Blackpill PSA: DO NOT WATCH ANTHROPOLOGY VIDEOS IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KILL YOURSELF. ANTHROPOLOGY IS BASICALLY THE BLACKPILL. AVOID!

[Cybersex is our hope]

Well, now you are moving the goalposts, if you're asking for direct evidence of "adding new genome to the mutation", which is called Horizontal gene transfer, it's possible in many different ways. One way, which is called transformation, is when bacteria take in exogenous DNA from their environment and incorporate it into their genome. Another way is through conjugation, which is when two bacterial cells physically connect and exchange genetic materials. These are observed and tested methods which can occur in nature.

There is evidence for these methods if you care to look for it. But just because there is no direct evidence doesn't mean Darwinism isn't correct.

Also, by your logic I could say something very similar about the blackpill, one could say, 'You've shown correlations and patterns, but you haven't shown proof of a definitive mechanism that guarantees these outcomes in all cases, so the blackpill is just a pseudophilosophy larping as science.'

No my goal post has always been: evidence of natural selection alone being able to add genetic infos to the point of giving birth to a new species. This has never been observed, only speculated about. Darwinian evolution is basically all about natural selection being capable of such thing (hence the name of the book) while other form of evolutionism didn’t.

I think even south korea recently removed darwinism from school programs recently exactly because of it being a speculation/philosophy and not a observable, repeatable science

 

[short yellow man]

Especially for yellows. Anthropology says we may have the genes from Homo erectus or some other ancient Homo species in East Asia. That's why we look like aliens.

 

[Jud Pottah]

Before modern civilization of post WW2 period, majority of children came from elites and their bastards. Low status subhumans couldn't reproduce much because they were poor, but in the post WW2 period, subhumans suddenly gained wealth and abundance allowing them to procreate in larger numbers (baby boom) while the elites reproduced less causing an explosion of subhumanity.

This is false. Serfs had families even Back. And most of the "poor" had the biggest of families. Never the rich. and still goes on. Just look at Africa. "muuh dick cant wear pants und shieet"

There is a striking line between poverty and the need to impose more misery!

 

[Jud Pottah]

Landlords needed serfs to procreate to tend their lands, and groom it with fertility.

That was the real wealth of old communities, and any pillar that could sustain anything. There were no incels most of the time. Unless you were a legit cripple. If you were Able bodied you would find a wife easily. One untouched by other men. Now every man is a competitor Against themselves, Hence no community! Welcome to jewish Capitalism.