Background
Dr. Pizza—also known as Peter Bright—is a former r/IncelTears member who was caught in an FBI sting operation in 2019. He attempted to have sex with a 7-year-old girl and a 9-year-old boy.
Dr. Pizza's defense was that he did not intend to have sex with actual minors because he was seeking to engage in "age play". The jury rejected this argument.
As the U.S. Department of Justice announced in a press release in March 2020:
Dr. Pizza is currently serving a 12-year sentence at Federal Correctional Institution, Petersburg.
Dr. Pizza's Incelophobia
Before I should proceed with my discussion, I should first address the elephant in the room: Dr. Pizza’s views on inceldom.
In recent months, Redditors have labored under the delusion that Dr. Pizza was not one of their fellow soy-fuelled bluepillers. Instead, their revisionist version of events describes him as…an incel.
Perhaps these delusional Redditors believe that if they repeat a lie frequently enough, it becomes the truth. Yet the record reflects otherwise; whilst the former r/IncelTears is no longer present, Dr. Pizza also spent a substantial amount of his time attacking incels on Twitter:
In addition, Dr. Pizza’s legal records do not indicate in any way, shape, or form that he was an incel. For one, he was in a polyamorous marriage at the time of his arrest. Also evident is that Dr. Pizza’s views on sex and marriage are diametrically opposed to that of many blackpilled incels. In fact, as I will explain further, one of the issues Dr. Pizza raises in his appeal is predicated on his sexuality and sexual promiscuity. As Dr. Pizza’s attorneys wrote:
Instead of being “one of ours”, it is evident that Dr. Pizza embodied everything that a blackpilled incel would dislike. He was a disgusting far-left, soy-slurping, SJW faggot. He was a normie who, right until his arrest, repeatedly disparaged the incel community on Reddit and Twitter. Any suggestion that he wasn’t part of CuckTears is simply a bald-faced lie. They own him.
Dr. Pizza’s appeal
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard the case today. The panel consisted of two Trump and one Obama nominees: Circuit Judges Gerard E. Lynch, Richard J. Sullivan, and Steven Menashi. Whilst a few different issues were raised in the written briefs, the arguments today focused on two of them.
A recording is available here:
(If you want to listen to federal judges discussing jailbait, skip to 29:40.)
1. The Rule 404(b) evidence.
After Dr. Pizza was arrested in 2019, investigators examined his entire digital life, consisting of hundreds of thousands of Tweets, Facebook and Google conversations, and found several instances where he had joked about or mentioned pedophilia. In his filings, Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander Li categorized some of these instances as follows:
"The Rape Law Tweet"
"The Jailbait Tweets"
"The Child Attraction Chats"
Dr. Pizza argues that this evidence should not have been admitted as they were "dissimilar and dated", and that this improperly prejudiced the jury, warranting a new trial. Federal prosecutors countered by arguing that these tweets and conversations were evidence of Dr. Pizza's intent to have sex with children.
Here, the Circuit Judges were unsure of the District Court's decision to admit this evidence. As one judge noted, "How does jokes about being attracted to someone who's 16 or 17 or whatever indicate an abnormal sexual attraction to children?"
2. Jury selection (voir dire) and kink-shaming
Dr. Pizza argues that he deserves a new trial because the District Court did not take sufficient steps to root out prejudice against his sexual orientation and sexual habits. As his attorneys wrote in their filings:
Here, the judges were skeptical of Dr. Pizza's argument that he was constitutionally entitled to question prospective jurors' views of nonconventional sexualities. As a judge asked: "You cite Ham v. South Carolina, but are kink practitioners really comparable to racial minorities in the civil rights era?"
A decision will most likely take several months.
Dr. Pizza—also known as Peter Bright—is a former r/IncelTears member who was caught in an FBI sting operation in 2019. He attempted to have sex with a 7-year-old girl and a 9-year-old boy.
Dr. Pizza's defense was that he did not intend to have sex with actual minors because he was seeking to engage in "age play". The jury rejected this argument.
