Experiment racepill ? but by average standards

[To koniec]

I am anti-racist I’m only giving him a taste of his own medicine by using stereotypes of his community to ridicule him

I have nothing against any Indian otherwise

not really, you seem to be really concerned and bitter with north curries and whites

 

[To koniec]

No just this delusional north curry in particular


Yes whites are filthy fakecels but I’m fine with them as long as they’re not whites supremacist

maybe he is racist
wanna talk on pm ? don't worry i'm friendly

 

[Misogynist Curry 卐]

Where did you get those second pics? I just used the first ones from each in a previous comment, and based it off of that. The first general indid mogs the first north indid. But all of them still get mogged by indo-nordic.

No, it's doesn't fool.
North Indid

Average Indid

 

[Postmaxxercel50k]

Yes whites are filthy fakecels

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

No, it's doesn't fool.
North Indid
View attachment 664668

Average Indid
View attachment 664669

I was referring to the pics from the previous comment from the human phenotype website. Where did you get the other pictures of north indid and general indid?

 

[Misogynist Curry 卐]

You didn't need to specify that you care more about satisfying your primal sexual urges than intelligence, kid. That shines brightly in this pathetic attempt at a "rebuttal", or more appropriately a bluster. Sometimes keeping your mouth shut is better than embarrassing yourself by bursting into rage with these long, furious rants. Just a pro-tip...

What should be embarrassing for you is the fact that you're a high-caste North Indian from Delhi whereas I'm a low-caste South Indian who personally received no education whatsoever on any of these subjects as I was raised in the United States. All these arguments I've had with you show how little you understand your own country's history, despite having a privileged birth and upbringing in India as well as being taught in the Indian education system.

Lol, it's funny when some fool incel says that Intelligence matters more than looks on an incel forum. I don't think you are fully blackpilled, nigger.

You spent an hour and thirty minutes to write exactly what you said before? The fact that you always avoid debates on the accomplishments of present-day ethnic groups like the Tamils,

Accomplishments?
We dominate in defense, sports, wrestling, entertainment etc fool.
Go and do some proper research first before making stupid claims.

utterly unaccomplished your ethnic group is,

Cope. Now you have started ranting about ethnic groups because you know you AASI dominating abos haven't done shit ever lol other than being subjugated by high caste moggers.

since the only source of pride you have is who raped your ancestors 4,000 years ago

Indus valley civilization belongs to our maternal ancestors. We carry most of their ancestry. Atleast We have some accomplishments to be proud of. What you AASI dominating niggers have ever done? Nothing!!
Your whole history is about being raped by outsiders.

I've already bent over backwards to explain how you were wrong in nearly every way, from the very online tools you used to make your claims on genetics to very precise details about the lexicon of the Dravidian languages.

You didn't prove shir, nigger.

You consider "Brahmins" to be "Aryans" when a third of their ancestry comes form the original Proto-Indo-Aryans,

They are more west eurasian shifted than aasi abos, nigger.
Stop playing semantics.

South Indian scheduled tribe is apparently an "abbo" to you despite tracing a third of their ancestry to Iran_N

Lol, all those niggers are AASI dominating. They got that small portion of Iran_N from being raped by Iranian moggers not that they originated from them.

despite the AASI not even being abbos as i've already proven to you.

AASI = Abo
Keep coping nigger.

And South Indian scheduled tribes aren't even representative of the vast majority of South Indians as they are the most extreme example of AASI ancestry in the subcontinent, and their population numbers are in the low thousands at best.

Majority of the South Indians are AASI dominating, nigger excluding brahmins. Don't try to be something you aren't.

You falsely assume Dravidian languages and culture are not native to South India.

Haha everyone knows Dravidian languages belong to proto Dravidian people who are maternal ancestors of North Indians and pakis and south Indian abo niggers have nothing to do with them. Those Dravidians imposed their languages upon y'all and wiped out your culture which is common thing for weak people

Iran_N = Dravidian, based on the theory that the Brahui are the remnants of an ancient Dravidian population (despite the fact their presence in the Indus is only attested to in the 17th century).

It's most accepted.
Even Balochs also carry high amount of original Dravidian ancestry and hence used as proxy for IVC ancestry in most of the dna testing companies.

Unfortunately, this theory has actually been rejected by plenty of scholars because Brahui does not contain loanwords from ancient languages

Haha here comes an another cope
Where does anyone say AASI niggers are related to original Dravidians?

Tamil language and culture is still fundamentally part of the mixed AASI and Iran_N population that produced it, not some random nomads thousands of miles away.

Thanks those superior Iranians for imposing their cultures and languages upon y'all, nigger.

How exactly would Iran_N not have significantly contributed to the genetics of South Indian populations? Agriculturalists support much larger populations than hunter-gatherers.

Because genetics say so. Your most of the ancestry comes from AASI people, nigger.

No...? The fact that North Indians disproportionately have the Y-chromsome haplogroup R1a-Z93 which originates in Europe (the Late Trypillia culture, to be exact) despite containing very little ancestry from Eastern Europe demonstrates that not only were North Indians the product of male-on-female "rapes" so to speak, but also the Aryans as well were basically rape babies. In fact, everyone is because requiring a woman's "consent" to marry is a modern,

Ror and Jats carry more than 40% Aryan ancestry. Keep coping nigger.

What are you talking about? You didn't wipe out the British at all; if anything, many North Indians assisted them through service in the British India Army as you later go on to admit:

We gave them the toughest resistance. We compelled them to free us.
You AASI abos didn't do shit us usually.

The British left simply because (a) it wasn't cost-effective anymore to hold onto an increasingly seditious population (b) the Labor Party had just gotten into power and they were more sympathetic to anti-colonialist sentiment in India as the Labor Party was a socialist, left-wing party. European powers vacated all their colonies post-WW2, not because freedom fighters were "fighting them", but because they had no further reason to keep them. North Indian "freedom fighters" or Gandhi contributed very little to this.

Hitler Zindabad.
Fuck Abos!!!!!!

As for the Mughals, they were on decline for a while now.

Due to attrition by Rajputs, Jats and Sikhs.

The Marathas themselves were a backward caste in Maharashtra, basically not really that different from OBC South Indians.

No, Maratha is an amalgamation of various tribes like Brahmins, Konkanis, Yadav, Rajput, Kurmi etc.
High caste moggers unify them under one caste and taught them how to fight.

Do you really just start making things up from the top of your head when you don't know what to say? Dravidian temples were constructed during the early part of the second millennium CE, thousands of years after the Indus Valley Civilization declined and the Vedic Period had passed. Hoysala architecture was even later than this. South Indian rulers would not have known either had ever existed.

