Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity Pro-war Russian journalist assassinated by traitorous Russian woman

  • Thread starter sneed (not chuck)
  • Start date
These aspects can be trained, incels are generally capable of building muscle.
Redpill me on height training.
The deadliest war in history was in the modern era.
Bigger populations mean more death in total, but not death per capita, small percentages of a nation's population die in modern war. In the past total defeat would sometimes mean being virtually wiped out, or being doomed to irrelevancy from the population being decimated at best.
Because producing weapons back then was heavily labor intensive, especially when they were largely limited to melee. Nowadays machinery allows one to mass produce guns and ammunition.
True, but employment in the workforce doesn't need to correlate with women's rights, that decision is social.
So if they had the ability to pass these laws without popular approval, why would they care about the opinions of women? Their power is clearly not limited by democracy.
Because they are weak men. Men could kill all women on the planet in a single day if they wanted to, vice versa is impossible, women depend on men, not the other way around.
If it was socially unacceptable then you wouldn't need to kill millions of men in these wars, dumb dumb.
Yes you would, surplus of men would still exist.
 
Redpill me on height training.
It's a detriment since it makes you a bigger target. I was talking about training strength.
Bigger populations mean more death in total, but not death per capita, small percentages of a nation's population die in modern war. In the past total defeat would sometimes mean being virtually wiped out, or being doomed to irrelevancy from the population being decimated at best.
Well then that's good, a smaller percentage of men are dying.
True, but employment in the workforce doesn't need to correlate with women's rights, that decision is social.
Women's rights are a social issue.
Because they are weak men. Men could kill all women on the planet in a single day if they wanted to, vice versa is impossible, women depend on men, not the other way around.
This "weak men" argument is just a way to deflect blame away from foids. Foids want men to blame and fight each other, not them.
Yes you would, surplus of men would still exist.
Populations are 50/50 unless you are aborting foids or sending men to die off in wars.
 
She didn't kill him because she cares about men, but because she's West's puppet.
 
Fuck this bitch. During war, all women should have all their phones taken away and they should have no access to the internet. They will be the first to sell out the nation.
Why should they have them during peace times either? All they use it for is sje undermining of civ and chad chasing on tinder.
 

Similar threads

DarkStar
Replies
9
Views
922
404BrainNotFound
404BrainNotFound
DarkStar
Replies
6
Views
364
Emba
Emba
RealSchizo
Replies
29
Views
2K
pizzamaxxer
pizzamaxxer
hghcel
Replies
28
Views
2K
currycell900
currycell900

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top