Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News Prosecutors, defense wrangle over sentencing of incel YouTuber Malik "Smooth" Sanchez for Manhattan bomb hoax

PPEcel

PPEcel

cope and seethe
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
29,095
Recently, the Federal Defenders of New York and the U.S. Department of Justice filed their respective sentencing memorandums in the case of Malik "Smooth" Sanchez.

TL/DR for LowIQcels

Probation Officer’s Recommendation:
Time served + 3 years supervised release
Defense Request: Time served + <3 years supervised release
Government Request: 8 to 14 months imprisonment + 3 years supervised release

Actual Sentence: Hearing scheduled for April 6th, 2022 before U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon.

Update: Sanchez was sentenced to time served plus three years of supervised release, in line with Probation's recommendation.

Background

"Allahu Akbar. Allahu Akbar. Bomb detonation in two, in two minutes. I take you with me and I kill all you. I kill all you right now. And I kill all you for Allah. Fuck, fuck that shit. I’m gonna Allah. I’m gonna do it. I’m gonna fucking do it for Allah. I’m gonna do it, for, Allah, Allah, Allahu Akbar, Come on. I do it, bomb now, bomb now."

Ezgif 4 d744453c1c

In February 2021, Sanchez approached two women who were dining in the outdoor dining area of a Manhattan restaurant and made a bomb threat while livestreaming. Two months later, he was arrested by the FBI and ordered held without bail by U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. Sanchez spent roughly three weeks in jail before Judge McMahon overturned Judge Wang's order and released him to home detention on a $10,000 unsecured bond.

Four months ago, Sanchez pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with false information and hoaxes concerning an act of terrorism, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1031(a)(1). Unusually for federal criminal cases, he did so without a plea agreement:

View: https://twitter.com/SDNYnews/status/1459256940287213570

Sanchez faces a statutory maximum of 5 years' imprisonment. However, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advise a far lower sentence in this particular case: imprisonment or home detention for between 8 to 14 months (if you ask the Government), or between 6 to 12 months (if you ask the defense). Probation Services recommended that he be sentenced to time served, followed by three years of supervised release. As is usual, Sanchez's counsel seeks a more lenient sentence, whereas the Government’s counsel seeks a harsher one. Here's how the parties' positions on sentencing stack up:

The Defense's Case

"This is a Pretrial success story...[Malik] spent 23 days in jail and then nine months on home confinement and off the internet. Malik used that time and mental space to reset his life. Now Malik has earned his GED, is productively engaged in a paid internship, and is planning for his future."

Download 4

In a brief filed last week, Sanchez's public defender, Clay Kaminsky, asked for a sentence of time served and a period of supervised release. He noted that Sanchez had markedly self-improved while on bail: Sanchez successfully completed numerous sessions of mental health counselling, obtained his GED and an internship, and is now considering a career in retail, construction, or the military. Over the last 11 months, Judge McMahon gradually relaxed Sanchez’s bail conditions, allowing him to take online classes, run a 5k race, and ultimately lifted his home detention requirement. Returning Sanchez to prison, Kaminsky pointed out, would “interrupt and hamper” his rehabilitative progress.


Sanchez struggled with ADHD at school, which led to bullying and behavioral issues; when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, his mental health care was paused and he was left with no safety net. That year, three of Sanchez’s relatives died within a two-month span. Kaminsky acknowledged that Sanchez sought social connection online and began livestreaming “immature and sometimes illegal stunts” after he was “immersed in toxic internet subcultures”, encouraged by online strangers who “did not have [his] best interests at heart”.

As is usual in criminal sentencing, Kaminsky also filed character reference letters from Sanchez’s family, friends, and teachers. According to two of Sanchez’s social workers, Sarah Witman-Salkin and Jessica Cuttone, he now “speaks often about the remorse he feels for his actions”, about “toxic masculinity”, and shares with his peers the “importance of treating others with kindness and respect”. An instructor says Sanchez told him of his desire to join the U.S. Army as an infantryman, writing that “I believe that if Malik were able to join the military, he would benefit from it…individuals can turn themselves around and be highly successful when they put their heart and soul into it.”


The Government's Case

"The defendant’s offense conduct demonstrates that he can inflict damage armed with even just a phone and an internet connection...all while proclaiming murderous Incel ideology."