Cope. How could filthy hunter-gatherers built temples?
And you already said "Dravidian Temples" that clearly means that they were made by my maternal ancestors. Thanks for making it easy, nigger.

The "Vedic people" also had no architecture. There wasn't even a word for a large settlement in Vedic Sanskrit, which is consistent with the fact the Aryans were semi-nomadic pastoralists and no a literate, urban population. Why do you think purer, Aryan-descended populations like the Scythians and Eastern Iranics were nomads?

Yes, my maternal ancestors also had a huge role in civilizing my aggressive, daring, masculine, powerful paternal ancestors.
But you AASI abos have no role in it, then why are you even calling them names when your own ancestors were fucking Hunter-gatherers who got subjugated by every outsider?

Besides, if they were in "imitation of ancient Iranian and Vedic" people, then why did North Indians build none of it?

Because we already had it, nigger.

The Indus Valley Civilization did have buildings, but you can go look them up. They have no affinities with anything built in India today. We don't even know what they used those buildings for or whether they were temples or palaces.

Because modern Indian architecture is amalgamation of Aryan and Dravidian architectures.

South Indian culture was relatively egalitarian

Hunter-gatherers were egalitarian?

and important aspects of Tamil culture like Sangam Literature were produced by people from all social classes and castes. Same with Bhakti Hinduism.

Thank my maternal ancestors to civilize your dirty ass, nigger.

Pretty much any caste that wanted power could get it, and would force Brahmins to recognize them as such. Here's an interesting excerpt on it.

They were busy doing Hunter-gatherering

The reason why the British never included the "Kshatriya" caste on their census was because, unlike Brahmins, any caste could become warriors and set themselves up as rulers regardless of what Brahmins thought of them.

Cope. Nobody could become Kshatriya without the consent of Brahmins.
That's why Gujjars are still considered shudras.

You didn't rule India.

Indo-Aryan people and high caste moggers ruled most of the parts of subcontinent.
You AASI abos were slaves.

The Jats have the highest Western Eurasian ancestry in the subcontinent and they are a backwards caste.

Jats are extremely rich with huge lands unlike stupid low iq shudras of south and Bihar.

The closest thing to this idea would be Nairs because they intermarried with Nambudiri Brahmins through the Sambandham system and got some additional steppe ancestry, but otherwise they're native to Kerala. The Nambudiri Brahmins are pretty unaccomplished anyway because they refused Western Education, jfl.

Nairs are high caste moggers.

Actually, forget South India. All of India in general has never been run by people belonging to a high social class. Examples of empires ruled by lower-caste dynasties include the Nanda empire and Maratha Empire.

Brahmins have always indirectly ruled India, fool. And also don't forget Rajputs, Vijaynagara, Cholas, Guptas, Mauryas etc were all high caste moggers.

They're not native anywhere, technically speaking. Steppe_MLBA and Vedic culture is as foreign to South India as it is North.

They came to existence after the mixing of Indus valley people and Aryans, fool.
Therefore, native to North.

What happened was Steppe_MLBA-enriched populations went to North India, some went South, and they admixed with local inhabitants (besides the isolated ones) to create the present-day distributions of Brahmins.

They(Steppe_MLBA-enriched)were Brahmins(originated in North) went to south to civilize your abo ancestors and eventually mixed.

That's why South Indian populations still have Steppe_MLBA despite strong endogamy within caste.

Only High caste moggers have.
Your statement more accurately fits for Northwest Indians that almost every caste has Aryan ancestry.

Have you ever heard of Sanskritization??? Missionaries bring religions with them all the time and fuse it with local indigenous religious ideas to aid in proselytization. That's how Brahminism gained foot in South India.

That's why I said Brahmins went to south to civilize those stupid hunter-gatherers, nigger.

Besides, the Brahmins in South India never recognized any non-Brahmin caste in South India as kshatriya or twice-born (including the Nairs, as a matter of fact). They were all Shudras. Why was this the case if they were "dravidianized" Indo-Aryans?

Their genetics prove they are outsiders, fool.
South Indian Brahmins(originally North Indians) have always kept y'all beneath their feet despite being negligible in numbers

Who's coping.. the one who can't respond to any of the arguments and just spams "cope", or the person making actual evidence-based arguments?

You aren't making any sense, nigger. You can't disprove that your(AASI) whole history is about being subjugated by outsiders.

Yes they are.. it's a garment worn around the waist and extending to the ankles. "The tamba, which is also called tehmat[1][2] is the Punjabi version of the lungi which has folds at the front and is the traditional dress for Punjabi men. The tamba is worn by Bhangra dancers. Although the use of the Punjabi tehmat in East Punjab has declined in recent years, being replaced by the pyjama, men can be seen wearing the tehmat and its use has not completely stopped.[3] The tamba or the lungi can also be seen on Punjabi men in West Punjab[4][5] and the Punjabi men of adjoining Hazara, Pakistan (in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa).[6]"

So, lungi is basically an imitation of Tamba and Dhoti? Lol lol lol

LOL, Bollywood is one of the few things Indian culture is known for abroad. If North Indian culture isn't Bollywood, then it's even less relevant to the world.

Who says bollywood represent North Indian culture? It's just an entertainment industry not culture representing. People from all over India work in this industry.

I'm pretty sure a video that Punjabis got mocked for with 190 million views says a lot more than a random video with a few ten thousand....

Punjabis are moggers.

Funny thing, Haryanvis hated Punjabis so much the second language of the state was set to Tamil instead of Punjabi. Seems like North Indians want nothing to do with each other.

Punjabi is second language of Haryana.
And also jfl at thinking south Indians don't hate each other.
Urdu is second language of Hyderabad.

Uh, no it isn't. The community he comes from used to be a low-caste community that is now associated with entrepreneurship in Tamil Nadu. They own a good amount of successful businesses in Chennai.

Again, an exception. Don't say all dogs can kill lions.

That's only for Jats who are low IQ high T ogres anyway.

Average AASI component in Northwest Indians is 20-30%. Jats are even less than 20%.

Southern Brahmins generally have a large amount of AASI ancestry,

They are only 30-45% AASI at max. Rest of their ancestry is west eurasian.

which is why they look no different than Adivasi tribes in many cases (I've shown you multiple pictures of them before, like the Nobel Prize Winners + Kamala Harris's mother)

Cope.
South Indian Brahmins

All are moggers

Low caste abos

Ugly AASI abos

They are now, but many (specifically South Korea and Taiwan) were extremely poor back in the 20th century. They simply had good leaders that brought them into the wealthy nations they are now.

