Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Should I feel attracted to this girl?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 42964
  • Start date
Deleted member 42964

Deleted member 42964

Today I am dirty, tomorrow I'll be just dirt.
-
Joined
May 15, 2022
Posts
483
So I found this Jim'll Fix It episode where Jimmy Savile fixes it for a mentally handicapped girl to make her own ice cream. This is a 15-year-old girl and I find her quite attractive. The reason I'm asking this is because I'm not sure whether she's Down or not. I mean she kind of looks like she is, but not quite. Not sure if my instinct is somewhat perverted. I'd still take her any day. I don't think she's Down, she just looks like it because she's handicapped, but idk. I'd take her. There's probably not many other 15-year-old girls who are innocent and virgins.

1658248363470Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6
 
Last edited:
Yeah, it's jfl, but my question was also half-serious I must say. Anyway, not sure if she's Down but I'll take her.
 
So I found this Jim'll Fix It episode where Jimmy Savile fixes it for a mentally handicapped girl to make her own ice cream. This is a 15-year-old girl and I find her quite attractive. The reason I'm asking this is because I'm not sure whether she's Down or not. I mean she kind of looks like she is, but not quite. Not sure if my instinct is somewhat perverted. I'd still take her any day. I don't think she's Down, she just looks like it because she's handicapped, but idk. I'd take her. There's probably not many other 15-year-old girls who are innocent and virgins.

View attachment 640706View attachment 640707View attachment 640708View attachment 640709View attachment 640710View attachment 640711
She's a downie.

Reminder that Downie foids are Chad-only as well.
 
She's a downie.

Reminder that Downie foids are Chad-only as well.
I'm not sure she's a downie. She kind of looks like she is but not quite. Anyways, even if she is, that's fine with me. I still find her attractive. I'd take her any day she wants to.
 
Also, the sweet romantic idea of showing the pleasures of sex and love to a handicapped girl who is suffering because of her disability.
 
Your taste is your taste, nothing you can do about it.
 
Look at her eyes and flattened face, she has it for sure.
 
Yeah, but isn't she cute? Wouldn't you take her? I sure would.
It's like having a relationship with an animal (depending in how bad her autism is)
 
It's like having a relationship with an animal (depending in how bad her autism is)
Nah, let's not exaggerate. I mean, she's obviously an Untermensch, but you know. I would also take a Jewish girl or a Japanese girl, even if they are clearly inferior. If I find her cute it's good enough for me.
 
Also, the sweet romantic idea of showing the pleasures of sex and love to a handicapped girl who is suffering because of her disability.
The other day I heard a friend talk about a friend of his, who is parent to a downie girl, how he put her on injectable birth control as soon as she hit puberty because her sex-drive is uncontrollable, and they can't monitor her 24/7.

Turns out this downie girl had a boyfriend.

Your "sweet romantic idea" was tenable when you were 12, maybe 13. Downie girls are fucking often, and fucking hard. Taking creampie after creampie from the boys on her street, on her school, sports clubs etc.
 
The other day I heard a friend talk about a friend of his, who is parent to a downie girl, how he put her on injectable birth control as soon as she hit puberty because her sex-drive is uncontrollable, and they can't monitor her 24/7.

Turns out this downie girl had a boyfriend.
And women say they have it harder.
 
How are you attracted to that:feelswhat:?
 
Yeah, but isn't she cute? Wouldn't you take her? I sure would.
No, i don't find her attractive and my kid would already have one set of poor genes from me even if she was normal.
 
How are you attracted to that:feelswhat:?
Ah, come on. Don't tell me she isn't cute. Also, she's obviously a virgin, which makes it even better, but don't tell me she isn't cute.
 
Nah, let's not exaggerate. I mean, she's obviously an Untermensch, but you know. I would also take a Jewish girl or a Japanese girl, even if they are clearly inferior. If I find her cute it's good enough for me.
It doesn't matter how she looks(which is subhuman,but it doesn't matter for a truecel).Just the fact that she behaves more like a vegetable than a human is a turn of.
 
No, i don't find her attractive and my kid would already have one set of poor genes from me even if she was normal.
Well, I'm not talking about having children with her obviously. Just having her a romantic-sexual partner. Just don't reproduce with her.
 
Well, I'm not talking about having children with her obviously. Just having her a romantic-sexual partner. Just don't reproduce with her.
Still it's a bad thing to do. If you want a legal jb looking girl just jerk off to Jordyn Jones.
 
Sorry but no bro. I draw the line with a Downs foid :feelsjuice::feelsjuice:.My Ashkenazi IQ would be flushed down the toilet:lul::lul::lul:
 
Sorry but no bro. I draw the line with a Downs foid :feelsjuice::feelsjuice:.My Ashkenazi IQ would be flushed down the toilet:lul::lul::lul:
Come on. She doesn't even look that Down. I'm not even 100% sure she's Down. I am down for taking her, though, I'll tell you that
 
Come on. She doesn't even look that Down. I'm not even 100% sure she's Down.
Even if she's 25% down, those are 25 IQ deducted from my IQ. 110-25=85. The kids would be nigger-tier retarded:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
 
Even if she's 25% down, those are 25 IQ deducted from my IQ. 110-25=85. The kids would be nigger-tier retarded:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
I'm not talking about reproducing with her. You can have a romantic-sexual relation with her but not reproduce. I obviously wouldn't want to reproduce with her.
 
Are you also 15? :feelsbaton:
I'm 18. If I was 15, where would the fun be? Where would the thrill be then? The thrill of taking a cute innocent mentally-handicapped 15-year-old girl. Hmmm....... Just imagine what pleasure it would be. Also, since she is mentally handicapped, you could fool her very easily. You could lie to her and she wouldn't even notice. She would be innocent and submissive. Just the way I like women.
 
I'm not talking about reproducing with her. You can have a romantic-sexual relation with her but not reproduce. I obviously wouldn't want to reproduce with her.
I wanna fuck a foid raw. If I wanted to fuck a foid with a condomn, I'll go visit an escort:lul::lul::lul:
 
I wanna fuck a foid raw. If I wanted to fuck a foid with a condomn, I'll go visit an escort:lul::lul::lul:
Then don't use a condom. Just make sure she takes anti-pregnancy pills.
 
Then don't use a condom. Just make sure she takes anti-pregnancy pills.
They're too retarded to even take a contraceptive, don't you get it?:lul::lul::lul:

Downs Syndrome:feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
 
They're too retarded to even take a contraceptive, don't you get it?:lul::lul::lul:

Downs Syndrome:feelsseriously::feelsseriously:
Just explain to her how to do it, and supervise her if necessary. Come on, that girl appeared on Jim'll Fix It and they showed her to make her own ice cream. If she can do that, she can take a fucking pill. It's not that hard.
 
absolutely no interest in girls who have down syndrome. they're about as attractive as grandmas to me. i dont hate them (i pity them tbh and not out of contempt i just feel bad for em) but i have no sexual/romantic interest in them.
I don't pity them, they're Untermensch. And yeah, I usually don't find downies attractive. They all look disgusting, but come on. This one is really cute.
 
i dont see people as inferior for things that are out of their control. idk how some1 can hate on girls for their hypergamy and dislike towards sub 5 men but then hate on others for the way they look.
I mean, a dog is inferior to a man, and it's out of his control to be a dog.
 
Well, she looks retarded but I can see some people seeing some value in her, we males are not known for high standards. I'd probably be attracted to some chinks who look worse so I can't judge you.

But she would be a burden like a child for the rest of your life I think.

Sorry but no bro. I draw the line with a Downs foid :feelsjuice::feelsjuice:.My Ashkenazi IQ would be flushed down the toilet:lul::lul::lul:
70 is high IQ for mid-retards, she's probably way lower than that.
 
a dog isn't a human
So? There are humans who are inferior to others. Just because someone is human doesn't deserve to be treated equally to other humans who are clearly superior.
 
i guess stacy is better than you because she has better genetics despite living like a total degenerate?
Well. She's a woman so she's intellectually inferior. When you say "better genetics", you're exclusively thinking of physical appearance. That doesn't change the fact that she's stupid and a whore. That means I have better genetics regarding my intellect and my ability to control primitive basic impulses.
 
her looks gives her more status and access to chads and orbiters who can do her bidding. her looks permits her to leechmaxx off of rich chads and also use them as bodyguards. her looks alone offers her more in life than your intellect could ever. that's why i think it's dumb as hell to value genetics above all. while im blackpilled and am aware of how important genes are in determining the difficulty settings of one's life i dont value them over one's moral principles at all.
Those are problems of society and the current system that allows women to be free and not be treated as property of the man. That's a social and political problem. In a logical and ideal society, things would not work that way.
 
not true. it all comes down to the biology and genetics you give so much value to. women are biologically more valuable for continuing the species while men are more or less expendable since a woman can only bear one child at a time while a single man can impregnate multiple women (meaning that a high woman to man ratio is logically more favorable from a biological standpoint). it isn't a coincidence that men are far less picky than women about their spouses. in a state of anarchy i chads would prob just kill incels and enjoy their harems.
In a state of anarchy everyone could buy any firearm they like and chads wouldn't just "kill incels", because incels would have fucking bazookas and AK-47s to defend themselves if they wish to. Also, I don't understand what does women being more valuable to the perpetuation of the species have to do with what I said.
 
i'd argue most incels are relatively high inhib so i just cant see them winning a war against chads. and if 2 sides have access to the same firepower the side with greater physical prowess will win. anyway i was envisioning an old school society that took place far before this soy one where everyone has guns.

