Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Retarded ITfag compares inceldom to survivorship bias.

Misogynist Vegeta

Misogynist Vegeta

The Prince of all Incels
★★★★
Joined
Feb 16, 2024
Posts
4,939

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/IncelTears/comments/1lzdpfg/incels_when_they_complain_they_cant_get_a_girl/


So Survivorship Bias is a logical error where one only looks at the survivors of something while completely ignoring the non-survivors, This image is used as an example, supposedly some military in WW1 decided to start keeping track of where a plane was damaged so that they could make improvements to it, some people thought it would be good idea to put more armor where more of the damage was reported but somebody pointed out that all the planes that came back that were damaged didn't have damage in certain spots so one could assume that planes that did damaged in those spots didn't survive and thus it would be better to put more armor on the spots that weren't damaged.

Now what this has to do with inceldom is a complete mystery to me, If you were to apply this logic to dating wouldn't WE be the ones not to survive? It'd be one thing if the logic was retarded but I can't even tell what this retard is trying to imply here.
 
Now what this has to do with inceldom is a complete mystery to me
I am also confused. I am staring at this post trying to make sense of it but I don't know what the fuck they are trying to say :feelsugh:

breaking-bad-funny.gif
 
Survivorship bias better describes all the bluepilled examples of ugly men ascending jfl
Inceldom focuses on the people that didn't pass the selection process when we look at everyone who couldn't succeed in relationships while survivorship bias does the exact opposite of what the blackpill does by fixating on the few examples that do pass the selection process as if the exceptions disprove the norm, which is what cucktears tries to do every time they try and fail to debunk the blackpill's huge body of statistically significant evidence with some measly anecdotal example that mean nothing in the grand scheme of things.
These morons have no clue what they're talking about as always. Unless these retards believe there's millions of deformed ugly autistic men that women find attractive that every single peer reviewed study and survey is ignoring on purpose, IT is making zero sense here and they fail to raise a single coherent point or counterargument.
 
Last edited:
I guess their point is that we're also focusing on the wrong things to fix.

But, doesn't this comparison mean we then have nothing to fix? So, what's the problem?

That place is retarded.
 
Normies usually resort to survival ship biases
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
7
Views
415
Hoor Al-Ayn
Hoor Al-Ayn
Hoor Al-Ayn
Replies
49
Views
3K
Cnidoblastos
Cnidoblastos
Zaraj11
Replies
13
Views
546
TooSomething
TooSomething

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top