There are some ideas we push that aren't exactly accurate. I propose a review and alteration of our message to further reflect reality more truthfully and accurate. Such an undertaking could allow our message to be spread further and be accepted by more people as it would better reflect an objective view of human relationships and mating strategies.
Allow me to provide an example:
I don't believe the sub8 designation as an insurmountable obstacle to be accurate.
What of the 7s? I'm sure that most can agree that they would do just fine in the dating world
and have an easier time scoring their looksmatch. IMO it gets harder and near impossible
to be successful as a sub5ft, 1-4 being the group most likely to experience inceldom.
There are many other ideas we can redefine and reexamine. In order to keep this post succinct,
I will provide additional examples, but not delve into details and the reasoning behind the suggested items for
review :
We have to acknowledge that outliers exist but express that the chances are grimly low.
We have to recognize the authenticity of the personality meme, but stress that it only applies if you meet
their physical standards before it can be deployed.
Emphasize heightism, but acknowledge that many women do go out with shorter guys or their match
but only if they have the looks, once again personality does play a part (keep her interest and make you the most attractive orbiter to be chosen).
Beliefs should be formulated ideally from stats, and any other disputed blue pills must be based on real world experience and observations that most can agree on. But once again, we must try our best to keep things objective,
level headed, and as accurate as possible.
Do you find any of our messages to be inaccurate? What would you like to see further reviewed? What are your general thoughts on this?
Allow me to provide an example:
I don't believe the sub8 designation as an insurmountable obstacle to be accurate.
What of the 7s? I'm sure that most can agree that they would do just fine in the dating world
and have an easier time scoring their looksmatch. IMO it gets harder and near impossible
to be successful as a sub5ft, 1-4 being the group most likely to experience inceldom.
There are many other ideas we can redefine and reexamine. In order to keep this post succinct,
I will provide additional examples, but not delve into details and the reasoning behind the suggested items for
review :
We have to acknowledge that outliers exist but express that the chances are grimly low.
We have to recognize the authenticity of the personality meme, but stress that it only applies if you meet
their physical standards before it can be deployed.
Emphasize heightism, but acknowledge that many women do go out with shorter guys or their match
but only if they have the looks, once again personality does play a part (keep her interest and make you the most attractive orbiter to be chosen).
Beliefs should be formulated ideally from stats, and any other disputed blue pills must be based on real world experience and observations that most can agree on. But once again, we must try our best to keep things objective,
level headed, and as accurate as possible.
Do you find any of our messages to be inaccurate? What would you like to see further reviewed? What are your general thoughts on this?
