Deep.Nest
El Violador
★
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2021
- Posts
- 4,582
So most women have these things called eyes, right. What if we removed them? What if we surgically got rid of them or stabbed them out by force. Stabbing out women's eyes is like closing off the windows to their souls........ kidding of course cause women don't have souls.
Now hear me out, I think this would effectively reduce inceldom quite a bit. If women can't see anything cause their eyes were removed at birth, a lot of them won't necessarily care if they are dating chad or not. Theoretically, the attractiveness of their mate's face wouldn't matter to them as they will never be able to see them in the first place. Tbh I'm just kinda brainstorming here and I don't know whether I would actually support a policy like this but it's necessary to flesh out your theories. Also it'd be funny to watch some ditzy blonde slut stumble around and accidentally walk off a cliff cause she can't see.
I don't want women to see black, I don't want women to see at all. When a camera isn't filming, does it film black? Of course not, it simply doesn't film at all. Same idea for women's vision. They don't deserve eye privileges. Think about it, do women even NEED eyes? Last time I checked their pussies feel the same regardless of whether or not they can see. The only valuable part of a woman would still be intact is what I'm saying. They can keep their tongues and their olfactory bulbs intact, but their eyes, their eyes will be taken out and then burned.
Imagine some feminist leader with no eyes giving an emotionally charged speech about how subjugated women are and how they need to unite and rise up, but then the camera zooms out and she's just talking to a fucking wall
Now hear me out, I think this would effectively reduce inceldom quite a bit. If women can't see anything cause their eyes were removed at birth, a lot of them won't necessarily care if they are dating chad or not. Theoretically, the attractiveness of their mate's face wouldn't matter to them as they will never be able to see them in the first place. Tbh I'm just kinda brainstorming here and I don't know whether I would actually support a policy like this but it's necessary to flesh out your theories. Also it'd be funny to watch some ditzy blonde slut stumble around and accidentally walk off a cliff cause she can't see.
I don't want women to see black, I don't want women to see at all. When a camera isn't filming, does it film black? Of course not, it simply doesn't film at all. Same idea for women's vision. They don't deserve eye privileges. Think about it, do women even NEED eyes? Last time I checked their pussies feel the same regardless of whether or not they can see. The only valuable part of a woman would still be intact is what I'm saying. They can keep their tongues and their olfactory bulbs intact, but their eyes, their eyes will be taken out and then burned.
Imagine some feminist leader with no eyes giving an emotionally charged speech about how subjugated women are and how they need to unite and rise up, but then the camera zooms out and she's just talking to a fucking wall
Last edited: