You ever been browsing porn and you see some "teen category" video, but you notice from the thumbnail the female in the video looks nowhere near 18, and isn't depicted "as an 18 year old".
Doesn't society find it weird that porn companies are specifically making videos where they specifically cast young petite females, apply makeup, and shoot at angles literally to make the female look like jail bait. How the fuck can society argue that men's sexual desire towards this age group isn't normal, when porn companies keep producing tons of content (the majority of all "teen porn") to appeal to men with such desires. Literally most of all "teen porn" I've seen online are these kinds of videos, they aren't trying to convey that these girls are 18+, they are literally trying to allude to them being way younger as part of the scene.
You'll notice some reoccurring themes (traits) for these "teen porn videos":
>The use of female pornstars with short and/or petite "child like" bodies, usually A-Cup, mostly "flat" yet somewhat curvaceous
>The use of clothing usually associated with "girls" rather than "women" (sun dresses, bows, ribbons, overalls, colourful "cute" stockings, etc)
>The use of bright and often fluorescent colours
>The use of stereotypical "child like" hair styles (pig tails are the most used)
>Some form of candy or treat being offered by the male or used by the female without him offering (usually a lolipop or Popsicle, or anything that could be seen as a phallic symbol).
>Articles of clothing or items that signify the female is still attending school or part of a group/activity associated with children (e.g. girl scouts or trick or treating), just to hint at her "youngness" even more (a colourful school bag is the most used one)
>The use of significantly older male actors or actors whose size draws greater significance to the size of the female (heightmogging the female is often depicted)
>For the sake of "immersion" they "infantilize" the female in the video, requesting that they "act clueless and innocent" or be a "ditz" and then slowly descend into lust due to the males advances
>Etc Etc Etc (I've listed the bulk of it really, after reading this list you can go look up more "teen porn" which is supposedly portraying 18+ "legal teens", they all have these "traits")
I mention these noticeable traits a bit in one of my videos (beside the point, please continue reading, save the video for after):
Seriously look at images from some of these scenes:
Oh yeah society, men who are attracted to "young teens", were the ones that are confused here, clearly these depictions are to display the typical 18 year old female (its so obvious....... like the sarcasm I'm using here
)
Clearly porn companies are wasting their time and money displaying these traits in basically all of their "teen" videos, because it only appeals to the desires of a "small sub group" of males, the rest of males only arbitrarily want 18+ teens, that's the norm riiiiiiiiiiiight? (these companies just love wasting money JFL)
I mean lets forget about the studies showing that men downplay their attraction to adolescents - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25813610
https://philiaresearch.wordpress.co...ownplay-their-attraction-to-adolescent-girls/
"The consistent finding that the same photographs of younger females, but with different age labels, were assigned significantly different levels of attractiveness suggests that cognitive factors beyond biologically driven sexual attraction were involved in making these ratings. In all the three samples, apparently younger girls were rated as less attractive than older girls despite being the same photographs. We hypothesize that this difference reflects some self-censoring mechanism involved in making such judgments. This may involve a form of comparison between participants’ own sexual attraction to the individual girl and the likely social norms surrounding this judgment."
"This finding has now been replicated across four samples, including one that is yet to be reported. "
Lets forget about the studies showing that the penile responses of men were also significant to females of age groups that would not be considered "legal" (has also been replicated) - https://eurekamag.com/pdf/006/006773600.pdf
The strongest penile response were as expected, to adult females.
The response to adolescent females was almost exactly as strong as the response to adult females.
The penile response to female children was around 60% of the response to adult women.
All this shit must mean nothing I guess, all the video traits I pointed out that you'll now start to pick up on (if you didn't already), all the studies, in fact even common sense doesn't matter, lets forget the fact that this was a norm way back when:
None of that matters because some retard can just fear monger and scream "pedos" instead of facing and acknowledging a biological reality.
Lets be honest about whats obvious here, porn companies are covertly targeting natural male sexuality in a way that doesn't leave them in legal trouble due to the current political environment, they know they can't acknowledge that they are attempting to satisfy these male urges so they classify the category as "teen porn" and always try their best to indicate that all the actors are 18+, while simultaneously doing their best in each scene to convey the opposite, its semantic games, legal loop hole fuckery.
People want to pretend as if we all don't already know what men are attracted to, society wants to pretend like you can just rewrite biology by just wishing it so, or shaming it out of existence, that shit isn't going to work, porn companies know men are sexually repressed as a group, and are exploiting that through porn, because they know full well that these kinds of videos are the only outlets men have for these urges, because what we would naturally do will land us in jail in this current era.
