Deleted member 33091
Resident IT bully
-
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2021
- Posts
- 3,641
That guy posts hundred and hundreds of poorly drawing cartoons (each with zero to five upvotes) - his Chris-chan-like art style doesn't improve, nothing he does makes any sense and his choice of words is so fucking stereotypical that he could very well be a persiflage. Whenever you feel down, you can at least cope with saying that you are not one of these guys.it’s not even funny anymore, it’s just sad tbh
I don’t even give a fuck about IT but what they’re doing is a colossal waste of time. There’s literally no point at all. Why would anyone even want to watch dog an obscure forum for lonely virgins on the corner of the internet? Better yet make comics about us? Like holy shit you could be doing literally anything else with your lifeThat guy posts hundred and hundreds of poorly drawing cartoons (each with zero to five upvotes) - his Chris-chan-like art style doesn't improve, nothing he does makes any sense and his choice of words is so fucking stereotypical that he could very well be a persiflage.
Nah, even though I meme about it I don’t take joy in others’ misfortune ded srsWhenever you feel down, you can at least cope with saying that you are not one of these guys.
You are one of my favorite posters here already.I can type a long ass comment that'll debunk that entire nonsensical thread, but atm I'm tired of trying to get those thickheaded motherfuckers to see what's in front of them. I might create a Reddit account for that later tough. Only because I'm tired of their stupidity. It's really starting to get on my nerves. The IT morons keep alluding to subjectivity all while denying the objective reality, regardless of how much evidence you put in front of them. Mark Twain said it best: Never argue with an idiot. You'll never convince the idiot that you're correct.
Also, this looks like it was written by some blue-haired, liberal landwhale tbh. As I said in a previous post on here, IT have certain linguistic idiosyncrasies that stand out, and are easily recognizable
Thanks, brocel.You are one of my favorite posters here already.
That's because they have no actual arguments. In that case, a red herring is their best move.Also notice how IT never addresses the point that we make directly
Even that statement in itself is problematic, and wrong. Not only it violates Hume's guillotine, but it assumes that I posses the same moral values as them. Meaning, they think it's wrong because it's wrong within their moral frame of reference which not necessarily the same as mine."But we shouldn't self improve to just get sex!"
That too, is a rather vague statement. For words like good and bad to have any meaning they need to occur within a moral frame of reference. What is good for them is not necessarily objectively good. I mean, to Jeffery Dahmer it was considered moral to kill people and sleep with their corpses. To him that's good. So if you tell him to be a good human being, he'll do exactly that (I'm not equating incels with Dahmer, just using him as an example here). So why dosen't IT say exactly what it means to be "good"? cuz they don't know. They don't have the answer."Just be a good human being!"
That is true. A Christian and an atheist will have a very different concept of good. A feminist and redpilled male will have different concept of what is good and acceptable. What IT does is they impose their own moral guidelines on the entire world and says that they are the sole arbiter of how we should behave or speak. This is why America started with the concept of freedom of speech(we don't have it anymore). Everyone should be allowed to think for themselves and be truly free to determine what is good or bad.That too, is a rather vague statement. For words like good and bad to have any meaning they need to occur within a moral frame of reference. What is good for them is not necessarily objectively good. I mean, to Jeffery Dahmer it was considered moral to kill people and sleep with their corpses. To him that's good. So if you tell him to be a good human being, he'll do exactly that (I'm not equating incels with Dahmer, just using him as an example here). So why dosen't IT say exactly what it means to be "good"? cuz they don't know. They don't have the answer.
He calls himself advocate against hate, yet he uses autistic as an insult jfl. Idk if these people act dumb deliberately or they're actually this stupid.His life revolves around making comics about incels.![]()
They actually are that stupid. There’s literally thousands of comics all with him winning imaginary arguments. It’s some sort of power trip definitely, absolutely not nice whatsoeverHe calls himself advocate against hate, yet he uses autistic as an insult jfl. Idk if these people act dumb deliberately or they're actually this stupid.
They are legitimately stupidHe calls himself advocate against hate, yet he uses autistic as an insult jfl. Idk if these people act dumb deliberately or they're actually this stupid.
For real what kind of life do these people who use that sub have?That too, is a rather vague statement. For words like good and bad to have any meaning they need to occur within a moral frame of reference. What is good for them is not necessarily objectively good. I mean, to Jeffery Dahmer it was considered moral to kill people and sleep with their corpses. To him that's good. So if you tell him to be a good human being, he'll do exactly that (I'm not equating incels with Dahmer, just using him as an example here). So why dosen't IT say exactly what it means to be "good"? cuz they don't know. They don't have the answer.
He probs stalks our forum too.His life revolves around making comics about incels.![]()
He definitely does, all of em do, there life revolves around us, without incels they have nothingHe probs stalks our forum too.
KekHis life revolves around making comics about incels.![]()





