely never happen no matter how bad the situation gets

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

FrothySolutions is the biggest moralfag on this forum hands down

This could be me being autistic or just low empathy from years of inceldom but I was shocked at the number of white knights in that CP thread yesterday

I dont care that it might cause pedos to act out or that it indirectly supports the industry or whatever, LOL @ making things illegal because they make you uncomfortable, LOL @ giving up your rights because some rando kiddo might get hurt

Hang pedos publicly by the neck until dead or flay them alive to deter it

Sequences of ones and zeros should not be illegal unless you sign some sort of contract or agreement not to disclose them or copy them like when you purchase a DVD or sign an NDA

And mind you this isnt even about CP because I dont care about prepub kids, hatespeech too or any kind of speech shouldnt be illegal because its obscene or it might cause this or that

Normies dont understand that the internet is just electrical signals traveling across wires, anyone advocating for making anything illegal probably has 0 understanding of how computers work and thinks images and videos are magic

Consider drawing two stick figures fucking

And then making progressively more realistic drawings

At what point does your drawing become "obscene" and become pornography?

I personally wouldnt even consider hardcore porn obscene because Ive seen so much of it its just meh to me

And even if hardcore porn is obscene and has no value so what? Should we make it illegal for kids to draw because their art has no serious political or philosophical value either?

Drugs should be legal too, if you wanna shoot up heroin until your heart stops beating you should be more than welcome to do it

Smh @ these white knights

That said they shouldnt be banned, but each moralfag act should be like a 24h ban with no warning % to deter it

Hanging them wouldn’t really deter it, because many might be able to figure out how to get away with it. But if it’s illegal to view cp why is viewing videos of people being murdered ok?

 

[Caesercel]

I was saying that it did not make sense, based on legal precedents, to make the viewing of cp illegal. A legal system needs consistency to work well. Please read my comments again. Nowhere did I defend the creation of child porn.

Also consider reading some books and learn to argue better. It's impossible to respond to bold accusations and statements with no reasoning or evidence to back them up. I think you are falling into the Dunning-Kruger Effect. You believe that you're being coherent, but really you're not.

Oh I have made my arguments, respectfully so too in that thread. You can go on and read it. I have countered every point that he had to offer. I even mentioned again and again that I am for intervention and subsequent action, not explicit jailing. Which, of course, you people chose to ignore. Just read my words atleast before spewing bs out of your ass, its not that hard.

And the part where I implied y'all pedophiles was a judgement on my part based on the thread. Its evidenceless opinion and something you don't need to argue. Its equivalent to you calling me a "moralfag". Its what I think and believe, of course that does not necessarily make it so. But then again in my honest opinion if you guys really are not pedophiles, then from that thread, the other inference to be drawn, as Fabio beautifuly put it, is

RETARDED EDGELORDS

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Oh I have made my arguments, respectfully so too in that thread. You can go on and read it. I have countered every point that he had to offer. I even mentioned again and again that I am for intervention and subsequent action, not explicit jailing. Which, of course, you people chose to ignore. Just read my words atleast before spewing bs out of your ass, its not that hard.

And the part where I implied y'all pedophiles was a judgement on my part based on the thread. Its evidenceless opinion and something you don't need to argue. Its equivalent to you calling me a "moralfag". Its what I think and believe, of course that does not necessarily make it so. But then again in my honest opinion if you guys really are not pedophiles, then from that thread, the other inference to be drawn, as Fabio beautifuly put it, is

RETARDED EDGELORDS

 

[fuck_ITcucks]

Absolutely

This thread has been featured on IT btw

 

[EeEcel]

i am ngl not a single letter but imho religionfags need to gtfo asap as possible imho

 

[Total Imbecile]

Hanging them wouldn’t really deter it, because many might be able to figure out how to get away with it. But if it’s illegal to view cp why is viewing videos of people being murdered ok?

I mean offending pedos or just rapists who defile virgins in general

Punishment deters crime and the more severe it is the more people are gonna fuck off, I dont do anything illegal because even just 1 day in jail is not worth it

I could get away with stealing peoples amazon packages for example, but even just that 0.0001% chance that I might get caught is not worth it imo

To answer your second q imo its just shock value

You will find that surprisingly many people are completely okay with underage teens in a relationship exchanging nudes because thats I guess cute and what bfs/gfs do? But then they turn around and think regular CP is the worst thing ever because its disturbing

Same with murder, its okay to watch people jump to their deaths from the twin towers and police bodycam shootings but suddenly if someone livestreams just mowing down innocent civilians like that New Zealand dude oh the horror shut it down, wipe the video and persecute those spreading it

People need to be less sensitive

Then again Im autistic and its all the same to me, its just pixels changing colors and I dont really feel any emotional attachment towards it

 

[BummerDrummerOG]

#legalizerapingbabies

 

[Transcended Trucel]

#legalizerapingbabies

 

[Total Imbecile]

But TLDR is essentially youre completely right

@Edmund_Kemper

Nobody is entitled to anything tbh

 

[BummerDrummerOG]

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

I mean offending pedos or just rapists who defile virgins in general

Punishment deters crime and the more severe it is the more people are gonna fuck off, I dont do anything illegal because even just 1 day in jail is not worth it

I could get away with stealing peoples amazon packages for example, but even just that 0.0001% chance that I might get caught is not worth it imo

To answer your second q imo its just shock value

You will find that surprisingly many people are completely okay with underage teens in a relationship exchanging nudes because thats I guess cute and what bfs/gfs do? But then they turn around and think regular CP is the worst thing ever because its disturbing

Same with murder, its okay to watch people jump to their deaths from the twin towers and police bodycam shootings but suddenly if someone livestreams just mowing down innocent civilians like that New Zealand dude oh the horror shut it down, wipe the video and persecute those spreading it