Doesn't society find it weird that porn companies are specifically making videos where they specifically cast young petite females, apply makeup, and shoot at angles literally to make the female look like jail bait. How the fuck can society argue that men's sexual desire towards this age group isn't normal, when porn companies keep producing tons of content (the majority of all "teen porn") to appeal to men with such desires. Literally most of all "teen porn" I've seen online are these kinds of videos, they aren't trying to convey that these girls are 18+, they are literally trying to allude to them being way younger as part of the scene.
You'll notice some reoccurring themes (traits) for these "teen porn videos":
>The use of female pornstars with short and/or petite "child like" bodies, usually A-Cup, mostly "flat" yet somewhat curvaceous
>The use of clothing usually associated with "girls" rather than "women" (sun dresses, bows, ribbons, overalls, colourful "cute" stockings, etc)
>The use of bright and often fluorescent colours
>The use of stereotypical "child like" hair styles (pig tails are the most used)
>Some form of candy or treat being offered by the male or used by the female without him offering (usually a lolipop or Popsicle, or anything that could be seen as a phallic symbol).
>Articles of clothing or items that signify the female is still attending school or part of a group/activity associated with children (e.g. girl scouts or trick or treating), just to hint at her "youngness" even more (a colourful school bag is the most used one)
>The use of significantly older male actors or actors whose size draws greater significance to the size of the female (heightmogging the female is often depicted)
>For the sake of "immersion" they "infantilize" the female in the video, requesting that they "act clueless and innocent" or be a "ditz" and then slowly descend into lust due to the males advances
>Etc Etc Etc (I've listed the bulk of it really, after reading this list you can go look up more "teen porn" which is supposedly portraying 18+ "legal teens", they all have these "traits")
I mention these noticeable traits a bit in one of my videos (beside the point, please continue reading, save the video for after):
Seriously look at images from some of these scenes:
Oh yeah society, men who are attracted to "young teens", were the ones that are confused here, clearly these depictions are to display the typical 18 year old female (its so obvious....... like the sarcasm I'm using here
)Clearly porn companies are wasting their time and money displaying these traits in basically all of their "teen" videos, because it only appeals to the desires of a "small sub group" of males, the rest of males only arbitrarily want 18+ teens, that's the norm riiiiiiiiiiiight? (these companies just love wasting money JFL)
I mean lets forget about the studies showing that men downplay their attraction to adolescents - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25813610
https://philiaresearch.wordpress.co...ownplay-their-attraction-to-adolescent-girls/
"The consistent finding that the same photographs of younger females, but with different age labels, were assigned significantly different levels of attractiveness suggests that cognitive factors beyond biologically driven sexual attraction were involved in making these ratings. In all the three samples, apparently younger girls were rated as less attractive than older girls despite being the same photographs. We hypothesize that this difference reflects some self-censoring mechanism involved in making such judgments. This may involve a form of comparison between participants’ own sexual attraction to the individual girl and the likely social norms surrounding this judgment."
"This finding has now been replicated across four samples, including one that is yet to be reported. "
Lets forget about the studies showing that the penile responses of men were also significant to females of age groups that would not be considered "legal" (has also been replicated) - https://eurekamag.com/pdf/006/006773600.pdf
The strongest penile response were as expected, to adult females.
The response to adolescent females was almost exactly as strong as the response to adult females.
The penile response to female children was around 60% of the response to adult women.
All this shit must mean nothing I guess, all the video traits I pointed out that you'll now start to pick up on (if you didn't already), all the studies, in fact even common sense doesn't matter, lets forget the fact that this was a norm way back when:
None of that matters because some retard can just fear monger and scream "pedos" instead of facing and acknowledging a biological reality.
Lets be honest about whats obvious here, porn companies are covertly targeting natural male sexuality in a way that doesn't leave them in legal trouble due to the current political environment, they know they can't acknowledge that they are attempting to satisfy these male urges so they classify the category as "teen porn" and always try their best to indicate that all the actors are 18+, while simultaneously doing their best in each scene to convey the opposite, its semantic games, legal loop hole fuckery.
People want to pretend as if we all don't already know what men are attracted to, society wants to pretend like you can just rewrite biology by just wishing it so, or shaming it out of existence, that shit isn't going to work, porn companies know men are sexually repressed as a group, and are exploiting that through porn, because they know full well that these kinds of videos are the only outlets men have for these urges, because what we would naturally do will land us in jail in this current era.
Last edited:
