I always maintain men are never gonna rise up, but when I see these banworthy twitter posts, even by foids' standards, I really wonder if men are truly gonna snap one day at foids. That being said, I think for that to happen, ricecels gotta grow balls and stop this wmaf shit. So that JBWs get frustrated enough.
The Gecko himself dropping pure facts as alwayswdym want?
nigga this is already reality! this is exactly what traditionalism is!
women control 80% of the spending, women as a group don't pay taxes etc
Men dont spend anything on themselves, all the labor goes to women.
remember this website:
Marriage as economic slavery – GreenPill.net
greenpill.net
.Children not having to work = Absolute universally admitted good, zero % political opposition to potentially jailing people who force children to work, everyone now thinks back to childhood as the time when they had no responsibilities and only fun (and bullying, but let's not remind normies of our existence)
We are already living the "feminist" dream. There is no such thing as a "feminist" foid - its just normal foids pushing their in-group bias to its natural conclusion. It's like white people getting angry about illegal immigrants - in-group vs out-group fights.
The idea that women were naturally perfect, docile etc before the "ebil feminism" corrupted their minds, like women are the fucking elves in the lord of the rings or something, is hilarious.
Anyone who studies propaganda knows that one of the first things always mentioned is that propaganda can not create new instincts.
It can only harness what is already in people. Primordial desires, fears, urges. But it can not create anything new. You can throw oil on the fire of an instinct, you an also throw water on it.
You first have to create emotional momentum by riling people up, then you channel that momentum into what you want. The whole "feminism" thing and why every woman supports is because they already have innate resentment towards all men, simply by virtue of being women, being neotenous and being in an in-group distinct from men.
How did this bitch become a "feminist" in the middle ages for example?
Christine de Pizan - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Whenever I think about this stuff now, I'm not even exasperated with the guys who claim that in "the good old days" you totally just could marry a 12-year-old virgin and she'd be a loyal wife forever and if not you could discipline her however you wanted because she was your property, or with the feminists claiming the same but from the reverse POV anymore. More genuinely terrified by how much history is at risk of being forgotten and rewritten because so many people prefer BDSM fantasies that suit their sexual tastes to what the past was actually like.Remember, at this time women were anything but disempowered:
The French Impotence Courts - Brazel Moore Lawyers
Brazel Moore Lawyers are an experienced friendly team of lawyers in Gosford, servicing the legal needs of the Central Coast community since 1981. We live herebrazelmoorelawyers.com.au
Women In The 16th Century Could Sue Their Husbands For Erectile Dysfunction
Sex, marriage, and impotence are generally private matters not usually brought up in public discourse. In the 14th century, however, erectile dysfunction was under increased scrutiny in Europe. In pre-revolutionary France, a woman could bring her husband to public trial for an annulment on the...www.ranker.com
from "the priviliged sex" (epub below)
467.2 KB file on MEGA
mega.nz
Also this. In every single society, men are more acceptable targets of violence than wonen, yet nobody who believes that it was acceptable to beat women in the past ever makes the smallest logical jump possible and start thinking of just how acceptable violence against men, especially low-status ones, would be in such a societyAnother example is old school rules for teachers beating students. Most books specifically say that it is permissible to beat boy students with sticks and what not, but not girls.
School corporal punishment - Wikipedia
..Hope that info is still somewhere around.
.
No, lmao...your pov is that of foids.
absolutely fucking based video
"If we lived in a proper civilized society it would look like this
"Men would live together in military style barracks on the outskirts of town. They would be shuttled into work everyday to fulfill their daily labor requirement and then immediately sent back to the barracks where they are free to pursue all the bussy and video games they want until their hearts content.
"They would be taxed at a 90% rate but their housing, food, AI generated porn, and video games would be provided for them. The 10% they keep would be their disposable income to spend on fantasy football leagues, weed, and AI onlyfans models that are all run by the state. All men would be free to submit their sperm samples to the state sperm bank.
"Women would live in town in whatever set up they’re comfortable with as women are unique and desire different living arrangements. Most of men’s tax dollars would go to women and their children, with each additional child a woman receives more benefits to support that child. Childless women would be taxed but only a 10% rate.
"Women can visit the state sperm bank to pick out any father of their choosing for their child whenever they want. The state would also provide free IVF services and genetic testing. Healthcare would be free in fact with women being provided the states most luxury package that included wellness services such as massage and sauna.
"Men would receive a more basic package but generally wouldn’t have to pay for routine healthcare. They can get premium services approved if they needed a particular procedure to remain a productive tax pig. A highly discerning team of woman will sign off on any additional state service requests from men. These will be blind applications to ensure no bias in favor of chad. In this healthy society we care about how much tax money a man can provide and nothing else.
"The birth rate will boom and no woman will be oppressed by a man. All it takes is the right incentives in place for women and men being pseudo imprisoned as a class. We would colonize the galaxy within a generation."
View: https://x.com/hollowearthterf/status/1810353472484815026#m
@DarkStar @based_meme @GeckoBus @OutcompetedByRoomba @SlayerSlayer @FucktheFBI @LeFrenchCel @weaselbomber @Lv99_BixNood @EpedaBIGDICKENERGY @starcrapoo @Subhuman Niceguy @Defetivecuckachu @mcmoohyun @Made in Heaven @Uggo Mongo @decafincel @Samurai @Darth_Aurelius @SoycuckGodOfReddit @Friezacel @SocialzERo @prajeet88 @comradespiderman29 @reveries @SupremeSaint @NorthernWind @Incline
So what's your utopia then? Foids are everywhere spewing blackpills?
wdym want?
nigga this is already reality! this is exactly what traditionalism is!
women control 80% of the spending, women as a group don't pay taxes etc
Men dont spend anything on themselves, all the labor goes to women.
remember this website:
Marriage as economic slavery – GreenPill.net
And I quote:
Now here comes the kicker, the weight of labor is shifted to men, who now compensate for foids DELIBERATELY dropping out of the workforce, under the guise of "muh home maker" and "muh gender roles and virtuous living."
We are already living the "feminist" dream. There is no such thing as a "feminist" foid - its just normal foids pushing their in-group bias to its natural conclusion. It's like white people getting angry about illegal immigrants - in-group vs out-group fights.
The idea that women were naturally perfect, docile etc before the "ebil feminism" corrupted their minds, like women are the fucking elves in the lord of the rings or something, is hilarious.
Anyone who studies propaganda knows that one of the first things always mentioned is that propaganda can not create new instincts.
It can only harness what is already in people. Primordial desires, fears, urges. But it can not create anything new. You can throw oil on the fire of an instinct, you an also throw water on it.
You first have to create emotional momentum by riling people up, then you channel that momentum into what you want. The whole "feminism" thing and why every woman supports is because they already have innate resentment towards all men, simply by virtue of being women, being neotenous and being in an in-group distinct from men.
How did this bitch become a "feminist" in the middle ages for example?
Christine de Pizan - Wikipedia
Related to what you wrote in OP, this bitch literally wrote A WHOLE FUCKING BOOK, on how women are a superior species and how an utopian female society would look like. EXACTLY LIKE THE WOMAN YOU QUOTED:
The Book of the City of Ladies - Wikipedia
"cItY OF LADIes"
Remember, at this time women were anything but disempowered:
The French Impotence Courts - Brazel Moore Lawyers
Brazel Moore Lawyers are an experienced friendly team of lawyers in Gosford, servicing the legal needs of the Central Coast community since 1981. We live hereWomen In The 16th Century Could Sue Their Husbands For Erectile Dysfunction
Sex, marriage, and impotence are generally private matters not usually brought up in public discourse. In the 14th century, however, erectile dysfunction was under increased scrutiny in Europe. In pre-revolutionary France, a woman could bring her husband to public trial for an annulment on the...
from "the priviliged sex" (epub below)
467.2 KB file on MEGA
Another example is old school rules for teachers beating students. Most books specifically say that it is permissible to beat boy students with sticks and what not, but not girls.
School corporal punishment - Wikipedia
long time ago i saw a video on a mgtow channel (since deleted), who went through multiple lawcodes on student beating in germany from the past, and all of them made exceptions for girls.
So yeah, when women say shit like you quoted, they are just describing reality. Like what, you srs thought women could come up with anything new?
The Share of Patents Filed by Women is Growing -- Here's Why It Matters
You may not know that before I started Operator Collective, I spent years pushing for increased innovation and inclusion in the world of patents. So I was particularly excited to see a recent report which showed that women’s participation in scientific patents has increased in the last couple of decwww.linkedin.com
Even with the internet, which enables you to basically learn anything you want for free, they don't invent ANYTHING. It's like with politics and high-paying high-risk jobs, women simply do not choose do engage in these activities. So why would the women you quote come up with some new revolutionary idea about society? We know women are way more similar to each other than men, IQ wise, in-group bias wise, looks wise, fashion wise etc.
She's just echoing what has been female sentiment for 1000s of years, and globally societies are living demonstrations of this mindset: matriarchy, matriarchy, matriarchy everywhere. Me stay home, me cute and innocent, you evil hyper sexual brute who needs to die at work and war, hush hush now, go out, earn me pearls while me scissor lock my cousin hoi toi toi toi
"our society is build on male exploitation" (timestamp):
View: https://youtu.be/e17rqgK3e5U?t=5120
incels.is
Kinda funny if that's indeed what she's trying to do, since Tate's entire thing is that he mostly says those controversial things for attention and his actual main goal is to get people into TRW. Also, he's a general trditionalist and a contrarian rather than solely being an anti-feminist, so the fact that this chick only sees the anti-feminist stuff Tate says and posts kinda shows her, and the wider media's, biases pretty clearly
.
