Serious [Poll] Should we debate IncelTears?

[Blackpill101]

If yes, then how do you guys wanna do this? How many rounds must there be?

The main argument will be: Our looks, not our personalities, cause us to be incels.

Tinder experiments are not proof.

Mods sticky this or make your own poll if you're interested. I need a reply whether you're down to do this.

 

[Hunter]

do not send out the tinder experiments, why?

 

[Blackpill101]

This should be stickied tbh if the mods are into this happening.

do not send out the tinder experiments, why?

Because they're not proof and could be easily rebutted as: "oh personality doesn't matter to hot guys! We're not denying this."

The main argument should be discussing the fact that looks are the reason as to why we're incel.

 

[Robtical]

This should be stickied tbh if the mods are into this happening.

Because they're not proof and could be easily rebutted as: "oh personality doesn't matter to hot guys! We're not denying this."

The main argument should be discussing the fact that looks are the reason as to why we're incel.

And the government cucking us to pay for single moms and femoid education.

 

[NormieKiller]

Yeah. This will add a lot more actions to this forum (who is an echo chamber for the moment).

 

[MarriedAndLookin4Fun]

Nope, it's a wasted effort and a war we can't win. They will refute all of our valid data which is backed by scientific research

 

[Robtical]

They will refute all of our valid data which is backed by scientific research

How will they?

 

[LastEvolutionCell]

How will they?

with illogical arguments

 

[MarriedAndLookin4Fun]

How will they?

They will probably use either:

1. Anecdotal evidence (often fake) : but but i am 5'6 and ugly and i am married to a beautiful woman
2. Mental gymnastics
3. Outdated experiments, way before online dating and hypergamy was a thing

 

[Robtical]

They will probably use either:

1. Anecdotal evidence (often fake) : but but i am 5'6 and ugly and i am married to a beautiful woman
2. Mental gymnastics
3. Outdated experiments, way before online dating and hypergamy was a thing

Then we'll debunk that too. It will reach a point where they start to get completely ridiculous no one listens anymore.

 

[VLÖ]

You'd have better luck debating a pigeon.

I'm not sure how you can debate someone who yells "RAPE! RAPE!" every 1/10th of a second.

 

[SupremeCel]

No
Instead of wastinf time arguing with people that have no logic go write good blackpill bait posts so IT helps spreading the pill

 

[Cam The Angel]

im fully willing to debate one of those incels in denial

 

[Blackpill101]

Guys the debate will be done on a professional website like debate.org or something and we send a representative to post our argument there, and they do the same thing with their representative.

I need the mods to see this.

 

[VLÖ]

Guys the debate will be done on a professional website like debate.org or something and we send a representative to post our argument there, and they do the same thing with their representative.

I need the mods to see this.

You're forgetting that they don't want debate.

They make false-flag posts to circlejerk and gloat about how amazing it is to be a cuck and channel all their soylent inferiority onto us.
You look at any of their posts and it just is desperate attempts to seem cool and "above" other people.

It'd be like me going around saying "AHAHAH STUPID FUCKING HOMELESS PEOPLE! HOW ABOUT YOU STOP BEING SO HOMELESS AND GET A HAIRCUT LMAO AHAHAHA! I AM SO MUCH BETTER THAN YOU, LOOK AT ME! AHAHAH AREN'T I JUST SO COOL, FUNNY AND CHARMING??"

You can't debate someone who's #1 goal is just to justify flailing around in their own shit.

 

[Blackpill101]

You're forgetting that they don't want debate.

They make false-flag posts to circlejerk and gloat about how amazing it is to be a cuck and channel all their soylent inferiority onto us.
You look at any of their posts and it just is desperate attempts to seem cool and "above" other people.

It'd be like me going around saying "AHAHAH STUPID FUCKING HOMELESS PEOPLE! HOW ABOUT YOU STOP BEING SO HOMELESS AND GET A HAIRCUT LMAO AHAHAHA! I AM SO MUCH BETTER THAN YOU, LOOK AT ME! AHAHAH AREN'T I JUST SO COOL, FUNNY AND CHARMING??"

You can't debate someone who's #1 goal is just to justify flailing around in their own shit.

Can't the admin ask them personally?

 

[Hunter]

You're forgetting that they don't want debate.

