Another element of WOKE ideology that everybody, including cuckservatives have internalized and without a second thought follow is the idea that there is such a thing as "sexual orientation". The theory that there is some kind of spectrum of human sexualities or something. This is just linguistic manipulation and false information to normalize paraphilias.
The reason sex exists is for reproduction. Men by default are attracted to women who are capable of reproduction, especially those who can be used to produce quality offspring. There is nothing else to it.
Then, there is mental illness. Specifically sexual mental illnesses or paraphilias. In order for it to be unnatural, the only thing it has to be is to be non-reproductive or dangerous to reproduction.
To put it simply:
●Everything that can produce a child = natural and good
●Everything that can't produce a child = unnatural sickness
Many attractions and acts that can't produce a child have been classified as mental disorders or paraphilias. Examples of unnatural behaviours:
●Necrophilia - Having intercourse with a dead body: a dead body can't get pregnant.
● Zoophilia - raping an animal: an animal can't get pregnant.
● Pedophilia - Having sex with a prepubescent individual aka a child: Prepubescent individuals can't get pregnant.
● Gerontophilia - sex with really old people: old people aren't fertile. Most healthy males find the idea repulsive.
Now if you have an iq above 59, you will obviously know that there is one big category that would fit well here. That being so called "homosexuality". The word "sexuality" was added there specifically and strategically to normalize it. It used to be called "homophilia", the word homophilia captures the essence of this sick perverted mental illness way better. It puts it in the category where it belongs. From now on, you will stop bowing to the altar of woke pseudoscience and call it what it is.
Homophilia might even be the sickest of all the paraphilias. It was classified as one for a long time, but during the 1970s, the DSM held a vote to remove it from this classification. Absolute utter insanity.
henrymakow.com
Now what seperates homo"sexuality" from the other paraphilias? Libtards have no real anwsers, they will only come up with some ideological babble, appeal to emotion etc, "it doesn't hurt anyone", "they consent" etc. And? How does this make it normal? Most people don't do any of those things, it by definition is not "normal". In fact, most are actually deeply repulsed by it, but will hide their disgust because "it isn't my business". The truth is you're disgusted because it's unnatural and extremely dangerous.
Homophilia usually comes in a package with other mental illnesses. Many homophiles also have narcissism, autism or some other retardation. Many homophiles are also pedophilic, sadistic or attracted to feces (makes sense since they put their penises in the shitgutter).
The ammount of serial killers who are faggots isn't a coincidence. For example Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy. It's a fact that they are overrepresented among killers. (Dahmer was also a necrophile, cannibal)
Here's a list of some of them:
Out of the two known "consensual cannibalism" criminal cases that exist, both times the participants were homophilic males. Their cannibalism had a sexual component to it.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
The ammount of pedophiles who are also homophiliacs is throught the roof. This has led many redditor types to claim that "pedophiles are just attracted to children in general, they are not gay", which is not true considering that a number of pedophiles exclusively target one sex of children. It's bogus to claim that one person can't have multiple paraphilias and that they aren't correlated in any way. In fact, most existing pedophile organizations and groups are homophilic pedophiles, they call themselves by many names.
This also invokes the question, why aren't other paraphilias rebranded to "sexualities" and a part of the "spectrum of sexualities". Why aren't necrophiles called "necrosexuals" instead? Redditors will usually come up with weak excuses "it's different" etc. Their go-to is "sexuality is attraction to a gender, not age, species or another factor". This just shows how weak the whole idea of muh "sexual orientation" is. It's a made up social construct. Some pedophiles have actually tried to rebrand pedophilia as "pedosexuality" just like the homos did with homophilia, but without much success.
Now coming back to the beginning where we discussed what is natural and what isn't. Some things that in fact are natural are falsely conflated with paraphilias. Like i said in the beginning, everything that encourages reproduction is natural therefore not a paraphilia.
An obvious example of this is the attraction to females who have entered puberty regardless of age. Yet, in modern times, one will falsely be labelled in regular circles a pedophile (child"lover" or pedo (child) if the fertile woman is below the man-made age of 18. If a woman who is let's say 13 years of age is capable of pregnancy and has sexual characteristics, then the attraction to her hody is valid and has a natural basis.
In some academic circles terms such as "hebephila" and "ephebeophilia" are thrown around. These are not actually classified as real mental disorders for obvious reasons. Still i would put under doubt the existence of those terms themselves especially ephebophilia which is absolutely ludicrous. It supposedly means primary or exclusive attraction to females aged 15-18. Which is absolutely nonsensical to label as a paraphilia since most men are primarily attracted to those ages. Are all men "ephebophiles" then? No it is simply that it isn't a paraphilia. It's natural male sexuality.
