As the bourgeois is the holder of the means of production, the female is the holder of the means of reproduction.
Yet when the petty bourgeois lacks success in his endeavors, or fails to engage in any, he is severely punished.
While his counterpart, the Becky, remains untouched.
The bourgeois is in part responsible for the well-being of society in the free market system.
The female bears even greater authority over humanities present and future.
Yet not only are the penalties for failure and inaction not equivalent, one side faces none at all regardless of whichever path it proceeds on.
If the petty bourgeois produces low quality product, he is punished by society by having his material wealth depleted followed up by likely ostracization from his social circle.
If the Becky produces low quality specimen, she has an infinite number of chances to produce more, without any need of a guarantee of future success. (If the specimen she produced is so low quality that it can't function on its own, she receives material support from society as well as encouragement from well-wishers)
If the petty bourgeois fails to utilize the means of production, he ends up in material destitute.
If the Becky fails to utilize the means of reproduction, she is rewarded with better choices in the sexual marketplace as well as a chance to be materially taken care of perpetually.
If the petty bourgeois fails to produce a satisfactory amount of product, he loses significant ground in the marketplace.
If the Becky fails to produce a satisfactory amount of specimen, she is rewarded with a greater position in the sexual marketplace.
While behaviour of the petty bourgeoisie contrary to societal well-being is, at least in theory, punished, antisocial Becky behaviour is rewarded.
Grande bourgeoisie and the Stacies are not named for they can evade punishment in whichever system do to the power they possess regardless of it.
Yet when the petty bourgeois lacks success in his endeavors, or fails to engage in any, he is severely punished.
While his counterpart, the Becky, remains untouched.
The bourgeois is in part responsible for the well-being of society in the free market system.
The female bears even greater authority over humanities present and future.
Yet not only are the penalties for failure and inaction not equivalent, one side faces none at all regardless of whichever path it proceeds on.
If the petty bourgeois produces low quality product, he is punished by society by having his material wealth depleted followed up by likely ostracization from his social circle.
If the Becky produces low quality specimen, she has an infinite number of chances to produce more, without any need of a guarantee of future success. (If the specimen she produced is so low quality that it can't function on its own, she receives material support from society as well as encouragement from well-wishers)
If the petty bourgeois fails to utilize the means of production, he ends up in material destitute.
If the Becky fails to utilize the means of reproduction, she is rewarded with better choices in the sexual marketplace as well as a chance to be materially taken care of perpetually.
If the petty bourgeois fails to produce a satisfactory amount of product, he loses significant ground in the marketplace.
If the Becky fails to produce a satisfactory amount of specimen, she is rewarded with a greater position in the sexual marketplace.
While behaviour of the petty bourgeoisie contrary to societal well-being is, at least in theory, punished, antisocial Becky behaviour is rewarded.
Grande bourgeoisie and the Stacies are not named for they can evade punishment in whichever system do to the power they possess regardless of it.
Last edited:
