Philosophy, morals and other copes

[verbittERt]

Those subhuman philosophERcels debate about all those meaningless questions all day while chad creampies their looksmatch.

"Ohh but muh will to power" yet nietsche died an unfuckable simpcel while one of his best friends stole his oneitis.
He died from syphillis too, after losing his virginity to a hooker jfl

But im gonna philosophiiiiizee brooo!

Nigga you would be better off gooning than engaging in philosophy. All philosophers were subhuman losers just like us, chad doesnt philosophize he is too busy creampieing your looksmatch while you rot

There is only one philosophy i need to know and that is that that if you are ugly, short and autistic its ovER and you can either rope, rot in basement or geomaxx if ur white and 4/10+

This whole unproductive mental masturbation needs to stop, being a philosopher has the same objective value as being a video game addict

 

[GigaL0ser]

No philosophy for your face

Chads keep winning

 

[readingcel]

This is a case of profound mental retardation. Bravo, this is not just caveman thinking, but is self contradictory. Either you affirm copes as such (even if you take sex to be the telos of life), or you commit suicide. Given that we are having a conversation, which necessitates that all the interlocutors are alive, Its ought to be the case that you do affirm copes in general in your daily life, either consciously or subconsciously. The question, then, becomes a hierarchy of SOLELY copes, rather than being a hierarchy of life as such, where you place sexual intercourse at the apex point.

And only then can one claim that philosophy is ought to take a high priority on that hierarchy. What you are doing, rather, is deeming copes in general as futile against sex, and then particularizing this towards a specific cope.

 

[Judge Holden]

No philosophy for your face

Chads keep winning

 

[Judge Holden]

Those subhuman philosophERcels debate about all those meaningless questions all day while chad creampies their looksmatch.

"Ohh but muh will to power" yet nietsche died an unfuckable simpcel while one of his best friends stole his oneitis.
He died from syphillis too, after losing his virginity to a hooker jfl

But im gonna philosophiiiiizee brooo!

Nigga you would be better off gooning than engaging in philosophy. All philosophers were subhuman losers just like us, chad doesnt philosophize he is too busy creampieing your looksmatch while you rot

There is only one philosophy i need to know and that is that that if you are ugly, short and autistic its ovER and you can either rope, rot in basement or geomaxx if ur white and 4/10+

This whole unproductive mental masturbation needs to stop, being a philosopher has the same objective value as being a video game addict

If Nietzsche had been Chad, he wouldn't have been a chud copER that inspired edgy normies

If Hitler had been Chad, he would have been busier fucking aryan chicks instead of crying about not getting into art school, or he would have won WW2

If ER had been Chad, the faggots he killed would still be alive

If Charlie Kirk had been Chad, he wouldn't be dead now because he was too busy fucking foids.

 

[eatdinner]

This is a case of profound mental retardation. Bravo, this is not just caveman thinking, but is self contradictory. Either you affirm copes as such (even if you take sex to be the telos of life), or you commit suicide. Given that we are having a conversation, which necessitates that all the interlocutors are alive, Its ought to be the case that you do affirm copes in general in your daily life, either consciously or subconsciously. The question, then, becomes a hierarchy of SOLELY copes, rather than being a hierarchy of life as such, where you place sexual intercourse at the apex point.

And only then can one claim that philosophy is ought to take a high priority on that hierarchy. What you are doing, rather, is deeming copes in general as futile against sex, and then particularizing this towards a specific cope.

I think the original poster is just being hyperbolic. But I do think he kinda has a point. It’s hard to toil while starving.

 

[readingcel]

It’s hard to toil while starving.

This I do not disagree with, nor any other incel for that matter. But I disagree regarding the hyperbole. The underlying logic, if one were to formulate as a set of points, seems to be something like this:

1. Sex is the telos of life
2. Philosophy is not Sex
3. Sex-havers do not indulge in Philosophy to the relevant degree
4. Philosophy is a futile activity

The "problem" is that this can be generalized to every single cope. And given that copes in general are essential for us, the importance of philosophy and related activities/fields ought to be measured by a logic internal to copes, and not in a way thats related to sex.

Im also giving him the benefit of the doubt in a few ways, given that he has implicitly and explicitly made out of copes a flat web regarding their values, which I dont think he himself would agree with.

