I don't know who it was exactly but I remember not too long ago, that someone made a thread where he described inceldom as the first movement/group to unite men of all races, religions and political ideologies. When I was contemplating this recently, I realized something about history: when you come down to it, every single conflict between men in history was caused by the hypergamous nature of women.
For example, nationalism generally arises in a society when women start intermixing with other races and the men of their own race start getting less chances at getting a sexual partner because of it. In National-Socialist Germany, propaganda posters and films depicted the relationships between Jewish men and German women (never the opposite) as evil and they of course had the Nuremberg laws which outlawed marriages between Jews and Germans. So nationalism arises when men lose the monopoly on women of their own race. The main concern among white nationalists in Europe and America as well is the interbreeding between women (again, never men) of their race with men of other races. This is not limited to whites though, there were news articles for example about Middle-Easterners in France who are frustrated with their women marrying/dating black men.
Socialism could be said to arise when lower-class men no longer have the financial opportunity to marry or otherwise gain a sexual partner. The wealthy elite get all the women for themselves. Something similar happened in Islamic countries where polygamy is legal, where the rich elite men married most of the women, leaving the lower class unable to find a partner thus leading them to joining terrorist organizations like Boko Haram.
On the subject of religion, religion's main purpose has in my opinion always been to legitimize the institution of marriage. As we see in the west, women generally don't feel like remaining loyal to their partner in marriage without a faith forcing them to. We see that religious uprisings often happen right after women get more rights and thus get more opportunity to be whores and not give sub-8 men a chance, just look up photos of Iranian women before and after the Islamic revolution.
So basically, all ideologies exist purely for sub-8 men to increase the chance of gaining a sexual partner and all ideological conflicts were essentially a struggle to regain control over women, who naturally lack any form of loyalty for men that aren't Chad. If women were inherently loyal and not hypergamous, many of the major wars of history would not have happened and men of all races and creeds could live together in peace.
For example, nationalism generally arises in a society when women start intermixing with other races and the men of their own race start getting less chances at getting a sexual partner because of it. In National-Socialist Germany, propaganda posters and films depicted the relationships between Jewish men and German women (never the opposite) as evil and they of course had the Nuremberg laws which outlawed marriages between Jews and Germans. So nationalism arises when men lose the monopoly on women of their own race. The main concern among white nationalists in Europe and America as well is the interbreeding between women (again, never men) of their race with men of other races. This is not limited to whites though, there were news articles for example about Middle-Easterners in France who are frustrated with their women marrying/dating black men.
Socialism could be said to arise when lower-class men no longer have the financial opportunity to marry or otherwise gain a sexual partner. The wealthy elite get all the women for themselves. Something similar happened in Islamic countries where polygamy is legal, where the rich elite men married most of the women, leaving the lower class unable to find a partner thus leading them to joining terrorist organizations like Boko Haram.
On the subject of religion, religion's main purpose has in my opinion always been to legitimize the institution of marriage. As we see in the west, women generally don't feel like remaining loyal to their partner in marriage without a faith forcing them to. We see that religious uprisings often happen right after women get more rights and thus get more opportunity to be whores and not give sub-8 men a chance, just look up photos of Iranian women before and after the Islamic revolution.
So basically, all ideologies exist purely for sub-8 men to increase the chance of gaining a sexual partner and all ideological conflicts were essentially a struggle to regain control over women, who naturally lack any form of loyalty for men that aren't Chad. If women were inherently loyal and not hypergamous, many of the major wars of history would not have happened and men of all races and creeds could live together in peace.