If he had included being black as well, I'm pretty sure the answers would be the opposite.
Absolutely undoubtedly. There's a single line white leftoids would never cross outside of maybe a few freak occurences, and that is denying that blacks have it hard.
Liberals: "OMG, can authors stop stereotyping people based on their identity, women and minorities aren't defined by what they they, they are just people who happen to be born with certain traits, don't write
female or
minority characters, write characters who
happen to be women or minorities


."
Meanwhile, foids and minorities the moment they get access to Microsoft Word:
It's because leftists see Asians as "Whites 2: Oriental Boogaloo". They would NEVER say this if it happened to another race. True to horseshoe theory, many far-right people see Asians as Honorary Whites.
For all their faults and cringe, Aznidentity and other communities like that are an undeniable proof that it's social discrimination, and nothing else, that matters. Asians have money, good reputation, and even can cope with being a majority in non-Western great powers and a superpower, all unlike other nonwhites, but none of that matters because they don't have bitches


.
Jeets should be excluded from Asian category. Asian should include only East, Southeast and Central Asian people
AFAIK, for Americans "Asian" only means those, while for Brits it means mainly South Asians. It would be a brutal blow to whatever remains of Britbongs' cultural relevance if everyone just agreed that South Asians aren't even really Asians at all.