We're all aware of the dating market. We know that for men the chances have dipped so far down it's not even funny anymore. We're resorting to violence, backstabbing, life-threatening procedures, crime ; you name it. Just to get a chance at getting laid. We're all also very much aware of how much power womyn have over society. It's all done, tested and confirmed. If you look around you all see it. This is where we all agree on (for the most part, "femcels" go fuck yourselves).
But where a lot of us disagree on is what should we do about it? There's the "redpill", MGTOW, the blackpill, etc. Each of them theorize a solution to a problem. Here's mine though :
My idea of "Social Socialism" goes something like this : applying the "to each according to his ability, to each according to his need" to the sexual market. It's quite simple really. My idea is that love and companion shouldn't be something you "work" for. It's an archaic practice and should be abolished. The reason being because not only is it horribly inefficient, but it's also stupid as fuck. Let's step back for a moment, what does "working", "improvement" "bettering" actually mean? What is "better"? Who decides what "better" is? How much "better" do you have to be for it to count? How long does it take? Everyone has a different answer, one says it's clothes, one says it's muscles, one says it's money, one says it's personality (lmao).
But why do they all give different answers? Because none of them actually fucking mean anything. It's placebo at it's best, 99% of all relationships happen because of luck. This idea that you somehow did all of it is completely fucking retarded, for a relationship to work BOTH sides have to feel attached. And in reality you have no idea why the girl chose you. It could have been ANYTHING, but most people assume "wow, we met while doing X so obviously she likes me because of X! HEY GUYS, DOING X IS 100% PROVEN TO WORK!" without realizing that X had fuckall to do with it, it was pure chance. He could have just easily never met anyone doing X, but just because he got lucky this one time, he assumes it must be X that helped him. That's why I don't listen to bullshit advice like that, it's all based on personal experiences that have no correlation with me.
But back to Social Socialism, why would it be better? It would give every man who genuinely wants someone to be with a chance of getting that someone. Doesn't matter if you're fat, short, skinny, balding etc. You should have a chance being who you are. You shouldn't have to change yourself or feel shitty about yourself to have a chance at a relationship. If you're fine the way you are and you're at least healthy (medically speaking), it shouldn't matter whatsoever. This would benefit EVERYONE. Some might say it ruins the "wonder" of it, but there is no fucking "wonder" involved when you're not good looking. None. The attractive people will still have their fun, but this is a means to give everyone a chance.
It also has plenty of other perks too, mostly being motivation. Think of it this way, what would motivate a man more : telling him if he works his ass off for 10 years and he MIGHT MAYBE get a wife, or pairing the guy up with a girl and then letting him work? I know what motivates me more. If I know that I ALREADY have someone by my side it makes working and doing things much easier. The whole uncertainty about "what if this doesn't work?" falls out because it doesn't need to work. You already have what you wanted. But doing work now is a lot less stressful because a) you have someone to be with and b) you'll work solely because you want to or to keep you and your wife happy. A lot of married men are depressed because their wives treat them like shit, but if they didn't the men would be 100x more happy and much more willing to work. It benefits the system in every way. And if the man can't work or doesn't want to, well then he'll at least not be a depressed burden on society because he'll still have someone by his side to keep him company. It's much easier to work for an iPhone than it is working to have a 1 in 100,000,000 chance at finding a girl who actually likes you and not just your money.
That's my theory anyway, and I think most would agree. It's only the retarded-ass arrogant wannabe Chad gymrats who think if you're not obsessed with lifting 24/7 then you don't deserve anyone and the bluepilled "male feminist" mental slaves that would oppose to this system.
However while this sounds good on paper, like "real socialism" it's sadly probably impossible to implement unless we removed ourselves from our human bodies that are keeping us back.
pinging @fukmylyf since he wanted this thread
But where a lot of us disagree on is what should we do about it? There's the "redpill", MGTOW, the blackpill, etc. Each of them theorize a solution to a problem. Here's mine though :
My idea of "Social Socialism" goes something like this : applying the "to each according to his ability, to each according to his need" to the sexual market. It's quite simple really. My idea is that love and companion shouldn't be something you "work" for. It's an archaic practice and should be abolished. The reason being because not only is it horribly inefficient, but it's also stupid as fuck. Let's step back for a moment, what does "working", "improvement" "bettering" actually mean? What is "better"? Who decides what "better" is? How much "better" do you have to be for it to count? How long does it take? Everyone has a different answer, one says it's clothes, one says it's muscles, one says it's money, one says it's personality (lmao).
But why do they all give different answers? Because none of them actually fucking mean anything. It's placebo at it's best, 99% of all relationships happen because of luck. This idea that you somehow did all of it is completely fucking retarded, for a relationship to work BOTH sides have to feel attached. And in reality you have no idea why the girl chose you. It could have been ANYTHING, but most people assume "wow, we met while doing X so obviously she likes me because of X! HEY GUYS, DOING X IS 100% PROVEN TO WORK!" without realizing that X had fuckall to do with it, it was pure chance. He could have just easily never met anyone doing X, but just because he got lucky this one time, he assumes it must be X that helped him. That's why I don't listen to bullshit advice like that, it's all based on personal experiences that have no correlation with me.
But back to Social Socialism, why would it be better? It would give every man who genuinely wants someone to be with a chance of getting that someone. Doesn't matter if you're fat, short, skinny, balding etc. You should have a chance being who you are. You shouldn't have to change yourself or feel shitty about yourself to have a chance at a relationship. If you're fine the way you are and you're at least healthy (medically speaking), it shouldn't matter whatsoever. This would benefit EVERYONE. Some might say it ruins the "wonder" of it, but there is no fucking "wonder" involved when you're not good looking. None. The attractive people will still have their fun, but this is a means to give everyone a chance.
It also has plenty of other perks too, mostly being motivation. Think of it this way, what would motivate a man more : telling him if he works his ass off for 10 years and he MIGHT MAYBE get a wife, or pairing the guy up with a girl and then letting him work? I know what motivates me more. If I know that I ALREADY have someone by my side it makes working and doing things much easier. The whole uncertainty about "what if this doesn't work?" falls out because it doesn't need to work. You already have what you wanted. But doing work now is a lot less stressful because a) you have someone to be with and b) you'll work solely because you want to or to keep you and your wife happy. A lot of married men are depressed because their wives treat them like shit, but if they didn't the men would be 100x more happy and much more willing to work. It benefits the system in every way. And if the man can't work or doesn't want to, well then he'll at least not be a depressed burden on society because he'll still have someone by his side to keep him company. It's much easier to work for an iPhone than it is working to have a 1 in 100,000,000 chance at finding a girl who actually likes you and not just your money.
That's my theory anyway, and I think most would agree. It's only the retarded-ass arrogant wannabe Chad gymrats who think if you're not obsessed with lifting 24/7 then you don't deserve anyone and the bluepilled "male feminist" mental slaves that would oppose to this system.
However while this sounds good on paper, like "real socialism" it's sadly probably impossible to implement unless we removed ourselves from our human bodies that are keeping us back.
pinging @fukmylyf since he wanted this thread
Last edited:
