W
i don't believe he was ugly at all. i believe the general consensus amongst everyone was that he was around average to good looking?
my friend who's an unironic faggot rated him 8/10.
He was an ugly effeminate manlet framelet ricecel.
W
ah yea he was a bit short.he was under average 5'9 which means u gotta betabux
but i'm a firm believer that face>height though so he was still GL overall to me
He wasn't ugly, he wasn't masculine attractive by rigorous standards of every foid.
niggas cute
This
W
hmm, effeminate, manlet, framelet, (hapa) ricecel yes, but ugly i don't believe so.
facially, i believe he was pretty decently GL.
maybe this is another one of the things the forum is gonna be torn on too, along with the face v.s. height debate. (i'm face all the way)
Plus not NT
Dude was 7/10 facially at least, main issue was being 5'7 in a college town in Southern California
I am convinced he was still not an incel though
I am convinced he was still not an incel though
Isla vista is the worst place to be as an incel
Last edited:
If i looksmaxx and surgerymaxx, ill end up a cutecel. Brutal low T pill.
P
He wasn't goodlooking, maybe above average at best, and aside from that he was short and physically weak. Even in the manifesto he mentions he was too short to play basketball and always physically weaker than the other kids.
W
yea. biggest issue regardless though was mentalceldom. dude could've ascended ez if he fixed himself and locationmaxxed if he couldn't get any where he was at
he looked ok, around 4/10.
mogs me with has moneymaxxed dad tho
mogs me with has moneymaxxed dad tho
Mogged most of us but was still a turbo autist. The fool didn't realise he could've gotten laid all along, if only he'd have kept his spergy ways at least somewhat hidden.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
