Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious People Here Underestimate The Amount Of Sex Partners and Romantic Relationships Normies Have

  • Thread starter universallyabhorret
  • Start date
universallyabhorret

universallyabhorret

Overlord
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 8, 2017
Posts
8,309
Typical Range of LTRs and ONS Attained At Each Level of Facial Attractiveness within Life-Time
Incel (sub4) 0 LTRs and 0 ONS
LTN(4-5/10) 1-2 LTRs and 0 ONS
MTN(5-6/10) 4-8 LTRs and 2-5 ONS
HTN(6-7/10) 30-45 LTRs and 15-30 ONS
Chadlite(7-8/10) 50-100 LTRs and 40-75 ONS
Chad (8+) 100+ LTRs and 100+ ONS

@Zer0/∞ @PLA1092 @wereq @Simulacrasimulation thoughts?
 
Last edited:
chad has 0 ltrs
 
ltr peaks at mtn zone
 
It is true that average looking men do have quite a few partners in their lives, however a happy long term relationship (like a marriage/family) at this point is not an achievable goal for any man that isn't at least Chadlite.
About half of all marriages end in divorce and already men who do get married are way less likely to be sub4.
 
That's a choice, but chad gets so many women that he could easily get hundred more stacies to commit to him and get a whole harem of stacies.



LTNs often do have 1 or 2 relationships generally with sub4 foids.
I have never met any sub5 that ever had a relationship at all.
 
Chads and gigastacys dont do a lot of LTRs, their ability to get sex is so abundant that they don't value it that much and just find it tiringly abundant
 
Where do you get these numbers from chico
Statistically it has been shown that the average man has 4 LTNs in his life, extrapolating from that I came up with this. Also, @Zer0/∞ has shown a HTN can have 18 slays and not even full life-time so this indicates it's quite easy to get women if you are HTN+.
Chads and gigastacys dont do a lot of LTRs, their ability to get sex is so abundant that they don't value it that much and just find it tiringly abundant
Maybe I should have included it as FWBs then from HTN onwards.
 
Should have factored in height to the equation but I assume this list is for a 5'9 man.
This is based on SMV. Height is simple addition or subtraction of SMV by 0-1 point depending on height. Average height gets you 0, 1 sd above/below gets you +/- 1/2 a point and 2 sd above/below gets you +/-1 point.
 
Last edited:
I have never met any sub5 that ever had a relationship at all.
I have seen sub5s in relationships but usually with undesirable women, with a few exceptions, where the girl mogged the guy, but the guy was fat and was likely betabuxxing and would be close to her looksmatch if he was thin.
 
This is assuming that they are not dumpster diving?
 
Many guys dumpster dive at least for ONS so this factors that in.
You should specify what type of women each looks level gets, a ons with a landwhale is very different than the ons a chad gets
 
You should specify what type of women each looks level gets, a ons with a landwhale is very different than the ons a chad gets
It's generally women who are 2 points below for ONS. While it's typically a woman that is 0.5-1 point below for LTR.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →