wdym want?
nigga this is already reality! this is exactly what traditionalism is!
women control 80% of the spending, women as a group don't pay taxes etc
Men dont spend anything on themselves, all the labor goes to women.
remember this website:
greenpill.net
And I quote:
Between 1787 to 1815 in families with unemployed children (!) wives earned 41 percent of household income. [
28]
In this same period 66% of married women had a recorded occupation. [
29]
In 1833 Britain, women made up 57% –
the majority – of factory workers. [
30] [
31]
Even in labour intensive agricultural work, significant numbers of women worked. [
32]
Now here comes the kicker, the weight of labor is shifted to men, who now compensate for foids DELIBERATELY dropping out of the workforce, under the guise of "muh home maker" and "muh gender roles and virtuous living."
The share of household income generated by women started to decline rapidly from around 1830 onwards. Notably this involved “increased leisure for women and children” with the percent of income generated by men increasing from 55% in 1831-1855 up to 81% in 1860-1865. [
34] [
35]
By 1890, women’s work in Europe and the United States contributed just 1.9 percent to 3 percent of household income. [
36]
This was entirely because of married women being supported by their husbands. By 1887, 3/4 of female workers in American cities were under 25 years old. 96% of them were
single. [37]
By 1911 only 25% of British women worked. [
40]
In 1920 in the US, women were only 21% of employed adults. [
41]
We are already living the "feminist" dream. There is no such thing as a "feminist" foid - its just normal foids pushing their in-group bias to its natural conclusion. It's like white people getting angry about illegal immigrants - in-group vs out-group fights.
The idea that women were naturally perfect, docile etc before the "ebil feminism" corrupted their minds, like women are the fucking elves in the lord of the rings or something, is hilarious.
Anyone who studies propaganda knows that one of the first things always mentioned is that propaganda can not create new instincts.
It can only harness what is already in people. Primordial desires, fears, urges. But it can not create anything new. You can throw oil on the fire of an instinct, you an also throw water on it.
You first have to create emotional momentum by riling people up, then you channel that momentum into what you want. The whole "feminism" thing and why every woman supports is because they already have innate resentment towards all men, simply by virtue of being women, being neotenous and being in an in-group distinct from men.
How did this bitch become a "feminist" in the middle ages for example?
en.wikipedia.org
Related to what you wrote in OP, this bitch literally wrote A WHOLE FUCKING BOOK, on how women are a superior species and how an utopian female society would look like. EXACTLY LIKE THE WOMAN YOU QUOTED:
Part I opens with Christine reading from
Matheolus's Lamentations, a work from the thirteenth century that addresses marriage and argues that women make men's lives miserable.
[6] Upon reading these words, Christine becomes upset and feels ashamed to be a woman: "This thought inspired such a great sense of disgust and sadness in me that I began to despise myself and the whole of my sex as an aberration in nature".
[7] The
three Virtues then appear to Christine, and each lady tells Christine what her role will be in helping her build the City of Ladies.
en.wikipedia.org
"cItY OF LADIes"
Remember, at this time women were anything but disempowered:
Brazel Moore Lawyers are an experienced friendly team of lawyers in Gosford, servicing the legal needs of the Central Coast community since 1981. We live here
brazelmoorelawyers.com.au
Sex, marriage, and impotence are generally private matters not usually brought up in public discourse. In the 14th century, however, erectile dysfunction was under increased scrutiny in Europe. In pre-revolutionary France, a woman could bring her husband to public trial for an annulment on the...
www.ranker.com
Similarly, during the late middle and early Modern Ages, wife-beaters were frowned upon by the community.
[680] Conversely, men whose wives beat them might be humiliated in a festival known as charivari.
[681] In medieval England, proportionally more than three times as many men as women 50 percent, compared to 15 percent convicted for killing people of the other sex were executed.
[682]
A famous 18th-century English law ordained that a husband beating his wife should use a rod or switch no thicker than the base of his right thumb. This law is often quoted as an example of what some wicked men permitted other wicked men to do to their wives. Yet its purpose was just the opposite namely, to impose a limit on those things.
The proof of this particular pudding is in the eating. In rural England, a husband convicted of beating his wife and breaking the peace was fined. If, on the other hand, it was the wife who was found guilty, he would also be fined, this time for having failed to restrain her.
[683]
from "the priviliged sex" (epub below)
mega.nz
Another example is old school rules for teachers beating students. Most books specifically say that it is permissible to beat boy students with sticks and what not, but not girls.
Much of the traditional culture that surrounds corporal punishment in school, at any rate in the
English-speaking world, derives largely from British practice in the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly as regards the caning of
teenage boys.[4]
en.wikipedia.org
Many schools in
Singapore and
Malaysia use caning
for boys as a routine official punishment for misconduct, as also some African countries. In some Middle Eastern countries whipping is used. (See list of countries, below.)
long time ago i saw a video on a mgtow channel (since deleted), who went through multiple lawcodes on student beating in germany from the past, and all of them made exceptions for girls.
So yeah, when women say shit like you quoted, they are just describing reality. Like what, you srs thought women could come up with anything new?
The data showed that patents filed by at least one female inventor stood at 7.2% in 2000 and grew to 10.9% by 2022. And when it came to electrical engineering patents specifically, which showed the biggest increase by sector, those numbers came in at 5.4% in 2000 and 10% in 2022
You may not know that before I started Operator Collective, I spent years pushing for increased innovation and inclusion in the world of patents. So I was particularly excited to see a recent report which showed that women’s participation in scientific patents has increased in the last couple of dec
www.linkedin.com
Even with the internet, which enables you to basically learn anything you want for free, they don't invent ANYTHING. It's like with politics and high-paying high-risk jobs, women simply do not choose do engage in these activities. So why would the women you quote come up with some new revolutionary idea about society? We know women are way more similar to each other than men, IQ wise, in-group bias wise, looks wise, fashion wise etc.
She's just echoing what has been female sentiment for 1000s of years, and globally societies are living demonstrations of this mindset: matriarchy, matriarchy, matriarchy everywhere. Me stay home, me cute and innocent, you evil hyper sexual brute who needs to die at work and war, hush hush now, go out, earn me pearls while me scissor lock my cousin hoi toi toi toi
"our society is build on male exploitation" (timestamp):
View: https://youtu.be/e17rqgK3e5U?t=5120
