This is going to be a really long thread, so please be warned.
Introduction: I've gotten sick of all these bluepilled shills (especially on cucktears) arguing that I'm some pedophilic monster for stating this opinion (although soon you'll realize that it's a fact). As a result, I've decided to make a megathread about this, stating my reasons for this statement (with supporting evidence) and arguing against the most common counter arguments provided by bluepill philosophy.
Body: The primary factor related to my statement is the fact that most women completely finish puberty by about age 14. As a result, we can conclude that most women by around age 13 have at least developed tits, asses, armpit hair, pubes, etc. They are on their way to finally become sexually mature women.
https://www.girlshealth.gov/body/puberty/timing.html
As a result, women by age 13 are almost fully fit for sexual reproduction.
The most common counter argument toward this statement is that although they can handle dick and sex physically, they are not mature enough "mentally."
This might be true, but current statistics show that even grown women seem to engage in actions (i.e. unprotected sex, sex regrets, multiple abortions, unwanted pregnancies) that indicate that they are mentally immature as a 13 year old, and by that logic, should not be allowed to have intercourse.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_statistics_in_the_United_States
From 1970 to this date, for instance, about 45 million abortions were carried out in the United States (mostly by MILLIONS of grown women), proving that, by bluepill logic, they should not be trusted to engage in sexual relations.
Regarding unwanted pregnancies, in 2011 for instance, "nearly half" of female pregnancies were "unintended," further proving my point.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/unintended-pregnancy-united-states
Another common counterargument is that 13 year old women cannot conceive a child as easily as a grown woman does. The fact is that, the average age at which females essentially reproduced back then (I'm talking at least 500 years ago) reached ages as low as 12 in many Western European nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_European_marriage_pattern
This proves that, females had no major problem in conceiving children at an age like 13 for instance. Was it ideal? Probably not. However, scientifically speaking, it was an age where women were sexually fit and commonly reproduced, hence the term "sexual beings."
Another fact that also proves why women at an age like 13 are essentially capable of reproduction is related to female fertility. The fact is, studies indicate that a sexually active teen has a 90% chance of getting pregnant (if the sex is unprotected).
http://www.pamf.org/teen/sex/pregnancy/myths.html
Compare this to the fertility rates of women 30 and above: about 60 percent. Bluepilled shills will claim that a 30+ year old woman is more sexually fertile than a teen girl, particularly a 13+ year old, which is utterly ridiculous.
https://www.invitra.com/female-fertility/female-fertility-rates-by-age-chart/
More counter arguments:
"The current age of consent laws state that 13 is too young, so your argument is invalid."
This is one of the most ridiculous counter arguments presented. Period. First of all, abiding by your leftist rhetoric, the law in the 1950s stated that black people cannot live with white people, yet the law was eventually changed. The law (not a long time ago) stated that gays cannot marry each other, yet the law was eventually changed.
Furthermore, the current US law is not universal, and ages of consent were altered by feminist groups throughout history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_reform
"It would be absolutely creepy to allow a man over 18 to have sex with a 13 year old woman."
Again, men rarely change (mentally and physically) after 18 years of age. If a male is able to respect the age of a young woman and not abuse her, then there should be no problem in him having sexual relations with her, as long as the two consent. Also, if a 13 year old woman is able to take a 6 inch dick from teen Chad, then she might as well be able to do so from a grown man.
"Many 13 year old girls have not hit puberty yet."
The solution to this problem is to simply not engage in sexual intercourse if puberty has barely began or not even started. Parents should have a huge role in advising and controlling their children, mostly.
"13 year old girls are just children."
The whole thread was about disproving this myth. If a young 13 year old female "sluts it up" on social media, has attraction toward teen Chads, and even worse, has sex (all types), then she is not a child. Simple.
Conclusion: Although many see those who want to change the AOC laws as displaying pedophilic attributes, the matter of fact is, most teen girls (13 and over) have not only developed sexually, are fertile, and lust for older males, but it is, most importantly, not pedophilic to feel attraction toward them, especially if they act and "look like" grown women.
In case some FBI shill tries to track down this thread and accuse me of harassing "underage" women, I assure you that this thread is simply an argument (mainly against the current AOC law) and not promotional of such deeds.
Thank you.
