"rape" being considered the most abominable crime is actually proof of Foid privilege

[vasletdepees]

Just think about it: we could not get any sex even if we begged and struggled for it, and we're mocked for the pain it causes, yet the WORST THING that could happen to a foid is getting sex without asking for it. The sex game is so tilted in the Foid's favor they can literally get sex while sleeping, and that's the drama of their lives. FML

 

[BasedStalin]

Treating neanderthalensis feminum a.k.a. "women" like if they aren't the not-fully evolved humans they actually are, is a crime to me. They have brains less evolved than monkeys. Monkeys are capable of a much much larger spectrum of true emotions than foids. No animal would prefer an entity that gives em pain instead of love, foids love Ramirez. That's just an example.

Don't be a criminal: rape foids!

 

[LeFrenchCel]

Based greycel

 

[vasletdepees]

Treating neanderthalensis feminum a.k.a. "women" like if they aren't the not-fully evolved humans they actually are, is a crime to me. They have brains less evolved than monkeys. Monkeys are capable of a much much larger spectrum of true emotions than foids. No animal would prefer an entity that gives em pain instead of love, foids love Ramirez. That's just an example.

Don't be a criminal: rape foids!

I read somewehere they're actually more like domesticated animals: apparently, the cave men did the work of God and exterminated all the women (i say women, because at that time they were part of our species, no offense) who required too much to eat or showed too much resistance, only keeping alive the most docile: this explains why there is a height and weight and muscle difference between men and foids, while there is no such things among other animals of a same species.
basically we created foids by domesticating them, the way we crreated dogs and cats. which is why they thrive living inside and being fed: and as pets, i have no hate for foids.
the drama starts when we start treating them as people, even though we domesticated them for our pleasure: and i understand that: i too speak to my cat, i too sometimes think he understands me: but i KNOW rationally that's not the case. But society is so upisde down we have to partake in this fantasy that foids are actual humans, and actually capable of empathy (lol) and undestand us when we speak. this is insane. Insane.

 

[Mecoja]

You're right, people treat it like it's the worst thing that can happen, worse than bloody murders and genocide. Why, because it's against foids, and rapists gets what billions of men work for.

Imo, since women are designed to have penetrative sex, it's equivalent of a smaller fight, jfl people act like foids life is over if she gets raped and the rapists gets 5 years plus for it.

 

[jonso]

Tbf the fact that women have to protect against rape and not go alone at night etc is a sign of privilege in itself. You only have to take precautions if you have something valuable. A man won't wear a diamond watch in the bad district. But it's still better to have the watch. Women have something so valuable that some people will risk getting a life sentence to get it. It is dangerous but it also tells something about the power they posses.

 

[bbwqs_v]

i think it's important to understand sexual conflict, men & women have different evolutionary interests. men's strategy is to have as much sex as possible while women's strategy is to find a committed partner who is of high enough genetic quality to raise children with.

to men, all sex is good. to women, no sex is better than unwanted sex. i think sexual freedom, having the ability to choose who you want to have sex with, is an inevitable aspect of advanced civilization / modern society. it's unavoidable, and it means that women arguably hold the greatest power as gatekeepers of sex, the force that drives men to strive.

i hate it all, but i think it's just how biology & nature works. you can argue about men's deaths & killings, but idk how you would compare which of the human rights to life or sexual freedom bear more weight.

also, it's important to mention most rapes are committed by attractive & dark triad men, not incels, but incels take all the blame, as usual. there are arguments that suggest women enjoy rape (from attractive/dark triad men), and i would not be surprised to hear that women are just seeking revenge when their rapist doesn't commit to them, as is expected by men's evolutionary approach.

both sexes employing their own evolutionary tactics, females of course being all the more privileged on average across all aspects compared to men, but i think it's a bad argument to say that females can have sex whenever they want, because the femcel problem is about love & commitment from a male of high enough genetic quality (chad), and not about whether she can acquire sex, that's an incel problem.

i think more people should check out dr david buss' works

 

[vasletdepees]

You're right, people treat it like it's the worst thing that can happen, worse than bloody murders and genocide. Why, because it's against foids, and rapists gets what billions of men work for.

