DostoevskyCel
Officer
★
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2021
- Posts
- 551
the only outcome of it not being private is ITcels screenshotting, but this isn't even the worst part, they feign ignorance at every opportunity, gaslight, and outright lie. Not to mention that the admins bot their posts like crazy, if you sort by new on their sub one in 20 posts have 1k+, one in around 10 have 100+ and 99% of the rest get sub 30 upvotes, it isn't normal for a legit sub. We are drip feeding content to incels in denial and keeping them in the sphere of normie advice, meaning they remain bluepilled.
No one needs me to tell you how horseshit all of this post is, but a proof by counter example should suffice for the claim that there are no chads or stacies. Jeremy Meeks, in spite of being an unironic violent criminal, became a stacked model purely because of his face. Do you think Margot Robbie and Marilyn Monroe became actresses because of their great personalities, contacts, and hard work!! no, people want good looking actresses, hence they became actresses.
There are no incels by nature? Well there are more men than women on earth, so statistically speaking a very many men will live alone forever or for extended periods of time. Also, some children are born unable to become theoretical physicists. No matter how hard you force them, they will never get a phd in physics, they are not smart enough. Incels are the 50 iq somalians of the dating world.
It's also worth mentioning that this (mostly) isn't a self identifying incel forum, if your lived experience tells you that women do not find you attractive, and despite all the self improvement you cannot get a gf, and you are involuntarily celibate, you're an incel. Not to mention, there have been incels, and violent incels, before the internet's conception, so the notion that incels are a internet subculture is embarrassingly false.
One final thing to note, dear IT cucks and virgins but not incels, some men are not attractive enough for Margot Robbie to be sexually attracted to them, we can all agree. However, there is nothing in her biology that tells her to go for the 9/10 chad as opposed to the 7/10 chadlite, its just her preference, and her own inflated ego which makes her seek out only the best males. As all women have their egos inflated owing to soyciety, they naturally gravitate to higher status men than themselves. That means the lowest value males in terms of attractiveness have zero women actively seeking to be romantically involved with them. Incels are the peacocks with no feathers, there is biologically no reason for women to gravitate to us and be attracted to us. What makes normies think that a bird with no feathers dying without having kids is different from an incel not having children of his own? - cope.
No one needs me to tell you how horseshit all of this post is, but a proof by counter example should suffice for the claim that there are no chads or stacies. Jeremy Meeks, in spite of being an unironic violent criminal, became a stacked model purely because of his face. Do you think Margot Robbie and Marilyn Monroe became actresses because of their great personalities, contacts, and hard work!! no, people want good looking actresses, hence they became actresses.
There are no incels by nature? Well there are more men than women on earth, so statistically speaking a very many men will live alone forever or for extended periods of time. Also, some children are born unable to become theoretical physicists. No matter how hard you force them, they will never get a phd in physics, they are not smart enough. Incels are the 50 iq somalians of the dating world.
It's also worth mentioning that this (mostly) isn't a self identifying incel forum, if your lived experience tells you that women do not find you attractive, and despite all the self improvement you cannot get a gf, and you are involuntarily celibate, you're an incel. Not to mention, there have been incels, and violent incels, before the internet's conception, so the notion that incels are a internet subculture is embarrassingly false.
One final thing to note, dear IT cucks and virgins but not incels, some men are not attractive enough for Margot Robbie to be sexually attracted to them, we can all agree. However, there is nothing in her biology that tells her to go for the 9/10 chad as opposed to the 7/10 chadlite, its just her preference, and her own inflated ego which makes her seek out only the best males. As all women have their egos inflated owing to soyciety, they naturally gravitate to higher status men than themselves. That means the lowest value males in terms of attractiveness have zero women actively seeking to be romantically involved with them. Incels are the peacocks with no feathers, there is biologically no reason for women to gravitate to us and be attracted to us. What makes normies think that a bird with no feathers dying without having kids is different from an incel not having children of his own? - cope.