JFL @ this "dog lover" roastie.
lulz.com
In the article, she talks about Kinsey report:
First of all she did not cite any reference on how/when it was debunked. According to Kinsey et. al. at least 3.6% of woman rode dock dicks in the 1950s. So it's not a complete lie right?
She also calls a brave woman like "Whitney dog-fucker Wisconsin" a "whore":
At the end of the article, she says:
Btw, that sub was used to be run by me and @tehgymcel420, and we did not allow any misogynistic or violent content. No bestiality porn. We only allowed screenshots from valid news articles and social media posts. The rules were strict.
Okay now let's say, dogpill is some stupid joke or some trolling (according to the roastie). Now assume some troll on the internet says "chudur-budur eats a table spoon of fresh shit every morning". Now what I'm gonna think? Obviously it's a joke, I won't be typing this if I was eating shit every morning, I would be in the hospital. For obvious reason, there is no reason to get triggered by it, since it's a "joke".
But if you have noticed, all these "dog lover" rosties get extremely triggered whenever some troll on the internet utters the word "dogpill". Why they get so much triggered by it? Why so defensive? If it's a joke, as the point of the entire article is to prove it's a joke, then what's the problem? It's a fucking joke!!
or not?
What is 'the dogpill'? Inside Reddit's belief that white women have sex with dogs
With a female whistleblower on their side, an army of sex starved Redditors is seeking to expose a horrific plot against their chances with women.
lulz.com
In the article, she talks about Kinsey report:
First of all she did not cite any reference on how/when it was debunked. According to Kinsey et. al. at least 3.6% of woman rode dock dicks in the 1950s. So it's not a complete lie right?
She also calls a brave woman like "Whitney dog-fucker Wisconsin" a "whore":
At the end of the article, she says:
Btw, that sub was used to be run by me and @tehgymcel420, and we did not allow any misogynistic or violent content. No bestiality porn. We only allowed screenshots from valid news articles and social media posts. The rules were strict.
Okay now let's say, dogpill is some stupid joke or some trolling (according to the roastie). Now assume some troll on the internet says "chudur-budur eats a table spoon of fresh shit every morning". Now what I'm gonna think? Obviously it's a joke, I won't be typing this if I was eating shit every morning, I would be in the hospital. For obvious reason, there is no reason to get triggered by it, since it's a "joke".
But if you have noticed, all these "dog lover" rosties get extremely triggered whenever some troll on the internet utters the word "dogpill". Why they get so much triggered by it? Why so defensive? If it's a joke, as the point of the entire article is to prove it's a joke, then what's the problem? It's a fucking joke!!
or not?