130347465

Two days ago, Assistant United States Attorney Kaylan Lasky filed her response to Kaminsky's memorandum. Arguing that “extremist, violent, and rephrensible Incel ideology” was the driving force behind Sanchez’s actions, she asks the Court to impose a carceral sentence. Indeed, the term “incel” shows up no less than 18 times in her brief. Incels, according to Lasky, are an “extremist, largely online group that spews misogynistic vitriol, promotes violence towards women, and [have] been responsible for carrying out horrific acts of violence in recent years.”


Lasky attempts to connect Sanchez with Elliot Rodger, who himself earns no less than six mentions. Rodger is inaccurately described as the “unofficial founder” of the Incel “group”, which is odd—there is neither a “founder”, official or unofficial, nor a “group”. She advances this position by quoting, amongst other examples, a speech that Sanchez made to two women while livestreaming in public:

"Fuck you, you bitch. It’s ‘cause of you, it’s ‘cause of you that I’m a virgin - I have Incel rage. You know what? Elliot Rodgers was good. Elliot Rodgers was a good guy. I swear to God. Elliot Rodgers was a good guy. I swear to God that he should have blown their brains out a long time ago. I swear to fucking God. They deserved to be run over and hit by a truck. They deserved to be slaughtered. Slaughtered and hit by a fuckin’ truck. Fuck these fuckin’ bitches, man. Fuck."

Lasky's sentencing memorandum is in large part markedly similar to her May 2021 letter opposing Sanchez’s application for bail, where she argued that Sanchez’s “violent Incel ideology” constituted a danger to the community—a position that she, the Government, ultimately lost in court.


However, Lasky bases her request for Sanchez’s incarceration not only on Sanchez’s status as an “Incel adherent” but also on the “serious harm” that Sanchez inflicted on the two women who were the subject of his bomb hoax. “Just punishment in this case demands real consequences,” she says, “[T]errorizing innocent people [should result] in serious punishment.” To buttress her case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office publicly released two victim impact statements. This is what one of the women had to say:

"We ran away in horror, thinking our lives were on the line...For the next several weeks, I lived with my parents in Pennsylvania, too afraid to return to life in the city. I was convinced a terrorist was operating in my neighborhood, ready to actually use violence at any given time...Mr. Sanchez altered my faith in humanity...I hope Mr. Sanchez receives the maximum sentence possible and learns how serious his actions are. I am afraid of him and other people like him. I was even too afraid to have my name shared with this statement because I never want him to find me and terrorize me further."


_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Colleen mcmahon b7fbc4ce a91c 43f7 8b70 27ac93fffb9 resize 750

Sanchez's sentencing hearing is scheduled before Judge McMahon (pictured here) at 12 p.m. next Wednesday, April 6th, 2022, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in New York.

In many ways, Sanchez’s case is a quintessentially American story: a young brown man in the hot seat while a (white) prosecutor seeking a punitive sentence clashes against a public defender seeking a rehabilitative sentence. It’s a scenario that unfolds in local, state, and federal courts across the country every week. In other ways, it’s a notable case in it’s own right, because of the Government’s attempt to draw a line between Elliot Rodger and Sanchez. This is, after all, one of two incel-related cases currently being prosecuted by the Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. (The other alleged incel, David Kaufman, is scheduled to be sentenced in White Plains, NY later this month on one count of threatening interstate communications and a second count of cyberstalking.)

Do either of these cases translate to a tougher position against incels? Time will tell. But so far, federal judges have been reluctant to consider self-described “inceldom” as an aggravating factor in criminal sentencing—a sign that they do not consider “Incel” as an “ideology” or a public safety issue more serious than any other. For example, in April 2021, U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee sentenced “redpilled” incel Carl Bennington to 18 months’ imprisonment for cyberstalking two teenage girls over several years—notwithstanding a plea agreement setting out a 21-month sentence, and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ recommendation of 33 to 41 months in that case. Even in Sanchez’s case, Lasky’s request for an 8 to 14-month sentence is a far cry from the 30 to 37-month sentence she originally predicted Sanchez would receive (see the May 2021 letter). Perhaps Boomer judges are more immune to the incelophobic, SJW hysteria currently permeating social media.