When it comes to hebephilia, which is primary or exclusive attraction to 12-14 year olds, i would say that it is equally fallacious for the most part, since these females are already in puberty. Most importantly the theory of chronophilias when it comes to fertile women is pretty dumb, since attraction to them is logical. Only chronophilic paraphilias that logically exist are pedophilia and gerontophilia since most people don't have symptoms of them and indulging can't result in pregnancy. Men can’t tell someone's age from looking at them, age is practically a social construct. What can be understood from merely looking at a female, is whether they are in puberty or not. This is the only distinction that is nescessary in nature.
The preference for certain pubescent or post-pubescent stages could be more accurately called exactly that — "preferences". Just like you may find blonde women more attractive than brunette women and i find the opposite more attractive. It isn't unnatural nor does it halt the probability of reproduction since i still would be capable of indulging in acts with blonde females even if i find them less attractive. Same way, most people who prefer 15-19 year olds, would still sleep with a 26 year old.
Saying that "attraction to a 14 year old woman is unnatural" is the same as saying "reproduction is unnatural". In fact it's the same thing. The age of consent agenda exists solely to decrease reproduction among western populations.
The terms "hebephilia" and "ephebeophilia" could be instead used to exclusively classify homophilic offenders instead. Considering where the term "ephebo" comes from, it would make more sense to use it only for homophiliacs.
en.wikipedia.org
@Rapistcel @Urlaubsinsel @Reddit=Bandwagonism @EcstasyCel
The reason sex exists is for reproduction. Men by default are attracted to women who are capable of reproduction, especially those who can be used to produce quality offspring. There is nothing else to it.
Then, there is mental illness. Specifically sexual mental illnesses or paraphilias. In order for it to be unnatural, the only thing it has to be is to be non-reproductive or dangerous to reproduction.
To put it simply:
●Everything that can produce a child = natural and good
●Everything that can't produce a child = unnatural sickness
Many attractions and acts that can't produce a child have been classified as mental disorders or paraphilias. Examples of unnatural behaviours:
●Necrophilia - Having intercourse with a dead body: a dead body can't get pregnant.
● Zoophilia - raping an animal: an animal can't get pregnant.
● Pedophilia - Having sex with a prepubescent individual aka a child: Prepubescent individuals can't get pregnant.
● Gerontophilia - sex with really old people: old people aren't fertile. Most healthy males find the idea repulsive.
Now if you have an iq above 59, you will obviously know that there is one big category that would fit well here. That being so called "homosexuality". The word "sexuality" was added there specifically and strategically to normalize it. It used to be called "homophilia", the word homophilia captures the essence of this sick perverted mental illness way better. It puts it in the category where it belongs. From now on, you will stop bowing to the altar of woke pseudoscience and call it what it is.
Homophilia might even be the sickest of all the paraphilias. It was classified as one for a long time, but during the 1970s, the DSM held a vote to remove it from this classification. Absolute utter insanity.
Therapist Calls Homosexuality "Mental Illness"
Henry Makow's official web site. Exposing Feminism and the New World Order
Now what seperates homo"sexuality" from the other paraphilias? Libtards have no real anwsers, they will only come up with some ideological babble, appeal to emotion etc, "it doesn't hurt anyone", "they consent" etc. And? How does this make it normal? Most people don't do any of those things, it by definition is not "normal". In fact, most are actually deeply repulsed by it, but will hide their disgust because "it isn't my business". The truth is you're disgusted because it's unnatural and extremely dangerous.
Homophilia usually comes in a package with other mental illnesses. Many homophiles also have narcissism, autism or some other retardation. Many homophiles are also pedophilic, sadistic or attracted to feces (makes sense since they put their penises in the shitgutter).
The ammount of serial killers who are faggots isn't a coincidence. For example Jeffrey Dahmer, John Wayne Gacy. It's a fact that they are overrepresented among killers. (Dahmer was also a necrophile, cannibal)
Here's a list of some of them:
Jeffrey Dahmer, killed 17-homosexual cannibal.