Blame congress for that.

This man you're simping for is nowhere near them, he clearly has no idea what he's doing if he thinks India needs to be even more decentralized with village-based governance than it is now.

Panchayats are based and anti-woman and anti-lgtbq.

So he's a demagogue, by your own admission?

No, his party name is Aam Aadmi Party which means common men party. He's pro middle class people unlike women worshipping modi.

 

[Genetic Error]

Men: Korea mogs while Iran is pretty boy maxxing.

u joking koreans look the most hideous here. and i even got 5 other ppl to rate the asian male faces and korean ranked ugliest to each person

 

[I want to believe]

I think that's not very informative, since all those averaged face look quite attractive. Besides, some of them look similar to other.
And I mean, we already know white people mog other races on average.

 

[Misogynist Curry 卐]

Intelligence does not matter over looks for romantic success, but this was never a debate over romantic success to begin with; this was a debate over intellectual superiority, and by all accounts I have proven South Indians are your intellectual superiors. That's why you are coping with this whole "looks > iq" thing, it's why you still haven't been able to respond to this post I've made, and it's why you still haven't been able to refute the Richard Lynn & Prateek Yadav study which demonstrated that the Northwestern India, particularly Uttarkhand and Jammu & Kashmir, have the lowest predicted IQs out of the entire subcontinent.

Nobody cares about nerds, nigger.
Looks> Iq
Nobody gives a about your "muh iq" Cope.

As do African-Americans. Do you think they are the most accomplished race in the United States? Your past comments on them suggest otherwise.

Don't compare North Indians with American niggers you fool.
North India also gives good amount of Doctors, Engineers, IAS, Teachers, Singers, Poets etc. North Indians can be found in almost every field in India unlike southie niggers who are negligible in wrestling, kabbadi, sports, defense, IAS, IPS, Olympics etc.
Maturity is when you realised North has more accomplishments that south and has good amount of contribution in almost every field.

Also, I noticed how you removed "food, clothes, business, politics" as you initially claimed. Your ass has been eviscerated on those areas,

What does "Etc" mean, you low iq nigger?
You live in US and you don't know the meaning of "etc" and you have audacity to mock us for iq? Jfl.

You are gigacoping at this point. I literally refuted ALL of this with historical, linguistic, and genetic evidence and your mind knows nothing but to repeat it over and over again endlessly since you lack the mental acuity to reply to it. Well, can't reason with stupidity

You didn't refute shit, nigger. Tell me what does AASI dominating have ever accomplished in India? Their whole history is about being btfo'd by high caste moggers and outsiders.

Anyway, thank your Northern European masters for giving you your language family, filthy dasyu rape-baby

Coming from an AASI nigger

They reproduced with your hideous dasyu ancestors because they had no other foids to reproduce with, as the Indo-Aryan migration was mostly male-mediated.

Again, what can be funnier than an AASI abo calling others' ancestors hideous

You think they peacefully settled down with your "maternal ancestors" ? Go read the Rigveda Samhitas to

They wiped your ancestors out of North, nigger
I am actually thankful that they mixed with Indus valley women and wiped out dirty AASI abo niggers otherwise we would be much uglier.

By whom? Where is your explanation for the absence of Old Avestan loanwords in Brahui or the fact Brahui is never attested to in the historical record until the seventeenth century?

Genetics matters more than language. Old avestan was an Aryan language anyway while Brahuis are Dravidians.

LOL, it is confirmed you have no idea what you're talking about (not that there was any doubt, in the first place). The Balochi are recent migrants into the Indus Valley from the Middle East and were not present anywhere near the Indian subcontinent during the Harappan period.

That's a theory. Balochs don't have Haologroup "J" Which is a middle eastern paternal haplogroup clearing refuting this nonsensical theory. This theory is as absurd as the theory of pashtuns being lost tribes of Israel.

The Brahui are Iranics, and Iranics get their Iran_N from BMAC (which had little to no AASI ancestry), not the Harappans. That's why they have so much Iran_N and are used as a proxy.

Then why do they have M maternal haplogroup?
And why don't modern day BMAC inhabitants don't have that much Dravidian blood as Brahuis and Balochs?

Michal Witzel and Bhadriraju Krishnamurti proposes that the Dravidian language family originated within India. These are the foremost authorities on Indian linguistics, one a Harvard professor and the other a visiting professor of linguistics at Stanford/UC Berkeley/UPenn/Tokyo University and many other universities around the world.

Nobody is certain where Dravidian languages really originated. But we all know they were definitely not AASI abos and that's what all matters.

Yes and very proud of my AASI side The AASI were six feet in stature, have sharp jawlines, were Millet Farmers, and independently started using Iron well before any Aryan or Harappan set foot into the Indian subcontinent. Source 1, and Source 2. That's why I'm high IQ and you're not

Still got subjugated and raped by all the outsiders

Nah you served them before they had enough of you and left North Indians have a natural tendency to bow down to white Indo-Europeans, as they were always your masters.

That's why you were the first ones to bow down to Britishers without giving any resistance, right? Lol, the audacity is inconceivable.

Cope with it how much you like, foreign dynasties still ruled North India for its entire existence except for a measly few decades. We wuzzing about your past won't help you.

Says an AASI nigger

Shivaji was lower-caste and had a fabricated genealogy to legitimize his rule. This is not hard to believe if you actually paid attention to Indian primary sources, as it happens very often with Indian rulers from humble origins (Sanskritization).

Shivaji claimed to have Rajput paternal ancestry.

Jats were in Tamil Nadu during the Medieval Era? Please discuss to me this breathtaking new discovery on Indian population movements.

When did I even say Jats were in Tamil Nadu, fool?
You clearly used the term "Dravidian Temples" not "AASI Temples".
Hunter-gatherers aren't known for building Temples. In fact, they can't even build homes properly let alone building monuments lol.

Nah they raped you. Go read the Rigveda, the Aryans weren't friendly people. Also how did your supposed maternal ancestors "civilize" the Aryans when the Indus Valley Civilization collapsed before any Aryan even set foot into India due to drought and climate-related effects? In the archaeological record settlements near Northwestern India were reduced to basically camps Post-Harappan period.

Again, says an AASI nigger whose ancestors total history is about being raped and subjugated by outsiders.
I don't know how could this guy even make fun of others for being rape babies when his own ancestors have no history other being raped and enslaved all over their lives

Keep coping. There is no such thing as "Aryan" architecture. There is only medieval era South Indian architecture (Hoysala and Dravidian), and Indo-Islamic architecture.