 

[fokusin]

Yeah its just useless mental masturbating nothing comes from it

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Congrats, you just philosophized about why philosophizing is pointless.

 

[eatdinner]

I agree.

given that copes in general are essential for us, the importance of philosophy and related activities/fields ought to be measured by a logic internal to copes, and not in a way thats related to sex

Average incel (including me) wouldn’t mind reverting to a state of bluepill unconsciousness if it granted cuddles and kisses and sex. Normie mentally/spiritually just not physically brutal.

 

[endoftheskies]

Congrats, you just philosophized about why philosophizing is pointless.

circles

 

[endoftheskies]

Those subhuman philosophERcels debate about all those meaningless questions all day while chad creampies their looksmatch.

"Ohh but muh will to power" yet nietsche died an unfuckable simpcel while one of his best friends stole his oneitis.
He died from syphillis too, after losing his virginity to a hooker jfl

But im gonna philosophiiiiizee brooo!

Nigga you would be better off gooning than engaging in philosophy. All philosophers were subhuman losers just like us, chad doesnt philosophize he is too busy creampieing your looksmatch while you rot

There is only one philosophy i need to know and that is that that if you are ugly, short and autistic its ovER and you can either rope, rot in basement or geomaxx if ur white and 4/10+

This whole unproductive mental masturbation needs to stop, being a philosopher has the same objective value as being a video game addict

everything other than sex is cope. maybe people like doing these things, and aren't like foids, which are 1d and only care about sex.

 

[poorenglishcel]

Absolute destruction

 

[Izayacel]

Congrats, you just philosophized about why philosophizing is pointless.

 

[Sir Waco]

banana

 

[Smiggles]

Congrats, you just philosophized about why philosophizing is pointless.

Peak philosophy

 

[baldfartsniffer]

Those subhuman philosophERcels debate about all those meaningless questions all day while chad creampies their looksmatch.

"Ohh but muh will to power" yet nietsche died an unfuckable simpcel while one of his best friends stole his oneitis.
He died from syphillis too, after losing his virginity to a hooker jfl

But im gonna philosophiiiiizee brooo!

Nigga you would be better off gooning than engaging in philosophy. All philosophers were subhuman losers just like us, chad doesnt philosophize he is too busy creampieing your looksmatch while you rot

There is only one philosophy i need to know and that is that that if you are ugly, short and autistic its ovER and you can either rope, rot in basement or geomaxx if ur white and 4/10+

This whole unproductive mental masturbation needs to stop, being a philosopher has the same objective value as being a video game addict

Brootal reality pill

 

[ESL]

i feel like you just are not recognizing how important philosophy is

 

[D. B. Gooner]

This is a case of profound mental retardation. Bravo, this is not just caveman thinking, but is self contradictory. Either you affirm copes as such (even if you take sex to be the telos of life), or you commit suicide. Given that we are having a conversation, which necessitates that all the interlocutors are alive, Its ought to be the case that you do affirm copes in general in your daily life, either consciously or subconsciously. The question, then, becomes a hierarchy of SOLELY copes, rather than being a hierarchy of life as such, where you place sexual intercourse at the apex point.

And only then can one claim that philosophy is ought to take a high priority on that hierarchy. What you are doing, rather, is deeming copes in general as futile against sex, and then particularizing this towards a specific cope.

Cavemen mog you and have led better lives than you.

 

[readingcel]

Cavemen mog you and have led better lives than you.

Takes a great neurological dysfunction to think that this isnt implicitly affirmed in what you are replying to.

 

[D. B. Gooner]

Takes a great neurological dysfunction to think that this isnt implicitly affirmed in what you are replying to.

Trust me I'm more intelligent than you

 

[readingcel]

Trust me I'm more intelligent than you

This is a really pathetic thing to post lmao. You first make a backhanded remark about something that my original post implicitly affirms, showing that you haven't understood its content. Then you say this after your lack of understanding was pointed out.

 

[D. B. Gooner]

This is a really pathetic thing to post lmao. You first make a backhanded remark about something that my original post implicitly affirms, showing that you haven't understood its content. Then you say this after your lack of understanding was pointed out.