Is “Smooth” Sanchez on the path to being a bluepiller who reflects on his “toxic masculinity”? Or is this an act and is he still based at heart? Regardless, does his supposedly “cruel conduct” (in Lasky’s words) still warrant imprisonment? Feminists will say yes, of course—because the true nature of (carceral) feminism is not liberalism; it is authoritarianism masquerading as social justice.

And last but not least, regarding the victim impact statements—melodramatic much? Woman moment. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
Giphy

@SparkLight @Dregster666 @BardakTheGreat @ERadicator @Wellington @Emba @highinhibition @ordinaryotaku @Mecoja @Transcended Trucel @the virgin shepherd @BPJ @Glerforpus @wei#3959 @ballistictesticles @Billowel @Jmax @FlyFace @nazianime @Arabcel9 @Rotter @JustinSane @übertard @kanyepilled @SoySupreme @Indari
 
Last edited:
all this trouble for 5$ media
 
insane amount of money wasted because of a harmless prank
 
Lasky attempts to connect Sanchez with Elliot Rodger, who himself earns no less than six mentions. Rodger is inaccurately described as the “unofficial founder” of the Incel “group”, which is odd—there is neither a “founder”, official or unofficial, nor a “group”.
sounds like my "counselor" in uni, fucking worthless cunt
 
i still don't understand how he was jailed at home for some random stupid prank.they should have just given him a fine and that's it.
 
Recently, the Federal Defenders of New York and the U.S. Department of Justice filed their respective sentencing memorandums in the case of Malik "Smooth" Sanchez.

TL/DR for LowIQcels

Probation Officer’s Recommendation:
Time served + 3 years supervised release
Defense Request: Time served + <3 years supervised release
Government Request: 8 to 14 months imprisonment + 3 years supervised release

Actual Sentence: Hearing scheduled for April 6th, 2022 before U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon.

Background

"Allahu Akbar. Allahu Akbar. Bomb detonation in two, in two minutes. I take you with me and I kill all you. I kill all you right now. And I kill all you for Allah. Fuck, fuck that shit. I’m gonna Allah. I’m gonna do it. I’m gonna fucking do it for Allah. I’m gonna do it, for, Allah, Allah, Allahu Akbar, Come on. I do it, bomb now, bomb now."

View attachment 596410

In February 2021, Sanchez approached two women who were dining in the outdoor dining area of a Manhattan restaurant and made a bomb threat while livestreaming. Two months later, he was arrested by the FBI and ordered held without bail by U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. Sanchez spent roughly three weeks in jail before Judge McMahon overturned Judge Wang's order and released him to home detention on a $10,000 unsecured bond.

Four months ago, Sanchez pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with false information and hoaxes concerning an act of terrorism, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1031(a)(1). Unusually for federal criminal cases, he did so without a plea agreement:

View: https://twitter.com/SDNYnews/status/1459256940287213570

Sanchez faces a statutory maximum of 5 years' imprisonment. However, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advise a far lower sentence in this particular case: imprisonment or home detention for between 8 to 14 months (if you ask the Government), or between 6 to 12 months (if you ask the defense). Probation Services recommended that he be sentenced to time served, followed by three years of supervised release. As is usual, Sanchez's counsel seeks a more lenient sentence, whereas the Government’s counsel seeks a harsher one. Here's how the parties' positions on sentencing stack up:

The Defense's Case

"This is a Pretrial success story...[Malik] spent 23 days in jail and then nine months on home confinement and off the internet. Malik used that time and mental space to reset his life. Now Malik has earned his GED, is productively engaged in a paid internship, and is planning for his future."

View attachment 596411

In a brief filed last week, Sanchez's public defender, Clay Kaminsky, asked for a sentence of time served and a period of supervised release. He noted that Sanchez had markedly self-improved while on bail: Sanchez successfully completed numerous sessions of mental health counselling, obtained his GED and an internship, and is now considering a career in retail, construction, or the military. Over the last 11 months, Judge McMahon gradually relaxed Sanchez’s bail conditions, allowing him to take online classes, run a 5k race, and ultimately lifted his home detention requirement. Returning Sanchez to prison, Kaminsky pointed out, would “interrupt and hamper” his rehabilitative progress.


