Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Reasoning of why I am Undesirable

Sir Silentium

Sir Silentium

Romans 8:18
★★★
Joined
Jan 8, 2025
Posts
3,268
If I am 4/10 facially, and in the bottom 20% of men my age then statistically only the bottom 5% of women would find me relevant. This is assuming I had moderate social skills. If the bottom 10% of men have some kind of speaking disability like I do face to face, then that is only 10% of the original 5% a women could accept me (0.5% overall).

This isn't even counting for ethnicity preferences, in which I would be bottom 20% ish again, not mentioning all of the other factors that could be included.

Why would ANY women settle for a <1% man, when they have so many options? If by a miracle all goes well, there is still a statistical 1/5 chance (80%) that the relationship is not long lasting.

To be accepted anyways in this category you would almost always have to be a soy filled cuck who has money, and who would accept an open relationship.
 
1740480836845
 
[IMG alt="Sir Silentium"]https://data.incels.is/avatars/m/72/72489.jpg?1739707208[/IMG]

Sir Silentium

-​

★★★★
JoinedJan 8, 2025Posts2,819
 
I am 4/10 and autistic so social skill shit as welll

Over
 
If I am 4/10 facially, and in the bottom 20% of men my age then statistically only the bottom 5% of women would find me relevant. This is assuming I had moderate social skills. If the bottom 10% of men have some kind of speaking disability like I do face to face, then that is only 10% of the original 5% a women could accept me (0.5% overall).

This isn't even counting for ethnicity preferences, in which I would be bottom 20% ish again, not mentioning all of the other factors that could be included.

Why would ANY women settle for a <1% man, when they have so many options? If by a miracle all goes well, there is still a statistical 1/5 chance (80%) that the relationship is not long lasting.

To be accepted anyways in this category you would almost always have to be a soy filled cuck who has money, and who would accept an open relationship.
make an SAT question about the likelihood of your getting rejected
 
1/5 corresponds to 20%
 
4/10 is not in bottom 20%, in my town is dead on average
 
no mention of height

tallfag detected

opinion discarded
 
Just go abroad, mate, you'll be valued.

Women in the west are broken.
 
Just go abroad, mate, you'll be valued.

Women in the west are broken.
I have considered Asian countries but I am not in a good financial state to do so for an extended period of time.
 
I have considered Asian countries but I am not in a good financial state to do so for an extended period of time.
I suggest working on changing that. And, in the meantime, you can geomaxx on Tinder.
 
I suggest working on changing that. And, in the meantime, you can geomaxx on Tinder.
Male Sub 5's who attract women on tinder are generally women for the streets, who have no interest in you whatsoever. They will sleep with you once just so they can get close to you and ask you for money or something like that. I'm just trying to find a long term partner who isn't a psycho.
 
Male Sub 5's who attract women on tinder are generally women for the streets, who have no interest in you whatsoever. They will sleep with you once just so they can get close to you and ask you for money or something like that. I'm just trying to find a long term partner who isn't a psycho.
Probably mostly true, but most women are on Tinder, at some point, nowadays. Or maybe you can geomaxx on Instagram instead, that would be better. Or Discord or whatever.
 
Probably mostly true, but most women are on Tinder, at some point, nowadays. Or maybe you can geomaxx on Instagram instead, that would be better. Or Discord or whatever.
Tinder is not meant for ugly men. It hasn't been designed in that fashion that women will settle for less when their inbox is already full. No point in me geomaxxing on Instagram if I can't see them in person, unless if I have some weird long disitance relationship with a japanese girl. Or an left winged discord e kitten freak.
 
Tinder is not meant for ugly men. It hasn't been designed in that fashion that women will settle for less when their inbox is already full. No point in me geomaxxing on Instagram if I can't see them in person, unless if I have some weird long disitance relationship with a japanese girl. Or an left winged discord e kitten freak.
It will give you an idea of what your SMV is in passportmaxxing countries, without having to waste money/time/effort.
 
If I am 4/10 facially, and in the bottom 20% of men my age then statistically only the bottom 5% of women would find me relevant. This is assuming I had moderate social skills. If the bottom 10% of men have some kind of speaking disability like I do face to face, then that is only 10% of the original 5% a women could accept me (0.5% overall).

This isn't even counting for ethnicity preferences, in which I would be bottom 20% ish again, not mentioning all of the other factors that could be included.

Why would ANY women settle for a <1% man, when they have so many options? If by a miracle all goes well, there is still a statistical 1/5 chance (80%) that the relationship is not long lasting.

To be accepted anyways in this category you would almost always have to be a soy filled cuck who has money, and who would accept an open relationship.
It’s over for me
 
Well written and concluded. Even if you maximize your chances of becoming an option to a woman, the woman herself will not stimulate you sexually, because most men desire women they are attracted towards, and there is a nigh-certain chance that a 1/10 woman doesn't met the criteria.

Not to mention, the relationship itself is doomed from the start, because you'll always be dumped when a better, more suitable candidate shows up, which is incredibly common as a bottom-of-the-barrel man. Close to 60-70% of the male population ranks more than 4/10.
That's due to the fact that looks are distributed, statistically, on a bell curve. The overwhelming majority of men rank from somewhere between 4/10 to 6/10. Anything above and below becomes more and more rare, hence the argument that you are an afterthought - because mathematically, you are. We are.

And finally the conclusion that only someone with some other form of influence, or resource to give, has a chance; in this instance it's money, but it could also be status or any other trait a woman wishes to exploit one for.
 
Sorry bud I would attempt to type some motivational shit for you but I know it would be pointless or vastly fleeting at the very minimum.
 
Well written and concluded. Even if you maximize your chances of becoming an option to a woman, the woman herself will not stimulate you sexually, because most men desire women they are attracted towards, and there is a nigh-certain chance that a 1/10 woman doesn't met the criteria.

Not to mention, the relationship itself is doomed from the start, because you'll always be dumped when a better, more suitable candidate shows up, which is incredibly common as a bottom-of-the-barrel man. Close to 60-70% of the male population ranks more than 4/10.
That's due to the fact that looks are distributed, statistically, on a bell curve. The overwhelming majority of men rank from somewhere between 4/10 to 6/10. Anything above and below becomes more and more rare, hence the argument that you are an afterthought - because mathematically, you are. We are.

And finally the conclusion that only someone with some other form of influence, or resource to give, has a chance; in this instance it's money, but it could also be status or any other trait a woman wishes to exploit one for.
Exactly, well written. Bookmarked this response.
 
Sorry bud I would attempt to type some motivational shit for you but I know it would be pointless or vastly fleeting at the very minimum.
It's all good brother, where all in the same boat anyways on this site. I fee sympathy back for you
 

Similar threads

mrvain
Replies
31
Views
1K
intothewild
intothewild
NDManlet173
Replies
14
Views
571
LeFrenchCel
LeFrenchCel
S
Replies
11
Views
420
justuseless
justuseless

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top