Rajput architecture? Maurya architecture? Gupta architecture? European architecture? Iranian architecture? Filthy coper!
Also, don't claim Dravidian architecture to be yours. You dirty hunter-gatherering abo niggers have no architecture. Your whole history is about being enslaved by others not building architecture.

LMAO, they never ruled India. The Brahmins are a priestly class who have no intrinsic power, they just served to legitimize rulers by sucking them off in exchange for land and resources. E.g.,

Cope. Nobody could do shit without the permission of Brahmins.
5% Brahmins abused all the AASI niggers for thousands of years and still abusing

No they weren't, all of their castes are currently unknown. There are only speculations about their caste as they appear suddenly at various points in the historical record without clues as to their ultimate origins, apart from mythological ones like descending from a "solar race".

All their pictures portray them as Caucasoids not AASI abos.
AASI abos never had balls to rule anyone.
Stop coping, dude.

It must be in Jat genes to cope by claiming they were rulers of foreign lands. I've seen Jats claiming the first human was a Jat too and Jats saying that they conquered Europe as well...

Probably some victims of Hindutva Nationalism.

No one "became" a Kshatriya. The Vedic Kshatriyas long disappeared sometime during the Vedic Period and were replaced by anyone who had the adroitness to secure power. You can see this as early as the Mahajanapada period. There is a Buddhist text called the Ambaṭṭhasutta where a young Brahmin is infuriated that the ruling Shakya clan refuses to adopt Vedic rites and rituals, suggesting the Shakyas were non-Vedic in origin (in addition to linguistic evidence).

Jesus Christ, you really don't think for 3,000+ years every single Indian ruler belonged to some "pure" Kshatriya lineage stretching back to this one Bronze Age population and that no one else rebelled or asserted power over them at all, not even later migrants? If you sincerely think this then you'd not only be ignorant of Indian history, but ignorant of history in general since warrior nobilities are constantly establishing themselves and overthrowing previo

All the ruling communities were high caste moggers not AASI abos.

If anything, it makes much more sense to see North Indian rulers as South Indian migrants because upper caste North Indians have significantly more AASI ancestry than do backwards communities like the Jatts and Rors JFL

How on earth does it even make any sense? Lmao. You coping so bad, nigger. Do you even know how dumb you sound?
If North Indian Brahmins were South Indian migrants, then how come North has highest Brahmins population and why didn't they promote South Indian languages and culture instead?
Stop coping, mate.

....? It's worn across the subcontinent

Yes, because originated in North.

I don't know, because quite frankly I didn't even know North Indian states had their own entertainment industry separate from Bollywood until now Your people are just that invisible!

Says a black skinned nigger
Even mostly South Indian actors are high caste moggers(North Indian migrants).

It's not an exception you clown the article I linked to you is showing that it's not just Shiv Nadar but his entire community (Nadars) that is replacing other castes as the entrepreneurs and businessmen of South India. Other agriculturalist classes have experienced upward mobility as well like the Vellalas, Reddys, Ezhavas, etc. Kind of like what was organically happening in India for thousands of years now..?

Nadar is an exception, fool!

Yes; that 30-45% of AASI ancestry is why Tamil Brahmins cluster closer to Tamils than they do to any North Indian population.

They cluster with other high caste moggers not aasi dominating abos, low iq nigger.

Kid, I don't care for cherrypicked images (not to mention the fallacy of comparing old, poor women to rich young actors who have bleached their skin or underwent plastic surgery). For all I care, I could just bring up the pictures of C.V. Raman, Chandrasekhar, Kamala Harris' mother, or Ramanujan, who are more abbo-looking than even me. Phenotype is not a reliable proxy for genetic relatedness, as it is subject to selective pressures over time. That's why Negritos are much more closely related to Northern Europeans than they are to any Africans despite looking identical to the latter, because the former are descendants of a small group of Eurasian tribes that migrated out of Africa.

Cope Cope Cope.
South Indian upper castes look less abo than low caste South Indian niggers.
I dare you to show any Brahmin who looks anything like these

If you want a 2 IQ debate where you hairsplit over phenotypes go talk with Made in Heaven, not me. I only fuck w genetics.

Atleast you finally acknowledged your whole history is about being subjugated by outsiders and high caste moggers.

Also why are you hating on Southern Indian tribal people so much, JFL? They're usually small isolated tribes with populations in the hundreds or thousands. They won't have the same accomplishments as ethnic groups with tens of millions of members do. There are Indo-Aryan tribes who accomplished nothing for the very reasons, like the Kalash/ Dardic/ Nuristani.

I am not hating on anyone just spitting facts, fool!!!!!!!
AASI dominating people like you have no history other than being subjugated.

The fact that Jats, a ~40 million wide community of people, have to pick on some scattered farmers because they are below everyone else is rather pathetic. As for some Jats being landowners, that's true for nearly every caste, even low ones. Not all members of a caste have identical social status and it usually varies by geographic location.

Paniyas aren't the biggest landowners of South India, are they? Lol.

How does this answer anything I've brought up? You're telling me you care more about "muh tradition" over not being an impoverished shithole which sticks to feudal-era norms? Or that because they call themselves a certain way they must be competent leaders?

Mostly impoverished people are AASI ancestry dominating like you which they always have been, so it's not flabbergasting.
We care more about traditions, cultures, education, hospitals, patriarchy, water, electricity, homes etc.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

u joking koreans look the most hideous here. and i even got 5 other ppl to rate the asian male faces and korean ranked ugliest to each person

According to the pictures in the list OP gave, not irl. Iran and Korea are subhumams irl mosty,

 

[To koniec]

 

[Genetic Error]

According to the pictures in the list OP gave, not irl. Iran and Korea are subhumams irl mosty,

the pics OP gave koreans were the most subhuman + theyre even worse IRL

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

the pics OP gave koreans were the most subhuman + theyre even worse IRL

Honestly he mogs almost everyone on that list. To me the most subhuman is west african. But all these pics are above average for their race regardless.

 

[Misogynist Curry 卐]

huge cope, all you did was repeat everything you said again (except this low iq point about ""middle eastern"" haplogroups) even when I posted undeniable genetic evidence well nothing will convince you at this point so I'm not gonna spend any more hours giving attention to a coping jat

Calling theories as facts don't make any sense. Pashtuns and Balochs are Aryan tribes. Their genetics don't match with middle Easterns nor Haologroups clearly refuting your claims.

JFL @ this nigga. Dravidian is just the rendering of the word Tamilian in Sanskrit (Tamil -> Damil -> Damiḍ -> Dramiḍ -> Draviḍ—Drāviḍ) you retard.