No you clearly used 'caveman thinking' as an insult so you didn't affirm shit. You also managed to complicate a simple take with pointless word salad. Yet you contradicted yourself, by referring to copes as copes you have conceded to the fact that they are meaningless distractions. I can tell you're insecure about your intelligence so I thought I'd let you know you come off as a retard.

 

[readingcel]

No you clearly used 'caveman thinking' as an insult so you didn't affirm shit. You also managed to complicate a simple take with pointless word salad. Yet you contradicted yourself, by referring to copes as copes you have conceded to the fact that they are meaningless distractions. I can tell you're insecure about your intelligence so I thought I'd let you know you come off as a retard.

1. the signification behind "caveman thinking" does not relate to your remark in any relevant shape or form as to justify it
2. You have yet to understand that the discussion is not about the essentiality of copes, but rather their internal prioritization in a manner thats not related to sexual intercourse, as my two big posts have repeatedly explicitly stated.
3. Just stop being retarded man, read slowly through what I wrote and reply to me if you have any interesting ideas beyond whatever this is supposed to be.

 

[D. B. Gooner]

1. the signification behind "caveman thinking" does not relate to your remark in any relevant shape or form as to justify it
2. You have yet to understand that the discussion is not about the essentiality of copes, but rather their internal prioritization in a manner thats not related to sexual intercourse, as my two big posts have repeatedly explicitly stated.
3. Just stop being retarded man, read slowly through what I wrote and reply to me if you have any interesting ideas beyond whatever this is supposed to be.

1. Does it not? You referred to thinking you deem to be inferior as "cavemen thinking", I said cavemen mog you, you said "WELL THATS WHAT I SAID".
2. Their internal prioritization doesn't matter, all copes are equal in the sense that they are meaningless.
3. You are not smart

 

[Deleted Member 8090]

1. the signification behind "caveman thinking" does not relate to your remark in any relevant shape or form as to justify it
2. You have yet to understand that the discussion is not about the essentiality of copes, but rather their internal prioritization in a manner thats not related to sexual intercourse, as my two big posts have repeatedly explicitly stated.
3. Just stop being retarded man, read slowly through what I wrote and reply to me if you have any interesting ideas beyond whatever this is supposed to be.

1. Does it not? You referred to thinking you desm to be inferior as "cavemen thinking", I said cavemen mog you, you said "WELL THATS WHAT I SAID".
2. Their internal prioritization doesn't matter, all copes are equal in the sense that they are meaningless.
3. You are not smart

I'd like you both to know that I'm smarter than both of you so there's no point in you two arguing

 

[D. B. Gooner]

I'd like you both to know that I'm smarter than both of you so there's no point in you two arguing
View attachment 1584275

Possibly true. Not hard to be smarter than this guy tbf

 

[readingcel]

1. Does it not? You referred to thinking you deem to be inferior as "cavemen thinking", I said cavemen mog you, you said "WELL THATS WHAT I SAID".
2. Their internal prioritization doesn't matter, all copes are equal in the sense that they are meaningless.
3. You are not smart

1. Sorry for its length given that it's obvious you require a lengthy explanation. "cavemen thinking" was not used for thinking sex is the apex point of the referred hierarchy, but rather for the explicit and implicit grounding of the affirmation of copes being a flat web, regarding their values, on the fact that sex is at the top of this hierarchy.

here are a few verbatim quotations from me:

The question, then, becomes a hierarchy of SOLELY copes, rather than being a hierarchy of life as such, where you place sexual intercourse at the apex point.

And only then can one claim that philosophy is ought to take a high priority on that hierarchy. What you are doing, rather, is deeming copes in general as futile against sex, and then particularizing this towards a specific cope.

The "problem" is that this can be generalized to every single cope. And given that copes in general are essential for us, the importance of philosophy and related activities/fields ought to be measured by a logic internal to copes, and not in a way thats related to sex.

Im also giving him the benefit of the doubt in a few ways, given that he has implicitly and explicitly made out of copes a flat web regarding their values, which I dont think he himself would agree with.

Again, as you can see, caveman thinking is not in relation to conceptualizing Sex as such, but rendering null the possible hierarchies between copes through this primitive fact.