People need to be less sensitive

Then again Im autistic and its all the same to me, its just pixels changing colors and I dont really feel any emotional attachment towards it

Brutal punishments don’t deter crime actually. In the Middle Ages crime rates and murder rates were way higher. Saudi Arabia only has a low murder rate because of culture, not punishment, all those similar Arab countries have low murder rates except Iraq and syria

 

[Transcended Trucel]

View attachment 285966

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

 

[Total Imbecile]

Brutal punishments don’t deter crime actually. In the Middle Ages crime rates and murder rates were way higher. Saudi Arabia only has a low murder rate because of culture, not punishment, all those similar Arab countries have low murder rates except Iraq and syria

Then I guess its the price we have to pay to be free

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

@SuperMario64DS

 

[Mainländer]

I'm for freedom of speech but people who think like that simply don't jive with an all-male incel space. They have 99% of the internet to be agecucks and shame their fellow men. I say yes.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

I'm for freedom of speech but people who think like that simply don't jive with an all-male incel space. They have 99% of the internet to be agecucks and shame their fellow men. I say yes.

Agreed. This one of the only forums online where we can discuss the jbpill calmly

 

[Deleted member 19236]

No. The more diverse the discussion, the better it is.

 

[Mainländer]

Now you come here and pretend that you were not defending ALL child porn in the first place. Because that's exactly what you were doing.

You're being pretty dishonest there. I said plenty of times that I agree CP is immoral and that people who participate in those acts, produce, profit from and pay for it should be prosecuted. All I was arguing all the time is that people who just watch it, downloading it for free form the internet, should not. Also, you guys lost the argument.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

You're being pretty dishonest there. I said plenty of times that I agree CP is immoral and that people who participate in those acts, produce, profit from and pay for it should be prosecuted. All I was arguing all the time is that people who just watch it, downloading it for free form the internet, should not. Also, you guys lost the argument.

I clarified this to him so much but his skull is too thick

 

[Personalityinkwell]

ban all anti ephebophiles and anti hebephilies

 

[Caesercel]

You're being pretty dishonest there. I said plenty of times that I agree CP is immoral and that people who participate in those acts, produce, profit from and pay for it should be prosecuted. All I was arguing all the time is that people who just watch it, downloading it for free form the internet, should not. Also, you guys lost the argument.

You do not win or lose an argument by saying so. Or just bcz you got one or two other pedofags to agree with you.

Also I was not talking about production but consumption itself when i said "child porn" . Read a thread before responding, it will help you not fall on your foot.
You just want to pretend that there is nothing wrong with downloading and watching a video of a child getting raped to get off of it. That's just all there is to it. All that easily debunkable mental gymnastics.

 

[Mainländer]

You do not win or lose an argument by saying so. Or just bcz you got one or two other pedofags to agree with you.

Also I was not talking about production but consumption itself when i said "child porn" . Read a thread before responding, it will help you not fall on your foot.
You just want to pretend that there is nothing wrong with downloading and watching a video of a child getting raped to get off of it. That's just all there is to it. All that easily debunkable mental gymnastics.

Dude, I utterly refuted your argument and you ran from the discussion. I demonstrated that you either apply your "just looking at media containing crimes should be a crime" logic consistently and get a totalitarian government where most people would be criminals just because they looked at media, or you selectively apply that to CP only and be a hypocrite. I also demonstrated that your "you're giving attention to it!" argument doesn't hold itself for various reasons.

Men who simply watched media shouldn't be jailed. That's all I'm saying, I'm not for child abuse, yes, jail everyone who actually harmed an innocent child. But people who just watched a vid or saw a pic, not paying for it in any way, didn't do it. Regardless of the feelings of the producers, regardless of what the people who downloaded it do while they look at it. Accept it.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

You do not win or lose an argument by saying so. Or just bcz you got one or two other pedofags to agree with you.

Also I was not talking about production but consumption itself when i said "child porn" . Read a thread before responding, it will help you not fall on your foot.
You just want to pretend that there is nothing wrong with downloading and watching a video of a child getting raped to get off of it. That's just all there is to it. All that easily debunkable mental gymnastics.

He didn’t say it isn’t wrong he just doesn’t think it should be illegal

ban all anti ephebophiles and anti hebephilies

Agreed

 

[Mainländer]

ban all anti ephebophiles and anti hebephilies

I agree with that because it's shaming of normal male sexuality. Something that shouldn't happen here. It's similar to someone posting "I want to screw my hot neighbor" and me saying "stop disrespecting m'lady!" This is an all male space and shaming and whiteknighting don't belong here. You can point that you're not into girls that young, you can say you think adultery is wrong (I agree), but you shouldn't shame others for displaying normal male sexual attraction.

 

[Deleted member 236]

I’ve noticed some moralfags joining this forum lately and this sucks and we will end up like IT if this continues. Should we ban moralfagging such as “a 17 year old is a toddler”?

@Mainländer @epillepsy @Robtical @RREEEEEEEEE @turbocuckcel_7000 @existentialhack @Total Imbecile @Personalityinkwell @Diocel @ordinaryotaku @ThoughtfulCel @Sparrow's Song @Grothendieck @Transcended Trucel @nazianime @AlexanderTheGreat11 @manicel @Colvin76 @iKillCucks @zangano1 @FUCKITALLREEE @ionlycopenow @ihaveno1 @FACEandLMS @nxdismycope @werty1457

Suck my 4 inch dick

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

I agree with that because it's shaming of normal male sexuality. Something that shouldn't happen here. It's similar to someone posting "I want to screw my hot neighbor" and me saying "stop disrespecting m'lady!" This is an all male space and shaming and whiteknighting don't belong here.

Agreed

Suck my 4 inch dick

what?