Sanchez struggled with ADHD at school, which led to bullying and behavioral issues; when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, his mental health care was paused and he was left with no safety net. That year, three of Sanchez’s relatives died within a two-month span. Kaminsky acknowledged that Sanchez sought social connection online and began livestreaming “immature and sometimes illegal stunts” after he was “immersed in toxic internet subcultures”, encouraged by online strangers who “did not have [his] best interests at heart”.

As is usual in criminal sentencing, Kaminsky also filed character reference letters from Sanchez’s family, friends, and teachers. According to two of Sanchez’s social workers, Sarah Witman-Salkin and Jessica Cuttone, he now “speaks often about the remorse he feels for his actions”, about “toxic masculinity”, and shares with his peers the “importance of treating others with kindness and respect”. An instructor says Sanchez told him of his desire to join the U.S. Army as an infantryman, writing that “I believe that if Malik were able to join the military, he would benefit from it…individuals can turn themselves around and be highly successful when they put their heart and soul into it.”


The Government's Case

"The defendant’s offense conduct demonstrates that he can inflict damage armed with even just a phone and an internet connection...all while proclaiming murderous Incel ideology."

View attachment 596412

Two days ago, Assistant United States Attorney Kaylan Lasky filed her response to Kaminsky's memorandum. Arguing that “extremist, violent, and rephrensible Incel ideology” was the driving force behind Sanchez’s actions, she asks the Court to impose a carceral sentence. Indeed, the term “incel” shows up no less than 18 times in her brief. Incels, according to Lasky, are an “extremist, largely online group that spews misogynistic vitriol, promotes violence towards women, and [have] been responsible for carrying out horrific acts of violence in recent years.”


Lasky attempts to connect Sanchez with Elliot Rodger, who himself earns no less than six mentions. Rodger is inaccurately described as the “unofficial founder” of the Incel “group”, which is odd—there is neither a “founder”, official or unofficial, nor a “group”. She advances this position by quoting, amongst other examples, a speech that Sanchez made to two women while livestreaming in public:

"Fuck you, you bitch. It’s ‘cause of you, it’s ‘cause of you that I’m a virgin - I have Incel rage. You know what? Elliot Rodgers was good. Elliot Rodgers was a good guy. I swear to God. Elliot Rodgers was a good guy. I swear to God that he should have blown their brains out a long time ago. I swear to fucking God. They deserved to be run over and hit by a truck. They deserved to be slaughtered. Slaughtered and hit by a fuckin’ truck. Fuck these fuckin’ bitches, man. Fuck."

Lasky's sentencing memorandum is in large part markedly similar to her May 2021 letter opposing Sanchez’s application for bail, where she argued that Sanchez’s “violent Incel ideology” constituted a danger to the community—a position that she, the Government, ultimately lost in court.


However, Lasky bases her request for Sanchez’s incarceration not only on Sanchez’s status as an “Incel adherent” but also on the “serious harm” that Sanchez inflicted on the two women who were the subject of his bomb hoax. “Just punishment in this case demands real consequences,” she says, “[T]errorizing innocent people [should result] in serious punishment.” To buttress her case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office publicly released two victim impact statements. This is what one of the women had to say:

"We ran away in horror, thinking our lives were on the line...For the next several weeks, I lived with my parents in Pennsylvania, too afraid to return to life in the city. I was convinced a terrorist was operating in my neighborhood, ready to actually use violence at any given time...Mr. Sanchez altered my faith in humanity...I hope Mr. Sanchez receives the maximum sentence possible and learns how serious his actions are. I am afraid of him and other people like him. I was even too afraid to have my name shared with this statement because I never want him to find me and terrorize me further."


_______________________________________________________________________________________________

View attachment 596414

Sanchez's sentencing hearing is scheduled before Judge McMahon (pictured here) at 12 p.m. next Wednesday, April 6th, 2022, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in New York.