Original Dravidians have nothing to do with abo tamils. You should be thankful that they imposed their languages upon y'all and civilized your ass.

Holy shit are you this fucking dense? You're wondering why people hundreds of years ago didn't name this architectural style out of a genetic component only hypothesized to exist a few years ago and exists nowhere in pure form

AASI niggers have no architecture, no civilization, no glorious past. Nothing!!
Everyone knows your history is all about being raped and subjugated by others.
That's why y'all are the poorest and impoverished people in India.

Seethe!

The Proto-Indo-Iranians wanted to marry their own horse-riding, Indra-fearing women:

Aryans didn't have blonde hairs and blue eyes. It wasn't common among them.

You Jats are responsible wiping out the original Indo-Iranian phenotype in South Asia

I am not even a Jat, lol.

you filthy dasyu shitskins

Coming from an AASI nigger

could look a little whiter than us

Little whiter? My skin tone is probably more similar to Europeans than to you, nigger.

 

[Misogynist Curry 卐]

Every scientific model is a theory lmao. The Aryan Migration Theory is a theory and the Indo-European language family is a theory. The Earth being a sphere or the Earth going around the sun are also theories.

All of these have more evidence to substantiate their claims while you have none.

Haplogroups tell us very little, the concept of a haplogroup was only invented because we couldn't sequence the entire genome but now we can.

Lol, haplogroups help us to ascertain who were exactly our ancestors. Haplogroups are very important.

We know Western Iranian people like the Balochs get their Iran_Neolithic ancestry from BMAC,

Then why don't modern BMAC inhabitants don't have as high Iran_N ancestory as Balochs and Brahuis?

and we know that the Brahui have almost wholly assimilated into the Balochi ethnic group, so the simple explanation is that Brahui people are migrants from India who were genetically assimilated by Balochs.

Then how come Brahuis have more Iran_N ancestry than Balochs? How migrants can have more ancestry than the natives?
You clearly don't make any sense.

Iran_N =/= IVC

IVC ≠ AASI
and that's what all matters.

Nah the IVC people migrated to South India and were raped by AASI chads.

Their women mixed with Aryan chads while their men raped AASI women in South that's why haplogroup L is so dominating in South, nigger.

How else do most South Indians have the (probably) AASI patrilineal lineage then? Did IVC women rape AASI men???

Because South was AASI dominating.

Projection, North Indians have done none of these but us Tamils did

Say High caste tamil moggers not average AASI dominating tamils like you, nigger.
Indus valley wasn't tamil tho.
Stop claiming our ancestry and civilization, niggers.
You weren't kangz, you were slaves.

Malayali Brahmins did nothing at all. JFL I can't name a single famous Nambudiri at all.

They abused you all for thousands of years.

South Indian tribals like the Paniya and Irula did nothing but neither did Indo-Aryan tribals like Kalash or Nuristani.

Kalash and Nuristanis are atleast moggers. They atleast have looks. While South Indian tribals are complete abomination.

Nah those are Punjabis

We are talking about India here not whole South asia, fool.

Indian Punjab only has high HDI because it is 1/3rd scheduled caste/scheduled tribe

Giga cope
Those low caste niggers are literally the poorest in Punjab.

(they have high iq AASI genes)

That's why got subjugated and raped by everyone to hell and back

Indian Punjab only has high HDI because it is 1/3rd scheduled caste/scheduled tribe (they have high iq AASI genes) whereas rest of Punjab in Pakistan only has North Indian genes so its a shithole. As Pakistan is even more shit than Bihar (lower HDI) despite being majority Punjabi, that makes Punjabis the poorest.

Coping with Pakistan now

They did. Where did you think the Aryans came from?

Don't LARP. You also know very well that blue eyes and blonde hairs weren't common in Aryans.

How did Iranic people like Tajiks get blonde hair?

I don't think every tajik has blonde hairs, do they? Lol.

My point still stands

What point? You have been just clowning around. I don't think people like you whose history is all about being btfo'd by outsiders have any right to mock others.
People living in glass houses shouldnt throw stones at others.

as you are a North Indian whose ancestors begged to get fucked by white chads so you north pajeets could have higher SMV!

Again, it's funny when an AASI nigger says something like this
Don't you have any shame, nigger?

It's true all North Indians are dāsyus

Okay, nigger whatever helps you to cope

Cause they raped your ancestors Delhi nigger! From the Bronze Age to the British Raj you North Indians were slaving for whites How sad!

Again, says an AASI nigger

 

[To koniec]

you curries are sometimes pathetic really, but it's really pain to watch your self hatred

@Transcended Trucel
@Mecoja
@thespanishcel

 

[Mecoja]

you curries are sometimes pathetic really, but it's really pain to watch your self hatred

@Transcended Trucel
@Mecoja
@thespanishcel

I dont understand 90% of what is said in this thread, I suck at geography, history, biology and ethnology.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

you curries are sometimes pathetic really, but it's really pain to watch your self hatred

@Transcended Trucel
@Mecoja
@thespanishcel

big reason is Curryland being poor, if it had some money, they'd still have self hate but a lot less

 

[Misogynist Curry 卐]

Cope I already gave them to you, you’re now on terminal copium.

You didn't give shit, nigger.

No they only identify your patrilineal or matrilineal lineage.

That's why they are important and clearly proves Balochs have nothing to do with Arabs.

Maybe cuz BMAC hasn’t existed for at least 4000 years now?? Central Asia has been altered by tons of migrations since then like Turkic and Mongol invasions.

It's a cope. Central Asians still have tons of Iranic ancestry, then why not Iran_N?
You have no evidence that Balochs got that Iran_N from BMAC.

They got the Iran_N when they were raped by Balochs.

Even gypsies got raped by Arabs, Turks and Europeans, but still carry lots of Indian ancestry, then how come Brahuis carry more ancestry of their rapists then the rapists themselves?
You sound really dumb.

Yeah they ain’t BMAC either.

I don't care.
They were Western Eurasian and that's what all matters.

JFL, that haplogroup only has an allele frequency of 20-40% according to your own map.

And you think 20-40% is low? Lol Lol Lol
South India is like 90-95% AASI abo dominating still their 20-40% population carries L paternal haplogroup. What do you think from where it came? Of course from rapes committed by Indus valley men in south.

Also if “Aryan” men or their male descendants raped AASI women then their progeny would have haplogroup R1a, not H or L.

I clearly wrote you were mostly raped by Indus valley men not Aryan men that's why L is your second dominating paternal haplogroup after H.

Whether they do or not they must have gotten fucked by an AASI men as the Y chromosome only passes from man to man.