u talked about an ideal society so i tried to give u a more objective biological situation since u appear to put a lot of value in genetics.
You really think incels would lose in a war with the same firepower to chads? How many people do chads kill? They almost never do. They're assholes who like to prey on the weak, but they also follow the socially accepted moral dogmas, so they would never kill because they believe killing is bad. Incels on the other hand are way more willing to kill. Incels are know to the mainstream public for killing sprees and mass murders in fact. Incels are way more willing to kill than the average chad, period. You're assuming that because it's an anarchy, people don't have morals. See, if the world suddenly became anarchic tomorrow, people wouldn't go around killing each other because they're indoctrinated with the social dogma of "killing is bad". Do you really think most people would kill and rape if they could? No. Most people don't even think about it. Chads are really a bunch of pussies and they wouldn't have the balls to kill. Even if they did, as I said, it's a fair war. Incels and chads would have access to the same firepower. There's no difference in the chances aside from which one of the two is more willing to kill and more determined to win the war.

As for the ideal society, as I said, females should be a property that could be sold and bought and they should have no choice on which men they breed with.
 
i was thinking primitive era. it was a hypothetical side point idc much to discuss.

that's ur ideal society because u have ur own unique set of morals. i've been trying to argue morals are something we should find more valuable than genetics this entire time. if u wanna treat people with down syndrome like they're inferior then u dont have any reason to be dissatisfied with the way women treat u for ur looks since it's only natural right? im just exposing the hypocrisy of incels who discriminate others solely because of their race, IQ, or other things they have no control over.
Women's sexual instinct is perverted. You say it's "natural" because it was 10,000 years ago. Their instinct of liking brute ape-like jock-type males comes from the Ice Age, when women's instinct was to go for these kind of men to protect them. Of course, that doesn't make sense nowadays because they don't need to be protected in the sense that physical strength is not a requirement to survive in today's society anymore. Back then, it was absolutely necessary. Women have simple minds, and the problem is that because of their inferior minds, they cannot overcome their primitive instincts from a hundred centuries ago. The only way to correct them is a patriarchal system. Women's instincts are not natural. They were natural when they were created. Obviously if Mother Nature gave them those instincts, it was for a reason. However, if women cannot overcome their primitive instincts 10,000 years later, it's not Nature or biology's fault, it's women's fault. It's because of their inferior, simple, shallow, perverted and stupid minds.
 
their sexual instinct is still technically natural since while circumstances and needs have changed their biology hasn't. even if their choices are illogical they are awarded the choice to make illogical decisions with regards to spouse selection because THEY have choice unlike us (women are naturally hypergamous and men are natural simps that pursue even worthless women and this has never changed). dont u see how u view others with a genetic advantage over u (stacy's natural ability to charm others to do her bidding) as inferior here but at the same time clown on people with down syndrome for being genetically disadvantaged?
I see women as inferior because they are inferior. They are intellectually and physically inferior to men. Women, as I said, have a perverted, inefficient and illogical sexual attraction, so they must be treated as property of the man. They should be classified as property of their father at birth, and later, of their husband. That way, it would be men who would make choices for them and it would be the father who would choice his daughter's romantic and sexual partner. Women are stupid and must not have a choice on who to breed with because their criteria is flawed. Also, I have written a thread on the subject. I recommend you to read it, and I think it would be more appropriate to discuss this here: https://incels.is/threads/how-to-end-involuntary-celibacy-once-and-for-all.392082/
 
their physicals abilities and their decision making based on logic abilities are definitely weaker than men's but don't forget their charm abilities. they're like an RPG character that has no strength stats but invested everything into charm so that they can simply task others with things that they are incapable of themselves. their high affinity towards succeeding in leechmaxxing is not something to be underestimated. that is an extremely powerful ability in itself that makes them technically genetically superiors to incels who may be 10x stronger and smarter than them.

as for the linked thread....no offence but it's just a TLDR to me.
Their charm is irrelevant as it only serves them to attract other males. In a society where women are classified as property, they would have no choice over who they marry and who they breed with, so their charm and their ability to attract men would be irrelevant. That aspect is only relevant in a society where women are free, and women must not be free.
 
i agree that a patriarchal society is best but honestly my point was that we shouldn't look down on and make fun of the genetically disadvantaged as incels since it's a hypocritical thing to do.
It would be hypocritical for incels who consider themselves biologically inferior to the rest. I consider myself to be biologically superior, so I quite happily look down on the mentally handicapped.
 
never began for delusionalcels.
Think what you want. I am superior to the average person because the average person is stupid. Society is flawed and perverted and that must be rectified. I am right and I will be proven right.
 
have u tried finding a legal girl with down syndrome to ascend with?
Well, since I'm 18, it would be legal for me to ascend with a 15-year-old downie. The age difference is minimal.
 

Similar threads

Q
Replies
26
Views
588
Qwertyuiop99
Q
highschoolcel
Replies
22
Views
858
Arnocel
Arnocel
Q
Replies
16
Views
542
Qwertyuiop99
Q
Q
Replies
63
Views
3K
Internalizzz
Internalizzz
Q
Replies
39
Views
1K
foidrapist69
foidrapist69

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top