In many ways, Sanchez’s case is a quintessentially American story: a young brown man in the hot seat while a (white) prosecutor seeking a punitive sentence clashes against a public defender seeking a rehabilitative sentence. It’s a scenario that unfolds in local, state, and federal courts across the country every week. In other ways, it’s a notable case in it’s own right, because of the Government’s attempt to draw a line between Elliot Rodger and Sanchez. This is, after all, one of two incel-related cases currently being prosecuted by the Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. (The other alleged incel, David Kaufman, is scheduled to be sentenced in White Plains, NY later this month on one count of threatening interstate communications and a second count of cyberstalking.)

Do either of these cases translate to a tougher position against incels? Time will tell. But so far, federal judges have been reluctant to consider self-described “inceldom” as an aggravating factor in criminal sentencing—a sign that they do not consider “Incel” as an “ideology” or a public safety issue more serious than any other. For example, in April 2021, U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee sentenced “redpilled” incel Carl Bennington to 18 months’ imprisonment for cyberstalking two teenage girls over several years—notwithstanding a plea agreement setting out a 21-month sentence, and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ recommendation of 33 to 41 months in that case. Even in Sanchez’s case, Lasky’s request for an 8 to 14-month sentence is a far cry from the 30 to 37-month sentence she originally predicted Sanchez would receive (see the May 2021 letter). Perhaps Boomer judges are more immune to the incelophobic, SJW hysteria currently permeating social media.

Is “Smooth” Sanchez on the path to being a bluepiller who reflects on his “toxic masculinity”? Or is this an act and is he still based at heart? Regardless, does his supposedly “cruel conduct” (in Lasky’s words) still warrant imprisonment? Feminists will say yes, of course—because the true nature of (carceral) feminism is not liberalism; it is authoritarianism masquerading as social justice.

And last but not least, regarding the victim impact statements—melodramatic much? Woman moment. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
View attachment 596423

@SparkLight @Dregster666 @BardakTheGreat @ERadicator @Wellington @Emba @highinhibition @ordinaryotaku @Mecoja @Transcended Trucel @the virgin shepherd @BPJ @Glerforpus @wei#3959 @ballistictesticles @Billowel @Jmax @FlyFace @nazianime @Arabcel9 @Rotter @JustinSane @übertard @kanyepilled @SoySupreme @Indari

Is sanchez a self-proclaimed incel :feelswhat:?
 
laughable..stupid fucking foids.

this wouldnt even be anywhere near considered a crime in my country..because it was so obviously just a hoax

thanks for ruining my evening..:feelswhat:
 
im going to get mcdonalds
An incredible Lifefuel :feelscomfy: I actually enjoyed myself a HotnSpicy sandwich earlier today :society:

FulltimeLoser would be seething right about now after reading your post :feelshaha:
 
He tried to say that the whole “incel thing” was a gimmick but we all know he can’t pull toilets in his streams
 
He plays them like a fiddle with his "mental improvement"
 
"This is a Pretrial success story...[Malik] spent 23 days in jail and then nine months on home confinement and off the internet. Malik used that time and mental space to reset his life. Now Malik has earned his GED, is productively engaged in a paid internship, and is planning for his future."

I didn’t know the fucker didn’t even graduate from high school.
 
We ran away in horror, thinking our lives were on the line...For the next several weeks, I lived with my parents in Pennsylvania, too afraid to return to life in the city. I was convinced a terrorist was operating in my neighborhood, ready to actually use violence at any given time...
Lmfao. Imagine moving to Pennsylvania JUST because some dude did a little bit of trolling & not because of living in Gomorrah AKA New York.
Anyways... SMOOTH SANCHEZ DID NOTHING WRONG!
 
the true nature of (carceral) feminism is not liberalism; it is authoritarianism masquerading as social justice.
Absolutely true. Feminists don't want to be equal to men, they want to control men :bigbrain:
i still don't understand how he was jailed at home for some random stupid prank.they should have just given him a fine and that's it.
Yeah. I hope that bitch cunt attorney Lasky loses her bar license and end up as a hobo on the streets. Same for the two bitches who couldn't take a harmless joke. It's sad that the legal system landers to those drama-seeking snowflakes :society:
 
Recently, the Federal Defenders of New York and the U.S. Department of Justice filed their respective sentencing memorandums in the case of Malik "Smooth" Sanchez.

