Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious People in dissident spaces have forgotten the importance of pipelines

Hoodpreet

Hoodpreet

It’s Gone Be Bad My Pajigga
★★★★★
Joined
Feb 8, 2023
Posts
24,471
Online time
5d 6h
A great example of this is how this forum views the Tate brothers. Are they redpill cucks? Yes. Scammers? Yes. Have they taken shots at us? Yes. But at the same time, they breathed new life into the manosphere, and they’re the reason a lot of young men woke up. Someone like Andrew Tate is an awful end point, but a great starting point, and I’ve seen firsthand quite a few accounts from newer users of this forum who claim their pipeline started with him or similar figures.

Though I’m not part of the online right, I can’t help but see parallels in how they view Nick. Sure, the guy has denied the whiteness of Slavs, claimed “hating brown people is Jewish,” and shat on WNs, but the work he’s done to shift the Overton window cannot be understated. He was literally on Piers Morgan talking about Jewish influence and white replacement recently.

People need to understand that you can’t turn a normie gigablackpilled in one day. They need to start somewhere comfy and ride the current to us. I’m not saying we shouldn’t criticize the worldview put forth by Tate, etc., cause obviously we need to challenge it in order to get people to come around to agreeing with us, but we should give such figures a little more credit and not viciously seethe at them just cause they’re controlled plants
 
The biggest problem was the guy was only in it for the grift. He has his pros but he is not a person who did this out of sincerity.

This is my take considering back in my normie days I could easily refute his BS.
 
The biggest problem was the guy was only in it for the grift. He has his pros but he is not a person who did this out of sincerity.

This is my take considering back in my normie days I could easily refute his BS.
Motivation doesn’t matter as much as impact in this case. An insincere guy who actually shifts the conversation and radicalizes people is more useful than a sincere guy who can’t influence anyone
 
The problem imo is the type of ppl this brings in inside of our community.

Imagine a bluepilled guy, ending up binge-watching Tate content (or any redpill content) out of the gate for months if not years.

This shit only brings arrogant brainwashed looksmaxxed cryptofascists guys full of themselves to our community, and this is not what we want.
 
The problem imo is the type of ppl this brings in inside of our community.

Imagine a bluepilled guy, ending up binge-watching Tate content (or any redpill content) out of the gate for months if not years.

This shit only brings arrogant brainwashed looksmaxxed cryptofascists guys full of themselves to our community, and this is not what we want.
It’s not uniform. I recall @Sasukecel and @Paladin for instance saying they started with Scamza (who’s even more “ImpRoOvE bRo!” focused than Tate) and yet they aren’t problem users.

I think the type of people you’re describing are more likely to end up on .org than here. Former RPers here are the kind who got disillusioned with RP, not the kind who interpret BP through an RP lens
 
The problem imo is the type of ppl this brings in inside of our community.

Imagine a bluepilled guy, ending up binge-watching Tate content (or any redpill content) out of the gate for months if not years.

This shit only brings arrogant brainwashed looksmaxxed cryptofascists guys full of themselves to our community, and this is not what we want.
I think the people you’re describing are more likely to end up here through the content of guys like SyrianPsycho, QOVES, and Dillon Latham. Basically these normie grifters who try to interpret and present blackpill through an inoffensive (and frequently gynocentric) perspective.

That’s another conversation to be had, because I disagree that those guys are useful radicalization agents. The reason being that they remove blackpill from a pro-male context and thereby don’t merely dilute but entirely bastardize the message
 
It’s not uniform. I recall @Sasukecel and @Paladin for instance saying they started with Scamza (who’s even more “ImpRoOvE bRo!” focused than Tate) and yet they aren’t problem users.
I was saying that in general, not hinting at one or several users in particular

I think the type of people you’re describing are more likely to end up on .org than here. Former RPers here are the kind who got disillusioned with RP, not the kind who interpret BP through an RP lens
The .org to .is pipeline sadly exists and there are still from time to time legit redpillers passing through the cracks and posting here

I think the people you’re describing are more likely to end up here through the content of guys like SyrianPsycho, QOVES, and Dillon Latham. Basically these normie grifters who try to interpret and present blackpill through an inoffensive (and frequently gynocentric) perspective.

That’s another conversation to be had, because I disagree that those guys are useful radicalization agents. The reason being that they remove blackpill from a pro-male context and thereby don’t merely dilute but entirely bastardize the message
Never heard of those guys tbh
 
Motivation doesn’t matter as much as impact in this case. An insincere guy who actually shifts the conversation and radicalizes people is more useful than a sincere guy who can’t influence anyone
i started with some guy who gave foid like improvement advice
then moved on to tate for a bit
then to bodybuilders
then to taking muh talking and game advice from some tyronelites puas
and then to learning about them reacting to the bp
and then the hamza ww debates
and then the statistics and the stats ytbers
 
see parallels in how they view Nick
Take Action!!
 
they remove blackpill from a pro-male context and thereby don’t merely dilute but entirely bastardize the message
That’s why it’s important for our spaces to be secured before we infiltrate others.
All those spaces should have heavy blackpillers present, so that anytime they pump content, there are blackpill evangelists and their upvotes-crew always putting pressure on the creator and guiding the audience to the more truthful side (here). For instance, dillon went live with some foids and no blackpiller was really there in the live chat like you’d expect. That’s really bad
View: https://www.youtube.com/live/4IRsFBZrQSY
 
Last edited:
I don't disagree. In an ideal world, being on tiktok for a few minutes would be enough to blackpill a guy, but most guys are cope-addicted and sensitive fucks. They need to be fed masculinity copes before they can develop a backbone and turn misogynistic.
That’s another conversation to be had, because I disagree that those guys are useful radicalization agents. The reason being that they remove blackpill from a pro-male context and thereby don’t merely dilute but entirely bastardize the message
Eloquently put. They are merely gynocentric agents.
 

Similar threads

TheScientist445446
Replies
3
Views
164
PhineasSpear
PhineasSpear
P
Replies
6
Views
539
Claudius the God
Claudius the God
TheFinalFrontier
Replies
7
Views
605
Flagellum_Dei
Flagellum_Dei
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
26
Views
1K
TheFinalFrontier
TheFinalFrontier

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top