Whether they do or not, you're distracting from the main point that Indians see Punjabis and Jats as not the brightest bunch. So if you attach so much importance to the Indian opinion of South Indians' appearance, why not attach just as much importance to the Indian opinion of North Indians' intelligence?
Looks>>>>>>>> intelligence.
I see you weren't able to disprove the fact North India was controlled by foreign conquerors for practically their entire existence post-Iron Age, except for the Sikhs maybe a short while
Whereas we were ruled by native South Indian dynasties that patronized art, architecture, math, science, etc.
You abos didn't do shit. Your whole history is about being raped and subjugated by foreigners be it ancient Iranians, Aryans, British, Portuguese, Nizams etc. It's funny when you call our maternal ancestors—ancient Iranians— as yours when in real you are filthy abos.
Atleast we retained our culture, lands, languages etc unlike you niggers.
All those South Empires were founded by dravidianized Indo-Aryans moggers.
How were South Indians "conquered" by Iranian hunter-gatherers when they're part Iranian hunter-gatherer themselves
They raped your ancestors, nigger.
Your real ancestors are AASI since your most of the ancestry comes from them.
Also LMAO, how do you think hunter-gatherers can conquer anything? They spend all their time gathering food and hunting wild game, not 'conquests'
They raped you. You AASI abos have no history other than being raped and subjugated by outsiders.
Ah yes, the mythical "Aryan" Invasion of South India that literally no one but you insists ever had happened.
Aryan moggers kicked out most of the dirty abos from North and abused rest ones with the help of Varna system.
Those people fucked over all Indians.
You were the ones to be fucked first without even resisting a bit cause you abos can't fight—it's not in your blood.
They just fucked North Indians even harder
Lol cope. Majority of the Anglo-Indians are found in south India and Bangladesh who were the first ones to be colonized.
as South Indian Kingdoms like Vijayanagara were able to reconquer lost land from Muslim Conquests (Madurai Sultanate) whereas North Indians were helpless and mounted no defense.
Marathas and Sikhs wiped out mughals. We North Indians also wiped out Britishers. We gave the most freedom fighters and sacrifices. If North Indians hadn't fought for freedom, you abo niggers would still be licking boots of Englishmen.
The British even cucked you so hard that North Indians take pride in the fact their people slaved for them via their service in the British India Army. Yuck!
Britishers knew that North Indians are aggressive, daring, fearless and masculine people unlike dirty nerdy south Indian abo niggers that's why Britishers used y'all as slaves.
LMAO you're so delusional. Syrian Christians are an endogamous minority restricted to the Malabar Coast. How did they "fuck" all of South India?
You let those people raped your foids. You all are cucks and even take pride being their descendants. Yuck!
Show me a single point in Indian history pre-Raj when this entire land
I am talking about AASI abos in general, fool. You all have always been fucked by foreigners and high caste moggers.
Speak for yourself, buddy. Dravidian architecture is an indigenous design of Hindu temples in South India. On the contrary, North Indian architecture is all Islamic architecture that was patronized by foreign Islamic dynasties.
Your all architectures are a imitations of ancient Iranain and Vedic people, but anyway it doesn't matters all of those were built by high caste moggers and not by dirty AASI abos.
You're projecting hard. It is an incontrovertible, historical fact you were ruled by non-autochthonous dynasties your entire existence except for a measly 50 years in total. On the other hand, It is a fact that non-South Indian dynasties like the Mauryas, Delhi Sultanate, etc. failed to control all of South India!
We have always ruled India for most of the time in history and still ruling while you dirty AASI abos have no empire in your history. Your history is all about being subjugated by outsiders. Those high caste moggers are all North Indian migrants.
So, you are saying Brahmins are native to South? Jfl at this stupid cope.
If they weren't high caste moggers(Indo-Aryans), they wouldn't have promoted Sanskrit, Vedic culture and religions in SEA.
You're clearly only making this up from the top of your head to compensate for the fact your people HAVE HAD NO accomplishments in your entire 3000+ year existence!! You remind me of Nordicists who cope with their lack of historical preeminence by claiming that the ruling class of various Mediterranean civilizations were Northern Europeans.
Says an AASI descendant whose ancestors total history is all about being subjugated by outsiders
Cope, nigger.
Punjabis do, as a matter of fact.
Lol, it's not lungi go and learn the difference first, nigger.
Also you conceded that South India was a world-renowned textile and cloth manufacturer so you can't say you mog us in cloth....
That's a cope.
No they don't. You should see how the rest of the world make fun of North Indian culture
Whites kept bullying me and calling me North Indian names (pajeet, baljeet) for embarrassing shit your people did like this
It's Bollywood not North Indian culture you dirty low iq piece of shit.
I can also show tons of videos of foreigners making fun of south Indians
Bollywood ≠ North Indian culture.
I have never seen anyone make fun of anything specific to South India besides coping North Indians.
Making fun of south Indian language
View: https://youtu.be/Xca6Y0wLmUM
1] Gujaratis are not North Indians and you have stated yourself they are West Indians. Also, Persians are North Indians now?!
I didn't say they are North Indians you faggot. However, they do have more North Indian related ancestry than AASI.
Also when did I say persians are North Indians?
2] You conveniently ignored the fact that the third richest Indian was a low-caste Tamil (higher than any Parsi or North Indian),
It's an exception. Just because a dog somehow killed a lion doesn't means all dogs can kill lions.
All the richest communities are high caste moggers with more North Indian related ancestry(Indus valley and Aryan) than AASI.
] None of those aforementioned populations are North Indian.
Aryans and ancient Iranians are our main ancestors.
IVC contributed significantly to all South Asian populations
They contributed mostly to North Indian genetics. Rest of the Indians—especially the lower caste ones—are genetically AASI dominated.
ancestors
The place of origin of our maternal ancestors
As for the Proto-Indo-Iranians, they were migrants from the Southern Urals who are closer to Siberian and Northern European populations than to modern day Indo-Iranians who have ancestry from various genetically-distant peoples.
When did I say we are most closely related to original Aryans?
And also how does it change the fact that they are our paternal ancestors?
Whether North Indians have more ancestry from Aryans or IVC populations is irrelevant.
Giga Cope
Europeans don't suddenly become African-Americans just because African-Americans have more European ancestry from them than do Afro-Caribbeans.
African-Americans don't carry 70-80% European ancestry unlike us whose 70-80% ancestry comes from western Eurasia.
The richest states in India, even Kerala, are still impoverished and have mediocre leaders compared to East Asia, Europe, and North America.
Those are first world nations you fool.
Your great North Indian leader is a devotee of a high-AASI politician
I dunno he probably said this to get votes from those low iq niggers just like other politicians.
Not a cope you admitted yourself that I mog you
If you have any chance with a North Indian foid then I do as well
You only height mog me. If I was tall, I would never be here. I have never been called ugly. People only made fun of my height back then.
Also do you really think Punjabi pajeetas look like that JFL
Understand the context, nigger.