They make false-flag posts to circlejerk and gloat about how amazing it is to be a cuck and channel all their soylent inferiority onto us.
You look at any of their posts and it just is desperate attempts to seem cool and "above" other people.

It'd be like me going around saying "AHAHAH STUPID FUCKING HOMELESS PEOPLE! HOW ABOUT YOU STOP BEING SO HOMELESS AND GET A HAIRCUT LMAO AHAHAHA! I AM SO MUCH BETTER THAN YOU, LOOK AT ME! AHAHAH AREN'T I JUST SO COOL, FUNNY AND CHARMING??"

You can't debate someone who's #1 goal is just to justify flailing around in their own shit.

this. whenever they try to put an incel down they always fail not to use it as an opportunity to elevate themselves. because they only care about attempting to elevate themselves.

 

[VLÖ]

Can't the admin ask them personally?

Our admin ask them? Or what?

The end result is still the same, they'll pussy out and say "Blah blah we don't debate evil rapists blah blah"

 

[Blackpill101]

Can the admin send them a proposal or something?

Our admin ask them? Or what?

The end result is still the same, they'll pussy out and say "Blah blah we don't debate evil rapists blah blah"

Do they want to debate or not? How do you know?

 

[Ridgid]

I don't see any reasonable incentive to do it. Knowing their failed normoid ways, they'll probably compensate for their lack of knowledge and factual information with typical Reddit sarcasm and snark.

Example:

-Incel: * presents reliable, scientific data backing up the blackpill *​

IT cuck: HAHAHA r/Im14AndThisIsDeep HAHAHAHA r/IAmVerySmart HAHAHAHAHA some Reddit inside joke HAHAHAHAHAHA.​

 

[VLÖ]

Can the admin send them a proposal or something?

Do they want to debate or not? How do you know?

There's literally no point since they won't listen, plus this has been suggested before and they refused.

You can tell easily who is actually looking to prove a point and who is just in it for personal gain.

 

[Red Shambhala]

Yes.

A forum is a bit like an RPG, something has to happen, there has to be a plot and an antagoinist otherwise it gets boring.

So from an roleplay perspective, debating cunttears would be good and interesting.

On the other hand .... it might be better to keep a low profile and do our thing. We will grow slowly but steadily. BEst to ignore the cunts there who just call the internet police on us.

So .. yeah, come to think of it I might switch vote to NO.

 

[Blackpill101]

I don't see any reasonable incentive to do it. Knowing their failed normoid ways, they'll probably compensate for their lack of knowledge and factual information with typical Reddit sarcasm and snark.

Example:

-Incel: * presents reliable, scientific data backing up the blackpill *​

IT cuck: HAHAHA r/Im14AndThisIsDeep HAHAHAHA r/IAmVerySmart HAHAHAHAHA some Reddit inside joke HAHAHAHAHAHA.​

lol they'll lose the debate like that, GG
Bro I've participated in debate.org and the normies there are forced to vote objectively. Even communists sometimes voted points for me when I was debating.

There's literally no point since they won't listen, plus this has been suggested before and they refused.

If they're gonna refuse again then there's no point tbh

Do you know how a debate works btw, especially on a debating website? If we start the debate with them they'll be forced to respond with arguments or else forfeit the debate. Don't host it on this site.



We should honestly send them another request. These fuckers don't have the right of ridiculing us if they can't defend their bluepilled agenda with facts.

 

[Rice Cel]

No, they'll just start to reeeee when they can't think of arguments and make distractions. And considering the IQ of average redditor or average American is around 85 or 90, the distraction would actually work on some of them

 

[Blackpill101]

Yeah. This will add a lot more actions to this forum (who is an echo chamber for the moment).

I agree man.

 

[JdawgYUNGmoney]

You'd have better luck debating a pigeon.

I'm not sure how you can debate someone who yells "RAPE! RAPE!" every 1/10th of a second.

 

[Blackpill101]

No, they'll just start to reeeee when they can't think of arguments and make distractions. And considering the IQ of average redditor or average American is around 85 or 90, the distraction would actually work on some of them

Do you know how a debate works bro? They'll lose like that. I suggest hosting it on debate.org, with each side sending a representative to post arguments. The normies there have to be objective btw. I know this for a fact.

 

[Deleted member 6101]

Caring about/debating/acknolwedging cucktears is a mental illness and low-IQ.