Introduction: I've gotten sick of all these bluepilled shills (especially on cucktears) arguing that I'm some pedophilic monster for stating this opinion (although soon you'll realize that it's a fact). As a result, I've decided to make a megathread about this, stating my reasons for this statement (with supporting evidence) and arguing against the most common counter arguments provided by bluepill philosophy.
Body: The primary factor related to my statement is the fact that most women completely finish puberty by about age 14. As a result, we can conclude that most women by around age 13 have at least developed tits, asses, armpit hair, pubes, etc. They are on their way to finally become sexually mature women.
https://www.girlshealth.gov/body/puberty/timing.html
As a result, women by age 13 are almost fully fit for sexual reproduction.
The most common counter argument toward this statement is that although they can handle dick and sex physically, they are not mature enough "mentally."
This might be true, but current statistics show that even grown women seem to engage in actions (i.e. unprotected sex, sex regrets, multiple abortions, unwanted pregnancies) that indicate that they are mentally immature as a 13 year old, and by that logic, should not be allowed to have intercourse.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion_statistics_in_the_United_States
From 1970 to this date, for instance, about 45 million abortions were carried out in the United States (mostly by MILLIONS of grown women), proving that, by bluepill logic, they should not be trusted to engage in sexual relations.
Regarding unwanted pregnancies, in 2011 for instance, "nearly half" of female pregnancies were "unintended," further proving my point.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/unintended-pregnancy-united-states
Another common counterargument is that 13 year old women cannot conceive a child as easily as a grown woman does. The fact is that, the average age at which females essentially reproduced back then (I'm talking at least 500 years ago) reached ages as low as 12 in many Western European nations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_European_marriage_pattern
This proves that, females had no major problem in conceiving children at an age like 13 for instance. Was it ideal? Probably not. However, scientifically speaking, it was an age where women were sexually fit and commonly reproduced, hence the term "sexual beings."
Another fact that also proves why women at an age like 13 are essentially capable of reproduction is related to female fertility. The fact is, studies indicate that a sexually active teen has a 90% chance of getting pregnant (if the sex is unprotected).
http://www.pamf.org/teen/sex/pregnancy/myths.html
Compare this to the fertility rates of women 30 and above: about 60 percent. Bluepilled shills will claim that a 30+ year old woman is more sexually fertile than a teen girl, particularly a 13+ year old, which is utterly ridiculous.
https://www.invitra.com/female-fertility/female-fertility-rates-by-age-chart/
More counter arguments:
"The current age of consent laws state that 13 is too young, so your argument is invalid."
This is one of the most ridiculous counter arguments presented. Period. First of all, abiding by your leftist rhetoric, the law in the 1950s stated that black people cannot live with white people, yet the law was eventually changed. The law (not a long time ago) stated that gays cannot marry each other, yet the law was eventually changed.
Furthermore, the current US law is not universal, and ages of consent were altered by feminist groups throughout history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_reform
"It would be absolutely creepy to allow a man over 18 to have sex with a 13 year old woman."
Again, men rarely change (mentally and physically) after 18 years of age. If a male is able to respect the age of a young woman and not abuse her, then there should be no problem in him having sexual relations with her, as long as the two consent. Also, if a 13 year old woman is able to take a 6 inch dick from teen Chad, then she might as well be able to do so from a grown man.
"Many 13 year old girls have not hit puberty yet."
The solution to this problem is to simply not engage in sexual intercourse if puberty has barely began or not even started. Parents should have a huge role in advising and controlling their children, mostly.
"13 year old girls are just children."
The whole thread was about disproving this myth. If a young 13 year old female "sluts it up" on social media, has attraction toward teen Chads, and even worse, has sex (all types), then she is not a child. Simple.
Conclusion: Although many see those who want to change the AOC laws as displaying pedophilic attributes, the matter of fact is, most teen girls (13 and over) have not only developed sexually, are fertile, and lust for older males, but it is, most importantly, not pedophilic to feel attraction toward them, especially if they act and "look like" grown women.
In case some FBI shill tries to track down this thread and accuse me of harassing "underage" women, I assure you that this thread is simply an argument (mainly against the current AOC law) and not promotional of such deeds.
Thank you.
Last edited:
or visit a fucking hooker you mentalcel degenerate. If you’ve ever been near a thirteen year old you should know why it’s not okay to have sex with them as a grown man. The saddest part is that you feel the need to cover yourself ‘please fbi it’s just a statement’.