AASI men didn't have balls to rape anyone because their whole history is about being enslaved by outsiders. That's why even in south—their homeland— around 20-40% people carry haplogroup L which is huge.

Also, you haven’t shown any evidence besides Irula or Paniya and you’re too low IQ to interpret the results anyway. It would be like using the Kalash to make claims about North Indians genetics.

What evidence? About south being AASI dominating? Who the fuck needs evidence for that? Everyone knows south is AASI dominating. In fact, except Northwest, Northeast and some western states whole India is AASI dominating.

Cope, there are no high caste Tamils. There’s only Brahmin, Backwards Caste, and Most Backwards Caste. As my previous excerpt showed, even members of the Most Backwards Caste cucked Tamil Brahmins hard. Probably even fucked them too, given how some of them are blacker than even me.

There is no evidence of that. Brahmins always kept y'all beneath their feet that's why y'all hate them.
Also JFL at cherry-picking.
Tamil Brahmins are the only people who look somewhat like Humans in Tamil Nadu

Cope, it’s a fact IVC contributed to all populations in South Asia

Then how majority of India is AASI dominating and not Iran_N unlike Northwest India and Pakistan?
IVC indeed contributed in South Asia but not as much as AASI.

except NW Indians as they have a lot of Iran_N ancestry from BMAC as well.

There is no evidence of that.

If they’re moggers why are the Kalash dying out jfl.

Thank Islam copers for that.

Foids want high T and masculine men as well. They probably get mogged by Dravidian tribal chads like this guy.

Haha people who got subjugated and raped by almost everyone are High T? JFL at this cope.
Then why are they so negligible in Defense? Sports? Wrestling? Olympics?
You coping so bad, nigger.

That’s why IVC whores fucked haplogroup H men so much.

Again there is no proof of that. They fucked Aryan chads while their Men raped AASI whores that's why 20-40% people have Haplogroup L in south
You got cucked by everyone, nigger

Copium, you said North Indian was an ethnicity and not a geographic region yourself

I never said North Indian was an ethnicity here, did I?

Pakistan has the least AASI populations in all of South Asia like the Kalash. It’s still poorer than fucking Bihar.

So? What Pakistan has anything to do with Bihar?

Indo-Iranians in general are the poorest ethnicities, creating poor shitholes like Afghanistan.

Blame USA for that.

How am I LARPing I’m not even claiming to be an Aryan jfl. I’m just repeating the claim people who have done the research on Aryan ancient DNA did. Don’t shoot the messenger bro.

Blonde hairs aren't even common among Europeans, then how could they be common hair colour of Aryans who were darker than modern day Europeans?
Stop spreading mendacious information, nigger.

Did I say every Tajik had blonde hair??? It’s in reduced frequency because Central Asians got raped by Turks and are not even 50% Aryan anymore.

All Aryans being blonde is a Nazi propoganda. Everyone who has knowledge of history and genetics knows Aryans weren't Blonde hairs and Blue-eyed people; it was rare in them. Same goes for Europeans.

Stop LARPing and be proud of your ancestry as a BMAC-white rape baby

Be proud of your own history of being btfo'd by everyone, nigger rather than claiming our glorious past and civilizations.
You weren't kangz, you were slaves.

 

[ItsACrazyWorld]

Lol at these being the 'average' man...so, the average american looks like ryan reynolds? Seems they just removed all the fat & ugly men from the sample - like, sure, if you take 100 actors and face morph them they probably look like this...but not the average person on the street (and, tbh, even this is slightly inaccurate - since better looking people are more likely to go outside & have friends...while uglier people are more likely to never/rarely leave their home)

 

[Pain And Hatred]

This post was taken over by two malding curries

 

[oldcel101]

moggers both male and female in Serbia.

 

[To koniec]

@Transcended Trucel look at this shit

 

[Misogynist Curry 卐]

I'm out here writing paragraphs and providing extensive citations to academic work. In fact I literally posted genetic distances between various South Asian populations which you completely ignored.

You do nothing but bullshit endlessly JFL. It's typical of how everyone else sees North Indians.

They are bengalis who have never seen a Jat or Punjabi in their whole life.
They are jealous because their women prefer those tall Well-built high T men over their own feminine docile bongoli men.
Also the answer is irrelevant.

Maybe you should focus on keeping your mouth shut and not reducing whatever little reputation everyone else has of you rather than going around LARPing as "muh troo IVC descendant!" "muh Aryan!" Hell, I showed absolutely no animosity to you yet the first thing you ever said to me was an insult. Can't you look at yourself and see how stupid you sound most of the time?

No, it's you you dirty AASI nigger

Do you really think when you go around preaching that "Indians are white people!" that people don't think of you as anything but yet another coping curry to laugh at?

By White I have always said I mean Caucasoid which we indeed are. Plus, My skin tone is white not dirty shitskin unlike yours, nigger.

I wasn't even going to bother replying to this thread anymore because of how obvious it was you had no idea what you were talking about compared to me, but when I saw your delusional ass go around telling people how you "destroyed [me]" in other threads I guessed I had to finish this off.

Your whole history is all about being btfo'd by everyone.

I didn't claim they were Arabs, I claimed they migrated from the Middle East.

No, they didn't. You have no evidence for that, nigger.

Balochis are Iranics. Iranics are the population that resulted when Proto-Indo-Iranians mixed with people from BMAC, and never interacted closely with the Indus Valley Civilization. This is common knowledge among anyone who knows the history of South and Central Asia.

Then how come Pashtuns have lots of AASI ancestry? Plus, your this statement contradicts with your previous statement of Balochs being Arab migrants.

Iranics are not Iran_N. Iran_N is just a label given to a population that was present in a place that Iranics later called called "Iran".

I know it, nigger.

Lol, they don't? Brahuis are genetically identical to Makranis and Balochs.

You clearly wrote Brahuis migrated from India, nigger. If Balochs are from Middle East, then why they don't have J paternal haplogroup and how come Brahuis(who are Indian migrants) according to you have more Iran_N than Balochs who allegedly raped Brahuis according to you? You make non sense, fool.

Both Balochis and Brahuis are significantly closer to the BMAC sample than they are to the IVC periphery sample. In other words, they could not have been present in Baluchistan during the Bronze Age since they're very distant from Bronze Age samples in Baluchistan.

How does it change the fact that they are still more related to IVC than you and you are nothing other than a stupid AASI nigger? Lol

Of the species on these lists, only Ziziphus and the date palm(s), might possibly have been known in Baluchistan/Iran, and only a few more species (toddy palm, the Ficus spp., Terminalia spp.) would have occurred in Sindh (and probably very patchily). Thus, taken together, the tree words and placenames point to a restricted peninsular zone for the early Dravidian speakers focused on the Dry Deciduous and savannah zones.”