As the U.S. Department of Justice announced in a press release in March 2020:
Dr. Pizza is currently serving a 12-year sentence at Federal Correctional Institution, Petersburg.
Dr. Pizza's Incelophobia
Before I should proceed with my discussion, I should first address the elephant in the room: Dr. Pizza’s views on inceldom.
In recent months, Redditors have labored under the delusion that Dr. Pizza was not one of their fellow soy-fuelled bluepillers. Instead, their revisionist version of events describes him as…an incel.
Perhaps these delusional Redditors believe that if they repeat a lie frequently enough, it becomes the truth. Yet the record reflects otherwise; whilst the former r/IncelTears is no longer present, Dr. Pizza also spent a substantial amount of his time attacking incels on Twitter:
In addition, Dr. Pizza’s legal records do not indicate in any way, shape, or form that he was an incel. For one, he was in a polyamorous marriage at the time of his arrest. Also evident is that Dr. Pizza’s views on sex and marriage are diametrically opposed to that of many blackpilled incels. In fact, as I will explain further, one of the issues Dr. Pizza raises in his appeal is predicated on his sexuality and sexual promiscuity. As Dr. Pizza’s attorneys wrote:
Instead of being “one of ours”, it is evident that Dr. Pizza embodied everything that a blackpilled incel would dislike. He was a disgusting far-left, soy-slurping, SJW faggot. He was a normie who, right until his arrest, repeatedly disparaged the incel community on Reddit and Twitter. Any suggestion that he wasn’t part of CuckTears is simply a bald-faced lie. They own him.
Dr. Pizza’s appeal
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit heard the case today. The panel consisted of two Trump and one Obama nominees: Circuit Judges Gerard E. Lynch, Richard J. Sullivan, and Steven Menashi. Whilst a few different issues were raised in the written briefs, the arguments today focused on two of them.
A recording is available here:
(If you want to listen to federal judges discussing jailbait, skip to 29:40.)
1. The Rule 404(b) evidence.
After Dr. Pizza was arrested in 2019, investigators examined his entire digital life, consisting of hundreds of thousands of Tweets, Facebook and Google conversations, and found several instances where he had joked about or mentioned pedophilia. In his filings, Assistant U.S. Attorney Alexander Li categorized some of these instances as follows:
"The Rape Law Tweet"
"The Jailbait Tweets"
"The Child Attraction Chats"
Dr. Pizza argues that this evidence should not have been admitted as they were "dissimilar and dated", and that this improperly prejudiced the jury, warranting a new trial. Federal prosecutors countered by arguing that these tweets and conversations were evidence of Dr. Pizza's intent to have sex with children.
Here, the Circuit Judges were unsure of the District Court's decision to admit this evidence. As one judge noted, "How does jokes about being attracted to someone who's 16 or 17 or whatever indicate an abnormal sexual attraction to children?"
2. Jury selection (voir dire) and kink-shaming
Dr. Pizza argues that he deserves a new trial because the District Court did not take sufficient steps to root out prejudice against his sexual orientation and sexual habits. As his attorneys wrote in their filings:
Here, the judges were skeptical of Dr. Pizza's argument that he was constitutionally entitled to question prospective jurors' views of nonconventional sexualities. As a judge asked: "You cite Ham v. South Carolina, but are kink practitioners really comparable to racial minorities in the civil rights era?"
@JoeBruhcel @Fat Link @Caesercel @iamsubhuman @kampman @TINMAN @Justdone @SlutLiberationFront @0Energy0Happyness @IncelGolem @Wizard32 @Zer0/∞ @Abominationcel @Blackcel rigth wing @Copexodius Maximus @ordinaryotaku @HeroinNihilism @Dotrinfobe @ERadicator @remincel @Therapywasaaste @MuslimCell @Robtical @Arabcel9 @dirtykombatcel @Izayacel @mericks @zangano1 @PM_ME_STRIPPERS
A decision will most likely take several months.
Last edited:
