Two "misogynistic" men who were considered a danger to society ended up destroying each other's lives.
No one benefits from this except normies and foids.
Paul Fitzgerald is a non-cuck. He was originally in prison for sexually attacking a female jogger, and
once wrote in his diary that he loved raping women. He hated people who rape children, though, and he didn't really understand the nature of Huckle's crimes, and this lead him to misjudge the situation.
I don't support what Richard Huckle did. He wanted to have sex with as many young girls as possible, and probably pumped and dumped some of them, but he definitely wasn't a rapist. He never forced himself on any of the girls that he slept with. Statutory rape is not really rape. It is not based on actual consent, but on what is legally defined as consent. The media doesn't care about the difference, though, and just refers to men like Huckle as rapists.
Fitzgerald had read newspaper articles in which Huckle was described as a child rapist and a monster, and wanted to give him a taste of his own medicine. So he raped him with a spoon handle to avenge the children he supposedly raped, and then murdered him. He ruined his own life to punish someone who wasn't quite the monster he thought he was, and he will never be a free man again.