TL/DR for LowIQcels

Probation Officer’s Recommendation:
Time served + 3 years supervised release
Defense Request: Time served + <3 years supervised release
Government Request: 8 to 14 months imprisonment + 3 years supervised release

Actual Sentence: Hearing scheduled for April 6th, 2022 before U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon.

Background

"Allahu Akbar. Allahu Akbar. Bomb detonation in two, in two minutes. I take you with me and I kill all you. I kill all you right now. And I kill all you for Allah. Fuck, fuck that shit. I’m gonna Allah. I’m gonna do it. I’m gonna fucking do it for Allah. I’m gonna do it, for, Allah, Allah, Allahu Akbar, Come on. I do it, bomb now, bomb now."

View attachment 596410

In February 2021, Sanchez approached two women who were dining in the outdoor dining area of a Manhattan restaurant and made a bomb threat while livestreaming. Two months later, he was arrested by the FBI and ordered held without bail by U.S. Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang. Sanchez spent roughly three weeks in jail before Judge McMahon overturned Judge Wang's order and released him to home detention on a $10,000 unsecured bond.

Four months ago, Sanchez pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with false information and hoaxes concerning an act of terrorism, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1031(a)(1). Unusually for federal criminal cases, he did so without a plea agreement:

View: https://twitter.com/SDNYnews/status/1459256940287213570

Sanchez faces a statutory maximum of 5 years' imprisonment. However, the Federal Sentencing Guidelines advise a far lower sentence in this particular case: imprisonment or home detention for between 8 to 14 months (if you ask the Government), or between 6 to 12 months (if you ask the defense). Probation Services recommended that he be sentenced to time served, followed by three years of supervised release. As is usual, Sanchez's counsel seeks a more lenient sentence, whereas the Government’s counsel seeks a harsher one. Here's how the parties' positions on sentencing stack up:

The Defense's Case

"This is a Pretrial success story...[Malik] spent 23 days in jail and then nine months on home confinement and off the internet. Malik used that time and mental space to reset his life. Now Malik has earned his GED, is productively engaged in a paid internship, and is planning for his future."

View attachment 596411

In a brief filed last week, Sanchez's public defender, Clay Kaminsky, asked for a sentence of time served and a period of supervised release. He noted that Sanchez had markedly self-improved while on bail: Sanchez successfully completed numerous sessions of mental health counselling, obtained his GED and an internship, and is now considering a career in retail, construction, or the military. Over the last 11 months, Judge McMahon gradually relaxed Sanchez’s bail conditions, allowing him to take online classes, run a 5k race, and ultimately lifted his home detention requirement. Returning Sanchez to prison, Kaminsky pointed out, would “interrupt and hamper” his rehabilitative progress.


Sanchez struggled with ADHD at school, which led to bullying and behavioral issues; when the COVID-19 pandemic hit, his mental health care was paused and he was left with no safety net. That year, three of Sanchez’s relatives died within a two-month span. Kaminsky acknowledged that Sanchez sought social connection online and began livestreaming “immature and sometimes illegal stunts” after he was “immersed in toxic internet subcultures”, encouraged by online strangers who “did not have [his] best interests at heart”.

As is usual in criminal sentencing, Kaminsky also filed character reference letters from Sanchez’s family, friends, and teachers. According to two of Sanchez’s social workers, Sarah Witman-Salkin and Jessica Cuttone, he now “speaks often about the remorse he feels for his actions”, about “toxic masculinity”, and shares with his peers the “importance of treating others with kindness and respect”. An instructor says Sanchez told him of his desire to join the U.S. Army as an infantryman, writing that “I believe that if Malik were able to join the military, he would benefit from it…individuals can turn themselves around and be highly successful when they put their heart and soul into it.”


The Government's Case

"The defendant’s offense conduct demonstrates that he can inflict damage armed with even just a phone and an internet connection...all while proclaiming murderous Incel ideology."

View attachment 596412

Two days ago, Assistant United States Attorney Kaylan Lasky filed her response to Kaminsky's memorandum. Arguing that “extremist, violent, and rephrensible Incel ideology” was the driving force behind Sanchez’s actions, she asks the Court to impose a carceral sentence. Indeed, the term “incel” shows up no less than 18 times in her brief. Incels, according to Lasky, are an “extremist, largely online group that spews misogynistic vitriol, promotes violence towards women, and [have] been responsible for carrying out horrific acts of violence in recent years.”