2. Yet this is obviously not the case. When you do stuff, or even do fuck all in your daily life you are affirming *some* kind of hierarchy between copes. We are not Buridan's Ass. Beyond this, you didnt come into this discussion to discuss this disagreement, but rather are importing it externally after making a retarded remark for no reason whatsoever.

3. My iq is prob in the double digits, but you should be a vegetable if this is your, intellectually speaking, maximum performance

 

[D. B. Gooner]

1. Sorry for its length given that it's obvious you require a lengthy explanation. "cavemen thinking" was not used for thinking sex is the apex point of the referred hierarchy, but rather for the explicit and implicit grounding of the affirmation of copes being a flat web, regarding their values, on the fact that sex is at the top of this hierarchy.

here are a few verbatim quotations from me:





Again, as you can see, caveman thinking is not in relation to conceptualizing Sex as such, but rendering null the possible hierarchies between copes through this primitive fact.

2. Yet this is obviously not the case. When you do stuff, or even do fuck all in your daily life you are affirming *some* kind of hierarchy between copes. We are not Buridan's Ass. Beyond this, you didnt come into this discussion to discuss this disagreement, but rather are importing it externally after making a retarded remark for no reason whatsoever.

3. My iq is prob in the double digits, but you should be a vegetable if this is your, intellectually speaking, maximum performance

1. You have attached a negative connotation to "cavemen thinking", that's all my remark was about, I literally didn't give a fk about the rest if your post, only once you replied with some pretentious nonsense did I decide to match your energy and irritate you as I can tell you deeply care about how you're perceived intellectually.
2. Yea, you can assign value to copes, that's called delusion. Somebody may tell me that praying to god helped their mental health, maybe they've convinced themselves of this but their self conviction means nothing to me. That hierarchy is an idea within your head that has no merit in objective reality. I can find playing with LEGOs to be the most enjoyable activity in the world, but a person telling me that it is a pointless cope still wouldn't be wrong.
3. Glad you're aware of that.

 

[readingcel]

1. You have attached a negative connotation to "cavemen thinking", that's all my remark was about, I literally didn't give a fk about the rest if your post, only once you replied with some pretentious nonsense did I decide to match your energy and irritate you as I can tell you deeply care about how you're perceived intellectually.
2. Yea, you can assign value to copes, that's called delusion. Somebody may tell me that praying to god helped their mental health, maybe they've convinced themselves of this but their self conviction means nothing to me. That hierarchy is an idea within your head that has no merit in objective reality. I can find playing with LEGOs to be the most enjoyable activity in the world, but a person telling me that it is a pointless cope still wouldn't be wrong.
3. Glad you're aware of that.

Yeah this seems to be a case of "If I dont post last fellow incels will think of me as the loser!!!!" The other interlocutors are, I hope, more genetically fortunate as to understand the point I am trying to make, as I'm not going to respond to any other retarded replies.

1. I attached a negative connotation to caveman thinking in the particular sense that I already told you. And you can see that its connotation is grounded on what I said, rather than cavemen having sex or something, as you have implied in your caveman remark, through the contents of my posts. The "pretentiousness" was me pointing out you not knowing what the fuck I was talking about, given the contextual signification of your remark.

2. Nobody said anything about an objective metaphysical-law like value of copes. But there are, in fact, desire-grounded, ethics-grounded, whatever the fuck-grounded hierarchies of copes, activities, fields, topics, etc., in both daily life and the realm of social consciousness. Sex is a sort of transcendent apex point compared to the internal hierarchies between copes that one can assign to em.

Just like how you have assigned some sort of value to being a retard in this thread over, say, gooning or reading, in this particular given time.

3. Again, pathetic. You are just spamming your obsession with intellect.

 

[readingcel]

Ah I see the retardation now. You think your caveman remark was a neutral remark about literally nothing whatsoever about cavemen in general, and you have abstracted it away from how I use it in the process. I do wish to ask, before you inevitably reply due to your insecurities, in what sense cavemen could mog a modern incel if not through sex?

 

[D. B. Gooner]

Yeah this seems to be a case of "If I dont post last fellow incels will think of me as the loser!!!!" The other interlocutors are, I hope, more genetically fortunate as to understand the point I am trying to make, as I'm not going to respond to any other retarded replies.

1. I attached a negative connotation to caveman thinking in the particular sense that I already told you. And you can see that its connotation is grounded on what I said, rather than cavemen having sex or something, as you have implied in your caveman remark, through the contents of my posts. The "pretentiousness" was me pointing out you not knowing what the fuck I was talking about, given the contextual signification of your remark.

2. Nobody said anything about an objective metaphysical-law like value of copes. But there are, in fact, desire-grounded, ethics-grounded, whatever the fuck-grounded hierarchies of copes, activities, fields, topics, etc., in both daily life and the realm of social consciousness. Sex is a sort of transcendent apex point compared to the internal hierarchies between copes that one can assign to em.

Just like how you have assigned some sort of value to being a retard in this thread over, say, gooning or reading, in this particular given time.

3. Again, pathetic. You are just spamming your obsession with intellect.

And I'll keep repeating myself.
1. You called OP a retard and a caveman under the same breath
2. My point stands
3. You have started every reply in this thread with a pretentious nudge on the other party's intelligence. All I'm saying is you're clearly insecure about your own intellect and I know exactly what buttons I need to push to irritate you. You. Are. Not. Smart. No amount of word salad will change that.

 

[D. B. Gooner]

Ah I see the retardation now. You think your caveman remark was a neutral remark about literally nothing whatsoever about cavemen in general, and you have abstracted it away from how I use it in the process. I do wish to ask, before you inevitably reply due to your insecurities, in what sense cavemen could mog a modern incel if not through sex?

Yes sex good. Cavemen have sex and sex good. Incel don't have sex so incel try assign meaning to meaningless mental gymnastics. Incel's delusional hierarchy is facade. Incel eventually burn out and commit suicide.

 

[AutismHaver]

its bleak man, the reason liberals are so depressed is cuz they arent needed to sustain society anymore, their biological purpose ISNT NEEDED

 

[ardeys]

Those subhuman philosophERcels debate about all those meaningless questions all day while chad creampies their looksmatch.

"Ohh but muh will to power" yet nietsche died an unfuckable simpcel while one of his best friends stole his oneitis.
He died from syphillis too, after losing his virginity to a hooker jfl

But im gonna philosophiiiiizee brooo!

Nigga you would be better off gooning than engaging in philosophy. All philosophers were subhuman losers just like us, chad doesnt philosophize he is too busy creampieing your looksmatch while you rot

There is only one philosophy i need to know and that is that that if you are ugly, short and autistic its ovER and you can either rope, rot in basement or geomaxx if ur white and 4/10+

This whole unproductive mental masturbation needs to stop, being a philosopher has the same objective value as being a video game addict

Philosophy is just a way to complain about our incel status in more technical ways so there’s nothing wrong with it

 

[ardeys]

Those subhuman philosophERcels debate about all those meaningless questions all day while chad creampies their looksmatch.

"Ohh but muh will to power" yet nietsche died an unfuckable simpcel while one of his best friends stole his oneitis.
He died from syphillis too, after losing his virginity to a hooker jfl

But im gonna philosophiiiiizee brooo!

Nigga you would be better off gooning than engaging in philosophy. All philosophers were subhuman losers just like us, chad doesnt philosophize he is too busy creampieing your looksmatch while you rot

There is only one philosophy i need to know and that is that that if you are ugly, short and autistic its ovER and you can either rope, rot in basement or geomaxx if ur white and 4/10+

This whole unproductive mental masturbation needs to stop, being a philosopher has the same objective value as being a video game addict

Explain to me why should an incel not play videogames do philosophy etc… it’s not that if I stop doing these I magically become chad and start slaying foids enough with this bluepill nonsense

 

[LUCK]

This whole unproductive mental masturbation needs to stop

rope, rot in basement or geomaxx

Thinking about the world around you is unproductive guys, let's all just be mindless slaves for the elites so we can hit big pharma's profit estimates by being suicidal hedonists

 

[verbittERt]

View attachment 1584521
Thinking about the world around you is unproductive guys, let's all just be mindless slaves for the elites so we can hit big pharma's profit estimates by being suicidal hedonists

i mean what else are u finna do?

 

[LUCK]

i mean what else are u finna do?

Not do that because these demon worshipping Jews don't deserve to own me

 

[poorenglishcel]

I'd like you both to know that I'm smarter than both of you so there's no point in you two arguing
View attachment 1584275