starcrapoo
Nothing to live for. Waiting for the next pandemic
★★★★★
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2020
- Posts
- 1,940
- Online
- 59d 3h 1m
"4. The civil-rights revolution left husband - wife balances among interracial couples more unequal. Back in 1960 white husbands were seen in 50 per cent of black-white couples (versus only 28 per cent in 1990), and in only 62 per cent of white - Asian couples (versus 72 per cent). Why? Discrimination, against black men and Asian women. In the Jim Crow South black men wishing to date white women faced pressures ranging from raised eyebrows to lynch mobs. In contrast, the relatively high proportion of Asian-man/white-woman couples in 1960 was a holdover caused by anti-Asian immigration laws that had prevented women, most notably Chinese women, from joining the largely male pioneer immigrants. As late as 1930 Chinese-Americans were 80 per cent male. So, the limited number of Chinese men who found wives in the mid twentieth century included a relatively high fraction marrying white women. In other words, as legal and social discrimination have lessened, natural inequalities have asserted themselves."
Thats just brutal. So before 1960s when America was far more conservative, the inequality and disparity between WMAF and AMWF wasn't that bad. Just 62% of white - asian couples consisted of WMAF. Now its well over 72% of all white - asian marriages are WMAF. And that doesn't even count dating and casual sex.
Also before 1960, BMWF and WMBF were about 50/50. Now only 28% or less of white - black marriages consist of WMBF.
I mentioned this a couple of times before, once white liberals get their way and people start race mixing. Asian men and Black women vastly lose. In an undignified dehumanizing way. We can't do jack shit about it. Its over. Its just the natural process taking over because society has allowed certain things to happen without thinking about the degrading consequences and suffering of certain people who would be most affected by it.
Imagine reading about this as a ricecel in 1997 before the internet was about to explode. There would not have been much copes online.
"SINCE these inequalities in interracial marriage are so contrary to conventional expectations, what causes them? Academia's and the mass media's preferred reaction has been to ignore husband - wife disproportions entirely. When the subject has raised its ugly head, though, they've typically tossed out arbitrary ideas to explain a single piece of the puzzle, rather than address the entire yin and yang of black - white and white - Asian marriages. For example, a Japanese-American poetry professor in Minnesota has written extensively on his sexual troubles with white women. He blames the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II. Presumably, the similarity of frustrations of Chinese-American men is just a coincidence caused by, say, China losing the Opium War. And the problems of Vietnamese men stem from winning the Vietnam War, etc. But piecemeal rationalizations are unappealing compared to a theory which might explain all the evidence."
Last edited:
