Proving AWALT is the last step towards unified theory of blackpill

[Just say NIGGER!]

I feel like the fact that all women are very similar or same is well known to most men on an instinctual or subconscious level, but it's hard to claim any grand claims and push for change just based on that. We can easily prove importance of height, race, facial bones, shoulder width, ratios etc, but all of this on it's own doesn't prove without a doubt that all women are the same. Blackpill deniers can easily say "oooh sweetie this only applies to women on this site!" or "ooooh sweetie this only applies to women in bars!" etc.

I think one way AWALT can be proved is with dating apps. We all know how women are on dating apps, instant classics like the 80/20 rule and chadfishing stories are from those apps, but realistically speaking not all women are using them, but something basically all women are using are social apps like instagram, facebook, twitter etc. A strong case can be made that the social apps and dating apps have a lot in common when it comes to how they affect the psychology and standards of women who use them, due to endless options they are presented with.

 

[GrandWizard_137]

No amount of bulletproof statistics, hardcore data and unshakeable logic can convince bluepill beta soyboy cucks or ITroons

 

[Just say NIGGER!]

No amount of bulletproof statistics, hardcore data and unshakeable logic can convince bluepill beta soyboy cucks or ITroons

But we don't have any statistics on AWALT.

 

[killchad]

But we don't have any statistics on AWALT.

Even if we had no one would care. Look at the rise of LGBtQ shit to 40 percent of the food population in Spain which shows it's like a disease and not soemthing natural, yet faggots deny that it's spreading

 

[Sonicfancel]

AWALT is the true, but normies will just claim "they know a girl who is not like that".

 

[Just say NIGGER!]

AWALT is the true, but normies will just claim "they know a girl who is not like that".

Yeah, but what proof we have for that. If someone asks me for the importance of height I can pull 10 different studies, but for AWALT I got nothing.

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

There is some few studies that claim that foids go more on the average of everything while men remains more on the extremes

 

[Sonicfancel]

but for AWALT I got nothing.

I think GeckoBus did a thread about female literature, and it is all the same about seeking Chad.

 

[Grodd]

No amount of bulletproof statistics, hardcore data and unshakeable logic can convince bluepill beta soyboy cucks or ITroons

 

[Choler]

bump

 

[femcelbreedingnig]

Yeah, but what proof we have for that. If someone asks me for the importance of height I can pull 10 different studies, but for AWALT I got nothing.

All women prefer men taller than them. Or at least 96%.

And lookism is objective. ”Out of my league” existing proves this. Babies stare at attractive faces for 4x longer. Women orgasm to attractive faces more than anything else by far. Divorce rates by body count proves ALL women (and men) are effected by mate comparison (but we all know who has more market power).
All stated vs revealed preferences studies show that women LIE. Lie detector studies on body counts too

 

[exposesociety]

No amount of bulletproof statistics, hardcore data and unshakeable logic can convince bluepill beta soyboy cucks or ITroons

 

[based_meme]

AWALT is a very useful heuristic, but it shouldn't be stated as some kind of sweeping, absolute, strict rule, because exceptions and anomalies will almost always exist. AWALT is your standard black pill boilerplate. It's the digestible phrase based in evo pysch that women's primal sexual behaviors have those certain narrow parameters that we're familiar with.

 

[Poopless One]

No amount of bulletproof statistics, hardcore data and unshakeable logic can convince bluepill beta soyboy cucks or ITroons