I thought of a new way to systematically dismantle Cucktears and their narratives using the Socratic method, I call it "riddle me this".
Riddle Me This Cucktears: why is it ok for Chad and Stacy to make out even if it makes others uncomfortable when we have to stop doing what we like when it makes others uncomfortable? There was a dude I knew in residence called "crazy tongue". We called him that because he would always be making out with different foids, even during mandatory seminars (so there was no way to avoid seeing it). The residence staff never cared. Meanwhile, an Indian floormate I knew (lets call him Raj) was banned from making curry in the common area because the smell irritated some people. So he can't practice his culture because it's unpleasant for others, yet it's ok for crazy tongue to make everybody uncomfortable with his behavior?
Riddle me this Cucktears: why is it ok for others to complain about their lot in life but not us? When poor people, minimum wage workers, and those in needing of free healthcare complain about economic injustices, they're victims and we should feel sorry. However, when we complain about being rejected we're told that "YOU'RE NOT ENTITLED TO ANOTHER PERSON!". Ok, then poor people aren't entitled to free food and shelter, how about that? Oh wait, it only goes one way. And don't give me the "you need food and shelter to live" BS because these same Liberal dorks also support free college.
Riddle me this Cucktears: If sex isn't a right, and we aren't entitled to it, why do you lose your shit when countries ban or politicians suggest banning LGBTQ+ activity? We have no right to date, to fuck, to marry, yet somehow "gay marriage" and "gay sex" are human rights for the LGBTQ+ community. I can understand from a Libertarian-esque point of you why you don't believe the government should ban those things, but to argue that they are "human rights" but then say Incels are not entitled to the hetero equivalent is contradictory. Same can be said about laws against prostitution. So it's ok to forbid Incels from getting sex the one consenual way they can, but laws against sodomy are "unconstitutional"? Spare me the horse shit.
The only questionI ask myself is will Cucktears be high IQ enough to answer these? Or will they squirm and run away like normal?
Riddle Me This Cucktears: why is it ok for Chad and Stacy to make out even if it makes others uncomfortable when we have to stop doing what we like when it makes others uncomfortable? There was a dude I knew in residence called "crazy tongue". We called him that because he would always be making out with different foids, even during mandatory seminars (so there was no way to avoid seeing it). The residence staff never cared. Meanwhile, an Indian floormate I knew (lets call him Raj) was banned from making curry in the common area because the smell irritated some people. So he can't practice his culture because it's unpleasant for others, yet it's ok for crazy tongue to make everybody uncomfortable with his behavior?
Riddle me this Cucktears: why is it ok for others to complain about their lot in life but not us? When poor people, minimum wage workers, and those in needing of free healthcare complain about economic injustices, they're victims and we should feel sorry. However, when we complain about being rejected we're told that "YOU'RE NOT ENTITLED TO ANOTHER PERSON!". Ok, then poor people aren't entitled to free food and shelter, how about that? Oh wait, it only goes one way. And don't give me the "you need food and shelter to live" BS because these same Liberal dorks also support free college.
Riddle me this Cucktears: If sex isn't a right, and we aren't entitled to it, why do you lose your shit when countries ban or politicians suggest banning LGBTQ+ activity? We have no right to date, to fuck, to marry, yet somehow "gay marriage" and "gay sex" are human rights for the LGBTQ+ community. I can understand from a Libertarian-esque point of you why you don't believe the government should ban those things, but to argue that they are "human rights" but then say Incels are not entitled to the hetero equivalent is contradictory. Same can be said about laws against prostitution. So it's ok to forbid Incels from getting sex the one consenual way they can, but laws against sodomy are "unconstitutional"? Spare me the horse shit.
The only questionI ask myself is will Cucktears be high IQ enough to answer these? Or will they squirm and run away like normal?