Lasky attempts to connect Sanchez with Elliot Rodger, who himself earns no less than six mentions. Rodger is inaccurately described as the “unofficial founder” of the Incel “group”, which is odd—there is neither a “founder”, official or unofficial, nor a “group”. She advances this position by quoting, amongst other examples, a speech that Sanchez made to two women while livestreaming in public:

"Fuck you, you bitch. It’s ‘cause of you, it’s ‘cause of you that I’m a virgin - I have Incel rage. You know what? Elliot Rodgers was good. Elliot Rodgers was a good guy. I swear to God. Elliot Rodgers was a good guy. I swear to God that he should have blown their brains out a long time ago. I swear to fucking God. They deserved to be run over and hit by a truck. They deserved to be slaughtered. Slaughtered and hit by a fuckin’ truck. Fuck these fuckin’ bitches, man. Fuck."

Lasky's sentencing memorandum is in large part markedly similar to her May 2021 letter opposing Sanchez’s application for bail, where she argued that Sanchez’s “violent Incel ideology” constituted a danger to the community—a position that she, the Government, ultimately lost in court.


However, Lasky bases her request for Sanchez’s incarceration not only on Sanchez’s status as an “Incel adherent” but also on the “serious harm” that Sanchez inflicted on the two women who were the subject of his bomb hoax. “Just punishment in this case demands real consequences,” she says, “[T]errorizing innocent people [should result] in serious punishment.” To buttress her case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office publicly released two victim impact statements. This is what one of the women had to say:

"We ran away in horror, thinking our lives were on the line...For the next several weeks, I lived with my parents in Pennsylvania, too afraid to return to life in the city. I was convinced a terrorist was operating in my neighborhood, ready to actually use violence at any given time...Mr. Sanchez altered my faith in humanity...I hope Mr. Sanchez receives the maximum sentence possible and learns how serious his actions are. I am afraid of him and other people like him. I was even too afraid to have my name shared with this statement because I never want him to find me and terrorize me further."


_______________________________________________________________________________________________

View attachment 596414

Sanchez's sentencing hearing is scheduled before Judge McMahon (pictured here) at 12 p.m. next Wednesday, April 6th, 2022, at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse in New York.

In many ways, Sanchez’s case is a quintessentially American story: a young brown man in the hot seat while a (white) prosecutor seeking a punitive sentence clashes against a public defender seeking a rehabilitative sentence. It’s a scenario that unfolds in local, state, and federal courts across the country every week. In other ways, it’s a notable case in it’s own right, because of the Government’s attempt to draw a line between Elliot Rodger and Sanchez. This is, after all, one of two incel-related cases currently being prosecuted by the Terrorism and International Narcotics Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York. (The other alleged incel, David Kaufman, is scheduled to be sentenced in White Plains, NY later this month on one count of threatening interstate communications and a second count of cyberstalking.)

Do either of these cases translate to a tougher position against incels? Time will tell. But so far, federal judges have been reluctant to consider self-described “inceldom” as an aggravating factor in criminal sentencing—a sign that they do not consider “Incel” as an “ideology” or a public safety issue more serious than any other. For example, in April 2021, U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee sentenced “redpilled” incel Carl Bennington to 18 months’ imprisonment for cyberstalking two teenage girls over several years—notwithstanding a plea agreement setting out a 21-month sentence, and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines’ recommendation of 33 to 41 months in that case. Even in Sanchez’s case, Lasky’s request for an 8 to 14-month sentence is a far cry from the 30 to 37-month sentence she originally predicted Sanchez would receive (see the May 2021 letter). Perhaps Boomer judges are more immune to the incelophobic, SJW hysteria currently permeating social media.

Is “Smooth” Sanchez on the path to being a bluepiller who reflects on his “toxic masculinity”? Or is this an act and is he still based at heart? Regardless, does his supposedly “cruel conduct” (in Lasky’s words) still warrant imprisonment? Feminists will say yes, of course—because the true nature of (carceral) feminism is not liberalism; it is authoritarianism masquerading as social justice.