"As previously argued (Fuller, 2003a) those species with the deepest Dravidian roots, based on recorded cognates, correspond to those with the oldest archaeological occurrences in South India, and suggest an identification with the Southern Neolithic"

The fact that several of these species have good cognates across all Dravidian subfamilies strongly supports a Proto-Dravidian homeland somewhere in Peninsular India"

So, you are saying this hypothesis is a fact? Jfl at the giga cope.

Also, even more suicidefuel for you: words for agriculture and social-complexity (multi-story buildings and writing) occur exclusively as innovations in Proto-South-Dravidian. So even if Iran_N spoke Proto-Dravidian then it was us who achieved any state of civilization and not the North Dravidians like the Brahui who lack words for any of those things

Again, there is no evidence for that, you stupid nigger.

How deep do you like white cock down your throat?

Don't you worry, we'll get Northern European men down to North India so they fertilize your women en-masse. Soon North India will be a white, Aryan land again, pal

Just say your ass is seething because Indus valley was west Eurasian dominating not filthy AASI, stupid nigger
They wiped your ass out

I assumed it would be low because you yourself said it was low . When I mentioned that the Irula people had 27% Iran_N ancestry you said it could be disregarded as they were "AASI dominating". Now you're telling me 20%-40% is "huge". So what is it? Is 30% huge or not? This is a yes or no question, so the only response to this should be a yes or no.

Yes, it's huge because Indus valley men raped your women that's why your 20-40% population carry L paternal haplogroup, nigger. But it still doesn't change the fact that North Indians have more Iran_N related ancestry than you.

AASI abo dominating" is just a term you invented to hide the fact South Indians are an AASI/Iran_N hybrid population, and aren't "Iran_N people" or "AASI people" like your one-dimensional brain can only understand.

You aren't 50-50% AASI and Iran_N, nigger.
Your almost 60-80% ancestry comes from AASI niggers which makes y'all AASI dominating.
You all are the modern descendants of AASI people especially the low caste niggers like you. I don't know why you South niggers hate to admit your original AASI nigger ancestry and keep associating your dirty ass with North Indians who have nothing to do with y'all.

You need it because you're so sick of being at the bottom of the barrel, so tired of being ridiculed by the whites you worship, so exhaused by being condescended to by people like Made in Heaven that you need to find some other people to make fun of to soothe your fragile inferiority complex. You're deeply hurt and this is the only source of validation

Says an ugly AASI abo

Iran_N ancestry is roughly 30%-50% in South India.

No, it's not nigger. It's around 20-30%(thank indus indus valley rapists for that)on an average not 50.

Higher percentage of autosomal ancestry than male haplogroup frequency demonstrates female-bias in Iran_N gene flow to South India. Simple as that. Lol.

Again, a giga cope.

There's no evidence that "Brahmin, Backwards Caste, and Most Backwards" are the only classification of castes in Tamil Nadu according to you? Do I need to provide evidence that SC/ST is a category that the central government uses to classify dalits, or will you just mindlessly repeat back "there is no evidence of that" either?

So who are the hypothetical Tamil Kshatriyas that transcend these commonly accepted categories, then? Who are the Malayali castes that aren't considered to be Shudras by the Brahmins? And don't give me a LARPing backwards caste that held power for some time.

Not like it matters anyway; artisans, metallurgists, poets, artists, weavers, architects, etc. make up the heart of a civilization, the vast majority of whom were lower caste. Not some high T ogres who fight in war or priests.

Hell, even in religion, the Vaishnavite Nayars or Shaivite Alvars (both of whom were mostly low caste) have done far more to contribute to contemporary Hinduism than the Nambudiri Brahmin priests who spent their entire 2,000+ year existence chanting the Rigveda over and over again to themselves in the hopes Indra will give them something

Brahmins civilized your dirty ass as I said earlier you stupid nigger. Why didn't you have any poets, architects etc before the Brahmin migrants? Who taught you how to write? Who taught you how to speak? Who taught you what is poem, architecture, hindusim, puranas, vedas etc?
Yes, Brahmins did. Thank them for that, nigger.

I don't actually hate any Brahmin. I was simply pointing out the historical fact that the Brahmins were a powerless population that was forced to submit to whoever acquired power (including criminal castes) in order to keep their privileges.

You really think some priests whose traditional lifestyle is begging is somehow a "threat" to me?

Yeah, that's why you low caste nigger are considered backwards and scheduled caste and tribes not Brahmins, nigger.
Brahmins don't need any privilege from others; they are self-sufficient.

But the three images you posted of poor, old tribals with Brahmin actresses and models isn't cherrypicking either?

Can I play that game as well? Can I compare poor, old Brahmins with models and actresses? Or am I not allowed to do that? Or should we both post pictures of models and actresses and fight over which one looks "better" despite the fact the average person looks nowhere near that?

Even an average South Indian Brahmin mogs the shit out of low caste niggers like you. Brahmins are moggers. They are literally the best looking people of South.
Show me any low caste South Indian nigger who looks anything like this

These Brahmins sure do look human buddy

Or maybe there's a problem in using a handful of pictures, especially women of old age, to determine how much an ethnicity "mogs" another...

You are coping so hard

So IVC refugees are "almost everyone" now? Lol?

IVC wiped you all out of Northwest and Pakistaand got

If IVC refugees are "almost everyone", what about the Mauryas, Greeks, Scythians, Guptas, Palas, Ghurids, Turks, Mughals, Afghans, Marathas, British, and so on that conquered North India?

We fought and eventually kicked them out you stupid nigger. We also managed to retain our cultures, languages, lands etc unlike you nigger who lost their languages, cultures, lands without giving any resistence to outsiders and got btfo'd by everyone.

Damn I'm sorry the 100 thousand something Irulas aren't outcompeting the 100-200 million+ North Indians JFL

Talking about south Indians in general nigger who are AASI dominating not just some tribals you stupid fag !!
North Indians are less in numbers than y'all, yet give more contribution to sports, defense, wrestling, olympics etc.

Why did you lie?

By ethnically North Indian, I meant I am not an outsider but a native North Indian you dumbfag. Can't you understand the context? Fool!!

Punjabis, Sindhis, Pashtuns, and Sarikis are "genetically superior" groups to you than Biharis due to the latter having significant AASI ancestry, correct or not correct?

Punjabis, Sindhis, Pashtuns, and Saraikis make up the bulk of Pakistan, correct or not correct?