 

[VLÖ]

Do you know how a debate works bro? They'll lose like that. I suggest hosting it on debate.org, with each side sending a representative to post arguments. The normies there have to be objective btw. I know this for a fact.

They don't care about losing lmao. Do you seriously think they give even an INCH of a fuck about actually seeming intelligent? They're just doing it to troll, you're going to achieve nothing.

Even if we destroy them, they'll STILL start crying "LOOK AT THIS, THIS AND THIS POST! YOU'RE ALL RAPISTS! WE HAVE PROOF!"

That is assuming they'll even accept it, which they won't.

 

[Blackpill101]

They don't care about losing lmao. Do you seriously think they give even an INCH of a fuck about actually seeming intelligent? They're just doing it to troll, you're going to achieve nothing.

Even if we destroy them, they'll STILL start crying "LOOK AT THIS, THIS AND THIS POST! YOU'RE ALL RAPISTS! WE HAVE PROOF!"

That is assuming they'll even accept it, which they won't.

They're gonna get fucking shitted on if they lose badly, and the debate will leave a scar on their bluepilled logic. If they're still gonna do this then the sub needs to be banned tbh, since all they do is troll and ridicule us.

If one can't defend his own ideology then he is better off not believing in it.

 

[Fontaine]

No. The defining characteristic of bluepillers is an inability to understand statistics, probability and nuance. They'll pick a few examples of famous ugly men with hot girlfriends and say "gotcha!".

 

[Evil Genius]

No thanks, I don’t need to associate myself with literally pondscum who are all incels in denial anyway.

 

[Blackpill101]

Caring about/debating/acknolwedging cucktears is a mental illness and low-IQ.

Why do you want to live in a bubble?
If you can't prove the blackpill to bluepilled people then you shouldn't believe in it. Right wingers do debates all the time. Why shouldn't blackpilled incels do debates too?
It's actually high IQ. Debates win you arguments, not tinder experiments.

 

[Deleted member 2047]

We already had this with "/r/debateincels" and nobody from inceltears posted and it got banned

 

[Robtical]

Do you know how a debate works bro? They'll lose like that. I suggest hosting it on debate.org, with each side sending a representative to post arguments. The normies there have to be objective btw. I know this for a fact.

That would be cool, how do we get started?

No. The defining characteristic of bluepillers is an inability to understand statistics, probability and nuance. They'll pick a few examples of famous ugly men with hot girlfriends and say "gotcha!".

We'll show them that they are betabuxxers, or met when they were young or through family friends, or social circle. They have to show consistency like we can.

 

[Blackpill101]

No. The defining characteristic of bluepillers is an inability to understand statistics, probability and nuance. They'll pick a few examples of famous ugly men with hot girlfriends and say "gotcha!".

But see they can't do this in a debate website and will lose immediately if they do this.

 

[VLÖ]

They're gonna get fucking shitted on if they lose badly, and the debate will leave a scar on their bluepilled logic. If they're still gonna do this then the sub needs to be banned tbh, since all they do is troll and ridicule us.

If one can't defend his own ideology then he is better off not believing in it.

You remember the time they got assblasted on SOTD? They don't give a single fuck, they'll just find excuses like "IT WAS RIGGED! YOU BROUGHT IN YOUR OWN PEOPLE!" which further proves the point that they're just TROLLING. They're low life beta TROLLS, like every other pathetic redditor who pretends he's a scientist with multiple girls and an amazing lifestyle while in reality they're just fatasses rotting away at Starcucks.

You can't debate someone who doesn't care about winning.

 

[Anglo-Saxon]

No, let's not debate them. I've tried that before, but they clearly argue in bad faith. They disagree for the sake of disagreeing. If you crush their argument they'll resort to insults, banning and anecdotes.

 

[Mainländer]

How to instawin a debate against cucktears:

Pick an incel from here who has shown his face, is sub3, is not particularly odious towards women or any other "personality problem" according to cucktears and challenge cucktears to find a foid volunteer to have sex with him. Looksmatch level minimum clause would be a landslide victory.

 

[Blackpill101]

That would be cool, how do we get started?

We'll show them that they are betabuxxers, or met when they were young or through family friends, or social circle. They have to show consistency like we can.

Have you debated there before or do you need some tutorial?