And last but not least, regarding the victim impact statements—melodramatic much? Woman moment. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
View attachment 596423

@SparkLight @Dregster666 @BardakTheGreat @ERadicator @Wellington @Emba @highinhibition @ordinaryotaku @Mecoja @Transcended Trucel @the virgin shepherd @BPJ @Glerforpus @wei#3959 @ballistictesticles @Billowel @Jmax @FlyFace @nazianime @Arabcel9 @Rotter @JustinSane @übertard @kanyepilled @SoySupreme @Indari

Quite interesting and I think the answer is that he fell through a crack and is headed back into Normieville for a temporary period of time. I find it hard to believe he is truly what they call "rehabilitated". His Inceldom is showing, that was a peak at the difficulties of his existence. It may have been that the term Incel was used vaguely and tied to him erroneously. However, the net result of this is clear. Now, younger types like Lasky are trying hard to tie a loosely or non-affiliated group of people all experiencing a cultural phenomenon into a legit category of "Extremist ideology perpetrated by Incels"
 
Yeah. I hope that bitch cunt attorney Lasky loses her bar license and end up as a hobo on the streets. Same for the two bitches who couldn't take a harmless joke. It's sad that the legal system landers to those drama-seeking snowflakes :society:

it is straight up impossible for an AUSA to ever face consequences for literally anything since they are the only part of the DOJ that is immune to OIG oversight, and OPR is as useless as a hole puncher in a condom factory. you could literally commit ten brady violations and still not lose your job
 
And last but not least, regarding the victim impact statements—melodramatic much? Woman moment. :feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:
I want to him to have the maximum possible sentence.

It's not suprising every person of the empathetic gender wants to set a young man's future backwards further over a few words rather than establishing grounds and helping him progress and move on.

Seriously fuck those bitches. It's like goliath patronising a harmless ethnic subhuman, while they hop on chad's dick afterwards
 
He was so low inhib it makes me wonder if he was actually suicidal. Based and funny ADHDcel, nonetheless :feelsjuice:
 
Dumb low inhib porto rican
 
Lmfao. Imagine moving to Pennsylvania JUST because some dude did a little bit of trolling & not because of living in Gomorrah AKA New York.
Anyways... SMOOTH SANCHEZ DID NOTHING WRONG!
Woman moment
 
Lmfao. Imagine moving to Pennsylvania JUST because some dude did a little bit of trolling & not because of living in Gomorrah AKA New York.
Anyways... SMOOTH SANCHEZ DID NOTHING WRONG!
Woman moment

i keep reading this victim impact statement and cant help but laugh
SDNY 1 21 cr 00269 CM 46 1 6
 
JFL 14 months in prison for a stupid prank
 
This is what one of the women had to say:

"We ran away in horror, thinking our lives were on the line...For the next several weeks, I lived with my parents in Pennsylvania, too afraid to return to life in the city. I was convinced a terrorist was operating in my neighborhood, ready to actually use violence at any given time...Mr. Sanchez altered my faith in humanity...I hope Mr. Sanchez receives the maximum sentence possible and learns how serious his actions are. I am afraid of him and other people like him. I was even too afraid to have my name shared with this statement because I never want him to find me and terrorize me further."
"NOOOOOOOOOOOO HE SAID HE WOULD BLOW ME UP AND MY DUMBASS TOOK IT SERIOUSLY!!!:foidSoy:I HOPE HE GOES TO JAIL FOREVER THE SCARY TERRORIST!!!!!! :foidSoy:"
jfl
 
If he was a Chad he would have gotten a few laughs, Incels get jail time. :blackpill::blackpill::blackpill:
 
Good looking guy, I hope he ascends and never looks back.
 
Its all because These fucking 2 Woman Not getting it "

This world is so fucking cucked , you even have to Care what your saying Out loud ( for man that Is :feelsclown: )
 
Beyond ruining his life for what is essentially a thought crime, the increasingly alienating rhetoric toward the fact of his being incel should worry everyone here. A virgin male saying he deserves love and sex will be outlawed not long into the future.
 

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
4
Views
282
faded
faded
just another incel
Replies
23
Views
462
Robb97
Robb97
NotTheElliot
Replies
8
Views
439
Ron.Belgrade
Ron.Belgrade

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top