Imo, since women are designed to have penetrative sex, it's equivalent of a smaller fight, jfl people act like foids life is over if she gets raped and the rapists gets 5 years plus for

Tbf the fact that women have to protect against rape and not go alone at night etc is a sign of privilege in itself. You only have to take precautions if you have something valuable. A man won't wear a diamond watch in the bad district. But it's still better to have the watch. Women have something so valuable that some people will risk getting a life sentence to get it. It is dangerous but it also tells something about the power they posses.

it's only valuable because foids are keeping the price inflated, sort of speak. Pussy should be free, like water and all basic necessities. But they keep a monopoly on it to inflate the "price": you used to get pussy for a movie ticket and mcdonald menu back in my parents day, now it's three or four dates even for normies. so of course it becomes valuable and dangerous for them: they chose that.
That's why they fight so hard for the young girls to be kept out of the pool: a big supply of fresh pussy, eager to be given, driven by hormones, would kill the market for " deflated 27 year old pastrami sandwich vagina".
In itself, there is nothing valuable in sex: sex shouldn't be rare: it should be made available for everyone, like water. If a person was hoarding water to inflate price, while people were dying of thirst, we'd call him a monster, nobody would defending him in the name of "free entrepise".
Sex is as much a necessity as water (see winslow's pyramid of needs) so foids hoarding it are equally monsters, and people defending them in the name of "liberty of choice" are idiots. pussy should be given back to the people as a public utility sevice.

 

[wei#3959]

it's stupid that ppl think that rape is worse than murder

 

[bbwqs_v]

In itself, there is nothing valuable in sex: sex shouldn't be rare: it should be made available for everyone, like water. If a person was hoarding water to inflate price, while people were dying of thirst, we'd call him a monster, nobody would defending him in the name of "free entrepise".
Sex is as much a necessity as water (see winslow's pyramid of needs) so foids hoarding it are equally monsters, and people defending them in the name of "liberty of choice" are idiots. pussy should be given back to the people as a public utility sevice.

isn't sex the most valuable thing, the act of spreading your genetic material & reproducing? it's the thing that all men strive for, the thing that the very foundations of society is built upon.

i don't think you can compare a readily available resource like water, an essential resource that is required for survival, to sex, controlling a sentient being's bodily autonomy. even if sex were a basic human need, i doubt there is any realistic way of making it accessible. the best we can have is pornography & prostitution, imagine how much social unrest there would be if the human right of sexual freedom was taken away in any society? i'm not a cuck, but i want to try & look at things from a rational lens. there is no fighting natural selection

it's stupid that ppl think that rape is worse than murder

i've been thinking about this, how would you go about justifying that one is better/worse than the other? they are both violations of human rights and there are arguments outlining why one is worse than the other, it seems like there is no objective answer on the matter

 

[Words2_live_bye]

Tbf the fact that women have to protect against rape and not go alone at night etc is a sign of privilege in itself. You only have to take precautions if you have something valuable. A man won't wear a diamond watch in the bad district. But it's still better to have the watch. Women have something so valuable that some people will risk getting a life sentence to get it. It is dangerous but it also tells something about the power they posses.

 

[bbwqs_v]

it's stupid that ppl think that rape is worse than murder

i don't there is an objective answer, it comes down to your subjective morality on whether living is a better state than death or whether death is a better state than living, i forgot if it's called ontology or kant's moral philosophy, basically a fixed rule of morality.

let's say you get brutally murdered in the most painful way possible, you die. there is a 0% probability of existing in a better state (unless you think being dead > being alive).

let's say you're a male, and you get brutally raped by a male more powerful than you, literally tears your asshole apart, but there is always a chance of improving, in terms of recovery, even if the probability of living a better life is slim to none, it beats being dead and having a 0% chance of existing in a better state.

you cannot objectively compare the subjective experiences of rape & murder in any meaningful way, but you can compare the chances of living a better life (assuming you think being alive is a better state than being dead, but that is subjective for everyone)

at the end of the day, doesn't it just come down to whether you believe being alive > being dead or being dead > being alive?