Saw a guy try to explain evolutionary psych to incel tears.

[Dopecel]

He told them certain behaviours have evolved over millions of years.

He explained that evolutionary psychology could propose an argument that promiscuous females are less valuable to their partners than promisicous males.

This is because a promiscuous female is genetically worthless to her partner, because she creates a huge risk of him raising someone else’s child. This would remove him from the gene pool if he put all his focus into this child. In an evolutionary sense this is the same as death. Hence there is evolutionary pressure against men who choose promiscuous mates. It is clear and logical.

It doesn’t really matter evolutionarily to a woman if a man is promiscuous. There is no risk of her having a baby that isn’t hers.

Thus from an evolutionary sense a promiscuous women is less valuable to her partner than a promiscuous man.

This has provoked incredible vitriol of cucks questioning his qualifications, but no logical responses.

 

[FlyFace]

This has provoked incredible vitriol of cucks questioning his qualifications, but no logical responses.

InsultTears. Because that's the only weapon they have.. insults.

 

[Deleted member 1042]

The males over there gets mad at this because it devalues their life choices (going after used up over the hill roasties).

 

[qwepmi]

Inceltears said the pigwoman experiment isnt proof that women have it easier in dating.
Dont take anything they say seriously

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

He told them certain behaviours have evolved over millions of years.

He explained that evolutionary psychology could propose an argument that promiscuous females are less valuable to their partners than promisicous males.

This is because a promiscuous female is genetically worthless to her partner, because she creates a huge risk of him raising someone else’s child. This would remove him from the gene pool if he put all his focus into this child. In an evolutionary sense this is the same as death. Hence there is evolutionary pressure against men who choose promiscuous mates. It is clear and logical.

It doesn’t really matter evolutionarily to a woman if a man is promiscuous. There is no risk of her having a baby that isn’t hers.

Thus from an evolutionary sense a promiscuous women is less valuable to her partner than a promiscuous man.

This has provoked incredible vitriol of cucks questioning his qualifications, but no logical responses.

Cucktears literally. They have to cope hard

 

[Solitarian_Walker]

Their kind try to deny nature all the time.

 

[Uglyman]

> Tries to explain science to IT

rip mate