Basically a representative create his account there (from both sites-Incels and cucktear), and one of the two rep invites the rep for a debate. You can edit how many rounds, responding time, etc.

When the debate ends there will be a vote and the winner will be determined. Normies there have to vote objectively or they'll have their votes removed, since they have to explain why they voted that way and give "points" for several categories.

 

[Deleted member 6101]

The point is that both groups are, for all intents and purposes, completely irrelevant and uninfluential. You are getting mocked by normalshits and fail for their bait like some kindergarden kids. No one there wants to debate you there and no one cares about the blackpill.

Debates win you arguments

Whoa, big internet fight. Yuge internetz win...

 

[Blackpill101]

The point is that both groups are, for all intents and purposes, completely irrelevant and uninfluential. You are getting mocked by normalshits and fail for their bait like some kindergarden kids. No one there wants to debate you there and no one cares about the blackpill.


Whoa, big internet fight. Yuge internetz win...

These people are obsessed with the blackpill idiot and want to prove it as ridiculous and false.

 

[Robtical]

Have you debated there before or do you need some tutorial?

Basically a representative create his account there (from both sites-Incels and cucktear), and one of the two rep invites the rep for a debate. You can edit how many rounds, responding time, etc.

When the debate ends there will be a vote and the winner will be determined. Normies there have to vote objectively or they'll have their votes removed, since they have to explain why they voted that way and give "points" for several categories.

Just a typical poster here can wreck those pussies. If they are really objective they will give the win to the incel. We should challenge a cucktear mod.

 

[Blackpill101]

Anyone with debate.org experience please explain to these people...

Just a typical poster here can wreck those pussies. If they are really objective they will give the win to the incel. We should challenge a cucktear mod.

I agree. Or I would say just challenge sub vs sub tbh

The representative's role is to just "copy and paste" our arguments/replies.
Since everyone believes in the bluepilled stuff, most evidence should be done by our group. As a result, we have to present the main argument first, and we reply to each other in rounds.

 

[Deleted member 6101]

These people are obsessed with the blackpill idiot and want to prove it as ridiculous and false.

From what I've seen, you're just being mocked and taking it way too seriously.
Also, you can't win against normies on normie soil because they can always suppress you with sheer socially-validated ad hominems (i.e you're a racist/sexist/small dicked/loser/whatever)

 

[Blackpill101]

From what I've seen, you're just being mocked and taking it way too seriously.
Also, you can't win against normies on normie soil because they can always suppress you with sheer socially-validated ad hominems (i.e you're a racist/sexist/small dicked/loser/whatever)

LOL do you know how an online debate works??????

-.-

They have to post arguments and back their reasonings with logic or else the users on the site will all vote against them, lmao. You can't be "biased" on the site if there's a clear winner. Only professional members vote and they all have to explain their voting.

 

[Robtical]

LOL do you know how an online debate works??????

-.-

They have to post arguments and back their reasonings with logic or else the users on the site will all vote against them, lmao. You can't be "biased" on the site if there's a clear winner. Only professional members vote and they all have to explain their voting.

I think I get it, it's fairly simple. I hope they're not too big of bitches to accept the offer.

 

[Blackpill101]

Alright it seems that the mods are considering it right now, so we'll see what happens.

I urgently need a debate.org user to explain to all the inexperienced people here who haven't had a proper online debate before. I haven't used that site since months, so I can't really "explain" properly.

I think I get it, it's fairly simple. I hope they're not too big of bitches to accept the offer.

Go to debate.org and see how online debates work bro.

 

[Deleted member 6101]

debate.org

Even more irrelevant than r*ddit. Even in that way- do you think they'll care afterwards whether they win or lose. "Winning" this will validate you in front of whom and how? You clearly don't understand how normalfag thinking and attention span work.

 

[Blackpill101]

Even more irrelevant than r*ddit. Even in that way- do you think they'll care afterwards whether they win or lose. "Winning" this will validate you in front of whom and how? You clearly don't understand how normalfag thinking and attention span work.

All we do is fucking LDAR all day bro... why not spice things up and destroy these bluepilled cucks in a debate?

I don't think what we have to suffer from this. At the very least, they'll have to consider our argument, and many normies will probably get blackpilled too. It's a win win


Guys trust me on this... it's gonna be fun debating these fucks who hate us and think we're all low IQ rapists... that's if they accept and if the majority say yes by 2 AM