Pakistan has a lower HDI than Bihar, correct or not correct?

Yes, Pakistanis mog the shit out of Biharis. The reason of low HDI is their obsession with islam. Even muslims of India are mostly illiterate and have low HDI.

Blame the USA for what exactly...? for aiding the mujahideen so that the Afghans didn't get cucked by Soviets, for trying strenuously to establish a Western democracy in Afghanistan, or for spending copious amounts of money on developing infrastructure in Afghanistan?

Afghanistan was better especially during monarchy but became shithole because of americucks, soviets and islamic copers.

It's common in Northern Europe.

See this arrow here pointing to "Ancestral North Indians"? It represents the Aryan migration into South Asia. Trace that arrow and look at the intersection where it comes from.

Are you really that dumb or trying to be oversmart? People of yamnaya culture didn't have blonde hairs on an average.
They mostly had brown hairs and brown eyes.

People of the Yamnaya culture are believed to have had mostly brown eye colour, light to intermediate skin, and brown hair colour, with some variation.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamnaya_culture%23:~:text%3DPeople%2520of%2520the%2520Yamnaya%2520culture%2520are%2520believed%2520to%2520have%2520had,hair%2520colour%252C%2520with%2520some%2520variation.&ved=2ahUKEwic2oD0rfP6AhX_1HMBHSB0APcQFnoECBMQBQ&usg=AOvVaw0HlHqwO-BtlCz4w_g85PPW

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://dna-explained.com/2015/06/15/yamnaya-light-skinned-brown-eyed-ancestors/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwjI7buQrvP6AhU6xnMBHWh7AnwQFnoECA4QBQ&usg=AOvVaw2VqnmvwVqyr6SJ2SuItekv

Yamnaya facial reconstruction

Yes; I have no interest in claiming North India's past or its civilization. You stick to North Indian history and civilization and I stick to South Indian history and civilization.

There is no South Indian civilization, nigger. Your whole history is about being btfo'd by every non AASI outsider.
Indus valley was Iran_N.

 

[Oroborus]

They are bengalis who have never seen a Jat or Punjabi in their whole life.
They are jealous because their women prefer those tall Well-built high T men over their own feminine docile bongoli men.
Also the answer is irrelevant.

No, it's you you dirty AASI nigger

By White I have always said I mean Caucasoid which we indeed are. Plus, My skin tone is white not dirty shitskin unlike yours, nigger.

Your whole history is all about being btfo'd by everyone.

No, they didn't. You have no evidence for that, nigger.

Then how come Pashtuns have lots of AASI ancestry? Plus, your this statement contradicts with your previous statement of Balochs being Arab migrants.

I know it, nigger.

You clearly wrote Brahuis migrated from India, nigger. If Balochs are from Middle East, then why they don't have J paternal haplogroup and how come Brahuis(who are Indian migrants) according to you have more Iran_N than Balochs who allegedly raped Brahuis according to you? You make non sense, fool.

How does it change the fact that they are still more related to IVC than you and you are nothing other than a stupid AASI nigger? Lol


So, you are saying this hypothesis is a fact? Jfl at the giga cope.

Again, there is no evidence for that, you stupid nigger.

Just say your ass is seething because Indus valley was west Eurasian dominating not filthy AASI, stupid nigger
They wiped your ass out

View attachment 667551
Yes, it's huge because Indus valley men raped your women that's why your 20-40% population carry L paternal haplogroup, nigger. But it still doesn't change the fact that North Indians have more Iran_N related ancestry than you.

You aren't 50-50% AASI and Iran_N, nigger.
Your almost 60-80% ancestry comes from AASI niggers which makes y'all AASI dominating.
You all are the modern descendants of AASI people especially the low caste niggers like you. I don't know why you South niggers hate to admit your original AASI nigger ancestry and keep associating your dirty ass with North Indians who have nothing to do with y'all.

Says an ugly AASI abo

No, it's not nigger. It's around 20-30%(thank indus indus valley rapists for that)on an average not 50.

Again, a giga cope.


Brahmins civilized your dirty ass as I said earlier you stupid nigger. Why didn't you have any poets, architects etc before the Brahmin migrants? Who taught you how to write? Who taught you how to speak? Who taught you what is poem, architecture, hindusim, puranas, vedas etc?
Yes, Brahmins did. Thank them for that, nigger.

Yeah, that's why you low caste nigger are considered backwards and scheduled caste and tribes not Brahmins, nigger.
Brahmins don't need any privilege from others; they are self-sufficient.

Even an average South Indian Brahmin mogs the shit out of low caste niggers like you. Brahmins are moggers. They are literally the best looking people of South.
Show me any low caste South Indian nigger who looks anything like this
View attachment 667554View attachment 667555

You are coping so hard

IVC wiped you all out of Northwest and Pakistaand got

We fought and eventually kicked them out you stupid nigger. We also managed to retain our cultures, languages, lands etc unlike you nigger who lost their languages, cultures, lands without giving any resistence to outsiders and got btfo'd by everyone.

Talking about south Indians in general nigger who are AASI dominating not just some tribals you stupid fag !!
North Indians are less in numbers than y'all, yet give more contribution to sports, defense, wrestling, olympics etc.


By ethnically North Indian, I meant I am not an outsider but a native North Indian you dumbfag. Can't you understand the context? Fool!!

Yes, Pakistanis mog the shit out of Biharis. The reason of low HDI is their obsession with islam. Even muslims of India are mostly illiterate and have low HDI.

Afghanistan was better especially during monarchy but became shithole because of americucks, soviets and islamic copers.

Are you really that dumb or trying to be oversmart? People of yamnaya culture didn't have blonde hairs on an average.
They mostly had brown hairs and brown eyes.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamnaya_culture%23:~:text%3DPeople%2520of%2520the%2520Yamnaya%2520culture%2520are%2520believed%2520to%2520have%2520had,hair%2520colour%252C%2520with%2520some%2520variation.&ved=2ahUKEwic2oD0rfP6AhX_1HMBHSB0APcQFnoECBMQBQ&usg=AOvVaw0HlHqwO-BtlCz4w_g85PPW

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://dna-explained.com/2015/06/15/yamnaya-light-skinned-brown-eyed-ancestors/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwjI7buQrvP6AhU6xnMBHWh7AnwQFnoECA4QBQ&usg=AOvVaw2VqnmvwVqyr6SJ2SuItekv

Yamnaya facial reconstruction
View attachment 667558View attachment 667559

There is no South Indian civilization, nigger. Your whole history is about being btfo'd by every non AASI outsider.
Indus valley was Iran_N.

Ultimate autism holy fuck