Andrew Cunanan, killed 51, killed fashion designer and fellow homosexual Gianni Versace
Gilles de Rais, killed 300+, associate of Joan of Arc
Luis Alfredo Garavito,killed 140+,murdered over 140 boys
Randy Steven Kraft, killed 65 ."Score Card Killer"
Michael Swango, killed 35 -"Doctor of Death" -- killed hospital patients
Andrei Chikatilo, killed 52
Fritz Haarmann, killed 40 (est.), the "Butcher Of Hanover"
John Wayne Gacy, homosexual child molester who killed 33, 27 of his victims were under aged boys he buried in crawlspace under his house.
Patrick Wayne Kearney, killed 28
David D. Hill, killed 28-Patrick Kearney's homosex partner;
Hans Grans27+until 1924GermanyGermanyaccommplice and love of Haarmann, the "Butcher Of Hanover"
Wayne Williams, killed 27
Dean Corll, killed 27
Elmer Wayne Henley, killed 27- Victims were underaged boys who he kidnapped and tortured
David Owen Brooks, killed 27
Donald Harvey, killed 25 - 40
Juan Corona, killed 25. All of his victims were men that he first homosexually raped, and then killed with a machete over the span of six weeks. Presently resides in Corcoran State Prison. Juan Corona's brother is Natividad, also a homosexuial sex practitioner and owner of the Guadalajara cafe in Marysville, CA.
Adolfo de Jesus Constanzo, killed 21 Mexico"Matamoros Cult Killer"
Larry Eyler, killed 19
Huang Yong, killed 17. Murdered underaged boys, saved their belts as souvenirs.
Dennis Nilsen, murdered 16
William Bonin, killed 12
Henry Lee Lucas, killed 12+
Vaughn Greenwood, killed 11+1
Richard Speck, killed 8+
David Bullock, killed 6+
Vernon Butts, killed 6-accomplice of homosexual sex acts practitioner William Bonin
Paul Bateson, killed 6
Marc Dutroux, killed 61 He is unusual among homosexual serial killers in that his victims were all underaged girls, who he kidnapped and tortured before killing.
Michael Terry, killed 6
Lynn Majors, killed 6
Gary Bishop, killed 5, serial killer of underaged boys. "I am a homosexual pedophile convicted of murder, and pornography was a determining factor in my downfall."
Michael Lupo, killed 4+
Peter Moore, killed 4
Allan Dodd, killed 3+
David P. Brown (a.k.a. Nathaniel Bar-Jonah), killed 3+ Victims were all young boys.
Charles Manson killed 3+-Bisexual.
David Edward Maust, killed 5+-Killed underaged boys, usually by stabbing
Bruce Davis, killed 2+ accomplice of bisexual Charles Manson
Erik Menendez, killed his two parents with help of his brother.
Andrew Cunanan, killed 51, killed fashion designer and fellow homosexual Gianni Versace
Gilles de Rais, killed 300+, associate of Joan of Arc
Luis Alfredo Garavito,killed 140+,murdered over 140 boys
Randy Steven Kraft, killed 65 ."Score Card Killer"
Michael Swango, killed 35 -"Doctor of Death" -- killed hospital patients
Andrei Chikatilo, killed 52
Fritz Haarmann, killed 40 (est.), the "Butcher Of Hanover"
John Wayne Gacy, homosexual child molester who killed 33, 27 of his victims were under aged boys he buried in crawlspace under his house.
Patrick Wayne Kearney, killed 28
David D. Hill, killed 28-Patrick Kearney's homosex partner;
Hans Grans27+until 1924GermanyGermanyaccommplice and love of Haarmann, the "Butcher Of Hanover"
Wayne Williams, killed 27
Dean Corll, killed 27
Elmer Wayne Henley, killed 27- Victims were underaged boys who he kidnapped and tortured
David Owen Brooks, killed 27
Donald Harvey, killed 25 - 40
Juan Corona, killed 25. All of his victims were men that he first homosexually raped, and then killed with a machete over the span of six weeks. Presently resides in Corcoran State Prison. Juan Corona's brother is Natividad, also a homosexuial sex practitioner and owner of the Guadalajara cafe in Marysville, CA.
Adolfo de Jesus Constanzo, killed 21 Mexico"Matamoros Cult Killer"
Larry Eyler, killed 19
Huang Yong, killed 17. Murdered underaged boys, saved their belts as souvenirs.
Dennis Nilsen, murdered 16
William Bonin, killed 12
Henry Lee Lucas, killed 12+
Vaughn Greenwood, killed 11+1
Richard Speck, killed 8+
David Bullock, killed 6+
Vernon Butts, killed 6-accomplice of homosexual sex acts practitioner William Bonin
Paul Bateson, killed 6
Marc Dutroux, killed 61 He is unusual among homosexual serial killers in that his victims were all underaged girls, who he kidnapped and tortured before killing.
Michael Terry, killed 6
Lynn Majors, killed 6
Gary Bishop, killed 5, serial killer of underaged boys. "I am a homosexual pedophile convicted of murder, and pornography was a determining factor in my downfall."
Michael Lupo, killed 4+
Peter Moore, killed 4
Allan Dodd, killed 3+
David P. Brown (a.k.a. Nathaniel Bar-Jonah), killed 3+ Victims were all young boys.
Charles Manson killed 3+-Bisexual.
David Edward Maust, killed 5+-Killed underaged boys, usually by stabbing
Bruce Davis, killed 2+ accomplice of bisexual Charles Manson
Erik Menendez, killed his two parents with help of his brother.
Out of the two known "consensual cannibalism" criminal cases that exist, both times the participants were homophilic males. Their cannibalism had a sexual component to it.
Armin Meiwes - Wikipedia
Killing of Nguyễn Xuân Đạt - Wikipedia
The ammount of pedophiles who are also homophiliacs is throught the roof. This has led many redditor types to claim that "pedophiles are just attracted to children in general, they are not gay", which is not true considering that a number of pedophiles exclusively target one sex of children. It's bogus to claim that one person can't have multiple paraphilias and that they aren't correlated in any way. In fact, most existing pedophile organizations and groups are homophilic pedophiles, they call themselves by many names.
This also invokes the question, why aren't other paraphilias rebranded to "sexualities" and a part of the "spectrum of sexualities". Why aren't necrophiles called "necrosexuals" instead? Redditors will usually come up with weak excuses "it's different" etc. Their go-to is "sexuality is attraction to a gender, not age, species or another factor". This just shows how weak the whole idea of muh "sexual orientation" is. It's a made up social construct. Some pedophiles have actually tried to rebrand pedophilia as "pedosexuality" just like the homos did with homophilia, but without much success.
Now coming back to the beginning where we discussed what is natural and what isn't. Some things that in fact are natural are falsely conflated with paraphilias. Like i said in the beginning, everything that encourages reproduction is natural therefore not a paraphilia.
An obvious example of this is the attraction to females who have entered puberty regardless of age. Yet, in modern times, one will falsely be labelled in regular circles a pedophile (child"lover" or pedo (child) if the fertile woman is below the man-made age of 18. If a woman who is let's say 13 years of age is capable of pregnancy and has sexual characteristics, then the attraction to her hody is valid and has a natural basis.
In some academic circles terms such as "hebephila" and "ephebeophilia" are thrown around. These are not actually classified as real mental disorders for obvious reasons. Still i would put under doubt the existence of those terms themselves especially ephebophilia which is absolutely ludicrous. It supposedly means primary or exclusive attraction to females aged 15-18. Which is absolutely nonsensical to label as a paraphilia since most men are primarily attracted to those ages. Are all men "ephebophiles" then? No it is simply that it isn't a paraphilia. It's natural male sexuality.
When it comes to hebephilia, which is primary or exclusive attraction to 12-14 year olds, i would say that it is equally fallacious for the most part, since these females are already in puberty. Most importantly the theory of chronophilias when it comes to fertile women is pretty dumb, since attraction to them is logical. Only chronophilic paraphilias that logically exist are pedophilia and gerontophilia since most people don't have symptoms of them and indulging can't result in pregnancy. Men can’t tell someone's age from looking at them, age is practically a social construct. What can be understood from merely looking at a female, is whether they are in puberty or not. This is the only distinction that is nescessary in nature.
The preference for certain pubescent or post-pubescent stages could be more accurately called exactly that — "preferences". Just like you may find blonde women more attractive than brunette women and i find the opposite more attractive. It isn't unnatural nor does it halt the probability of reproduction since i still would be capable of indulging in acts with blonde females even if i find them less attractive. Same way, most people who prefer 15-19 year olds, would still sleep with a 26 year old.
Saying that "attraction to a 14 year old woman is unnatural" is the same as saying "reproduction is unnatural". In fact it's the same thing. The age of consent agenda exists solely to decrease reproduction among western populations.
The terms "hebephilia" and "ephebeophilia" could be instead used to exclusively classify homophilic offenders instead. Considering where the term "ephebo" comes from, it would make more sense to use it only for homophiliacs.
Ephebophilia - Wikipedia
@Rapistcel @Urlaubsinsel @Reddit=Bandwagonism @EcstasyCel
