The 80/20 rule, in reality, means that 80% of all sex with women is being had by the top 20% of men. The bottom 80% of men are having 20% of the sex.
Sub-8 theorists came in and deduced, using their broken as fuck logic, that this means 80% of men are getting pretty much no sex whatsoever. What they fail to realise is that Chad in college is fucking multiple chicks every night there is a party and that women have ridiculously high notch counts, so giving away 80% of the sex to 20% of the men does not mean that sub-8s are all incel. Befriend a normalfag-tier man who does casual sex, and you will find that they get sex once a month to a few times a year using stuff like tinder. They are NOT incel.
The 80/20 rule talks about who gets what share of the sex, it is NOT about who has sex. What happens when sub-8 theorists, who are full of shit and go against the studies which have given us that figure in the first place, start screeching that it means the latter instead of the former? "80% of men are incel" "it's over if you aren't male model tier", "5/10 men are going to rise up because of sexlessness and overthrow the government next decade just wait", "95% of men are going to be having no sex by 2025". This is not factually correct, while it is true that things are more competitive and more men are incels than a few decades ago, the majority of men are still getting sex, just infrequently.
Peddling what is currently referred to as "hard sub-8 theory" just makes us look stupider, even in the eyes of incel-in-denial copers who really shouldn't be LARPing as male feminist activists on the internet, for their sake and ours. If you support sub-8 theory you support bad copes, male feminism, inceltiers and redditors by proxy, you also butcher a very effective blackpill on hypergamy and the sexual market.
Sub-8 theorists came in and deduced, using their broken as fuck logic, that this means 80% of men are getting pretty much no sex whatsoever. What they fail to realise is that Chad in college is fucking multiple chicks every night there is a party and that women have ridiculously high notch counts, so giving away 80% of the sex to 20% of the men does not mean that sub-8s are all incel. Befriend a normalfag-tier man who does casual sex, and you will find that they get sex once a month to a few times a year using stuff like tinder. They are NOT incel.
The 80/20 rule talks about who gets what share of the sex, it is NOT about who has sex. What happens when sub-8 theorists, who are full of shit and go against the studies which have given us that figure in the first place, start screeching that it means the latter instead of the former? "80% of men are incel" "it's over if you aren't male model tier", "5/10 men are going to rise up because of sexlessness and overthrow the government next decade just wait", "95% of men are going to be having no sex by 2025". This is not factually correct, while it is true that things are more competitive and more men are incels than a few decades ago, the majority of men are still getting sex, just infrequently.
Peddling what is currently referred to as "hard sub-8 theory" just makes us look stupider, even in the eyes of incel-in-denial copers who really shouldn't be LARPing as male feminist activists on the internet, for their sake and ours. If you support sub-8 theory you support bad copes, male feminism, inceltiers and redditors by proxy, you also butcher a very effective blackpill on hypergamy and the sexual market.
Last edited:
