Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Rejoice Incels, we were simply born at the worst time

S

strange_to_be

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Dec 11, 2017
Posts
320
I created an account on Seeking Arrangement out of curiosity. There are 786 women within 10 miles of me. The estimated total population in the area is 356,000. That's 178,000 women. About 1/2 of adults are married, so 89,000, and probably roughly half is 18-50, so 44,500.

So around 2% of non-married adult us women of childbearing age are on Seeking Arrangement. I know my narrowing isn't perfect (some women are probably married for instance), some are probably duplicates, and I have no idea what percentage of the profiles are fakes (though looking at them 1 by 1, the majority of them look legit. Even looking at the 18-23 year old blonde white college grads, a demographic likely to be full of fakes, I find they mostly look legit).

Why is this good news?

Our Judeo Christian Society was built on nuclear marriage. One man would end up with One Woman. Great. He'd financially support her and her offspring, and she'd let him fuck her. It was a great evil for the woman to break this arrangement by sleeping with other men.

By and large this worked.

But Christianity is dying, and women now work themselves. Marriage is on the way out, so the question is, what is going to replace it? And the answer is that nothing has really changed, we just don't dress it up as much now. Eventually, it will be societally acceptable, even accepted that a man simply pay a woman a certain amount per month per sex. This is going to be the norm.

There are two reasons this is great news for Incels

1. Our current state is actually the final death throes of Judeo Christian coupling. There was a lie that went along with this sort of coupling. It was called LOVE. Men and women both believed in it. Men feel love in the form of oneitis. Women feel love in the form of Chad. When a man believes in love, he believes in his oneitis one day loving him. When a woman believes in love, she believes in Chad one day loving her. The system we had before facilitated the belief of both parties that the other one was fulfilling this role at least to some degree. That is dead now. But the ideal of LOVE is not. Both men and women were raised to believe in this by Hollywood and the people around them. They STILL believe this. But it's going to die, and we're going to be more honest. Women fuck men for resources. I actually think that Chad will get less women in the future, and he's peaking now, because once women no longer believe in love, and see sex as the exchange that it is, and weigh the difference between fucking Chad or making $$$, they'll choose the $$$ most times. Chad will still get sex for free, but he'll get less.

2. The price of pussy is determined by the supply of pussy. The number of women seeking money directly in exchange for pussy is going to increase exponentially. This will drop the price of pussy. If you know anything about hooker rates, you know that they cost less in Germany and Canada where they're legal. Essentially the entire middle and lower class is going to be selling their pussy on a monthly/yearly basis. It'll be the same as a car or rent payment. The upper classes will probably still get married, but it'll be more readily understood for the financial arrangement it is. For incels, though, we'll actually be able to have sex occasionally depending on how much money we have. We'll also be able to have some variety.

tl;dr: We're headed towards a Sugar Baby/Sugar Daddy norm. Currently around 2% of available child rearing aged women are already participating. This rate is likely to accelerate overtime. We'll see the imbalances reduce from their current levels, as in, Chad will get free pussy, but he won't be able to fuck 100 girls off tinder a year because those girls will no longer see him as a source of potential love, and would rather make money. Incels will have women available to them completely on teh basis of resources, this amount will not be extremely high, and will be determined by market considerations. ie, once the vast majority of women are on exchanging pussy for money, and the vast majority of men are participating, the price of that pussy is only going to depend on what other men can spend on it. Wealthy men will marry the highest quality women, and have 1 or 2 concubines, but not more than that, in most cases, because they'll have children and work and some relationship with their main bitch. Essentially it'll be the same as a car payment. After food and housing and clothes etc etc men will spend what's left on pussy, but this is only going to be, by definition, what is affordable for the median. Men will actually spend less on other items like cars and clothing and housing so they can increase their pussy budget. In 2018 dollars it'll probably be something like 1000 a month on average level pussy.
 
stopped reading at "Judeo-Christian"
 
tl;dr: We're headed towards a Sugar Baby/Sugar Daddy norm. Currently around 2% of available child rearing aged women are already participating. This rate is likely to accelerate overtime. We'll see the imbalances reduce from their current levels, as in, Chad will get free pussy, but he won't be able to fuck 100 girls off tinder a year because those girls will no longer see him as a source of potential love, and would rather make money. Incels will have women available to them completely on teh basis of resources, this amount will not be extremely high, and will be determined by market considerations. ie, once the vast majority of women are on exchanging pussy for money, and the vast majority of men are participating, the price of that pussy is only going to depend on what other men can spend on it. Wealthy men will marry the highest quality women, and have 1 or 2 concubines, but not more than that, in most cases, because they'll have children and work and some relationship with their main bitch. Essentially it'll be the same as a car payment. After food and housing and clothes etc etc men will spend what's left on pussy, but this is only going to be, by definition, what is affordable for the median. Men will actually spend less on other items like cars and clothing and housing so they can increase their pussy budget. In 2018 dollars it'll probably be something like 1000 a month on average level pussy.
If your tl;dr is too long, ITS OVER
 
stopped reading at "Judeo-Christian"

Monogamy is an outgrowth of Christianity. All other societies were either matrilineal or polygamous until Christianity touched them.
If your tl;dr is too long, ITS OVER

tl;dr: Monogamy is going to die completely (except for the wealthy) and what will replace it is the Sugar Daddy/Sugar Baby relationship. All of society will become willing participants. Incels will only need to pay for sex, and sex will become much more resource based than looks based.
 
Last edited:
>not being an atheist
Low IQ detected
 
i can't even write a paragraph. how the fuck you guys pumping out essays all the time?
 
Honestly, foids will be replaced soon enough by sex bots. Their pussies will be worth pennies on the dollar. Who will seriously take a loud mouth deceptive cunt over a TPE goddess who can cook, clean, and take it up the ass every night? Any solution that doesn't involve replacing women with bots is cope.
 
Honestly, foids will be replaced soon enough by sex bots. Their pussies will be worth pennies on the dollar. Who will seriously take a loud mouth deceptive cunt over a TPE goddess who can cook, clean, and take it up the ass every night? Any solution that doesn't involve replacing women with bots is cope.

Maybe, but we're at least 50 years from that point. However, virtual reality sex is more likely to be developped over the next 10
 
Maybe, but we're at least 50 years from that point. However, virtual reality sex is more likely to be developped over the next 10

How so? They already have robots that can move and do back flips. We're probably 10 to 20 years tops from robots that can do the splits, twerk, and make a fucking sandwich. Honestly, that's about all I need. Having someone to talk to is overrated. People put way too much stock in this interaction bs. If that's what you're looking for then yeah, 50 years sounds about right.
 

Similar threads

theblackpillchoseme
Replies
18
Views
573
PrototypeCel
PrototypeCel
tandoorichickencel
Replies
23
Views
622
FaceWithNoEyes
FaceWithNoEyes
littlemanhikicel
Replies
5
Views
293
littlemanhikicel
littlemanhikicel
Nordicel94
Replies
28
Views
856
FishmanBecker
FishmanBecker
Flick
Replies
23
Views
811
reveries
reveries

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top